Tom Collins Will Not Seek Re-election As Nevada Party Chair

This is an interesting development in Nevada. Within one month, Tom Collins will no longer be the Nevada state party chair, and at least one candidate has already announced her intention to run. From Turn Tahoe Blue (emphasis mine):
Jill Derby, former Regent and 2006 Democratic nominee for Congress in Nevada's Second Congressional District said today that she plans to run for Chair of the Nevada State Democratic Party when elections are held in March.

"In my congressional campaign, I laid out a new vision for what a Nevada Democrat and Democrats from the West stand for. That's the kind of vision and leadership I plan to bring to the Party," Derby said.

As was evidenced by the past week of candidate events and national media attention, Nevada will play a central role in the selection of the Democratic candidate in 2008. Nevada's caucus will be the second in the nation, falling between key events in Iowa and New Hampshire.
Interesting indeed. I was unaware that Nevada was about to experience a shift in party chairs. Given the newfound importance of the Nevada caucus, and the recent Faux News kerfuffle, this seems like precisely the sort of moment where the netroots can have a big impact.

I don't know much about Jill Derby, except that she ran in a very red district in 2006 and still came kind of close. Turn Tahoe Blue certainly seems to like her:
Wow! This is awesome news. When I heard that Tom Collins announced his intention not to run again, I didn't expect any good candidates to come forward. This is an awesome candidate. With Jill Derby as state party chair we might actually be able to turn both Tahoe and Nevada blue.
When it comes to Tom Collins, we are dealing with a lame duck. It is time to look elsewhere for change in Nevada. It is time for the silent revolution to makes its way to the fastest growing state in the nation.



Display:


his parents must not have been (none / 0)

drinkers


McCain - a serial Opportunist, from marriage to policy positions
by TarHeel on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 03:01:52 PM EST

will Harvey Wallbanger be running to replace him? (3.00 / 1)

yeah, i'm not above cheap jokes either :)


Strengthening the progressive movement through liberal entrepreneurship http://www.plantingliberally.org
by Shai Sachs on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 03:25:45 PM EST

Re: Tom Collins Will Not Seek Re-election As Nevad (none / 0)

Tom Collins made his decision last week, shortly before all hell broke loose regarding the Fox debate. The Las Vegas Gleaner posted his press release on Feb 22:


    Nevada Democratic Chairman Tom Collins has decided not to run for reelection to his post as state chairman when the Democratic Central Committee elects new state officers at a meeting March 31 in Reno.

   Collins, who was elected to a one-year term as party chairman last April, will remain the chairman of the Nevada Caucus Commission, helping to raise money, coordinate and promote the Nevada Presidential Caucus, to be held Jan. 19, 2008.

   During his term, Collins oversaw the coordinated campaign that helped to elect four Democrats to statewide office, plus an additional Democrat in both the state Senate and Assembly. Democrats also picked up another seat on the Clark County Commission.

   Collins was one of the first advocates to lobby Democrats nationally to put an early presidential caucus in Nevada. Collins has argued the West is the new frontier for Democrats, and by focusing on Western states, Democrats can win the White House.

   "The Nevada Caucus is a huge undertaking, and stepping down as state chairman will give me more time to focus on my duties as one of the chairs of the Nevada Caucus Commission," Collins said. "I believe that Democrats must win in the West in order to win the White House, and I want to spend as much of my time as possible promoting the caucus and ensuring it is a success. I look forward to working with a new state chair who can bring the resources to the table to continue to build the Nevada Democratic Party and turn Nevada `blue.'"


Turn Tahoe Blue | Nevada Caucus 2008
by jedinecny on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 03:31:25 PM EST

Sounds good to me (none / 0)

We were 0 for 3 in Nevada last year; while Carter and Derby both had uphill battles, Hafen v. Porter was a winnable race. Maybe it's time for new blood in the Nevada Democratic Party.

