Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms

Part of the candidate blogger series for Obama

Obama released a major package of technology initiatives today that Matt Stoller  greeted as "transformative" and "genuinely radical" --- even going so far as to announce that, based on this package and despite his other reservations, Obama is now his first choice.

Prof. Lawrence Lessig, one of the most deeply respected experts on net neutrality,  was led to announce his full endorsement of Obama today:

Obama has committed himself to a technology policy for government that could radically change how government works.
Kos praised the package on the frontpage.  And VentureBeat today called the package "the most comprehensive set of policies for open government I've seen."  Steve Benen at The Carpetbagger Report notes that Obama's bold new positions on Iran and now on technology have led to some reconsideration of his candidacy among the netroots.  

No one can critique this policy package for a lack of vision, as it lays out an extraordinarily idealistic view of the ability of technology to change the way government works.

Clearly with this package, Obama hit the ball out of the park.

There have been a number of responses already.  I diaried the details of the plan today on DailyKos.  Adam B has an excellent post on the significance of the Lessig endorsement.  Matt Stoller provides a run-down of the proposals on net neutrality and broadband accessibility, while Kos focused on the transparency and open government proposals.

Obama sees the secretive years of the Bush administration and the recent lobbyist scandals as an opportunity to make a case for a radically more transparent government, for a different way of doing business:

Barack Obama will use the most current  technological tools available to make government less beholden to special interest groups and lobbyists and promote citizen participation in government decision-making.  Obama will integrate citizens into the actual  business of government...
The web shouldn't just be merely a new means of disseminating old information.  It is not enough to simply post thousands of pages of budget documents online and to literally throw these volumes into the public realm.  The information needs to be organized in new ways, taking advantage of new technology.

One of Obama's most crucial proposals is to make government information "available online through universally accessible formats."  Or as Lessig describes, these information streams could be put into RSS or Atom format, making them easily searchable and broadly accessible.  These RSS/Atom feeds could include "votes, contributions, Members of Congress's calendars."

Obama envisions this new access to information as empowering citizens to take action in their communities:

Greater access to  environmental data, for example, will help citizens learn about pollution in their communities, provide  information about local conditions back to government and empower people to protect themselves.

But it's also intriguing that Obama, in the end, is aiming at more than just improving transparency and providing information.  He is actively trying to find ways to incorporate broader citizen input into government decision-making:

Establishing pilot programs to open up government decision-making and involve the public in the work  of agencies, not simply by soliciting opinions, but by tapping into the vast and distributed expertise of the American citizenry to help government make more informed decisions.

Obama is proposing the creation of wikis, blogs, video livefeeds, mandatory broadband townhall meetings for cabinet secretaries to discuss pressing issues before their agencies, and even social networking tools.  All of this "to modernize internal,  cross-agency, and public communication and information sharing to improve government decision-making."  These tools would not just to aimed at the greater public but at improving communication within and between outdated and musty bureaucratic structures.

He would require that all non-emergency legislation pending White House approval be put on the White House website for five days to solicit public comment.

Remarkably, he would require:

his appointees who lead Executive Branch departments and rule-making agencies to conduct the significant business of the agency in public, so that any citizen can watch a live feed on the Internet as the agencies debate and deliberate the issues that affect American society.  He will ensure that these  proceedings are archived for all Americans to review, discuss and respond.  He will require his  appointees to employ all the technological tools available to allow citizens not just to observe, but also  to participate and be heard in these meetings.
Obama also proposes vastly improved government websites:
Lifting the veil from secret deals in Washington with a web site, a search engine, and other web tools that enable citizens easily to track online federal grants, contracts, earmarks, and lobbyist contacts with  government officials.
 These proposals are startlingly imaginative and go beyond what he has mentioned before in the context of his ethics reform package.  There is clearly vast potential here, and there's little wonder that the netroots are giving Obama a second look.  



