Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey

Back during the end of September 2000, when Gore had Bush on the mat following the bounce from the LA convention and the RATS ad, it was Oprah that picked Bush up off the ground.

"My pleasure," he purred when she thanked him for the kiss. The establishment media went gaga after Oprah embraced Bush.

That's what I know about Oprah and her politics.



Display:


Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 6)

so this is a hate obama marathon,right? gonna hammer him til oprah gets home sunday nite.. I'm getting some popcorn.

This is weak,lame,jealous,and dumb.

Gee,You know what, once Al Gore visited the white house when Bush was there and they even talked... oh man, what has happened to gore?


by hawkjt on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:45:36 AM EST

Oprah Winfrey and Unions {h/t to Digby} (2.00 / 3)

Obama and Oprah are appearing in Mancheser, NH at a non-union venue that is picketed by local unions. Though they seem to have fanangled a waver from the NH AFL-CIO late friday, the Verizon Cener is always picketed at all other events by the stagehand workers union for being a 100% non union house.  

Oh the perks of being audacious and appearing with a beloved billionaire!

But the truth is, back in Chicago, Oprah herself runs a 100% non-union shop.

As to the writers strike - that has shut down the networks, Leno, Letterman, the Daily Show, Colbert...

   "`Oprah isn't shutting down,' commented Chicago Film Office director Rich Moskal. The reason her show is not shutting down is because she employs only non-union writers.

   In the case of Oprah, she belongs to three different craft unions herself (as a performer), yet refuses to allow union representation of any sort inside the doors of her studio, instead paying substandard wages and benefits to non-union crews. Oprah's magazine is 100% non union also.

It is a travesty that Oprah feels no responsibility to those who helped her create her billions in profit, but that's the way things are and it's part of the reason union representation is so vital in this industry.

Some Democratic politicians have been playing both sides of this issue for a long time now.
Democrats have to start drawing some bright lines on this issue.

Unions are fundamental.

Digby


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:56:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

way to nit-pick. (1.50 / 2)


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:09:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

nit-pick?. (2.00 / 1)

PLEASE tell me you are kidding
PLEASE tell me you were being sarcastic

you dont ACTUALLY think tha being a closed shop in a unionized industry is a minor thing do you?

Or do you?


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:55:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Nit-Pick? (2.00 / 1)


My grandpa, who took a skull fracture for the IWW so that our generation could have the weekend off, used to say that there were three unforgivable sins: burning a book, crossing a picket line, and voting Republican.

Getting a wee bit peeved about union-busting is
not nit-picking.


by admiralnaismith on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:01:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nit-Pick? (none / 0)

Obama is NOT crossing any picket lines anytime soon.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:17:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nit-Pick? (none / 0)

Certainly not before the primaries are over.


by souvarine on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:37:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nit-Pick? (none / 0)

funny.....??


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:07:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oprah Winfrey and Unions {h/t to Digby} (2.00 / 6)

There won't be pickets because Obama negotiated with the AFL-CIO, and will make a mention of the ongoing struggle during his speech. I don't think Obama is the type of democrat who has been playing both sides on union issues.


by Ozymandias on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 05:44:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

oh he's gonna "mention" (1.00 / 1)

the Union's struggle with the hall?

whoo- hoo!  Hes a regular Samuel L. Gompers isnt he? - a real working class hero -

with his anti union gal pal Oprah at his side!

Im sure it will be very moving and almost sound sincere to those who arent really paying attention.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:12:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: oh he's gonna "mention" (2.00 / 2)

Oh come on Obama is just trying to bring people together so they can understand each other. In this case, he's trying to help the AFL-CIO better understand scabs.

It's just like McClurkin where he showed so much leadership in helping gays and lesbians better understand gay bashing preachers.


by hwc on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:43:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: oh he's gonna "mention" (none / 0)

it wasn't obama who signed the defense of marriage act into law. something hillary supported.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:05:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Why not give Gore equal time? He was on Oprah (none / 0)

too.

HERE


by iamready on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:08:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oprah Winfrey and Unions {h/t to Digby} (none / 0)

Thanks for this info about Oprah and unions.
Reading it was fundamental to my understanding.
by Woody on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:50:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

It is real week.

Totally pathetic.

And someone is taking marching orders from someone.

And why not put up the pictures of Al Gore kissing Oprah's cheek, since both men went on her show.

This is worst of Jerome, just the worst.  Colors have been shown of this site and this owner.


by iamready on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:59:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

I just wish the attacks would be substantive, rather than all this garbage.  I started reading mydd a few years ago, and used to find important, substantive journalism on election and progressive policy issues.  This kind of work is an embarassment!  It is not hyperbole at all to say that this site has become a mockery of it's former self, and I can't tell you how disappointed I am in Jerome.


by loolool on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:34:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

What an unnerving thought, Jerome!  Thanks for posting.


by pradeep on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:47:34 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

I have to say that when I saw that clip of Jenna Bush on Ellen this week, it kind of creeped me out in how it tried to make Bush seem like just a regular guy dad having to deal with a fun-loving all-American daughter. Abu Ghraib? Iraq? Torture? Warrantless wiretaps? Feh, he's just a regular Joe, and his daughter's so cute!

I couldn't help wondering why someone whom you would assume reviles Bush and opposes everything that he stands for would do this right now, after all that's happened. I mean, if you want to have Jenna on, fine, she recently wrote a book. But why the cutesy phone call to daddy? Do we really need to boost the creep's poll numbers among the segment of the population that can't remember beyond last Tuesday and knows more about Ellen's cats than where Iraq is on the map (and yes, I think that people who watch these shows regularly are illiterate nincompoops with the intellectual maturity of a 12 year old)?

I just can't stand this American tendency to want to make everything "cute" and non-threatening. But what do you expect from someone who cries over a dog, but not stuff that's actually worth crying over, like, um, dead troops and innocent Iraqis. Or perhaps Darfur. Or maybe Katrina. Whatever, I give up.


by kovie on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:49:44 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

Yes, the Jenna Bush footage was creepy.  She kept saying her dad was going to "kill" her.  Very weird for an adult daughter.  When she said it once, I thought, it's just an expression.  But she said it about five times.


Born Questioning
by KathyinBlacksburg on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:59:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

I think that Keith Olbermann remarked on that. Yeah, it was strange. That whole family's got a really weird and unhealthy dynamic. It's like someone committed a horrible crime 150 years ago to make the family fortune and they all know about it and are forced to cover it up, and it explains their secrecy and coldness. It's also almost like they view themselves as royalty, but of the non-nobless oblige type. I.e. screw the commoners--there's a reason they're called commoners. Anyway, the daughters seem a bit more "human" than the rest, but at least Jenna still seems to think that she's 15, which is bizarre. Then again, daddy think's he's 12 (of the drown puppies sort), so it kind of makes sense...


by kovie on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 02:35:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

I had forgotten this, she really did save Bush's campaign. The media swooned and Gore became the guy who couldn't dress himself.

