Harnessing Obama's Crowds

Throughout 2007, I've had the chance to see Barack Obama, by far the most accessible candidate here in California, three times, two of which were public events that utilized the massive crowds he attracted in different ways.

The first event I attended was his Oakland rally back in March. It was early in the campaign and he was still building his list, so they set it up so that every person who came to see him, for free by the way, filled out a form with contact information. Annoying for those in a long line, but a smart way to build an online list through an offline event.

The next public rally I attended was Obama's Santa Barbara event the afternoon of his Oprah fundraiser in early September. Here, while list building was still in full effect, there was more of a sense that anyone attending the event was probably already on board and were considered potential activists rather than mere e-mail addresses; here, the crowd was used as a campaign organizing tool. As I wrote then:

Obama's California state campaign director as well as his CA field director spoke to motivate the crowd to join the Santa Barbara area local campaigns. Their goal is to create 53 cd teams, within which they will have a city team within which they will have community teams and then finally precinct teams. This is about engaging the people on the ground to spread the word about Obama, wear your buttons and stickers, they urged us, e-mail your friends. They're banking on the peer to peer method of communicating as being the most effective to win in such a huge state as California.

As the campaign began to ramp up in California and actually open offices and organize on-the-ground staffs, this was a smart way to spread the word about the local opportunities to help Barack's candidacy and I suspect more effective than simply e-mailing the information. By virtue of the crowd's having come out to see Barack in the first place, the attendants essentially identified themselves as among the more active in the community and, no doubt, the political opinionmakers in their circles and the Obama campaign was smart to tap into that.

Now today, I read an account of Obama's South Carolina Oprah rally and was impressed by the further innovation of how the campaign is continuing to exploit his crowds. This strikes me as rather brilliant.

The campaign attempted to organize that enthusiasm by asking the crowd to text their cell phone numbers to the campaign.   Jeremy Bird and Anton Gunn, the campaign's field and political directors took the stage to ask the crowd to text their phone numbers to Obama's campaign.  They also broke a Guinness World Record by conducting the world's largest phone bank, 36,426 people in the audience called four names of South Carolinian voters listed on the back of their tickets and asked them to support Barack Obama.

Here, we see his campaign collecting supporters' cell phone numbers rather than e-mail addresses for more immediate access to them, and has taken the exploitation of the crowds as activists one step further by actually having them make calls right there.

I'll be interested to see if it's replicated when I see him at an event tomorrow here in L.A. It's a small dollar fundraiser ($50/$25 students) that also features a performance by the Goo Goo Dolls among other bands. The event is clearly targeted to young people, so I will be shocked if there isn't some sort of cell phone # harvesting activity. Look for my report on that event tomorrow night.



Display:


sounds like a great idea (none / 0)

Are so many people really willing to give out their cell phone numbers, though?

That surprises me.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 06:43:33 PM EST

text-centered GOTV (none / 0)

Your children are obviously young--my 14 year old spends his life texting on his cell phone. It is his preferred form of communication.

On the other hand I gave Obama my cell phone number back in the summer and have never heard a peep.  I suspect that they are planning to orchestrate their GOTV relying heavily on text messages, reminding people to vote.

Its brilliant and will be common place by 2010. But he will be remembered as the first campaign to have a text-centered GOTV.


by aiko on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:11:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: text-centered GOTV (none / 0)


It's the kind of think I would have expected Trippi to come up with.

(Guess he's sooooo 2004.)


by Bush Bites on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 08:47:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sounds like a great idea (none / 0)

That is ingenious.  I picked up on it immediately while watching the event in SC.  My husband said, "why are they asking for them to text, etc."  I said, "it is all about gathering information".  Again, everyone follows what he does when it comes to contacting the public or fundraising.


by iamready on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 10:23:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

That is very interesting, especially the phone banking thing.

Could see them developing some kind of support phone tree....or something.

