OH-05: Election Results Thread

Polls are now closed in OH-05. Results will be updated HERE.

Also we may get live reports from HQ where they're watching local TV coverage.

Swing State Project has a handy chart of baseline numbers for how each county performed in 2006 when Robin Weirauch won 43% of the vote.

Update [2007-12-11 19:49:47 by Todd Beeton]:OK, they're taking their sweet time. Anyone care to make some predictions?

<Update [2007-12-11 22:6:52 by Todd Beeton]: Results are trickling, and I do mean trickling in.

With 79.13% precincts reporting:

Latta (R): 56.05%
Weirauch (D): 43.77 %

And by the way, check out this sweet interactive election returns map.

Update [2007-12-11 22:2:52 by Todd Beeton]:The AP has officially called it for Latta. Good effort everyone and thanks to all the volunteers on the ground and of course, Robin. If there's a takeaway, it's that it's going to take outspending us 2 to 1 to keep Democratic challengers to 2006 levels and we all know they just don't have that kind of money. We made them blow a huge wad of cash this time around.



Display:


Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Robin wins 50% to 50%.


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 07:50:51 PM EST

my prediction (none / 0)

i think the race will be around 50-50 breaking for weirauch.  if you've read about latta's last couple days and the gop vibes on this race, youd be expecting them to lose here.  


"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forward." - Soren Kierkegaard
by SixthElement on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 07:51:25 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

So far she is outperforming her 2006 run in Ashland county by 3%. She won 45% in 2006.


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 07:54:54 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

We lose. Hurt by the pathetic congress. Learn the lesson here...


Slash and burn politics baby! Say anything do anything lie cheat steal railroad the opposition into submission: CLINTON FORMULA FOR 2008.
by crackityjones on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:00:27 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

I thought it said 32% but its apparently .32?

I think I must and I hope I will be forgiven- take back my prediction.

thank you very much. good night.


Slash and burn politics baby! Say anything do anything lie cheat steal railroad the opposition into submission: CLINTON FORMULA FOR 2008.
by crackityjones on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:19:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Just think about how bad we will do in 2008 with Hillary Clinton on the ballot.  We need to dump her fast.  


by Toddwell on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:30:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

john green (wi). ok i'll bite what does wi stand for?


by bob reid on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:04:22 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

write in


by thorgrim on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:05:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

write in


by Trowaman on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:05:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

W 50.37%
L  49.11%
by truthteller2007 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:04:55 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Ohio Secretary of State has us down 75 votes to 69 votes.  All we need is 7 more votes.  Yay us!


by hilltard on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:06:52 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

75 votes? That's what I call a low turnout election...


by ConnecticutHack on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:23:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

I know Obama's campaign was helping Robin.  Did any others do that as well?


by Piuma on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:18:00 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

edwards campaign chipped in later that day.  similar request.  virtual phonebank.  


"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forward." - Soren Kierkegaard
by SixthElement on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:19:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Dodd and Edwards both sent e-mails out to supporters (I think to their Ohio lists) as well.


by Todd Beeton on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:19:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

I say we win with 52%.


by Progressive America on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:21:08 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

IT UPDATED FINALLY!  We're up to about 3000 votes.  


"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forward." - Soren Kierkegaard
by SixthElement on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:22:22 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Doing well.

Weirauch is outperforming 2006 performance in Seneca.

46% this time vs. 40% in 2004.

That could get us a victory if numbers stick like this tonight.


by Progressive America on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:23:19 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Robin is up 6% in Seneca from 2006!


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:23:23 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

if results continue to come in this slow then it's gonna be a long night.


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:30:53 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Yeah but that's one sweet interactive election returns map.
by hilltard on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:39:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Now way down with precincts reporting in Ashland -- 38% (compared to 42%+ in 2006) with 3.72% of overall precincts reporting... grrr


by ConnecticutHack on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:33:57 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

uhhh. she's down 7% from 06 in Ashland county.


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:34:19 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

she'll probably loss Ashland anyway since only Strickland was able to carry it with only 49%-48%


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:35:20 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

She must get at least 47% there.  Thats what Sherrod Brown get when he narrowly won the district in 2006.  


by Toddwell on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:37:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

She doesn't need anything. Ashland is a small county. Crawford's numbers don't look good and they're much more important. Wood is still clutch.


by ConnecticutHack on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:44:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Why the slowness?!?! (Ben weeps softly)


bentheben
by bentheben on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:37:58 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

as long as she can get around 45-49% in each county she loses then that would mean a victory for her.