Who knows, maybe she will do the same for Obama.


by souvarine on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:50:48 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

That was before we had Bush, A Million Little Pieces and Beloved.  Plus it was eight years ago.  She had better ratings.  I doubt it will have much impact.


formerly bookgirl
by masslib1 on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:03:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Though I don't buy that she influenced (2.00 / 2)

people to vote for Bush anyway. Can't blame Oprah for Bush.


formerly bookgirl
by masslib1 on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:08:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

EXACTLY (2.00 / 2)

I was inking he exac same thing earlier today.

I remember when Bush went on with Letterman and Dave just GRILLED him - bu when he went on with Oprah - it was all just kiss-kiss!

And what about by 2004 - when we knew what a disaster he was by then - was she offering her mansion for a fundraiser or her fame for a crutch to any other Dem?

Noooooo!


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:52:09 AM EST

whaty is that I smell?? (none / 0)

sniff..sniff..


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:10:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: whaty is that I smell?? (2.00 / 1)

he's so panicked, it's affected his spelling.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:43:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

whaty is that I smell?? (none / 0)

CONTEMPT

your getting just a whiff of the perfume of my contempt.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:24:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: whaty is that I smell?? (2.00 / 1)

Actually it was bullshit. And it stinks!


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:42:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: whaty is that I smell?? (none / 0)

20 points down...less than a month to go...now who is it thats desperate again?


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:42:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: whaty is that I smell?? (none / 0)

I'll talk to you in a month. ;-)


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:08:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

Well obviously any implication that Oprah helped Bush to win other than to do her job as a daytime talkshow host (asking famous people softball questions and crying on air from time to time) is silly.

I do think it begs the question of what Oprah Winfrey has to add to the political discourse. I haven't heard her make any stances on where this country should be going nor have I any idea what specific policy Obama is proposing that she endorses over the other candidates.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:13:11 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

I agree. She isn't going to do that on her show, though.

I am hoping that she'll admit she was wrong about the war. I remember that time all too well.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:19:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 7)

Wow, three anti-Obama posts on the front page....Record?


by Jim Engler on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:19:35 AM EST

no (2.00 / 1)


More like: the beginning of the End.
by killjoy on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:17:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

next, jerome is going to critique obama's kindergarten and 3rd grade essay.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:18:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

oh look! (none / 0)

the latest mantra

of the most dumb!


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:35:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: oh look! (none / 0)

pity hillary made y'all vulnerable to it.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:54:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 4)

is this the same jerome from 2003? i don't even know this reincarnation.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:22:49 AM EST

amen (1.75 / 4)

some asshole stole his user id!


by loolool on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:46:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: amen (none / 0)

rofl


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:55:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

Is this comment coming from a Hilbot. One has to stoop pretty low to post this kind of slur!


by waldo on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:28:11 AM EST

new kind of politics? (none / 0)

attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:39:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

This is ridiculous. As ridiculous as headlines that read "Edwards supporters bash Oprah". Not true. We have reduced ourselves to trying to appeal to the lowest common denominator and most of the time we would like to think it's the Republicans, but we're trying to pass it on our own. But let's face it, most Democrats including elite bloggers aren't as smart as they would like to think. Let's keep these idiotic tactics at bay until the general and let's get back to policy. Mmmm?

Mary Stylianopoulos
Melbourne, Australia


by 12345 on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:29:40 AM EST

We Get That You Don't Like Obama (2.00 / 4)

But what about substantive issues?  What about building up the Democratic Party?  What about correcting the media?  What about the fundamental goal of the progressive blogosphere, to reshape America into a better, more progressive nation?  What happened to all those noble goals?


by msrpotus on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:32:30 AM EST

how bout prevetng charlaaton hype peddler (1.00 / 1)

and his sycophants from taking over our party!

go jerome!


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:28:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

suuuuuure, it was all oprah's fault. do you know how ridiculous you sound?

The establishment media went gaga after Oprah embraced Bush.

they were gaga over bush even before that. they were oohing and ahing how bush picked cheney.

what about all the favorable things bill clinton and his crew (like leon panetta) had to say about bush after he was anointed president? what about the coverage the clintons gave bush over the war? you hold them responsible for that?  


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:43:51 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 1)

No, he's right. There was a substantive change in media coverage and polling results after Bush went on Oprah. I remember it distinctly and remember being really pissed at Oprah because of it. She made Bush "a sweet man" blah blah. It was disgusting. Of course, Gore won anyway, and there was the whole Florida thing, so you can't blame Oprah for Bush being president, but it is annoying the role she has played in the past.


by adamterando on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:26:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

What the hell? (2.00 / 6)

I'm an Edwards man, but this is just absurd.


by meekermariner on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:51:31 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

There's no doubt that the Oprah appearance helped Bush recover in 2000. The New Republic even used the kissing picture on its cover with the phrase "How George Got His Groove Back" or something like that.

Having said that, I wouldn't read too much into it--I remember she had Gore on as well. In particular, I wouldn't take this to mean any similarity between Bush and Obama.


by OrangeFur on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:53:44 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

There could be no surer confirmation that Obama's traded places with the leader in his marathon run for gold than the sudden negative attention attracted by every aspect of his campaign.  At this point I don't think it has much impact, I doubt these narratives will percolate through to the electorate in time to have any influence on the outcome in Iowa, at least.  And after Iowa?  Well, that's when it gets interesting...


by Shaun Appleby on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:56:04 AM EST

the negative attenton will have no impact (none / 0)

negativity only gains traction when the character or authenticity  of the candidate in question is already questionable. With Clinton the criticism stuck because people were already inclined to not believe anything she says.

With Obama the negativity doesn't stick, in fact it only helps to power his movement; because with Obama people are inclined to believe him and give him the benefit of the doubt.  Obama's authenticity - generally speaking - cannot be questioned (granted all politicians do have at least a little dirt)

I'm sure you already knew this. Just thought I'd mention it though


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:19:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the negative attenton will have no impact (2.00 / 4)

I agree completely.  She threw the pin and hung on to the grenade, and I think that it is dawning on Hillary's campaign now too.  They have believed their own narratives too much for too long.  Their whole offensive seems to have stalled in a flurry of bad press and polling.  Shucks.  Now it will be damage control, hagiography and smokescreen 'till Christmas.  If they do have a stink bomb they will throw it around Boxing Day, but I'm guessing they don't.

