How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll)

Field organizers for the presidential campaigns in Iowa have many jobs, and one of the most important is lining up precinct captains. Mike Lux laid out why Precinct Captains are the Key at Open Left this summer, emphasizing what these volunteers can do for their candidates on caucus night.

In this diary I will focus on how precinct captains can help their candidates during the weeks and months before the Iowa caucuses.

I covered some of this ground in a recent diary on my house party for John Edwards. I think it's worth going over a few points again for readers who don't click on diaries with "John Edwards" in the title.

Political junkies and hacks, join me after the jump.

In case you missed the earlier installments in the series:

How the Iowa caucuses work, part 1 (basic elements of the caucus system)
How the Iowa caucuses work, part 2 (corrects an error in part 1 and discusses who is over-represented and who is under-represented when delegates are counted)
How the Iowa caucuses work, part 3 (why it's hard to turn out caucus-goers)
How the Iowa caucuses work, part 4 (more about why caucus turnout is low)
How the Iowa caucuses work, part 5 (on second choices and caucus math)

Now, back to the topic of the day: why field organizers for presidential candidates work hard to recruit precinct captains.

Some precinct captains are too busy to do anything besides help on caucus night. They can still lend important assistance, for the reasons Mike Lux wrote about. But it's much better to have a precinct captain with the time and commitment to work his or her neighborhood before caucus night. They can take on the following tasks:

1. Identify the preferences of voters on the campaign's list.

All of the serious presidential campaigns have purchased a voter file from the Iowa Democratic Party, which includes not only names, addresses and phone numbers, but also information about who has voted in recent primary and general elections, as well as who attended a precinct caucus in January 2004.

Field organizers spend countless hours calling through these lists. But some people with caller ID will never pick up the phone if the call is coming from campaign HQ. On the other hand, they may pick up for a person with the same telephone number prefix, who is likely to be calling from nearby. Similarly, people are more likely to return a phone call if the message on their answering machine comes from someone who lives in the neighborhood.

I recently made dozens of calls to invite neighbors to my house party, and I was able to speak with quite a few people whom the Edwards campaign had previously been unable to contact.

It's most helpful when precinct captains identify neighbors who are supporting or leaning toward the candidate. Keeping track of supporters helps the campaign get a sense of where the candidate will definitely be viable and where extra work is needed before caucus night. Also, some supporters may be willing to volunteer for the campaign if they are asked by a neighbor rather than a stranger.

Precinct captains can also help by identifying non-supporters. Those people can be taken off lists used by the campaign's phone banks or canvassers closer to caucus night. When I reach non-supporters, I always try to find out their preference, which gives me a sense of who else will be viable in my precinct.

Additionally, some non-supporters may be open to Edwards as a second choice, especially if I am polite and don't bash the candidate they're backing. Some of them may have a spouse or a child over 18 living at home, who are not on my contact list but turn out to be open to supporting Edwards.  

Undecided voters identified by the precinct captain can be targeted later in the campaign. If I am inviting people to see Edwards when he is coming to the Des Moines area, reaching the undecided voters who have said they are considering him will be my top priority. Similarly, when I canvassed my neighborhood this past weekend, most of the people on my contact list had been identified as undecided.

Finally, the precinct captain can alert the campaign to the people who will not caucus. These include voters who have died or have moved out of the precinct, as well as voters who spend their winters in the sun belt, will be on vacation, or do not plan to caucus for some other reason. Getting these names off the contact list will save campaign staff and volunteers time closer to January 3.

2. Identify and turn out supporters who do not appear on the campaign's list.

When I was planning my house party, I mentioned the event to people I ran into while walking the dog, taking my son to school, or trick-or-treating on Halloween. I also called a dozen or so people I knew to be either new to my neighborhood or not registered Democrats.

Last weekend I knocked on some extra doors in order to leave copies of the Edwards policy book with newcomers to my neighborhood, or people I remembered as Kerry supporters during the 2004 general election.

Finding potential caucus-goers like these is one way precinct captains can contribute more than volunteers who do not live in the neighborhoods they are canvassing.

Getting more Edwards supporters to the caucus will improve his potential delegate count in two ways. Obviously, the more people who come there with Edwards as a first choice, the better his chance of winning a second or third delegate.

In addition, increasing the raw number of caucus-goers in my precinct could potentially keep one or more candidates below the viability threshold. That would yield a larger pool of voters who might choose my candidate as a second choice.