Display:


genuinely radical (none / 0)

... Exactly what we don't need at this point.

Baby steps people.   The wingnuts didn't expect much from Reagan, they knew it was a process, a long process.   We've had Congress for 11 months, and haven't had the White House for 8.  We don't need "radical" today.  


by dpANDREWS on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 08:55:30 PM EST

The neat thing is that... (2.00 / 3)

these proposals, while they could potentially radically change the way government does business, are actually pretty simple and achievable.  A lot of this could happen by executive order.

I have to dispute your premise though.  Is it really time for baby steps?  Baby steps on health care?  Baby steps on poverty?  Precisely because we've been locked out of the White House for eight years, now is our opportunity for change.  

Especially since we might just pick up six or more senate seats in November, we're going to have a window of opportunity to pass some legislation.


One Million Strong --- Join up
by psericks on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:01:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: genuinely radical (2.00 / 1)

If you think genuine reform comes from incremental change you are missing the point.  Are you afraid of losing the election?  Consider this:


Triangulating and poll-driven positions because we're worried about what Mitt or Rudy might say about us just won't do.  If we are really serious about winning this election Democrats, we can't live in fear of losing it.

Senator Obama - Jefferson-Jackson Speech

I think the Senator is spot on and this reform is a classic example.


by Shaun Appleby on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:06:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I think the Senator gives a good speech (none / 0)

He puts his chin up and the air and strikes that tone that reminds one of a 1960s civil rights activists and says pretty things.

That is about it.

Obama's speech doesn't change the fact that after the election there will still be more than enough Republicans around to stand in the way, they will be angrier than ever, looking at trying to get the White House back in 2012 and they will have their noise -  I mean communications - machine in tact.  

Edwards is more right than Obama.  We need someone to fight them and beat them.  They are not going to along on their own unless we inflict some political pain on them.  That is why I support Clinton.  She has the best combo of fight and political skill to get things done.

Obama is out of his league in that regard.  What he calls triangulation others call compromise, and that is required sometimes.  I thought he of all people would know that ... being so "different" and all.


by dpANDREWS on Thu Nov 15, 2007 at 08:19:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms (2.00 / 2)

This is a bullshit proposal and I say that as the spouse of a long-term government employee.

You know what government needs to work better?  More people.  Good people.  Qualified people.  My husband's workload has increased a) because he's very good at what he does and b) there aren't enough people hired to help take on the work that needs to be done.

Public service is not seen as a viable employment option. The hiring process takes too long.  The private sector offers better and higher salaries. Do you have any clue how many contractors are working for the federal government, making lots of money but doing very little?  Too many.

There are going to be lots of retirements coming up in the federal workforce.  Who will replace them?  Solving that problem will go a long way to help change the way government works, not some bullshit technology proposal from a freshman senator who has not the first clue about how the federal government actually operates.  

But because it fell from the lips of Barack Obama, it's perfection.

Obama will integrate citizens into the actual business of government.

Here's some advice: You can't get anything done by committee.  If he wants to improve the actual business of government so much, learn how it operates first.  


by KimPossible on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:11:27 PM EST

how convenient (none / 0)

Obama proposes transparency - but has no Illinois records.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071114/ap_o n_el_pr/democrats_records

No records from lobbyists - and Corporate lobbyists and PAC have funded his political career - UNTIL he took a hiatus in 2007 - basing his campaign on "changing Washington."

Why didn't he begin "changing Washington" in 2005 and begin rejecting donations from corporate lobbyists and PACs?
Didn't Hillary's Hsu donate about $20K to his PAC?

Obama's campaign has always helped Hillary the most.


Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:33:30 PM EST

Re: Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms (none / 0)

good diary. thanks for the effort. it matters.


by aiko on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:37:06 PM EST

Re: Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms (none / 0)

Stoller supports Obama?

Didn't expect to see that.


by Bush Bites on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:43:39 PM EST

"Leans" would be more accurate (2.00 / 1)

Who knows if it'll last...