The real story of the last two weeks seems the almost total failure of the Hillary campaign's strategy and their tactical fumbling of most of the stories she's gotten herself tangled up in lately.  Bill vs Iraq, Kindergate, the madrassa emails, the Speech of the Long Knives.  Whew.  And she had Gennifer Flowers pipe up in support and the Hsu thing resurface just for lagniappe.  Wolfson admitted a mistake in public.  It's been a hell of a fortnight.

She expected her character attacks on Obama to work?  With her negatives and polling on trust?  What could they be thinking?  It could only have been an attrition attack, accepting damage to inflict it.  I thought her 'team' was supposed to be the flower of the heavy cavalry, irresistible.  

We few, we happy few, we band of Obamaniacs...  

The interesting thing is that Huckabee and, to a lesser extent Romney's dilemma (I think he's blown it) are leaving the Democrats a bit asphyxiated in these crucial weeks.  The Huckabee story will stay with us for awhile, it's what the media has been praying for.


by Shaun Appleby on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:54:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the negative attenton will have no impact (none / 0)

nice summary.

She expected her character attacks on Obama to work?

somebody noted for hillary to resort to this, when she had been the victim all these years of republicans launching character attacks against her...

having born the brunt of it for so long, she should know better than anybody the wrongness of stooping to this level. what do you call the abused who turns around and becomes the abuser?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:37:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Wolfson admitted to a mistake ?? (none / 0)

Really? Which one of their many mistakes did he admit to? I must have missed that one.

And yes, you are oh so right. Frankly I've been a bit perplexed the last few weeks at the tactics of the Clinton campaign. I think I and many others falsely bought into the notion that her team had the best political minds on the planet - "The Clinton Machine"; as a consequence I was stunned at how they committed gaffe after gaffe. But as they say "Perception is reality.

I think Hillary and her campaign underestimated the degree of her toxicity to the democratic electorate. They were how shall I say, caught-up in their own fake bubble of inevitability, a bubble that was helped created by the media, a bubble that has blown up in their faces.

If they are (Hillary's political team) as good as advertised, they'll make a comeback, but only on the merits of Clinton; not by attacking Obama

I still caution that we Obamaniacs remain humble and hungry. Nothing is in the bag yet. Let us not gloat, lest we eat our own crow on January 3rd. This is going to be a fun 27 days.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:56:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wolfson admitted to a mistake ?? (none / 0)

'Adding the childhood homework, Wolfson said yesterday, "was clearly an unwise thing to do."' -NYT

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/06/opinio n/06collins.html?_r=1&oref=slogin


by Benstrader on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:34:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wolfson admitted to a mistake ?? (none / 0)

Wow. I'm shocked he said that.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:45:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

Oprah bullied her audience into accepting right-wing talking points...

Doubt me?

The worst possible issue: Were there WMDs in Iraq?

Watch Oprah bully her audience...ofcourse Bush is right...ofcourse the reports are right THERE ARE WMD IN IRAQ!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoWfYL_GK Rk

She's a fraud and I'm glad Jerome is man enough to step up to this...


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:06:43 AM EST

how right you are... (none / 0)


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:21:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

i remember that clip. she wasn't alone. 70% of the country (or more) bought into the lies.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:37:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 1)

do you hold hillary as accountable, for giving bush coverage on the war, as you do oprah?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:40:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

your on EVERY SIDE of this one arent you  ...70 percent is ok -

but still gotta blame a clinton right?

-------------

25 points down - a month to go -

do i smell desperation in the air?


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:46:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

Yeah, you can smell desperation.  Do your laundry.


by Shaun Appleby on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:39:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

25 poitns down where???


Democrats Against Hillary
by wahoopaul on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 11:29:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Those days leading up the the invasion (2.00 / 2)

of Iraq were horrible. I can remember arguing with my spouse on a daily basis asking why are we rushing to war, begging them to come to a forum that would talk about the history of our dealings in Iraq, getting online and really utilizing it as a research tool and finding out about Project for the New American Century aka neocons....

When Oprah did that show I remember it well( it comes on at 4pm in Boston and the topic had been heavily promoted) and I remember thinking, no balance there and we've( peace movement) lost the women who watch her show and her influence is considerable even though in that instance and some  others over other issues the conclusion can be she acts like an airhead and her judgement is questionable.

If anyone watches her show over the years she really does not seem to have a political philosophy except celebrity, who's got it, how can she attach it to her show and anyone wanting a serious look at a topic would not automatically think of tuning into her show first.

She makes Barbara Walters look brilliant in comparison who at least gives a viewer an idea she has done better research.


by merbex on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:03:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Those days leading up the the invasion (none / 0)

her other political endorsement of note -

Arnold for Governor.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:48:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Those days leading up the the invasion (none / 0)

yes, it is too bad that oprah did not vote against the iraq war..oh wait, she was not in the senate was she? well, who was?

oh, HRC and John Edwards.. surely they will stand up to bushco and save the day,right? oh wait.. HRC voted to invade iraq without even reading the classified NIE and John Edwards co-sponsored the resolution to invade iraq...

Gee, oprah looks better than them anyway.
Obama.. he was out in Federal Plaza warning congress not to let bush take us to war for all the reasons that became sadly true soon thereafter.


by hawkjt on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:55:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

If Oprah is a fraud then your gal is a fraud too, and I have the pictures and youtube videos to prove it.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:04:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Such Subjectivity and Hyperbole (none / 0)

nice try though.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:01:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

Good find (youtube footage).


Born Questioning
by KathyinBlacksburg on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:03:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Now you're going after Oprah too? (2.00 / 2)

lol. Oh well, If she did in fact help Bush with the supposed Oprah-Bounce, then hey I'll take her support for Obama any day.

I'm sure you didn't bother to look for any pictures of Al Gore's appearance on Oprah, that year, did ya?

You're pathetic.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:07:36 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

Also, notice how Markos has gone after every candidate? Clinton, Gravel, Richardson, Biden, Kucinich, Edwards...he was leaning Dodd but since Imus now Dodd is a bigot too...

Fine with me...but notice someone missing from that list?

Obama has such a glass jaw, and so many holes as a candidate...yet Markos wouldn't shutup about Edwards public financing...I don't even like Edwards (as a candidate)

Only Jerome is standing up against the ridiculous Obama surge that is playing right into the hands of the GOP...