Derby did very well in her race given the slant of her district; I'm hopeful that under her leadership, Nevada Democrats can beat Porter in 2008 and send the state's electoral votes to the Democratic candidate.


by brownsox on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 03:58:18 PM EST

Re: Sounds good to me (none / 0)

Has anyone asked Derby's position on the whole Faux Noise having exclusive rights to the debate?


John McCain: Bush right to veto kids health insurance expansion
by Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 04:06:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sounds good to me (none / 0)

There's a poster over at http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view .php?id=25197

who is v. familiar with NV politics... worth asking him the question.


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 04:20:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Have you paid any attention to Derby? (none / 0)

When I was in Nevada last year I attended a Jack Carter rally where she spoke and consequently looked at her website. She was promoting this:

Heller vs. Derby: Who's more right?

September 27, 2006

By Michael J. Mishak
Las Vegas Sun

Jill Derby doesn't want to cut and run in Iraq. She's against amnesty for illegal immigrants. She says her opponent is a "big taxing liberal." And if elected to Congress, this daughter of a Nevada rancher would cut wasteful government spending and restore fiscal discipline.

Quick: Guess which political party she belongs to?

You'd be hard pressed to tell from her tough talk and rural-themed campaign ads, but Derby is the Democrat in Nevada's 2nd Congressional District race.  Link.

Not exactly a proud Democrat in my book. But I'm not from Nevada, so I may not have all the facts here. Found this on a quick pass through.


Can It Happen Here?
by janinsanfran on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 06:49:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Tag (3.00 / 0)

You might want to change the tag from "Kill Derby" to "Jill Derby"


by LynChi on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 04:27:06 PM EST

Re: Tom Collins Will Not Seek Re-election (none / 0)

According to John Walsh at counterpunch Jill Derby was one of Rahm Emanuel's hand pick pro-war candidates.

"U.S, must "win" in Iraq (9): John Cranely(OH); Jill Derby (NV); Tammy Duckworth (IL); Brad Ellsworth (IN): Teresa Hafen (NV); Baron Hill (IN);Ken Lucas (KY); Lois Murphy (PA); Heath Schuler (NC).

Link

Begala (Carville's side-kick) apparently stumped for her:

"...Her stance in the Iraq War has been concrete in that Americans should "win the war once and for all." She believes "career politicians in both parties have failed to craft a plan to win the war and get the job done. Now that we're there, we've got to finish what we started, honor the sacrifice of our service men and women, and built a stable peace. I'll stand up to leaders in both parties who claim we don't need a plan, and hold them accountable for success. And I'll stand up to leaders in my own party and oppose an immediate withdrawal."
Link

She apparently lost.


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 05:45:06 PM EST

She did lose (3.00 / 1)

However, neither of your criteria mean that she might not be an excellent and effective state chair for Nevada.

The position is not about ideology. It's about effectiveness, innovation, and bringing new activists in to the party structure.

She may not be the best choice. I don't know-but if not it won't be because Rahm Emanuel liked her for Nevada's CD02


Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.
by boadicea on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 06:17:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She did lose (none / 0)

Still, she sounds like a FOX News Democrat...


by js noble on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 10:23:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tom Collins Will Not Seek Re-election (none / 0)

Her ideology is not ours. However, that she ran in a deeply red district might be indicative that she's mightily anti-Republican. Might, of course, does not mean will, but let's give her the opportunity to state her position.


Visit Forgotten Countries, my new foreign policy-based blog
by Englishlefty on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 06:59:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jill Derby supporters (none / 0)

Jill Derby's supporters also included the likes of General Wesley Clark, Americablog's John Aravosis and Daily Kos front pager mcjoan. Just saying.


Turn Tahoe Blue | Nevada Caucus 2008
by jedinecny on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 07:53:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jill Derby supporters (none / 0)

I also noticed when someone provided the link to Wes Clark's PAC that he ALSO supported:

PA CHRIS CARNEY (D) :- This guy had Richard Perle do a fundraiser for him.  He was part of the Douglas Feith team that concocted the Iraqi intelligence to go to war~!

I mean, who VETTED these guys?