I could see it being picked up by Edwards. I don't think Hillary's people use cell phones much.


by Bush Bites on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 06:58:19 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

the harvesting started months ago with Obama ringtones from his 2004 convention speech. I get a txt message nearly every week from the campaign.


by Piuma on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:08:26 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (2.00 / 1)

I just got back from volunteering at the Oprah event in Columbia, SC. I'm not sure what the crowd total was, but I would guess something like 30K. The sheer number of supporter IDs collected makes the event a huge positive for the campaign. Also, it appeared that many folks left with stickers, shirts, signs, etc., which should boost visibility.

I thought Obama was outstanding today (sure, I'm biased, but I can't imagine a much better performance). I'm not an Oprah fanatic, but I did think she did well, especially when she forgot about the script, left the podium, and walked around the stage with the handheld mic. Also, it was interested to see how genuine her fondness for Obama was, watching her react to his speech while she watched from her seat onstage. She was visibly excited by him.

I don't know if there will be any significant boost in polls, but the event was extremely helpful to our organizational efforts regardless.


by DPW on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:10:25 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

Jeremy Bird and Anton Gunn, the campaign's field and political directors took the stage to ask the crowd to text their phone numbers to Obama's campaign.  They also broke a Guinness World Record by conducting the world's largest phone bank, 36,426 people in the audience called four names of South Carolinian voters listed on the back of their tickets and asked them to support Barack Obama.

That's a brilliant idea! Impressive.


by markjay on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:25:48 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (2.00 / 1)

Thanks for volunteering DPW.  

NBC led its evening news with "Oprahpalooza."  The crowd looked huge and enthusiastic.  They interviewed a 60-something yo woman who said she had been "completely a Hillary girl."  The reporter asked, "and now?"  She said, "Not any more."  I think a lot of minds were changed or at least filled with possibility.  NBC did not mention any other democratic campaign except to give the new Mason-Dixon numbers.  I think it was the first completely positive piece I have ever seen.

ABC also covered it and said positive things about Obama and Oprah.  After talking about how massive the crowd was, the reported then said "in response, Hillary deployed Bill, who played to relatively tiny crowds."

Bravo OO.


by Javier Doval on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:29:13 PM EST

The video from NBC (2.00 / 1)

is already on YouTube.


One Million Strong --- Join up
by psericks on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:05:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

Awesome! See you tomorrow night!


by dmc2 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:34:37 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

Todd, given your (somewhat endearing, somewhat odd) tendency to describe Obama and his campaign in purely superlative terms, I think it's time you put together the Obama version of ChuckNorrisFacts.

  1. Barack Obama doesn't make speeches. He makes dreams.
  2. No one has ever voted against Barack Obama. There's simply a list of people who failed his campaign's hope test.
  3. When Barack Obama becomes president, Blues music will be officially renamed the Purples.
  4. Barack Obama was once sued by the US Justice Department for having a monopoly on hope. They withdrew their lawsuit when Obama promised to stop giving people hope, and to give them change instead.


by blueflorida on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:44:07 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

Let those who have ears hear.


by Shaun Appleby on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:01:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

Thats hot!


by rapcetera on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 10:06:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Attended an early rally in Atlanta (none / 0)

I attended an April Obama rally (along with over 20,000 others), and I noticed the same exact thing as Todd did in the Oakland March rally (signing up with your email address to get in). But an important difference was that if you already RSVPed online and printed out the confirmation email as a ticket, you essentially already gave the campaign your email address and info.

There were two separate areas where we could enter: an area closer to the stage, and an area farther from the stage. Those of us who signed up online got to go into the area closer to the stage. We had a better overall experience simply because we had already signed up online and joined their My.BarackObama.com network. They certainly knew how to please their volunteer/small donor base...


Leftmost Bit
by Luigi Montanez on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:04:46 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

i won't vote for obama...never...i haven't forgotten the donnie mcclurkin (ex-gay) gospel concert in south carolina...i'll never vote for obama...he made a calculated political decision that enraged me and i won't forget...don't believe the hype...the audacity of hype that is.


by OKLABUBBA on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:19:15 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

uh...ok. then don't.  no worries.


"Well Hillary, I looking forward to you advising me as well." - Barack Obama
by General Sherman on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:35:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

That McClurkin dead horse is nothing but a sad sack of crunched up bones at this point. Geez...

