I've noticed a meme developing in the blogosphere, that John Edwards supposedly is only attacking and not providing any positive message for his campaign. I encourage you not to confuse what you read on the blogs (reports by journalists obsessed with process stories or diaries based on a campaign press release) with what Iowans have been seeing and hearing from Edwards lately.

The weekend before Thanksgiving, volunteers hand-delivered the 80-page policy book containing details on Edwards' proposals to thousands of Democratic households in Iowa.

Since late October, active Iowa Democrats have received direct-mail pieces from Edwards about once a week. I diaried the first two of these, about his biography and his most important policy proposals and about his plan for Iraq. Since then, he has sent out a mailer on health care, a Thanksgiving card, a piece on proposals to benefit American families and a piece on providing a better life for our children. After the jump I will reproduce the text of one of these mailers, "Fighting for American Families."

But before I do that, I want to talk about a theme underlying Edwards' communications with Iowans, which I believe will resonate with caucus-goers.

The message goes beyond any laundry list of policies. He is tapping into the frustration Democrats feel about our party's failure to advance core Democratic values since taking control of Congress.

In the first tv ad Edwards aired in Iowa this fall, he said:

"It is time for our party, the Democratic Party, to show a little backbone, to have a little guts, to stand up for working men and women. If we are not their voice, they will never have a voice."

If you listen to Clinton, Dodd, Richardson and Biden campaign in Iowa, they talk a lot about their experience, their ideas that would benefit the middle class, and the fact that they are ready to lead. You get the impression that the main problem of recent years has been the total failure of presidential leadership, and that if we put someone capable in White House, we will quickly turn things around.

Barack Obama also touts his personal leadership qualities (judgment, vision), as well as some policy ideas, but he adds a promise to change the system. He suggests that he can move our country beyond bitter partisan divides and the culture wars that are rooted in the 1960s.

But if you ask most Democrats what the big systemic problems are in American politics, are they going to say partisanship and the culture wars?

I don't think so. I think that active Democrats are angry that our Congressional majorities seem unable to stand up to the deeply unpopular Bush administration. Why aren't our leaders showing more backbone when it comes to funding the Iraq war or restoring our civil liberties?

Why are corporate interests still able to stifle reforms, such as last month's effort to close a loophole allowing people earning tens of millions of dollars a year to pay only 15 percent taxes on their income?

Democrats in my county, which will contribute nearly 15 percent of the state delegates, are represented in Congress by "Bush dog" Leonard Boswell, who has failed to stand up to Bush on torture, Iraq funding, and big subsidies for the fossil-fuel industries.

Most of the other large counties in terms of Democratic state delegates lie in Iowa's 1st or 2nd Congressional districts, where last year voters finally elected Democrats to represent them. Bruce Braley and Dave Loebsack have solid, progressive voting records so far, but don't you think many of their constituents are disappointed in the party's Congressional leadership?

John Edwards is not only advocating policies that would benefit the middle class, but also tapping into the sense that Democrats need more backbone, not more accommodation.

He recognizes that our willingness to fight for systemic change will affect the legacy we leave to the next generation. This ad went up on the air in Iowa yesterday:

What we want to make certain is true is that our children have a better life than we've had. Twenty generations of Americans before us have ensured that that was true.
And if we want to do that, we're going to have to be willing to take on this corrupt system and change it. And if we're not going to do it, we're going to have to be willing to look our children in the eye and say we're going to leave this mess for you.
This is the great moral test of our generation, and we will meet that test.
I'm John Edwards and I approve this message.

We need a president who is determined to fight the interests that frustrate progressive change.

The text of one recent mailer from Edwards is after the jump. Next week I will diary another direct-mail piece, which I also thought was very strong.