I always thought Wes Clark was with the Clintons, since him coming into the race in 2004, but after all the rhatcheting up of war in Iran, I think he may have changed 'slightly'...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-hu ffington/dc-notes-wes-clark-is-_b_37837. html

Maybe he couldn't stomach the mad plans and marketing of AIPAC and the Clintons?

Anyway, anything with Clinton and her teams mitts and money on it  makes me wonder what she wants in return?


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 08:14:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tom Collins Will Not Seek (none / 0)

effective state chair for Nevada.

Not my point.

Would Derby represent the WHOLE NV state democratic party? Will her connections and favors she received from the Hillary team, when she was campaigning for Congress affect her decision-making and possible favoritism towards a 'particular' activist arm of NV politics?

Time will tell, when someone in NV will hopefully ask her about her position on the Fox News gig, and see if she sees the BLARING problem about the media 'management' of a pro-war and republican Murdoch network?


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 06:33:18 PM EST

Your point is ideological (none / 0)

I'm curious as to why you're so sure that Derby is a bad choice right out of the gate?

Whatever her stance on the war during her congressional campaign, things are a whole lot different regarding the war today.  Don't get stuck in a time warp.

And applying a ideological litmus test for the party chair position is counterproductive for a big tent party.


Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.
by boadicea on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 07:15:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your point is ideological (none / 0)

Nah not interested in time warps...

I just follow the money...!! More reliable in politics.


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 07:17:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Follow your own advice (none / 0)

Right now all you've done is blown smoke and made a series of unsupported assertions.


Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.
by boadicea on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 08:22:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Follow your own advice (none / 0)

What do you think politics is?


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 08:24:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I know what politics is (none / 0)

That doesn't make your smoke anything more than smoke.


Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.
by boadicea on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 10:15:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I know what politics is (none / 0)

Well, we'll just have to wait, out of the two of us is blowing the MOST smoke?

It's early days with regard to the NV Fox News story and who will be replacing Tom Collins.

All my questions are legitimate, so those who ARE the activists in NV I'm certain will flesh out the movers and shakers.  And if Hillary is amongst them we'll be finding out I'm sure...


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 11:18:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Waiting to see what the NV folks think (none / 0)

before jumping to conclusions?

What a novel idea.  Why didn't I think of that?


Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.
by boadicea on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 10:28:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Try Thinking That's Novel Too... (none / 0)

You do have a v. peculiar way of arguing?

I looked back over my posts, no where have I jumped to any conclusions, however, I have asked legitimate questions about certain political associations of Ms Derby's which might favor one particular presidential nominee, one particular faction of the 'national' Democratic Party.

I do think it v. odd that you do not wish to explore the NV fiasco which has implications for the WHOLE of the Democratic Party, but I guess YOU just didn't want to think about that?


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 11:49:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tom Collins Will Not Seek Re-election (none / 0)

Adding, if you don't think money, campaign support, and payback is significant in politics, then you don't seem to know much about politics?

Or if you do, you are just not admitting that that money and alliances do matter.


by SandThroughTheEyeGlass on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 08:27:03 PM EST

Nevada: Not Ready For Prime Time??? (none / 0)

This may be painful, but let's face it folks.  The Fox News fiasco is deeply indicative of a state party with its head where the sun don't shine.  Tom Collins wasn't the only involved here.

Harry Reid?  Well, we've already seen what a mixed bag he is.  When he's good, he's very, very good, and when he's not, he's AWOL.

Jill Derby?  Running to the right of her GOP opponent tells me all I really want to know about her.  Those who think that ideology is irrelevent in a party chair just haven't been to the right parties.  It's not so much a question of ideology directly (although that sometimes figures in), it's much more an indication of how hard and how shredly they'll fight.  Put simply, someone who is sharply ideologically opposed to the Reps is simply more likely to see the best angles to attack them on.  You don't have to be far left to do this.  But you do have to be ideologically distinguishable from them.

Then there are a number of fights they've failed to press over the years that they should damn well have fought--even if they were going to lose.  Just to show they would stand up for something.