Let's say Bill Richardson has 20 supporters in my precinct. If 100 people attend our caucus, he easily clears the 15 percent threshold. If 150 people attend, he will be close to the line, and his precinct captain will probably be able to attract the extra people they need to make Richardson viable. If 200 people attend our caucus, Richardson will fall short. Then we would have a chance to bring some of his supporters over to our Edwards group. Already two Richardson supporters in my neighborhood have told me that Edwards is their second choice.

3. Persuade voters on the list to support the precinct captain's candidate.

I already mentioned house parties, which provide a friendly setting for undecided voters to pick up information and ask a field organizer questions about the candidate.

Most of the people I invited were unable to come to my party, but at least they received a personal message from me giving concrete reasons why I support Edwards.  

Canvassing is another great method for voter persuasion. Anyone can do a lit drop, but the precinct captain is more likely to be able to get residents to open the door and engage in conversation. One of my big regrets is that family and other volunteer commitments leave me little time to knock on doors. Every time I have done so, it has been well worth my effort. Face-to-face contact is much better than a phone call. Some precinct captains I've met have been out knocking on doors every weekend since the middle of the summer.

I won't claim that personal pitches are the most important factor in Iowans' voting decisions, but they have the potential to help at the margins. On caucus night 2004, my husband overheard a few people say they were there because I kept asking them to show up.

One of my neighbors, a close friend of the family, is currently undecided between Clinton and Edwards. He has told me that even if he decides on Clinton, he will come over and caucus with our group if I only need one more person to make Edwards viable or earn an extra delegate.

I've already found enough supporters to be confident of surpassing the 15 percent threshold on January 3, but I may need just a few extra people to get a second or third delegate for Edwards. When I talk with someone who is leaning towards another candidate but also likes Edwards, I occasionally mention that they have the option of crossing over to Edwards if he just needs one or two people to get a delegate.

4. Make sure all known supporters are able to attend the caucus.

As soon as the caucus locations are announced, I will call the Edwards supporters and leaners we've identified to let them know where they need to be at 6:30 pm on January 3. At that time, I will check to see if anyone needs a ride or has a friend or relative in a different part of town who needs one. I already know of one Edwards supporter in my neighborhood who will need a ride, because she does not drive at night. Other elderly voters may be in the same boat.

I may make a few of these calls to neighbors who are supporting other candidates, if they've said Edwards is their second choice and if their first choice is unlikely to surpass the 15 percent threshold in my precinct. This tactic is risky, though, because someone who seems unlikely to be viable today may surge in December. I only know of three firm Biden supporters in my precinct today, but there are so many undecideds that he could easily end up with 30 or more supporters on caucus night.

I also plan to arrange for a baby-sitter or two to be "on call" in case someone calls me at the last minute saying they can't come to caucus because their baby-sitter is unavailable. Failing that, I may be able to persuade the person to bring their children to the caucus, as my family will do.

So how important are precinct captains?

Nobody can measure their precise impact. Possibly my efforts during the last campaign helped John Kerry win more delegates from my precinct than Edwards did. The Edwards precinct captain in my neighborhood couldn't do any voter contact before caucus night because of his job with the state.  

On the other hand, a neighboring precinct with similar demographics and a much less active precinct captain for Kerry went exactly the same way on caucus night: three delegates for Kerry, two for Edwards, one for Dean.

The hardest-working Kerry precinct captain I knew lived in a Des Moines neighborhood with lots of young families, and Edwards ended up winning more delegates despite all of her efforts. Probably Edwards would have won her precinct by a larger margin if she had not knocked on all those doors, but there is no way to know.

Talking with my field organizer this past weekend, I asked him how the canvassing went in other parts of my suburb. The local volunteer who knocked on doors in her precinct had a great day. The out-of-state volunteer who knocked on doors in a precinct where we lack a captain had fewer conversations with voters and a generally less enjoyable time. If we fail to meet our vote goals in that precinct on January 3, I'll be inclined to think it was the lack of a captain that made the difference.

Thanks to those who made it to the end of this long diary. I look forward to reading your comments. Feel free to suggest topics for later installments in this series. I know I will write a diary about the precinct captain's job on caucus night, as well as a diary responding to some common arguments in defense of the caucus system.


