MyDD :: Who's on your side? A Study in Contrasts

Who's on your side? A Study in Contrasts

by DerekLarsson, Wed Dec 19, 2007 at 11:13:36 PM EST

Truth

LIES and the road to Hell

______

More Truth

More Phony Unpresidential Bullshit

Any Questions?
Drive Carefully.

Poll

Votes: 5
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Tags: Dennis Kucinich, John Edwrads, Hillary Clinton, NeoCon, Iraq, PNAC, Dick Cheney, Bush (all tags)

Permalink :: 4 Comments :: Post a Comment

Re: Who's on your side? (2.00 / 1)

God I wish America wasn't so fucked up. I wish a vote for Kucinich could be a good choice, but it seems to me that despite the fact he is 100% correct and the most progressive candidate in the race, my vote would be dismissed and belittled by the corrupt powers that run this rigged game.

At lease with Edwards I believe my vote might actually move change forward. But damn, he does say all the right things, probably why the MSM gives him the McGovern treatment.

Hillary Clinton is not a monster,....as far as I know.. We are all Hussein JUNIOR.. ///.. FEINGOLD/BOXER 2016

by Its Like Herding Cats on Wed Dec 19, 2007 at 11:32:11 PM EST

Re: Who's on your side? (2.00 / 1)

John Edwards has been moving in the right direction (Joe Trippi influence?).
Voting for John Edwards is a credible choice.

The great thing about Kucinich though is, he cannot be bullied, pressured, persuaded with propaganda, or corrupted by anyone in DC into screwing the American people.
He never attended the CFR meetings (Council on Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission meetings, the Bilderberg meetings, the DLC meetings, the AIPAC meetings, the AEI meetings.

He's not part of the elite Club and he never was or will be.

"I'll win when the American people decide they are tired of losing."
-Dennis Kucinich

For a "surge" in Truth: Say NO to NeoCons!!!

by DerekLarsson on Wed Dec 19, 2007 at 11:58:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Who's on your side? (none / 0)

john edwards has attended bilderberg meetings.

I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong

by jello on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 07:42:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Who's on your side? (none / 0)

I had said that Kucinich had not attended them (and would never even want to).

Edwards has (true) in the past, but I'll bet that Elizabeth Edwards is clean, so that's at least a bit better here then the Clintons double credibility gap (and track record of PNAC-agenda appeasement/propaganda ).

For a "surge" in Truth: Say NO to NeoCons!!!

by DerekLarsson on Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 04:46:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.