I was pretty surprised to see that most commenters actually wanted to see some pretty heavy fines doled out to the company, or at least that the local cities should sue Turner Broadcasting for millions of dollars over the incident. I was expecting more anger at what seems to be a massive over-reaction by the local police force. From my perspective, this is an utter inability to tell the difference between real threats and non-threats that resulted in a huge waste of government resources. However, from the perspective of the media and elected officials in Boston--and even to a certain extent from local progressive commenters--all of the fault appears to rest on the marketers. Apparently, because of 9/11 (media and elected officials in Massachusetts have repeatedly played this card during the incident) any governmental over-reaction and inability to tell something is and is not a threat is justified, and those who point out the governmental incompetence and fear-mongering and considered "not serious." Does this sound familiar to anyone?|
|
|
Permalink :: 58 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.