Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland

Delegate Herman Taylor in Maryland just introduced this bill that opens up the debate pretty dramatically on the nature of the internet.  It requires a quarterly report from broadband providers describing the extent of access to broadband, and it includes as a legislative finding the terms of net neutrality from the AT&T merger.

It's a big deal.  Net neutrality and universal access are two sides of the same problem, and uniting them in this bill on a state level is a major step forward.  Thank you, Delegate Tayler.  The telcos are going to fight this, and there will be a hearing later this month in the Economic Matters Committee.

Owning state legislatures has been a secret strategy for corporate elites for years, and our focus on a Federal level and the courts has crippled us in understanding what is really possible when progressives step up on a state level.  But that's where change really happens.

UPDATE: The bill is also listed at the Maryland Billhop wiki.



Display:


Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

Nice bill, but Herman is an empty suit.  And he's pro-life.


by Marylander on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 10:48:25 AM EST

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (3.00 / 1)

I should say anti-choice.


by Marylander on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 10:48:38 AM EST

and that's all that matters, right? (none / 0)

Please see "Crashing the Gates" for why single issue voters lose a lot.


by DrFrankLives on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 11:01:30 AM EST

Re: and that's all that matters, right? (none / 0)

Not just that.  I live in his district.  I think he's a phony.  


by Marylander on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 11:18:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: and that's all that matters, right? (none / 0)

Coalitions are often weird.


by Matt Stoller on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 12:21:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: and that's all that matters, right? (3.00 / 1)

I'm glad he introduced this.  Just offering my opinion about Delegate Taylor.


by Marylander on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 01:25:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

Looking at this language, is anything binding other then the reporting requirement?
(This bill is also reported at the Maryland Billhop Legislative wiki )

by xax on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 11:42:36 AM EST

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

You'd think more Congresspeople would support Net Neutrality. The Netroots won this election and their jobs. Women and minorities won this election and their jobs. They're a bunch on entitled ingrates.

We should ride their asses on everything from Iran to Network Neutrality because they owe us BIG TIME. Otherwise, we should start supporting the third party.


--donna darko. I don't read or respond to comments. There's too much hate and misogyny here.
by nonwhiteperson on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 02:03:46 PM EST

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

What this bill does --

initiates oversight -- currently broadband is unregulated in MD.

starting point to address equal access in all neighborhoods in response to complaints.


by dblhelix on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 02:48:31 PM EST

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

Ethan Strimling just introduced a Net Neutrality bill in Maine as well.  My take is that Ethan knows it's a big deal to some of the Big Dogs in the blogosphere, and he wants to get on your good side in his fight against former Common Cause director Chellie Pingree in the '08 primary battle for Maine's 1st CD (doesn't help that Kos trashes Pingree for some past purported slight against "the blogosphere".)  

Strimling's moral compass points to Strimling first, but he, like a growing number of politicians knows red meat to the netroots when he sees it, and hopes you don't look any further under the hood.


by MBW on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 03:03:38 PM EST

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

That's great!  Links?


by Matt Stoller on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 04:21:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

Matt, may I suggest adding "D-14" to your references to Delegate Taylor in your post, and conforming the spelling of his name to the above?  Delegate Taylor is from Montgomery County's northeastern border with Howard County and includes Damascus, a conservative alcohol-free town within an otherwise liberal District 14 and a very liberal county.  The district is moderate, conservative by Montgomery standards.  A lot of Donna Edwards' voters came from this district.

It's a 3-member district. My site Crablaw Maryland Weekly did not follow District 14 intensely this election season, but it would not surprise me if having a pro-life Democrat in 14 helped keep down the influence of the religious right in the northern corner of the district near Damascus.  One of Taylor's fellow Democratic Delegate in 14 is openly lesbian, which works fine in much of Montgomery but less so in Damascus.  This paragraph is speculative on my part, I did not follow the race.

Frankly, it may well be a Democrat with some conservative instincts who can get this thing sold.  I don't know how well you know local Maryland politics, Matt, but I will assume you know it well.  For other readers, there is a lot of tension growing between Peter Franchot, a sapphire-blue newly elected State Comptroller from a sapphire blue speck in sapphire-blue Montgomery County, and the relatively conservative old-school Senate President for Life Thomas "Mike" Miller who is from the distant ex-urb/tobacco country of lower Prince George's and Calvert Counties.  I suspect the two won't come to blows, but arrogance and ego are the only things they have in common.

It is perhaps helpful that a bill like this one should come from a Democratic delegate who is not from lower Montgomery and who catches flak for being, for example, pro-life.

Enough local "inside baseball."


by Crablaw on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 03:18:12 PM EST

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

Senate President for Life

he's gone in 2010.


by dblhelix on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 03:45:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

It is perhaps helpful that a bill like this one should come from a Democratic delegate who is not from lower Montgomery and who catches flak for being, for example, pro-life.

What are you implying? Not clear to me.

What the bill does is establish reporting to the PSC by zip code on broadband usage/availability of service.

Broadband is currently not a regulated public utility. The initiation of reporting requirements by  zip is due to heavy complaints in minority/rural areas on lack of access/availablity.

Here is what the bill does specifically:

[1] breakdown by zip on where service is offered
[2] %household offered, %household accepted by zip
[3] available bandwidth up/down by zip
[4] price/meg by zip
[5] report new services/upgrades by zip
[6] make above available at PSC site.