Poll
Which job of a precinct captain is most valuable to a presidential campaign?
Identifying voters on the campaign's list as supporters, non-supporters, undecideds or people who will not caucus
Identifying and turning out supporters who do not appear on a campaign's list
Persuading regular caucus-goers to pledge their support before caucus night
Making sure supporters know the caucus location and have the means to get there on time
Bringing over supporters of non-viable candidates at the precinct caucus
I don't care, because the Iowa caucuses are a travesty of a mockery of a sham of a mockery of two travesties of a mockery of a sham
other (please explain in the comments)

Votes: 23
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Re: How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll) (2.00 / 2)

Your diaries are so good!! Thanks so much for these insights.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 09:04:54 AM EST

Re: How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll) (2.00 / 1)

Feel free to suggest topics for later installments

I'd be interested in hearing about the battle b/t precinct captains at caucus to pick up the non-viable supporters.

Also, I assume it's still an option to walk out of the caucus meeting as "uncommitted?" Didn't Jimmy Carter come in 2nd to this bloc in 1976?


by dblhelix on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 09:24:26 AM EST

yes, you can stay uncommitted (2.00 / 3)

and you are correct, uncommitted did "win" the 1976 caucuses.

Nowadays, though, with all the focus on Iowa, only a tiny number of people would actually come to the caucus and walk away uncommitted. I would only do that if the only viable candidates in my precinct were completely unacceptable to me, which would pretty much never be the case.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 10:27:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll) (none / 0)

Voted 'other.'

1-5 all sound important.


by dblhelix on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 09:26:43 AM EST

I didn't put "all of the above" (2.00 / 1)

in the poll, because I figured everyone would choose that option if I did.

It's a tough call, but I voted for the first line in the poll. That saves campaign staff the most time and helps them target resources toward undecided voters.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 10:25:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

polls (none / 0)

you forgot to include tactics such as data mining potential caucus goers in order to determine which ones are supporting your opponent. then targeting them with push polling in order to undermine their support.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 09:50:36 AM EST

identifying non-supporters (2.00 / 3)

is part of the precinct captain's job. Whether the campaign uses that information in a fair or in a sleazy way is outside the precinct captain's hands.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 10:24:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll) (2.00 / 3)

Love your series on the Iowa caucus and agree that precinct captains are vital in any campaign. Another important job they perform is to identify non-voters who think they're no longer registered. These can appear on lists as "undecideds" but they really need to be labeled "nonactive" because they could have a candidate preference but don't bother voting because they think they're no longer registered. When I was a MoveOn precinct captain for Kerry-Edwards in NC (the Dem party blew off this state in '04 but MoveOn targeted it with an ambitious GOTV effort), I contacted 3 non-voting registered Dem voters who weren't going to vote because they thought they were no longer registered. They showed up on election day and presumably voted for Kerry-Edwards.


Speak out for the education our children deserve!
by jeffbinnc on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 10:29:41 AM EST

good point (2.00 / 2)

but anyone can register to vote right there on caucus night, so there shouldn't be anyone not caucusing because they are unregistered.

It's possible that people who aren't registered might think they are unable to caucus, though.

At the July 4 parade this year I was helping the Edwards people, and one woman I approached said, "Sorry, I can't vote--I was a very bad girl long ago." I mentioned this to my husband later, and he said I should have told her that Tom Vilsack signed an order making it possible for ex-felons to get their voting rights back.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 10:43:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: good point (2.00 / 1)

but anyone can register to vote right there on caucus night,

i've yet to see anybody speculate the consequence of iowa allowing for crossover voting.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 11:21:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

mitigated because GOP caucus is same night (2.00 / 2)

So Republicans won't be able to make mischief en masse by registering as Democrats on caucus night.

In 2004, the Republicans didn't have a contested primary election, but there was no concerted effort to get lots of Republicans to caucus on the Democratic side.