Of course, the fact that the caucus is being held there means that things will get stirred up.  New blood will come into the party.  And, of course, the Reps are going to keep on royally scewing over the country.  So I'm not saying we can't win Nevada in 2008, and I'm certainly not saying that our prospects beyond that aren't promising.

But I am saying not to expect too much in the way of leadership from them.  They're still playing AA ball.  No telling how long till they get to the show.  And don't expect rookie of the year when they finally do.


by Paul Rosenberg on Mon Feb 26, 2007 at 10:55:27 PM EST

Re: Nevada: Not Ready For Prime Time??? (none / 0)

Nevada likely is more conservative than I'd like-so Derby may very well reflect her state better than you or I. The question really is whether she approaches the problems the chair will face with an ideological or pragmatic attitude.  And that is unknown.

Howard Dean is more conservative on some things ideologically than I am. It doesn't make him any less of a successful national chair in my mind.

Certainly I know my home state of Texas is constantly working to reconcile the needs of a the rural constituency with the urban one. Very similar to Nevada, I expect.

So, the question is what are the folks on the ground in Nevada saying about her?  Turn Tahoe Blue seems impressed.  I haven't had a chance to check out the gleaner or  minx yet.  

So, not convinced, but not panicking over here.

Keep the pressure and the attention on, by all means, but demonizing Hillary as manipulating this all behind the scenes-as whats-his-sand seems to be bent on is not about what's good for the Nevada Dems, but on using their difficulties to beat a hobbyhorse with.

Wow, quite a metaphor salad in that last para.  I must need more coffee.


Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.
by boadicea on Tue Feb 27, 2007 at 10:37:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

A Time For Change (none / 0)

The problem with this talk about "how conservative Nevada is" is that it's reactive, it depends on a static view of politics, and assumes that the only possible change is both linear and incremental.

Politics, however, is not a linear game.  There are breakpoints where things change dramatically.  But these breakpoints only come about because people agitate for them.

They have to have the wind at their back, of course.  They can agitate for a hundred years without that wind, and little will change.  But once the wind comes along, dramatic change is possible.

But a wind without agitators can do worse than nothing.  It can shift direction in the opposite way.  (Think about the anti-immigrant legislation the Reps were pushing early last year, legislation they thought--with some credibility--could help keep them in power last November.)

Right now, we are at the cusp of such a breakpoint.  It could come all at once in the next election.  (Past realigning elections, such as 1800, 1860, 1896, 1932 have all come paired with 2 consecutive House wave elections.)  Or it could come a bit more gradually, with a Democratic President and Congress from 2008 to 2012 catalyzing further realignment.

The possibility is definitely there, but it's a possiblity that folks like the Nevada Democratic Party leadership are simply and utterly blind to.  They aim too low.


by Paul Rosenberg on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 10:55:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Tom Collins IS still in power! (none / 0)

BUT, he's still the State Chair and will be in charge of the upcoming State Party elections on March 31st, and guess what he's gonna do next?

Tom Collins is THE Chair of the 2008 Nevada Caucus - can you believe most Democrats want this guy in charge of anything?  ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Tom Collins has been publicly outed as a bully, dictator, homophobe, religious zealot, sexist and DINO!

Go to www.taylormarsh.com and scroll down to my "Guest Column" titled "Fear & Loathing in the Las Vegas Polticial Jungle!" and you all will get the back story...follow the links...read the comments from other REAL Progressive Democrats!

There is a cancer on the Nevada Democratic Party and Tom Collins is the main reason why!  In Clark County, Las Vegas, his "queen" is Liz Foley, also a DINO and the person that purged the progressives from the State Central Committee (who are the only Democrats that get to vote for the new State Party leaders - about 150 in all)!

Nothing could be sadder than what's happening in Nevada!  We need all the help we can get from the "NetRoots" to get these few DINO's out of power!


by J L Abbinett on Wed Feb 28, 2007 at 02:29:50 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.