I swear, common sense has stopped working with Markos and 99% of the netroots


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:11:13 AM EST

don't worry (none / 0)


It's one last long look at Obama for a lot of voters, before they decide against him.  The irreality and faith-basedness of his campaign, along with all the halftruths and misrepresentations, do grate fairly quickly.
by killjoy on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:24:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: don't worry (2.00 / 0)

speaking of halftruths and misrepresentations:

my favorite is hillary's insistance that her iraq vote didn't authorize bush to wage war.

and bill's rewriting history that he was always against the war was pretty funny.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:28:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You wish..... (none / 0)

Sad to tell you this, but I don't think thats going to happen. I've seen all candidates speak in person this year. There's a good reason why Obama is pulling ahead at the right moment.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:31:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You wish..... (none / 0)

because people are stupid and Democrats don't understand the GOP attack machine?

they already tested the waters in smearing obama with the "madrassa" BS story...and guess what...no sympathy for Obama...the public wanted to hear more, and didn't punish Fox News

it's going to be 100x that and we're going to be sitting here like when Kerry was swift boated going "WTF!?!?!? How can you people believe this shit?"

It was Kerry's election to lose...and people will say "This is Obama's to lose"...and he'll fucking lose it...


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:36:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You wish..... (none / 0)

it was kerry's to lose. kerry didn't fight for it.

obama isn't kerry.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:43:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Thank You (none / 0)

jeez. some of these folks take the pale...


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:49:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

And as for your assertion that the Public wanted (none / 0)

to hear more and that no one fought back?

Well just to debunk what you just said, here are some links for you. Next time do some research before you open your mouth.

And oh yeah, watch the both video's to the end.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5Hm_W783 Po

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouKJixL-- ms


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:54:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

sc (none / 0)

yawn

so the beard did a report at 540 ET on CNN...on his highly rated program end sarcasm

BTW, do you really think foxattacks is full of moderate swing voters who are deciding between the GOP and Dems, and go there for information?

Seriously, you've just proven again how unprepared you are for 2008

i can't believe these Obama idiots are going to make sure a Republican gets the White House...un-fucking-believeable


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 05:43:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

in case you didn't notice, you've moved the goalposts from your previous argument.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 05:59:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

the public wanted to hear more, but fox news had no more smears for the day

and "fought back"

CNN doing a story in the afternoon and a website posting a video is not "fighting back"

he is a big pansy, and he'll get slapped silly...he is possibly the most cowardly politician I have ever seen


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:14:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

the public wanted to hear more lies? they wanted to hear more obviously fraudulent muslim swiftboating that the hillary campaign has been engaging in? you wish.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:33:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

yeah, hillary engineered fox news to do the madrassa story months ago...

anyway, back in reality, yeah, the public did want to hear "more lies"

people like negative ads, even if they are completely unfair


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:04:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

 hillary's iowa county coordinator must have resigned because she wanted to spend more time with the family.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:46:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

people like negative ads, even if they are completely unfair

you mean hillary campaign and her supporters like unfair negative ads.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:48:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

he is possibly the most cowardly politician I have ever seen

yeah, a black man battling to be the nominee, that's sheer cowardice.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:34:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (2.00 / 1)

from his ultra-safe senate seat...real courage

what dangers await him...a tough interview?

You're right, he's MLK2...who knows what police will beat him up or what nutjob will try to assasinate him for being black

rollseyes


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:02:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: sc (none / 0)

that wasn't what i meant at all.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:48:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You wish..... (none / 0)

you are totally discounting a distinguished list of people who support Obama. We can't all be wrong.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:59:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

20- points behind (none / 0)

in almost all national polls

is NOT "pulling ahead"

you people must stop watching so much hardball!


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:51:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You wish..... (none / 0)


I say: Howard Dean redux.
by killjoy on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:16:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

a commment from ezra kleins blog (none / 0)

about Obama attacking Krugman

This, and Obama's apparent surge generally, is very, very troubling. It does not bode well for us at all, as Obama is the candidate most likely to give away an election that is ours to lose.

Democrats need to get really serious about this race really fast. People are always complaining about how "early" it is, but we're barely a month out from a handful of actual votes that will probably decide who carries the Democratic banner in 2008. There is very good reason to wonder whether Obama is ready for prime time, but we're on the verge of putting him there without even considering this question.

If Obama wasn't in the race, I think we'd see a more serious campaign. Clinton and Edwards have reasonably distinct ideological perspectives, and each would bring different electoral strengths to the ticket. It would be nice to have a forceful but rational debate over the future of the party and the different paths they represent.

But Obama is a sideshow, a candidate whose celebrity is his only rationale. It is very fitting that Oprah is campaigning for him. Obama's supporters represent a disturbing cult of personality that I do not see anywhere else (except Ron Paul). They seem to think that his very existence is somehow miraculous and that his election would be "transformative" in some ineffable, metaphysical way. Andy Sullivan's argument, essentially, which should really tell you something.

Posted by: Jason C.



Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:01:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hahahahaha. BULLSHIT!! (2.00 / 1)

Markos CLOBBERED Obama after the whole Donnie McClurkin affair. Markos said Obama's campaign was DONE! in fact he his exact words were Obama "has imploded". I'll go find some links and paste them here for you

Take of your blinders and be more objective in your criticism's


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:25:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hahahahaha. BULLSHIT!! (none / 0)

That was one incident where OTHER DKos posters were piling on and Markos gave a lil "me too"

Kos himself came out by his lonesome against Edwards and Clinton hardcore, and the rest of the candidates he has brushed aside

I'm not saying he's some pro-Obama maniac, I'm saying he's not thinking clearly

i understand, he just had a kid, but he should post less often or something...rather than leave it to Jerome to point out the glaring problems when a particular candidate surges


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:32:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hahahahaha. BULLSHIT!! (2.00 / 0)

for all the hillary supporters dumping on obama for mcclurkin, i had forgotten hillary's support for defense of marriage act, which barred recognition of gay marriage. her and her husband had more adverse impact against gays by virtue of policy. that's worse than some guy speaking at a rally.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:33:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Lies once again spouted by jello (2.00 / 1)

She's for repealing section 3 of DOMA which proscribes as federal law that marriage is between a man and a woman. The other parts have no bearing on the federal government's jurisdiction on gay issues,  only saying that one state does not have to respect the laws of another. It's a detailed and thorough position of which many of us in the community are fully aware. Nice try.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:02:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lies once again spouted by jello (none / 0)

for the clintons to sit on their high horse and try to lecture to anybody on the nature of marriage, defining what is acceptable and what is not - is the height of hypocrisy.

bill was originally sponsored by republican congressman bob barr. all doma did was add fuel to the culture wars. the clintons came out on the wrong side of it. again.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:19:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lies once again spouted by jello (2.00 / 1)

Your bs flows like magma. No one is lecturing anybody on the nature of marriage. There is a lot of homophobia still in this country and I'm convinced that if DOMA wasn't there, we'd have had an anti-gay constitutional amendment by now. Your distortions of reality with respect to how DOMA came about and passed are very unbecoming.