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:38:34 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

ohh...we're down to 45%...


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:41:43 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

if we lose this race then I'm digging a hole and burying my head so i wouldn't have to hear the ridicules we'll get from the GOP.  


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:43:17 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Ridicule?  Ridicule???  WE MADE THE NRCC SPEND 16% OF THEIR TOTAL CASH ON HAND IN ORDER TO EKE OUT A VICTORY IN A DISTRICT THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A GIMME FOR THEM.  Believe me, no matter how this turns out tonight, we really have won.


by JFMDC on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:46:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

we're doing 2% worse in Crawford...damn!!!


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:45:08 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Now matter what happens we got the NRCC to spend more that us in an 10 PVI district for the republicans. No shame in that.


bentheben
by bentheben on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:47:52 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Right. This race wasn't even supposed to be on the map.

Whoa, big update. Weirauch's going to have to do really well in Wood and Huron to pull this off. Nice if she can at least make it a barnburner.


by Wade on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:54:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Welp, i've got (none / 0)

10$ betting that we'll win this race, so we better win!


by KainIIIC on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:52:58 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

i know but i has just hoping on at least one victory tonight and if we can get a real progressive voice from a conservative district then we could do anything  


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:56:36 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Shot, We have a 5% improvement in Sandusky and Seneca, which we need to match in Wood.


by Democraticavenger on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 08:58:10 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

we really can't tell anything yet since only 25% of the votes have reported


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:00:16 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

and several of the counties that have reported are only partially reported


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:01:03 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

County
Number County Total
Voters Voter
Turnout Total
Precincts Precincts
Reporting % Turnout % Precincts
Reporting
17 Crawford 28,684 0 46 20 0.00% 43.48%
63 Paulding 13,119 0 18 10 0.00% 55.56%
74 Seneca 34,075 0 52 42 0.00% 80.77%
26 Fulton 28,282 6,813 35 35 24.09% 100.00%
3 Ashland 8,487 1,061 13 13 12.50% 100.00%
72 Sandusky 40,907 10,464 72 72 25.58% 100.00%
by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:04:45 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

the turnout seems very low and not in our favor. doesn't look like we are going to win this won.


by herndon on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:07:43 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

...win this one.


by herndon on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:08:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

With 33 % (none / 0)

race is likely over, I'm sorry to say.

50.1 % = .45 * .33 + x * .66

x = .535

She needs 53.5 % of the remaining.

That's unlikely.


by dataguy on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:07:46 PM EST

Re: With 33 % (none / 0)

Wood County still not in.

That's by far the most important county for her, the largest and most Democratic. It's off to a rocky start, but it's definitely not over.


by ConnecticutHack on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:08:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

to win she'll have to win Huron Wood and Lucas


by Hillary2008 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:11:42 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

We can call this.


by js noble on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:12:18 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

and several of the counties are only partially reported


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:12:30 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

and wood county has as many voters and 3 of the largest other counties that calculation doesn't work because all the precients don't have the same number of voters


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:17:11 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

of course the calculation is correct.  It has nothing to do with number of voters.  It's just math.


by dataguy on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:33:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

what was the turnout in wood county?


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:18:53 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Probably doesn't matter.  According to ODB

Wood County, the most populous in the district and the most Democratic, has counted about 70% of its precincts and the unofficial results are about 55% for Bob Latta (R) and 45% for Robin Weirauch (D).

Although the counting is not over, this looks very, very bad for Weirauch.

http://www.ohiodailyblog.com/


"Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forward." - Soren Kierkegaard
by SixthElement on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

unfortunately, it doesn't look like we win this ... the final result will be better than 2006 but still likely along the lines of 55R - 45D (unless a miracle happens in Wood or Lucas Co.)

nevertheless, it's still a win for us -- a 10 pt. margin in a district that went for Bush by 22 pts.

in the Massachusetts special, Ogonowski only got 45 % I think, and that district actually wasn't as Democratic as OH-5 is Republican.

AND the Repugs have spent 16% of their House money here !


by silver spring on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:20:57 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Does anyone know how much the d-trip spent?


by js noble on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:24:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

i think we spent a little over half of what the Repugs did (something like 240K vs. Repugs 410K), but we had over 10x as much as they did (over 29 million to Repugs 2.6 mil.), so only approx. 1% of Dem. House money was spent (as opposed to 16% for Repugs !)


by silver spring on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:33:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

So worth it :-)


by js noble on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:35:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wood County Results In (none / 0)

We've lost:

With 67% of precincts in Wood County reporting...