In my own precinct, a handful of Republicans changed their registration to participate in the January 2004 caucus, but they were genuinely disaffected Republicans looking for an alternative to Bush.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 12:01:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: mitigated because GOP caucus is same night (2.00 / 1)

It seems like there wouldn't be much room for these antics in a caucus system, period.  It's not a secret ballot, all your neighbors would see what you're up to and there would be adverse publicity.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 12:14:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

yes, it would be noticed (2.00 / 1)

if hordes of people who never previously participated as Democrats changed their registration so they could caucus with us. Technically, I don't see how we could prevent them from doing it, but it would be hard to pull off.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 12:18:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: mitigated because GOP caucus is same night (2.00 / 2)

IT would also be hard to organize it ahead of time to make any real difference. Lets say all of desmoinesdems' republican neighbrs decided to caucus for the Dem candidate they considered least electable. Even if they all teamed up together for, say, Gravel, they would likely only generate one or two delegates for Gravel, that is .01% of the county delegates allotted statewide that night.

You'd have to coordinate it in every precinct. At that point, you're talking about more work and expense than getting all the republicans to vote for a republican candidate they like...


by desmoulins on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 01:23:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: mitigated because GOP caucus is same night (2.00 / 2)

I can't imagine this kind of stunt ever working with Democrats because we're too pragmatic to vote for someone who is truly unelectable.  I mean, John Kerry certainly had his flaws as a candidate, but he was obviously electable.  So there's no opportunity for Republican mischief-makers to throw the Democratic primary to a candidate who can't win.

You see that sort of thing far more on the Republican side.  For example, in 2006, Rhode Island Republicans nearly threw out Lincoln Chafee (popular moderate) in favor of a far-right challenger who obviously would have had no chance to win a general election in Rhode Island.  That's a classic case where, if you're a Democrat and the state happens to have open primaries, you'd want to vote on the Republican side in hopes of getting the unelectable guy the nomination.  I can't really think of a comparable example in recent history from our side of the aisle.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 02:08:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: mitigated because GOP caucus is same night (none / 0)

we were getting reports from long term trusted posters (on another board) who lived in iowa that there were republicans who did vote for kerry in the primary because they thought him the candidate easier for bush to beat.

republicans voting for kerry explains how he went from single digit approval numbers within weeks before the iowa caucus to walking away with the nomination.

kerry was a weak candidate who was loathe to pick a fight. he had his campaign staff members launch most of the attacks during the primary. this inability or hesitancy to throw a punch didn't not serve us well during the general election.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 08:31:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I do not believe that was a big factor (2.00 / 1)

Maybe a handful of Republicans did that, but not enough to swing a lot of delegates. In my neighborhood you would have needed about 30 people to get an extra delegate for Kerry. I have not heard of any precinct where Kerry's winning margin came from Republicans. I was doing voter contacts among local Democrats for months, and in the final month you could see that all of the undecided Democrats were swinging towards either Kerry or Edwards.

Anyway, many Republicans (such as Charles Krauthammer) were quite disappointed that Dean didn't win the nomination.

I don't want to get into a flamewar with Deaniacs now, but when he was the front-runner the GOP had already started issuing press releases tagging him as a flip-flopper (he changed his position on the death penalty, among other issues). They were preparing the ground to use that against any Democrat.

Dean's message discipline was very poor, and the media made it worse by keeping him off balance with process stories. I think he would have lost the general badly.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 09:27:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I do not believe that was a big factor (none / 0)

this wouldn't be a concern to begin with if iowa didn't have such a liberal allowance for crossover voting. how about tightening the process?

why iowa is so wedded to the caucus sytem anyways? doesn't this test people's patience? why not go with ballots?


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 10:26:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

NH state law says they have the first (2.00 / 1)

primary. So Iowa is stuck with caucuses.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 11:36:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I do not believe that was a big factor (none / 0)

I think he [dean] would have lost the general badly.

i do not have a crystal ball, but i do know one thing:

dean. would. not. have. gone. down. without. a. fight.

- like kerry did. dean would have fought back at any attempts of swiftboating.

that was one of my main criteria during the primaries. who would not allow himself to get rolled? not only who would fight back when challenged, but who would be proactive and take the fight to the enemy? who would demand a recount if the election was close? the outcome revealed kerry was none of these things, and it was obvious in the summer of 2003 that he wasn't a fighter.


I really don't understand how that is an attack; lol. ~ by Jerome Armstrong
by jello on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 10:36:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll) (none / 0)

Im surprised by how prepare the Obama Iowa team are in Iowa...They had representatives from all 99 counties showing up at the JJ dinner and they are currently doing a lot of planning and making sure to keep in contact with those captains every  days to direct them and help them with resources.

Obama also has 39 field offices across Iowa which makes it easy for Iowans to get infos and for the captains to get troops for canvassing.