Meanwhile, she will work to remove Section 3 and then we'll see where it goes. She has attended gay pride events for nearly a decade (where Obama to my knowledge has not); she has numerous close, personal friends at HRC and Emily's List because of her active role in defeating George Bush's gay marriage amendment; by most accounts, she has earned the trust of the majority LGBT voters; and she in no way talked down to the panel at the Logo forum the way Obama did. Frankly, you have no ground upon which to dredge up these charges.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:41:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lies once again spouted by jello (none / 0)

she's such an LGBT advocate. that's why it took days for hillary to finally refute general pace's assertion that "homosexuality is immoral."


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:03:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lies once again spouted by jello (none / 0)

Um, no. She was already asked about this at the Logo forum. She adamantly criticized DADT at her first opportunity to respond to Pace's remarks, and then at the request of her friends in the community she clarified that she thought he was completely wrong to say those things. Frankly, I don't think you're very credible here when it's Hillary Clinton who's done more for the gay community than Barack Obama has even thought of doing.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:43:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

is it acceptable to say (none / 0)

SHUT THE FUCK UP?

oh. its not, then nevermind..


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:04:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: is it acceptable to say (none / 0)

poor little peewee, throwing another temper tantrum.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:17:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: is it acceptable to say (none / 0)

no just insulting the nitwit naderite.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:21:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

gays defending doma (none / 0)

don't that beat all. boy, she got you spun.

obama:
I support the full and unqualified repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. While some say we should repeal only part of the law, I believe we should get rid of that statute altogether. Federal law should not discriminate in any way against gay and lesbian couples.

http://citizenchris.typepad.com/citizenc hris/2007/11/the-obama-hilla.html


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:08:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: gays defending doma (none / 0)

oh no, don't let facts get in the way of the truth. ;-)


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:50:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: gays defending doma (none / 0)

Oh wow, what a strident position. He supports repealing Section 1 which names the legislation the Defense of Marriage Act.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:45:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lies once again spouted by jello (none / 0)

She's for repealing section 3 of DOMA which proscribes as federal law that marriage is between a man and a woman. The other parts have no bearing on the federal government's jurisdiction on gay issues,  only saying that one state does not have to respect the laws of another.

from lane hudson:

The commerce clause of the United States Constitution makes it clear that each of the States shall respect the laws of other States. Accordingly, it wouldn't be a stretch for her to advocate repealing that provision of DOMA.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lane-hudso n/hillarys-doma-dilemma_b_59614.html


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:12:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lies once again spouted by jello (none / 0)

I have serious doubts about whether we can force the states to recognize gay unions in other states. Obama likes to mention he taught constitutional law in the past.... I think he should know a lot better.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:47:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

glass jaw? who was desperate enough to dig up whose kindergarten record?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:26:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

an oldie but a goodie... (none / 0)

I'm sane and the world around me is mad.


Our Moment Is Now
by mboehm on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:31:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

ridiculous Obama surge that is playing right into the hands of the GOP...

one can just as easily argue that nominating hillary is playing right into the hands of the GOP.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:52:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 1)

if anyone thinks the Clinton team is going to be cake for the GOP in 2008...

These are the same people who think Clinton's general election team has proven ineffective for handling Obama

They don't understand politics at all...it's really annoying


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 05:49:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (2.00 / 0)

then she doesn't deserve to be in the general. You my friend are not a soothsayer. Obama can and will win in the general election.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:13:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (none / 0)

yeah, Kerry was the best possible choice...our democratic primary process is flawless


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:16:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (none / 0)

the clintons engineered for kerry to become the nominee, by undermining howard dean. go blame them.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:21:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (none / 0)

did they hatch that plot before or after they murdered vince foster?

and didn't you see that email of all that other people hillary killed....WITH HER OWN BARE HANDS!


by thorgrim on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:05:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (2.00 / 1)

rightwing unsubstantiated smears don't compare to actual admissions.

wes clark himself admitted the clintons recruited him to act as spoiler. paul begala was caught by reporters bragging about targeting dean. nyt reported clinton staffer worked with sharpton to play the race card against dean. but you go ahead and deny reality.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 07:59:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Ill give you $1000 if you can prove this (none / 0)

wes clark himself admitted the clintons recruited him to act as spoiler. paul begala was caught by reporters bragging about targeting dean. nyt reported clinton staffer worked with sharpton to play the race card against dean.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:36:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ill give you $1000 if you can prove this (none / 0)

i don't need nor want your money, but i'll go ahead and elaborate on source:

- wes clark admitted this on charlie rose, after he closed down his campaign last primary season.

- paul begala's comment was reported in nation magazine, by john nichols, if memory serves.

- the story about the clinton staffer working in concert with al sharpton, i've already noted was reported in new york times, as well as the village voice. this noteworthy alliance was made even more memorable by the addition of rightwing operative, roger stone, added to the mix.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.ht ml?res=9D04E3DC1638F936A15752C0A9629C8B6 3

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0405,ba rrett,50745,1.html


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:17:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (none / 0)

if you support undermining the democratic process, as was done in the 'o4 primaries, then hillary is your girl.

nice to see who the fascists in the room are.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 09:21:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (none / 0)

Exactly. If Clinton can't handle Obama, how will she handle the vast right wing conspiracy that's out to get her?

Her team is losing. Why? A combination of bad advice and reality. She was living in the fantasy world of believing that she was the most electable and her political machine was absolutely invincible. At least that was the impression I got here.

I would like to see the same passion in HWC that I see in her supporters here. Our MyDD Clinton team should be just as proud to be hilbots as we are to be obamaniacs (they are proud of their support of HRC.)  


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:58:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If Clinton can't beat Obama in the primaries (none / 0)

oops, HRC. Bowiegeek is sadly correct.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:59:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

I am always skeptical when Conservatives like Andrew Sullivan get on a candidate's bandwagon, as he did with Obama.


Born Questioning
by KathyinBlacksburg on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:15:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

Thank you Jerome. I can always count on you to put things in perspective. I just hope the early Primary states aren't as stupid as we were back in 2000.  I love MyDD.


by lonnette33 on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:17:46 AM EST

after the turn (none / 0)

after SC,Independents cant vote in dem primaries, and she will sweep through and get the delegate count.

these folks and team obama think ha if they win the media battles - they win the war -

thats NOT how it works.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:10:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Very Clear At Time Oprah favored Bush over Gore (2.00 / 1)

and she bumped him up in the polls and gave him significant momentum ( it is a joke when she says she has never endorsed a political candidate before ) glad you all still remember your American collective culture and how it effects political outcomes;


by dearreader on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:25:31 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 1)

I am shocked at the vitriol targeted at Obama.