ROBERT E. LATTA     REP     7390     54.62%
ROBIN WEIRAUCH     DEM     6102     45.10%

http://www.co.wood.oh.us/boe/Wood%20Coun ty%20Election%20Results.htm


by ConnecticutHack on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:22:12 PM EST

Re: Wood County Results In (none / 0)

With 100% of precincts reporting,

ROBERT E. LATTA     REP     12487     54.54%
ROBIN WEIRAUCH             DEM     10365     45.27%
Write-in Votes        ---        44      0.19%

It's over.  Sh*t.


Election fraud is treason, nothing less.
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:27:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

yeah what the republicans fail to realize is that that district in massachusetts simply votes for the inc then when there is a no inc it goes back to it's voting pattern


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:22:52 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Sigh.  Even without Wood and Huron county returns in yet, I'd say things look bad.  

According to Sean over at Swing State project, we needed to run even in Sandusky Co. and win Seneca 55 to 45.  They're both at about 46/53.  Unless RW had a huge turnout of base voters in Wood Co., I'd say we're sunk.  <sigh>

At least we made the NRCC spend big on this race.  Even so, that's cold comfort.


Election fraud is treason, nothing less.
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:23:50 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Ohio is a tough nut to crack, I guess. We've come surprisingly close in red districts a number of times (the one with Jean Schmidt, for example), but it's hard to get over the top. Even in the 2006 wave, we only picked up one seat, and that was the one held by the uber-corrupt Bob Ney, who waited until only a few days before the election to officially resign.

At least statewide races are looking better there...


by OrangeFur on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:25:51 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

a 30% turn out in wood co is 32k voters


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:25:56 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Wood Co. turnout was 22896 voters, or ~21%


Election fraud is treason, nothing less.
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:33:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Correction.  22896 voters / 93652 registered = ~24.4% turnout.


Election fraud is treason, nothing less.
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:36:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Having been through this myself, I with to thank Robin and her supporters in Ohio for all they did to make this a race. We need more people like Robin to step up to the plate and work on making every Dem look forward to voting for their candidate instead of voting against someone.


The best sig is no sig.
by Noonan on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:27:39 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

What I can't understand is how badly we lost Wood County. Its now looking like RW will barely improve over last year.


by js noble on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:30:09 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Wood is Latta's base, so don't be too surprised.  Robin still did better than last time in most (though not all) other parts of the dist.

the key thing to remember here is, if we perform this well in other less-Repug. districts in 2008 (10 % Repug margin in this election compared to 22.5% margin for Bush over Kerry) then we will do well -- we lost, but this is still like a 12.5% Dem. improvement over the norm ...

OH-5: 61.0 Bush 38.5 Kerry

looking just at Ohio districts we're targeting (or may target) next year:

OH-1: 50.5 Bush 49.5 Kerry
OH-14: 52.6 Bush 47.1 Kerry
OH-15: 50.3 Bush 49.6 Kerry
OH-16: 53.8 Bush 45.8 Kerry


by silver spring on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:45:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

That explains the Wood vote. Thanks. I was just hoping Robin would improve over last year. I guess incumbency doesn't really confer an advantage for the GOP anymore.

Also, Latta is considered a moderate, right?


by js noble on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:52:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

yes ... a "moderate" Repug. (relative to other Repugs I guess; by my standards kind of like fascist-lite)


by silver spring on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:57:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

looks like final is 57R-43D (almost exactly like 2006) ... still, an 8 or 9 point margin over Kerry's numbers ... such a margin would still make the above-mentioned districts very competitive (OH-16, more on the margin, but we have a very good candidate running there) ... also remember that both Paul Hackett & Vic Wulsin got 48/49% in a district that was several points more Repug than OH-5, so Ohio is still very, very competitive, esp. with the candidates we have running ...


by silver spring on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:30:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

where are you seeing returns for wood county they aren't reported yet by the state


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:31:52 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

http://www.co.wood.oh.us/boe/DEC%2007.ht m


by js noble on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:32:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

the district must be impulsivly republican. They vote republican unless the republicans have done something really horrible


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:35:48 PM EST

very rural (none / 0)

biggest city is about 50 K.  farms, small cities.