Obama also gets huge troops from Illinois coming to Iowa to help canvass and make phone calls every weekends.


by Prodigy on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 11:01:43 AM EST

Re: How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll) (2.00 / 1)

Also , i noticed that Obama Iowa audience seems to get older which is a good thing.

When you look at Hillary crowd in Iowa , he skews heavily old and women...On the other hand , Obama crowd looked very young which has some problem in itself

Because older voters are more reliable , Hillary may be happy about this observation , but if my observation is right and Obama crowds are getting older , Hillary could be a big trouble.

If Obama can raise his support among 60+ year old by just about 5-6% , he wins hands down because he gets planty of support from the other demo.

He doesnt have to lead among that group..All he has to do is get it to 17%...He now stands at 11% but i suspect he has grown his support among that groups...Dont expect him to get more support among those voters then Hillary/Edwards though.

This is his major weakness in Iowa and im glad his team are really pushing the envelope by trying to court older people.


by Prodigy on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 11:10:39 AM EST

for what it's worth (2.00 / 1)

The Obama captain in my own precinct is about 60.

I agree with you that Obama doesn't have to win the older demographic, but he does need to up his numbers in that group. As long as no other one candidate dominates the over-60 crowd, Obama still has a chance to win Iowa.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 12:02:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: for what it's worth (none / 0)

Hillary and Edwards will split it...Richardson and Biden are also getting as much support as Obama among that group , but they suck among other demos.

Obama emphasizing on social security is helping him pick up some ground among older voters but i dont expect this group to really be swayed because of this.

Older voters are more likely to believe that social security will soon run out of money and the fact that Obama is talking about it could be why he's making some slow pick up among the older people.

Those voters really cherrish this program and they want to hear candidate go beyond what Hillary is saying which is nothing because she's afraid the GOP may use it to attack her.

If i'm Obama , i'll fucking go on a bus tour to talk about social security....Let Krugman , the liberal idiot , scream all he wants.


by Prodigy on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 12:42:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: for what it's worth (2.00 / 2)

Obama's recent comments about social security have most likely come about because he's hoping to increase his support amongst older voters where he's very weak by scaring them into thinking there is a crisis. It may be good for him politically to get a second look by older voters and even some support from them, but it's completely untrue that there is any sort of crisis at all and Obama is merely advancing the right wing talking points and plan to try and take down SS.

Krugman is right on SS and not at all an 'idiot'


by Quinton on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 07:46:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How the Iowa caucuses work, part 6 (w/poll) (2.00 / 3)

Here's  a question. Does anyone record the results of the first allignment, prior to the first count for viability? In other words, I've got a voter in my pct who is for Kucinic but knows DK wont' be viable and will join Edwards during reallignment. She wanted to know if her "vote" for Kucinic will be recorded.

As I understand it, here in NV, each caucus goer will be completing a preference card and marking a first round preference and, if they reallign, a second round preference. So I told her, yes, her "vote" for DK in the first round would in some way be recorded, even though she would end up supporting (or, I hope, being) an Edwards delegate to the county convention.

Do you know, based on your experience in Iowa, if those first round preferences are at all tallied?


by desmoulins on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 01:27:46 PM EST

I should know that, but I don't (2.00 / 1)

The first choice votes may be recorded, but you never see the results reported anywhere, so I doubt anyone is tallying the raw votes. I will ask someone who works at the state party about that.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 03:28:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I should know that, but I don't (2.00 / 1)

Thanks, I can ask here. Almost all our rules are taken from Iowa, but you've got enough to do there.


by desmoulins on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 07:19:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I agree... (2.00 / 2)

Your diaries are always informative and relevant.  I think you're a mother of a young child?  So terrific that you can still make time to write such articulate, well-researched posts.

Thanks for the contribution to this community.


Be a Jan fan! Schakowsky for US Senate.
by passionateprogressive on Mon Nov 19, 2007 at 10:57:31 PM EST

thanks for your comment (2.00 / 1)

I have a toddler just turned two and a preschooler who will turn five in a few months. It's harder for me to find the time to write with two kids. I enjoy the outlet, though.

I used to write full-time and then on a freelance basis for six or seven years (not on American politics).

I have more Iowa diaries in my head, but it will be a scramble to get them written before January 3. I hate this election schedule.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Tue Nov 20, 2007 at 09:23:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.