Jerome, who's paying you?  The anti-Obama bias that is coming through in your posts is so strong that it makes me doubt your authenticity.  

You are attacking Oprah for being a softball host in 2000 with Bush?  

You are throwing out poll results that are heavily favored for Obama because they include Independents?

Obama is the real deal and has consistently been able to respond to attacks quickly and effectively.  Those Repubs that have already launched attacks his way have been subjected to withering responses and the attacks stopped.  

Hillary just experienced the same thing when she went into attack mode and I am sure Obama is going to end up with a bump in the polls directly following the week of Hillary Attacks.

He is ready for the main election, and he is most likely to win by big margins.


by jbsloan on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 06:28:35 AM EST

slime - slander and atttack (none / 0)

the obama way


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:39:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: slime - slander and atttack (none / 0)

whose iowa campaign coordinator was forced to resign?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:46:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome's head is exploding (2.00 / 3)

Wow , the guy has gone nuts on us.


by Prodigy on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:39:19 AM EST

Re: Jerome's head is exploding (none / 0)

But Obama is a sideshow, a candidate whose celebrity is his only rationale. It is very fitting that Oprah is campaigning for him. Obama's supporters represent a disturbing cult of personality that I do not see anywhere else (except Ron Paul). They seem to think that his very existence is somehow miraculous and that his election would be "transformative" in some ineffable, metaphysical way. Andy Sullivan's argument, essentially, which should really tell you something.

Posted by: Jason C.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:17:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome's head is exploding (none / 0)

Is that the jason C..? maybe Jason Christ?

Jason is who,exactly?  

I love how an anonymous poster becomes an authority figure to be much -quoted by HRC supporters...

or is he Jason Clinton.?

This is funny.


by hawkjt on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:00:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

wisdom is (none / 0)

wherever you find it.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:35:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

To think that I once respected you, Jerome (2.00 / 2)

You have lost or are losing the respect you once had among those of us in the netroots. I guess you don't care.


by casperr on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:43:13 AM EST

Re: To think that I once respected you, Jerome (2.00 / 1)

speak for yourself, please. You don't speak for me.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:53:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: To think that I once respected you, Jerome (2.00 / 1)

Jerome is only respected by the Clinton people.


by Prodigy on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:13:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: To think that I once respected you, Jerome (none / 0)

Well, then I'm the exception. Why are you here? If I thought that, I'd already be gone.

Attack the (lack of) substance, not the author. Oprah was part of the pro war media, although I don't agree with the Bush stuff, for one minute.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:35:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: To think that I once respected you, Jerome (none / 0)

new kind of politics?

attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack
attackattackattackattackattackattackatta ckattack


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:23:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

Wow i go to bed and somehow Jerome got even worse over night.


What would LBJ do?
by Socks The Cat on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:48:04 AM EST

I thought I had stumbled in (2.00 / 1)

on a Derek Larson diary.


Dare to be free.
by misscee on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:49:41 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

..and thanks to John Kerry, John Edwards, Ralph Nader, Bill Clinton, Florida, the electoral college, the Supreme Court, the MSM.......

You're really reaching, Jerome. Would this diary appeared if Oprah was campaigning for Kucinich or Clinton or Edwards?


by royce on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:11:54 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 1)

Of course not. Obama and everyone related to Obama must be torn down for reasons only Jerome knows. But with there being much real dirt on Obama, he has to really, really reach.

Watch for tomorrow' high-profile expose on Malia Obama's troubles in the 4th grade!


by Kal on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:22:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You're Right Jerome, But It's Much Worse... (2.00 / 6)

I appreciate your posting the photo, though it makes me cringe.  The truth is I have never forgotten that moment on Oprah.  Despite her assertion that she historically stayed out of partisan politics, Oprah has indeed meddled with an uneven hand in national politics.  The results have been disastrous for our side of the aisle.  It is her right, of course, to say or do what she wishes.  But claiming to be nonpartisan wasn't exactly true.  

1) In the late 1990s, she led the nation in a prayer and chest beating over the freshly dumped (onto the internet) Starr report.  Millions of viewers instantly turned on Clinton before the complete facts were even known.  I found it ironic that she tried to become a national arbiter for the marriage of BC.  (Note: I am not a Hillary supporter.)

2) As the photo indicates, there was the lopsided handling of the Gore/ Bush visits.  It was clear whom she favored (not Gore).  I saw the show and thought at the time, "there goes the election."

3) She hosted Judith Miller and her manipulative propaganda.  Miller's propaganda tome, Germs, was designed to scare people into surrendering their rights.  Miller's writings drummed up fear of terrorism, including WMD (that weren't there), and facilitated support for the Bush wars.  She tried to make Americans believe there was germ warfare ready to take out a neighborhood near each, or any, of us.  Her sources included those deep inside the Bush administration, and dubious "sources" proffered up by the Office of Special Plans, and Iraq war architect, Richard Pearle.  (Richard Pearle is a friend of Judith's).  See the new Craig Unger book, The Fall of the House of Bush for more on this.  The Miller visit was likely good for millions of viewers being willing to hand over their rights because of the "war on terror." Ironically, by her writings, Miller was terrorizing Americans.

4)Oprah also tried to play non-partisan in the presidential election of 2004.  She hosted Condi Rice who spun her false tales of WMD.  Oprah was a-ga-ga.

5)And then Oprah did the really unforgivable.  A new California resident, she aided and abetted the coup d'etat of California Governor Gray Davis.  Just days before the recall election Oprah had "her good friend" Maria Shriever and Arnold on the show to treat viewers to an hour long feast of how "great a guy" (and supposedly hubby) Arnold was/is. It was a real love fest.  Good for millions of votes.  And Gray Davis went down to a recall for doing nothing wrong.  It's no secret that Enron and other comapnies exploited the newly regulated Calif back then.  Records show that Arnold was actually present at one or more meetings with Ken Lay (Enron CEO)and other energy companies.  This was BEFORE the contrived/manipulated "energy crisis" that was designed to exploit rate payers of Calif and lead to the recall of Davis.  So, Arnold was involved in some way the sordid mess.  And then he tried to ride "to the rescue" of Californians.  It was really a corporate/Republican take down of Gray Davis and a DeLay takeover of another Blue state.  Davis's worst "crime" was that he wasn't "likable."  