McClurkin is not anti-gay; he has a different opinion about his homosexuality than the majority of people with similar tendencies. It's great that he supports a candidate like Obama, with a long record of support for gay rights. Don't get bent out of shape over one gospel concert; Obama's the best chance we've had for progressive change in America in a generation.


by dmc2 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:38:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

So, if he is the nominee, who are you voting for in the general?


by Obama08 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:03:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

That's exactly how I feel... about Hillary on the AUMF vote.  Difference is there are now ~600k casualties as a consequence of that calculated political decision that enraged me and I won't forget.  We all have our limits.  Vote your conscience.


by Shaun Appleby on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:33:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

You act as if you're been forced to vote for him. You don't have to if you don't want to.

Sigh. What to do about single issue voters......


by rapcetera on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 10:09:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

how do you feel about bill clinton signing the defense of marriage act?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 02:05:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Oprah (none / 0)

I really think Oprah should come back to Iowa and campaign some more for Obama if she really wants him to win this.

She could come back a week before the Iowa caucus and go on a rural Iowa tour bus with Obama.

I know there's a lot of folks that couldnt attend for whatever reason , so maybe if Oprah makes an appearace closer to their town , it could sway some more voters...Some would appreciate that Oprah took the time to visit their little rural town.


by Prodigy on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:06:00 PM EST

Re: Oprah (2.00 / 2)

disagree that would be overdoing it, he has to close the deal himself, plus the holidays are going to kind of shut things down a bit after next week anyway. I'm sure Oprah will be back for some mega rallies in the feb 5 states in January.


Obama! because 51% isn't enough!
by nevadadem on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:26:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

how about... (2.00 / 1)

Al Gore instead?  Keep your fingers and toes crossed.


Our Moment Is Now
by mboehm on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:30:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how about... (none / 0)

If it's gonna' happen right about... now would be good.


by Shaun Appleby on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:35:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how about... (none / 0)

Agreed.

Whoever Al Gore endorses, if he doesn't endorse in the next 10 days, it's meaningless.

To be honest, he probably needs to endorse in the next 2 or 3 days and then campaign with his candidate of choice for ~2 days (like Oprah and Obama this weekend) to really have an impact.

If he sits on it too long, he's gonna be talking somebody up during the dead season.  


by mopper8 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:47:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how about... (none / 0)

My guess is that he's waiting for the Iowa results. If someone other than Clinton wins, he endorses. Otherwise, he'll hang back.


by blueflorida on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 10:05:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how about... (none / 0)

i was thinking gore would say favorable things about obama, but stop short of an official endorsement. but waiting to do so until after iowa makes sense too.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 12:45:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how about... (none / 0)

Gore is scheduled to accept the Peace Prize today.  What better time than to follow up with an endoresement later this week?  He could dominate this upcoming weekend's news cycle like Oprah did this past weekend.


by jbsloan on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 06:43:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how about... (none / 0)

A Gore endorsement would be great , but i think Gore is a bit afraid to cross the Clinton and the possibility of them winning.

While Gore may not be a fan of Hillary , he would still like to have a say on global warming under her administration if she wins , ad right now , she's still the frontrunner , although not as strong as 2 months ago.


by Prodigy on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 11:47:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oprah (none / 0)

Maybe he's not polling well in IA and they don't want to put forth all that effort and then lose. Maybe they see better chances in SC.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 10:29:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oprah (none / 0)

it would be a mistake to overdo oprah in iowa. once was enough. saw too many skeptical faces at that rally. better to focus her on south carolina instead.

iowans punished howard dean because trippi presented dean too much like a rock star, instead of a candidate worried about pople's problems. iowa is about iowans. as soon as they sense you are on some kind of power trip or trying to dazzle them with star power, you're done with. the focus needs to be on iowans in the final leg.

i think michelle barack's best advocate, but i would really like to see zbig b. at a rally. or maybe he's better suited to a forum.

obama/brzezinski o8!


