Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa

One of the most often heard complaints about the candidacy of Barack Obama is that it is a media-driven one, that his current level of support and organizational prowess are not commensurate to the amount of coverage he has received in the print and, especially, the broadcast media. But if the early response to his candidacy in the key state of Iowa is any indication, the interest in his campaign -- not necessarily hard support, but the widespread interest -- is quite deep in the early nominating state. David Yepsen, who as a columnist for the Des Moines Register is a sort of dean of the political press corps in Iowa, has the details of the initial response to the junior Senator from the neighboring state of Illinois.

Barack Obama is off to a stellar start in Iowa.

The  Illinois senator had what is likely to be the largest kickoff ever seen for any candidate in the history of the caucuses.

His crowds in Cedar Rapids and Waterloo were huge - two or three thousand per event.  In Ames, about 5,000 people were at the Hilton Coliseum.  Even a lowly house party in Iowa Falls attracted 200.

Yepsen does note that a number of those in attendence "were ringers who trekked in from Illinois" and that going to see someone speak -- even trekking through the cold and snow to do so -- does not necessarily indicate that one supports for that candidate, but that "quick scans of the parking lots showed cars from a variety of counties" in Iowa, which could augur well for Obama's candidacy.

Polling out of Iowa has quite consistently shown Obama in third place in the state, at least dating back to December, with either John Edwards or (solely in the case of American Reseach Group polling) Hillary Clinton maintaining a lead in the early nominating state. But that doesn't mean that Obama -- or for that matter any other candidate, including those currently at the top of the heap as well as those polling in the low single digits -- won't be able to significantly boost their amount of support before Iowans head to the caucuses in 11 months. So if Obama can turn the thousands who showed up to see him speak into avid supporters, be might be able to catapult ahead of his competitors and score a key, early victory in Iowa in January 2008.



Display:


Re: Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa (none / 0)

My extremely early prediction is that Obama is going to take Iowa.  There is near universal support for him among the college Dems in Iowa.  This leads me to believe he'll have more activists and foot soldiers than Hillary and Edwards and will in the end take Iowa.  It will be be a lot of work and is such a long way away it's almost silly to speculate, but that's my thoughts and i'm sticking to them.


by blueryan on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 01:08:10 PM EST

Re: Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa (none / 0)

I think Obama will come in second to Edwards. I agree he has a chance of winning, but I question whether all those college student foot soldiers are going to get him many extra delegates. They are going to be concentrated in a few precincts.

Don't underestimate how many foot soldiers Edwards is going to have here. He starts out with pretty much every precinct captain he had last time, which is a lot.

I still am on record predicting Clinton finishes no better than fourth in Iowa.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 02:24:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa (none / 0)

but I question whether all those college student foot soldiers are going to get him many extra delegates. They are going to be concentrated in a few precincts

Well under 3 million people live in Iowa.  How many live in or around Iowa City, Ames, Des Moines, or another city with a sizeable college population?

I have to disagree with you.  College students are spread out throughout Iowa and can make a huge impact if they are involved and organized.


by blueryan on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 02:38:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa (none / 0)

My extremely early prediction is that Obama is going to take Iowa.  There is near universal support for him among the college Dems in Iowa.

In Iowa, the messenger matters. Everyone is oversaturated to the point of disgust. Having credible foot soldiers with local roots is super important.

The latest Zogby poll has Clinton & Edwards tied at 24, with Obama at 18. Now, at the moment, no one else has caucus viability.


by niq on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 01:18:36 PM EST

Re: Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa (3.00 / 1)

Foot soldiers don't matter if they are disorganized.  Dean had more soldiers than anyone, and his operation here was beyond laughable.

I told Dean folks starting in Sep 03 I was with Edwards.  I got 15 calls the week of the Iowa caucus from the Dean camp. That was wasted effort on their part and turned people off who were uncommitted to be "harassed" that often.  (Cavet: Deans team were not trying to harass, they were just too disorganized to remove people from their lists.)

When polling Iowans, I dont know why people dont ask for a second choice of candidates.  Call it a hunch, if Vilsack is viable in a district, he will get the majority of people who need to realign.  (I say that as once again an Edwards supporter.)


by demiowa on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 01:46:26 PM EST

Re: Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa (none / 0)

Dean's organization was disorganized, but they also weren't much larger then Kerry's from my viewpoint.  At least on college campuses in Iowa, Kerry appeared to have at least as much as support as Dean in 2004.  Gephardt also had a sizeable amount of support.  My point is that the amount of early support I for Obama is far superior than anything any of the candidates had in 2004.  


by blueryan on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 01:55:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I agree on second choices (none / 0)

I think Vilsack will be many people's second choice, as I wroteover at the Bleeding Heartland blog a few days ago.

Hell, if you are over 25 and an active Iowa Democrat, you've already voted for Vilsack twice. If you are for a non-viable candidate there's probably a reason your first choice wasn't Clinton or Obama.

Incidentally, when I was a precinct captain and I identified a supporter of another candidate, I did usually ask if the person had a second choice.

And I also got lots of phone calls from Dean's people well after I identified myself as a strong Kerry supporter.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 02:29:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I agree on second choices (none / 0)

I've voted for Vilsack twice, and I held my nose the first time.  I still remember him going back on his "No negative campaigning" twice. Back then, those things mattered to me because I hadn't been radicalized by Bush.  And obviously I wasn't going to vote for the bible thumping alternative.

Frankly, as a regular Iowa citizen, I don't remember him doing anything worthwhile or anything that would affect my life at all. Plus, he was the chair of the DLC!


by delmoi on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 08:39:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama Gets Strong, Early Response in Iowa (none / 0)

Somewhat OT, in that it doesn't have to with Iowa, but Obama is coming to Austin on 2/23 and they're predicting to fill the venue, which holds 5,000, and to have an overflow crowd of 2,000-3,000 more. Granted Austin is a very liberal community, where people are passionte about politics, but it's a good sign of the interest he's generating this early.

And kudos for choosing to come to Texas when he really doesn't have to. No, Texas is not going Democratic any time soon, but if you can get the 40% of the electorate here that is Democratic to get excited about you, and donate to your campaign, why not try to tap that resource?


by gin pahit on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 02:22:31 PM EST

he's going to TX to raise money (none / 0)

The non-Clinton candidates are going to have to work the big donors hard all over the country, especially in places where Dems understand that we do NOT want Hillary Clinton at the top of the ticket.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 02:30:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: he's going to TX to raise money (none / 0)

Forgot to mention that the event came about because Obama's people contacted Texans for Obama, a small grassroots organization that basically began as a group of people who got together through Meetup back in October. Then TFO coordinated with the UT Democrats from there.

So Obama is indeed reaching out to the grassroots. He may be doing a $2300-a-plate fundraiser, too, while he's in town, but his talk about reaching out to the grassroots isn't just hot air, at least in this case.


by gin pahit on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 03:51:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What about primaries? (none / 0)

Don't primaries in TX count for anything, delegate wise?  I honestly don't know, but it would be kind of dumb for primary candidates to ignore red states...


by delmoi on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 07:42:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I was at that rally (none / 0)

I was at that rally (photos here), and I went to a couple dean rallies in Ames in 2004.  The overall energy level at the rally was far, far lower then it was for Dean in '04, but Dean threw out a lot of "red meat", attacking guys like Limbaugh, you know the drill. Obama was all conciliatory and frankly that's a bit dull.

I only went because I was curious about him, and I'm as unimpressed as ever. Still, Edwards isn't that great and I'll be happy if he wins and it's not Hillary.


by delmoi on Tue Feb 13, 2007 at 07:41:17 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.