Some added motives for the take down of Davis go much deeper.  In order to get Republican voter purge systems in place, the Bush machine needed a GOP gov.  A little over a year ago, following a huge Democratic voter registration drive, such a system purged half of all new voters who had registered that in Calif.  It seems if the system has errors in the data base and the registrant's name doesn't line up perfectly (even if the data base is wrong), the voter gets purged.  Also many were purged because of input errors.  (Refer to Greg Palast's book, Armed Madhouse, revised paperback edition, for more on this).

I must add that Oprah does incredible of good.  Along with her other good works, her Katrina Project through her angel network is inspired.  Oprah's charities take no overhead.  She hels literally thousands.  She pays for hundreds to attend college and other schools.  But that's a story in itself.

It is when she mingles politics with entertainment that things get murkier. Let me also say that while I do not support Obama, I did at first.  However, I have had it with his ageist, intergenerational warfare against boomers.  As Ellen Goodman noted this week.  The reason there are still 60s related conflicts is that the ISSUES haven't been resolved.  Pretending they have won't fix the many problems made worse by this administration.  

I am also tired of his embracing GOP talking points about domestic issues, such as health care, social security and other matters.

But, where Oprah is concerned, I do think she has a right to support someone.  I don't mind that she is working for someone other than my choice.  At least it's for a Dem, for a change.  But, Jerome, I share your belief that she was one of the factors in getting GWB selected.


Born Questioning
by KathyinBlacksburg on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 09:33:56 AM EST

Re: You're Right Jerome, But It's Much Worse... (none / 0)

arnold did go on oprah, where he came off like a buffon. she gave him enough rope to hang himself with. that was where he exclaimed working out was better than sex, using a slang term to describe ejaculation. i doubt that won him over a lot of women voters. if media hadn't coddled him, that statement, and his story of molesting women, should have been a career ender in politics.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:06:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're Right Jerome, But It's Much Worse... (none / 0)

When the MSM collectively decided to grant Arnold a free pass for saying "I admire Hitler" I knew the fix was in.  If there is any sentence in the English language that ought to instantly sink a politician's career, that should be it.


by Will Graham on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:29:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're Right Jerome, But It's Much Worse... (none / 0)

Unfortunatley, this is a country where if given enough rope,apolitiican will hang themsleves, but the rope comes with a lengthy stay of execution, thanks to our head-up-the tookus electorate.


by spirowasright on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:16:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're Right Jerome, But It's Much Worse... (none / 0)

I should have said in a recently de-regulated California.


Born Questioning
by KathyinBlacksburg on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:12:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

clear and good (none / 0)

I expect attacks from the cultists any moment.


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:28:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 4)

The sudden and vicious Obama bashing is making me sick. I took a break the last time it happened around these parts and will do that again this time.

The only comfort I have is that it must mean he is getting close to VICTORY.  Why else spew such hate?

Have a great Obama - Oprah weekend y'all! I think we may just win this thing!!!


by aiko on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:43:20 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 0)

Righto! Win we will! Hear! Hear! The coalescing of the "Obama Nation"..........

Eat yer heart out Jerome.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:04:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

20 points behind in polling (1.00 / 1)

with a month to go doesnt sound like the victory road to me.

but he IS winning on Hardball with chris matthews, gotta give you that!


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

Oprah is Al Gore's favorite serial.


by Namtrix on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 10:59:58 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

It is embarassing to come to this site and see this posted.


Slash and burn politics baby! Say anything do anything lie cheat steal railroad the opposition into submission: CLINTON FORMULA FOR 2008.
by crackityjones on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:09:54 AM EST

is embarrasing to see so called democrats (none / 0)

buying into the "inauthenticy of hype".

though we were the "reality based" party?


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:34:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 3)

Sad Jerome just sad, you have been left out of the party and are throwing a temper tantrum.


Obama! because 51% isn't enough!
by nevadadem on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:10:22 AM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (1.00 / 1)

You and your blind allegiance to a Republican plant is appalling.  Log off and join Red State, for that is where you belong.  You are not even a Democrat.


by truthteller2007 on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:22:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

You are not even a Democrat.

Yes, because a real Democrat should support a candidate who voted for Bush's war and strongly supported it for years right?


by Will Graham on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:25:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (1.00 / 1)

And what was a Senatior in a state that was attacked supposed to do? Plant flowers in a Ntional Guardsman's rifle?

When the country stations stop playing "Have you Forgotten?", I'll start jumping the Dems on the war.


by spirowasright on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:12:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

And that is your only qualification for President?  Hillary never authorized the war; she voted for increased diplomacy.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:51:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

This is probably one of the best posts yet.  Keep posting more.  Expose them for what they are.


by truthteller2007 on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:21:13 AM EST

damn straight! (none / 0)


Offend the Media - Vote for Hillary!
by Seymour Glass on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:38:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

ooooooh I feel naked.


by rapcetera on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:53:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wow (2.00 / 1)

First Jerome's weird post suggesting Obama wasn't electable because he couldn't beat Huckabee in his home state of Arkansas, now this?

I really don't get it. Did Obama somehow personally offend Jerome? I don't see any other reason to explain some of these petty attacks.


by moreaxe on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 11:47:16 AM EST

Re: Wow (none / 0)

Did Obama somehow personally offend Jerome?

Seems to me he was offended over the Obama campaign's attack on Paul Krugman.


While I could sit in church and pray all I want, I wouldn't be fulfilling God's will unless I went out and did the Lord's work ~ Barack Obama
by bowiegeek on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 05:04:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 2)

It has to be personal.. why else would he undercut any cred he might have by making these ludicrous arguments?

It is like when matthews was not hired by the clinton admin for press secretary.. he has had a grudge ever since.. Jerome =Tweety..


by hawkjt on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:04:41 PM EST

Wesley Clark (2.00 / 2)

Didn't Gen. Wes Clark--who's now firmly in Hillary's camp--have some pretty nice things to say about President Bush a few years ago?  I don't suppose we'll be hearing about that anytime soon right?

You can play this game with any of the candidates...


by Will Graham on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 12:22:04 PM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

And let's not forget Oprah hugging Ahnold during the recall.


by spirowasright on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:08:16 PM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (2.00 / 1)

Even if Oprah DID help Bush via negligence, hell, even if she was a dyed-in-the-wool conservative, what's wrong with her switching over to support a progressive Democrat? Doesn't that HELP us?


by Colbycakes on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:24:10 PM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

not sure if anyone has already posted a link to this article from Sept. 25, 2000 (there are so many comments here) ....

