Democratic Committees Still Thrashing GOP Opponents in CoH

Remarkably, the campaign finance numbers for the Republican party committees are looking about just as bad as ever, with the Democratic committees continuing to hold better than a 2-to-1 cash-on-hand advantage even when debts and obligations are taken into account. Take a look:

CommitteeNovember ReceiptsNovember DisbursementsNovember Cash-on-HandOctober Debts & Obligations
DSCC (est.)$4,100,000$2,100,000$25,500,000$2,000,000
NRSC (est.)$2,300,000$1,400,000$10,400,000$0
DCCC$4,409,303.36$2,653,811.32$30,674,711.47$1,666,000.00
NRCC$2,705,120.05$2,893,522.14$2,325,414.25$3,350,000
DNC$4,409,303.36$4,883,429.77$2,783,730.34$1,474,125.00
RNC$5,391,668.47$7,360,730.66$15,664,904.75$0
Total
Democrats
$12,918,606.72$9,637,241.09$58,958,441.81$5,140,125.00
Total
Republicans
$10,396,788.52$11,654,252.8$28,390,319$3,350,000.00

A few days back I noted how great a disaster the seemingly competitive (but eventually not terribly competitive) special congressional elections earlier this month, both in Ohio and in Virginia, were for the GOP. In short, the DCCC was able to make a gambit and head faked the NRCC into dumping way more money than it could have afforded into both districts, further deepening the committee's monetary woes. These numbers bear out that assessment, with the NRCC still holding as large a net debt as it has in recent months -- and less than a year out from election day -- and the DCCC continuing to raise more than it spends, amassing over $29 million including debts.

And it's not only the NRCC that has been forced to spend like a drunken sailor as of late. In November, the Democratic committees raised about $2.5 million more than their Republican counterparts while the Republican committees spent $2 million more than their Democratic counterparts. So instead of cutting away at the Democrats' financial advantage the Republicans actually saw themselves losing quite a bit of ground -- more than $4.5 million, in fact.

In short, these are good days for the Democratic campaign committees, with even the DNC coming a net $1.5 million closer to the RNC than it was a month ago. No doubt it would be preferable to see better results coming out of Washington, results that would give voters a more affirmative reason for returning and indeed enlarging the Democratic majorities to Congress rather than just the reactive reason of voting against Republicans (which, it's worth noting, does remain a strong argument). That said, I'd rather be sitting on a net $54 million (or so) than a net $25 million (or so).



Display:


Re: Democratic Committees Still Thrashing GOP Oppo (none / 0)

At this rate the DNC will be net negative come February. Hope for a miracle if Edwards pulls off the nomination.


by souvarine on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 12:38:59 AM EST

Re: Democratic Committees Still Thrashing GOP Oppo (none / 0)

Howard Dean is a disaster for the Democratic Party. Not only is his fundraising an embarrassment, but he had contributed to a major rift with the state parties in Florida and Michigan.

For all intents and purposes, the DNC is broke.


by hwc on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 01:39:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democratic Committees Still Thrashing GOP Oppo (none / 0)

The real shame is the grassroots and netroots keep covering up for Dean by pointing to the extremely successful fundraising of Schumer's Senate Committee and Van Hollen's Congressional Committee.

Meanwhile, the top Democratic candidates and interest groups (including Emily's List, Women's Voices Women's Vote, and the major unions) are relying on independent voter database companies for their targeting and get-out-the-vote lists.


by hwc on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 01:42:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democratic Committees Still Thrashing GOP Oppo (none / 0)

 $2,783,730.34
- $1,474,125.00
  --------------
  $1,309,605.34

I feel sick.


by MNPundit on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 12:40:32 AM EST

Speaking of fundraising (none / 0)

Of course, it's unofficial at this point. But, former DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe told the crowd at the Chicago fundraiser the other night that the Clinton campaign has now raised $120 million this year. If this number is accurate, the Clinton campaign has raised $42 million this quarter. My guess is that this means a huge war chest of general election money. They already had $16 million in general election money at the end of September.


by hwc on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 01:48:03 AM EST

Re: Speaking of fundraising (none / 0)

The candidates are raking it in. And after the convention all the big donors will find their way back to the DNC again. Dean isn't perfect but his given the state parties a lot of confidence back. He might or might not be the the right person during the presidental campaign, but on average he's been a net plus.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 06:22:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Speaking of fundraising (none / 0)

It's hard to argue that Dean is the champion of the state parties when the Democratic Party of Florida is suing Dean and the DNC.


by hwc on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 01:25:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Speaking of fundraising (none / 0)

why? Florida isn't the only state party.

I think a lot of the other state parties that didn't break the rules would approve of deans actions.

And 9 times out of 10 suits on that level have little to do with personal likes or dislikes.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Sun Dec 23, 2007 at 06:48:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democratic Committees (none / 0)

Wait, did the DNC and DCCC really raise the exact same amount in November?


by Nautilator on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 11:38:28 AM EST

Re: Democratic Committees (2.00 / 0)

Hmm, the DNC shows 4,409,303.36 and the DCCC shows 4,115,977.21, so DCCC is wrong here.


by souvarine on Fri Dec 21, 2007 at 11:46:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.