The relationship of Damascus to this bill is complaints of slow roll-out as compared to down-county.


by dblhelix on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 04:12:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

1)  Miller is out - by his recent decision - in 2010.  So if he lives another 47 months, you are right.  No one can force him out.  Technically, Castro is not President for Life either.  Technically, you are correct.  Mike Miller works in the Mike Miller building; I think Castro works in the Castro building too.

2)  Broadband is not a publicly regulated utility, but the utilities and their parent companies have a stake in killing it, because even the regulated utilities can profit from the power to control access and delivery based on content.

3)  The utility companies throw around a lot of money on State Circle, and the less radical the proponent of a bill, the fewer reasons that the Senate President for Life (he keeps the title even if he retires, since no Democrat can take it from him without killing him) will deliver it a swift kick.  (Miller is Senate President, not Speaker of the House, but if it's dead in the Senate, it's dead.)  

If I were a utility lobbyist, I would do my best to smother this one in the nursery, even though the bill is indeed cautious.  If I wanted to smother it, I would call Mike Miller on his cell phone and ask him how I could help his people kill this unnecessary, tie-dye hippie driven bill, preferably in committee.  (In real life, I am the tie-dye hippie, but I digress.)  Miller and Speaker Busch are having difficult relations, but killed later or killed earlier is still killed.

4)  Mike Miller and Sen Brian Frosh (D-16) are butting heads as we speak on the death penalty bills, Miller supporting Norman Stone's pro-death penalty bill while Frosh's bill is about to die 6-5 in committee.  Miller's likely to have trouble with uberliberal Jamin Raskin (D-20), whose election involved a successful and nasty primary challenge against a long-time Miller ally Ida Ruben.  Sen. Madaleno (D-18) and Miller get along somewhat better, but in part because Madaleno is known as easy to work with and a sharp shot on budget matters.  But all of these Senators come from or near the part of the county that Miller derides as the "Chevy Chase/Kensington liberal agenda" i.e. mostly Madaleno's district 18 and nearby Takoma "Granola" Park, Bethesda and Forest Glen.

Mind you, I am the dirty hippie that Miller is often worrying about.


by Crablaw on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 04:55:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

Taylor's sponsorship has nothing to do with masking a 'Chevy Chase/Kensington liberal agenda' or a 'radical proponent'.

Del. Taylor is a member of the Economic Matters Committee and more specifically, the Business Regulation and Public Utilities Work Group(s).

The co-sponsors are from areas where there are complaints of alleged redlining, including Cumberland and a significant chunk of Prince George's.

Naturally the companies involved in broadband delivery will want no part of reporting requirements -- but Taylor is not playing a trojan horse role in an ideological conflict here.


by dblhelix on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 06:10:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

Re: Taylor not being radical - exactly my point - agreed - but you said it better.


by Crablaw on Fri Feb 16, 2007 at 11:42:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (3.00 / 1)

Your analysis of this district is completely erroneous.  It is a very safely Democratic district.  Two of the other 6 districts are more conservative-15 and 39.  Damascus is a very small part of the district.  This district becomes more safely Democratic in every election.


by Marylander on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 09:00:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

If I may ask, if the district is so blue, and greater Damascus area is such a small part of the district (lower density but a large chunk of land), how did a pro-life Democrat, of all things, prevail over other Democrats?  Taylor is African-American, and Burtonsville has a substantial African-American community, but where is the pro-life base that moved Taylor into third place over other Democratic choices in the primary?

It's like hearing that a pro-gay marriage Republican beat out the religious right, but that the district is very, very red.


by Crablaw on Fri Feb 16, 2007 at 11:48:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

Because abortion issues are not an election driver in MD unless the politician in question makes it so (1).

I don't understand why you would expect one unresponsive, no-name challenger to beat an incumbent on the D14 team.

(1) There are three bills in the House right now that are anti-choice: 2 parental notification bills & one fetus=person bill. Taylor is not a co-sponsor on any of them.

If Taylor were standing at the corner of New Hampshire Ave and Rt 108 with an aborted fetus poster, well, then his pro-life position might become an election issue.

Finally: nobody's up-in-arms about these bills they're going nowhere, one way or another.


by dblhelix on Fri Feb 16, 2007 at 01:50:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Herman L. Taylor, Jr. D-14 (none / 0)

I ask not to challenge, but for information; as stated, I did not follow this race, and I do thank you for your correction.


by Crablaw on Fri Feb 16, 2007 at 11:50:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

I voted too late. But for what it's worth, not sure and other were my votes at one and two, because of Edwards spineless reaction to the blog blitz. I'm not sure whether I will continue to thing of that as serious a character flaw in the longer term or not, but for now I'm less than happy with Edwards.


by Retired Catholic on Thu Feb 15, 2007 at 03:40:29 PM EST

Re: Net Neutrality Bill Introduced in Maryland (none / 0)

t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 t10 t11 t12 t13 t14 t15 t16 t17 t18 t19 t20 t21 t22 t23 t24 t25 t26 t27 t28 t29 t30 t31 t32 t33 t34 t35 t36 t37 t38 t39 t40 t41 t42 t43 t44 t45 t46 t47 t48 t49 t50 t51 t52 t53 t54 t55 t56 t57 t58 t59 t60 t61 t62 t63 t64 t65 t66 t67 t68 t69 t70 t71 t72 t73 t74 t75 t76 t77 t78 t79 t80 t81 t82


by pamlaa on Tue Jul 03, 2007 at 09:28:32 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.