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 12:40:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

Before he endorses I would want to know what is fav/unfav is.  The GOP loves to trash him because he has been right so many times.  So his endorsement could actually backfire (even though I personally think he is indeed a man in full).


by Javier Doval on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 10:06:02 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

I'm pretty nervous commenting here where the vile and washed-up Jerome got his start and now just shows up to trash the 'Only Politician That Matters!'

That parphrase is actually what's being diaried by the feces-flinging monkeys at OrangeLand is a little worse than that. Funny how the supporters of this noble man, this agent of change, this great hope are such a nasty gang of lying character assassins.

Funny how Paul Krugman is now an ignorant fool. A mouthpiece for the forces of darkness.

Yeah, funny....

As for the wunnerful Oprah amazing success that she is, and you just have to believe in her 'success',  She has her very own production company to produce her in all her shining glory.

'So what?, you inquire?

It's non-union. And it's non-union because Miss Wunnerful is virulently anti-union herself and has insisted the company is and stays non-union.

Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet!

Senator 'Hope' doan gotta worry about crossing no picket line when he visits Miss Multi-Millionaire Oprah and her good, good friend.

Some may consider this comment a little harsh; so be it....

But don't you really want to know all the facts about the next guy/gal you vote for?

I do.


by Pericles on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 10:41:02 PM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

Valium; pericles. Try some Valium.....


by rapcetera on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 11:01:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

what does oprah pay her people?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 12:42:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

I don't know.

I tried to look it up yesterday, but couldn't find much beyond character assassination.

I did find out that her XM Satellite show is the only XM show with a union contract.

Also found out that she employs service workers union people to handle the audience on her TV show.


by Bush Bites on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 09:02:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

I don't know, but she took all of her employees and their families on an all-expenses paid trip to Hawaii.  I also know that most of her employees have been with her from the beginning.  

There is something very wrong that people must try to disparage every person they disagree with.  Oprah builds schools (more than one) in Africa and some nitwits say she should build them in America, not knowing that Oprah, without much fanfare, has put hundreds of kids through college right here in America.  


by Javier Doval on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 09:32:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

do you have a camera?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 12:20:52 AM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (2.00 / 1)

The Kerry camp did the "mass phone bank" thing at rallies just before the 04 election -- at least at one they held here in Las Vegas a week before the election. Since there's no way for the campaign to gather any responses about the candidate preferences or issue IDs of those who were called, its really only a gimmick -- not at all a bad one, but not that valuable as a form of voter contact.  


by desmoulins on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 02:01:42 AM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

This is day three of positive press coverage for Oprah-Obama.  On every morning show, network and cable, there was positive coverage of the weekend rallies.  From an advertisers pov it was pure gold.  You saw massive, energized crowds, mostly women but also a lot of men, as well as a youthful, vibrant husband and wife (who clearly got a real thing going).  It looked like a superbowl halftime show.  But then you also get a glimpse of Obama being serious, telling the crowd that leadership and judgment were necessary for the future.

And this is just the national coverage.  The local papers and news stations in Iowa, NH and SC also covered the events.  


by Javier Doval on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 09:41:02 AM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

At several Deval Patrick rallies (one on the Boston Common with about 5,000 people I think) we did massive phonebanking. The campaign workers handed out phone lists and pens so you could write down the responses, and then the workers collected the sheets. Since we were waiting for Deval to come out and speak, we had plenty of time to do 10 phone calls. But not just that, the excitement of the event made the phone banking more effective. I could say, "I'm here with 5,000 other people RIGHT NOW calling for Deval Patrick because we're so excited about this movement for change." I imagine it's a similar, but bigger effect at the Obama rallies.


by afertig on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 10:45:40 AM EST

Re: Harnessing Obama's Crowds (none / 0)

He is so good looking and cool, everyone should put all his speaches on their iphones. Too bad mother teresa isn't around, she obviously would have endorsed him as the second coming of christ. I wanta party with obama, I wanta party with obama. You feel like a movie star just watching him. The only person cooler than obama is opera. she is like john the babtist. introducing obama to the masses. america is forgiven the sins of slavery by voting for the big o.


by maxstar on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 01:12:59 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.