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/2000 /10/02/oprah.html

"George W. Bush just had his first good week since the convention, and there's only one explanation: Oprah ..."


by silver spring on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:26:50 PM EST

Re: Thanks for the Bush Oprah Winfrey (none / 0)

We'll see how Oprah does- it's sort of a toss-up.  Yes, she can make a book a bestseller and her ratings are huge but I also remember the movie she made, 'Beloved,' she dedicated the entire week on her show before it opened to promote it- yet, when it opened, it was a huge bomb- she could not even persuade a big audience of African-Americans to see it- and she had even fooled herself into thinking she was going to win the 'Oscar.'  So Oprah is not always right- people say it has taken her years to get over the failure of that movie.


by reasonwarrior on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 01:29:00 PM EST

What? No mention of the forums Oprah gave (2.00 / 2)

... Hillary (December `06) and Bill (September `07)?

Hack.


by Bob Johnson on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:35:49 PM EST

Re: What? No mention of the forums Oprah gave (none / 0)

No mention of the fact that you are distorting the words of Taylor Marsh?

Pig.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 08:01:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama is anti-gay! (1.00 / 1)

Don't forget that Obama loves the bigoted anti gay minister Donnie McClurkin!  I hope Oprah and Obama discuss their love for ex-gay minister Donnie McClurkin...Remember that fiasco?  Obama not only didn't remove McClurkin from his concert he had him emcee!!! Oprah introduced McClurkin to Obama...I wonder if Oprah believes in the "ex-gay movement"?  I'll never vote for Obama...NEVER...he showed exactly the kind of person he is by catering to the anti-gay crowd.


by OKLABUBBA on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 02:48:55 PM EST

Re: Obama is anti-gay! (2.00 / 1)

Hmmm...

Obama is anti-gay???

Then why was Jill Sobule (of "I Kissed a Girl" fame) performing at an Obama rally I attended at the Riviera Theatre in Chicago this past Friday night?

If Donnie McClurkin performing at an Obama rally means that Obama is himself anti-gay, then by the same logic there must be only one logical conclusion to Jill Sobule performing at an Obama rally...

Obama is gay!

Oh, and Seymour:

I love how you keep referring to Obama being "20 points down with a month to go."  Keep spinnin' those wheels, buddy.  Obama is down 19.6% in the national polls.  In that case you are correct.

But in the polls for the Iowa caucus, which are a month away, Obama is ahead by 2.2% in the RCP average, and by as much as 6% in Newsweek and 7% in the Strategic Research poll (which is admittedly (R), but had the two tied a week ago).

Last time I checked, Super Tuesday was on February 5th, which is in about 2 months, which would be the date most fitting to apply the results of a national poll.

Given that Obama is leading in Iowa, and has reduced HRC's lead in NH and SC to single digits, I'd expect those national numbers to change pretty quickly, especially if Barack gets the win in Iowa.

But that's okay, I won't let the facts get into the way of the same talking points I'm sure you'll spew over and over again in other threads.  


by doschi on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 05:23:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

This diary (2.00 / 2)

is like the netroots version of the Clinton kindergarten attack.


by animated on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:03:54 PM EST

Why not (2.00 / 2)

post something positive about the candidate you support instead?

You know, the one who voted for a war that's resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.

But man, that Oprah...


by animated on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:07:33 PM EST

Hey Jerome... (2.00 / 2)

Maybe you can talk Mark Warner into jumping back into the race. So the paychecks will restart.


by Bob Johnson on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:18:49 PM EST

Re: Hey Jerome... (1.00 / 1)

Bob, that wouldn't be necessary. You yellin' for Obama?


by Jerome Armstrong on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 03:41:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No. (none / 0)

But I'm definitely not for the Queen of the DLC. Is that who you're backing?


by Bob Johnson on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 04:05:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: No. (none / 0)

No, but you are serving as an apologist for someone who refers to a crisis when asked about Social Security.   You are also aiding and abetting the candidacy of someone who refuses to support universal health care.

And no, claiming a Democrat is cannibalizing the Party's platform in the name of shameless ambition is not a racist comment.  That you believe it is reveals how desperate you and other Obama supports are for attention and for legitimacy.  You and your ilk always resort to ad hominem statements that frankly have no currency or import.  

You have no integrity, and you have no respect for those whose opinions may differ.

In fact, you are disgusting.  Indeed, you are a pig.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:56:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes, you truly are unglued. (none / 0)

Um, friend, Obama is not my candidate.

But don't let that stop your lunacy. It's fun to watch.


by Bob Johnson on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 12:41:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome, are you backing Hillary? (2.00 / 2)

* crickets *


by Bob Johnson on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 02:46:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, are you backing Hillary? (none / 0)

Why would he dignify such an allegation with a response?  And is the Chicago Mafia paying you to committ suicide online?  Are they?  Are you, a Chicagoan, performing online work for Obama?  Or are you a desperate blogger who is seeking the attention of someone who will dispose of you when his campaign is finished?

Again, you are shameless, and you are pitiful.  And you have contributed nothing to progressive politics.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 07:59:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wow. You're unglued. (none / 0)

Chicago mafia?

Hilarious.


by Bob Johnson on Mon Dec 10, 2007 at 12:39:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

How low will you go, Jerome? (2.00 / 2)

What happened? You know you're better than this.

Remember, what goes around comes around. Think about that.


by rosebowl on Sat Dec 08, 2007 at 08:42:56 PM EST

Re: How low will you go, Jerome? (none / 0)

I Jerome backing Hillary?

Remember when he railed against the DLC in his book?

I guess he was kidding.


by Bob Johnson on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 02:47:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How low will you go, Jerome? (2.00 / 2)

Is Jerome backing Hillary?

Remember when he railed against the DLC in his book?

I guess he was kidding.


by Bob Johnson on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 02:48:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

My faith in Jerome is restored. (none / 0)


Jerome, the Krugman post actually had a point. For once I actually had to say, that is a fair criticism of Obama from Jerome. I was stunned. Then you went and restored my faith in your irrational Obama-hatred by posting this juvenile guilt-by-association crap.

better luck next universe
by thenew on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 12:02:56 AM EST

Re: My faith in Jerome is restored. (2.00 / 2)

Mine, too.

I remember the glory days when he railed against the DLC.

Hillary isn't DLC, is she?

Heh.


by Bob Johnson on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 02:49:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

she did the same for Ah-nold (none / 0)

when the CA unions had him on the run.  She had him and Maria on the show and boosted his re-election chances.
Thanks Oprah, enjoy your big tax cuts.

ABO... Anybody but Obama. I LIKE the democratic party.

by MollieBradford on Sun Dec 09, 2007 at 02:38:44 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.