Tailor-made for repukeliscum - last apportionment in 2000 under full repukeliscum direction.


by dataguy on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:39:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Cold comfort? (none / 0)

Just for some recent historical context, I think that its important for us to remember that, in the last seven years, there have been a sum total of 25 special elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 3 of which have shifted from one party to the other - Randy Forbes (R) winning the Virginia 4th in 2001, and Dems Stephanie Herseth and Ben Chandler winning respectively in South Dakota and the Kentucky 6th in 2004.  (This assuming the GOP retains both seats tonight).  As has been said over and over and over, its all about the expectations game, and barring some REALLY extraordinary circumstances, we should not predict the results of these special elections to be so dramatically divergent from the disrict's regular voting patterns. Moreover, the results generally shouldn't be viewed in any context beyond district-wide politics, and the strengths and weaknesses of individual candidates.


by JFMDC on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:40:56 PM EST

thanks (none / 0)

The whole point of this comment is that, absent a tidal wave like 1994 or 2006, districts vote their composition.  This district is DESIGNED by Repukeliscum (Taft, Petro, Blackwell) to vote Repukeliscum.

And it is.


by dataguy on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:44:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is true (none / 0)


by JFMDC on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:46:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Is it really necessary... (none / 0)

to use childish insults like "repukeliscum"?


by johnny longtorso on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:51:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is it really necessary... (none / 0)

I'd say 'repukeliscum' is being kind. What would YOU call them? I would call people who destroy everything they touch, who lie, steal (elections especially) and murder, plain old nasty-ass motherfuckers, but somehow this seems too kind.


http://jimmyqnyc.blogspot.com
by jsedlock on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:14:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't know (none / 0)

it just sounds like something a 12-year-old would say.


by johnny longtorso on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:16:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Required pct (none / 0)

At this point, she must gain 55.9 % of remaining.  That means that for all remaining voters, observed probabilities must flip.  That's not gonna happen, unless the remaining are TOTALLY different than the votes now in.

Fat lady is now warming up...


by dataguy on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:42:33 PM EST

LAA-a-a--a---AAAAA---aa-a-a (none / 0)

With 74 % in, Latta is running away.  For Weinrech to win, she needs 64.6 % of all remaining votes.  That is not going to happen.  She is current not breaking 45 %.

Latta should call it.  


by dataguy on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:48:10 PM EST

Re: LAA-a-a--a---AAAAA---aa-a-a (none / 0)

Yeah, and I'd predict a slight up-tick for Latta in the last quarter of precincts.


by js noble on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 09:54:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

he's trying to avoid looking like a fool if for some reason there is a large turn out in the last 4 counties


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:00:46 PM EST

Props to Jennifer Brunner for the SoS website (none / 0)

She has improved the election results reporting immeasurably over the crappy out-of-date website they had during Ken Blackwell's tenure.


by johnny longtorso on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:15:07 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

does ohio still have the ACT distortion problem?


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:17:16 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

How could the polls have been so off? Weirauch w/ a 4-pt lead just last week, and now down by 12 points? WTF?


http://jimmyqnyc.blogspot.com
by jsedlock on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:31:06 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

You don't know the polls.  You know a leak about the polls.   And you don't know the turnout model vs. the actual.    

Special elections are among the dicier propositions to poll accurately.  I'm disappointed.  I'm a little surprised at the margin.  But I'm not shocked.


by InigoMontoya on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:34:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

Actually that last was supposed to be a reply to my own post, sorry Inigo.

So what WERE the polls, out of curiosity? I was only going by what DailyKos posted.


http://jimmyqnyc.blogspot.com
by jsedlock on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:47:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

[update] sorry, I should say 14-point deficit (now with 100% of the votes in)!


http://jimmyqnyc.blogspot.com
by jsedlock on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:42:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Lots of Work Ahead (none / 0)

OK folks. You know what this means: we have lots of work ahead of us if we are going to win in 2008. And not just mobilizing our forces -- we have to persuade a lot of people to our side. And for 2012, we need some good redistricting, so that means we need to change the state legislature in 2008 too.

Some quick mourning, then back to organizing!


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by RandomNonviolence on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:33:43 PM EST

Re: OH-05: Election Results Thread (none / 0)

they polled the wrong people


by orin76 on Tue Dec 11, 2007 at 10:34:00 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.