One Million Strong --- Join up
by psericks on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:51:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "Leans" would be more accurate (none / 0)

Ha! Good point.


by Bush Bites on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:07:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't think this stuff is earth (none / 0)

shattering.  Making information avaible online in a variety of formats is a great idea, but every candidate has talked about making information more available online.  The other stuff is fine, but Deval Patrick has a site asking for feedback on proposals and such and it has been abysmal failure.  I don't like this idea of agency meetings broadcasts.  How about releasing minutes instead? I don't think this idea will actually lead to the best debate, as people will be aware that every moment is being observed. I'm all for more openess but i don't see this a groundbreaking.


by bookgrl on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 09:59:04 PM EST

Re: I don't think this stuff is earth (2.00 / 1)

Well, have a look at this recent article on a new feature granting citizens access to comprehensive government spending information via a website which is now part of the official record.  Guess who?


Senator Obama and Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) teamed up to pass a law that will lift the veil of secrecy in Washington by creating a Google-like search engine that will allow regular people to track approximately $1 trillion in federal grants, contracts, earmarks and loans online.

Obama Website - Cleaning Up Washinton

 


by Shaun Appleby on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:08:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yeah, that's nice. (none / 0)

But I think people who spend alot of time online think that's more relevant than it is.  Again, I support more openess(though not taping all agency discussions0, but I just don't find this earth shattering.


by bookgrl on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:13:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yeah, that's nice. (2.00 / 1)

What we Obama supporters generally understand is that one of the important reforms is about process not just particular issues.  Not earth shattering perhaps, but an unequivocal step in the right direction.  And process oriented.  Rather than attacking a specific earmark it makes them all visible, and that's a big change.  Glad you liked it.


by Shaun Appleby on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:17:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I don't think this stuff is earth (none / 0)

What veil of secrecy?

I've been using this site for a while. There are others for tracking registered lobbyists.


by dblhelix on Thu Nov 15, 2007 at 09:04:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

unless of course it was your candidate who (none / 0)

proposed it. Gimme a break.


by rapcetera on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:14:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I sort of see your point (2.00 / 1)

I sort of see your point. I could see where it could be disruptive.

But, by the same token, why wouldn't meetings being broadcast improve the debate?

At the very least, participants would actually show up and wouldn't be able to bring up political considerations anymore.

At the very best, all particpants would come in well prepped and ready to objectively work through all the options.

I guess I could see maybe an audio feed versus video, but I'd be against minutes since they can be easily altered, as we've all seen over the past six years.

In any case, you see school boards, town halls, park boards, etc., on local access all the time. Why not federal administrative meetings?


by Bush Bites on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:17:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms (2.00 / 2)

Obama is, simply,  a breath of fresh air. he's been disappointing on some particulars but, in general, he's simply working at a higher level on so many issues.  I like all the Dems (even if Edwards makes me puke), but Obama really is different.

and better.


by CalDem on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 10:45:08 PM EST

Re: Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms (none / 0)

I don't know if you have the video linked, I just looked and I didn't see it... If you do, nevermind then.  But here's the link.  

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community /post_group/ObamaHQ/C5s3


by JeremiahTheMessiah on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 11:10:53 PM EST

Re: Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms (none / 0)

Over 300,000 profiles on barackobama.com.  


by JeremiahTheMessiah on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 11:11:31 PM EST

Re: Obama Proposes Broad Government Reforms (none / 0)

Internet for everybody...Open government... That's just stupid.  (Sarcasim)  I hope some of you arguing against this realize how stupid your partisan views are making you sound.  


by JeremiahTheMessiah on Wed Nov 14, 2007 at 11:39:39 PM EST

YouTube video is up (none / 0)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4yVlPqeZ wo


Start Running Better Polls
by bolson on Thu Nov 15, 2007 at 02:27:39 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.