TarHeel neglected to post a video of the Corporate Democrat whose support for Lieberman is unequivocal. I recommend TarHeel and others watch the following video:
Notice what occurs in the video: Obama dismisses Sharpton's allegation; Obama denies involvement with the article in which Obama supporters personally attacked and taunted Sharpton after Sharpton expressed an unwillingness to endorse Obama; Obama equivocates; Obama then changes the subject in an attempt to deflect Sharpton's criticism.
Obama had to equivocate and prevaricate, for he campaigned for Lieberman, which according to TarHeel's diary qualifies him as a Corporate Democrat. And Tarheel is not the only one to articulate this sentiment: Matt Stoller agrees, and Al Sharpton agrees. Obama is the Corporate Democrat who has abandoned the anti-war African-American constituency for which Sharpton is an unflagging advocate. And Obama, craven as always, had surrogates respond to Sharpton in order to shirk any form of accountability for the aggressive tactics to which he and his campaign resorted once they discovered that Sharpton would not endorse his morally bankrupt candidacy.
Hillary, by the way, supported Ned Lamont. As a result, Hillary is not what TarHeel calls a Corporate Democrat. Just review the evidence:

|
|
|
Permalink :: 14 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.