You wrote: " Are you just not good at persuasion?"

My intended response:  "Like You?"

followed by:

"pardon me as I fall on the floor laughing and rolling in glee.."

my apologies for any confusion...

you defend him.  You also stood with areyouready.

Shall we go back and read the garbage in HC your allies have spewed?    

perfectt word choice...

after 10 years of fighting the big media and how they hurt only Dems - to watch both Obama and Edwards join with Russet aand Bri-Bri during that debate....did make me angry and quite bitter at their false act...selfishness...and pure stupidity.

And Im bitter about them accusing both Hillary and Hillaary of being liars and corrupt....yeah...an acrimonious response is a fitting reply to tthat kind of low infamy.

I never once attacked either of these guys ever anywhere before that - i felt everybody has the right to run...but now that its clear that they and SOME of their supporters are willing to risk our long term chances for their short term gain....

gloves are off.

You must be new here.  Guess who said this:

any scum sucking vermin piece of garbage that goes to right wing hate sites run by our darkest enemies should be Id'd, grabbed by their weasel neck and the hung from he nearest liberty tree as traitors

(Hint: not a RedStater.)

you are a troll of enough Edwards supporters troll rate you.  That seems to be the reality for some people here.

It means you live under a bridge and eat billy-goats.

if you folks can some how teach even these two piglets to fly -

Id vote for them!

Cant break my 100% dem voting record!

Hell, I even voted for dukaakis - that midget -after what he did to Biden...and Id have punched him for it if he got near me that year.

but may i remind everyone - squeelers cant sprout wings!

... and what matters is guessing at the intent, then, I agree, you are wasting you time in the blogosphere.

... prefer that only people with money can bring a case ... that allows corporations to screw over people without money.

I don't understand why you wish to help corporations screw over people without money, and unlike some people, I'm not that good at mind reading over the internet, so I'm not going to try to guess.

They wouldn't have him.  He's a totally unreconstructed lefty with strong views on party solidarity, that's all.  He just backed the wrong horse in this race.

the present Party chairman wouldnt agree with ya...

He thinks Im funny!

And when Hillary chooses the next one, he'll probably be an old chum.

Its our generations turn.

So sorry to disappoint...

climb thru the ether and club ya...

yes, he made big dough, butt he did more than that....

remember the trial of the LA Times bombing?

wiki:

The national labor movement was outraged by the way the McNamaras had been treated, and labor leaders were convinced the brothers were innocent. Burns had clearly engaged in kidnapping, misrepresentation of his status as a law enforcement officer, unlawful imprisonment, and possibly torture in his handling of McManigal and J.B. McNamara. He had unlawfully extradited J.B. McNamara, and may have committed kidnapping by transporting him across state lines. The local circuit judge had unlawfully denied J.J. McNamara access to legal representation and had no authority to approve his extradition. Both McNamaras had been arrested on the basis of a confession wrung from a third man who himself had been kidnapped and perhaps coerced into confessing. The case seemed too much like the kidnapping and trial of Bill Haywood and others in 1906.[3]

Labor leaders were also convinced of the McNamara's innocence by other factors as well. The open shop movement and virulent hostility shown by Otis convinced many that the whole event was a frame-up (with some, including Eugene V. Debs, suggesting that Otis himself may have planted the bomb). Burns repeatedly implied that Gompers and other labor leaders were involved in the national bombing campaign, and AFL officials feared a national campaign of arrests designed to destroy the nascent labor movement might be in the works. Meanwhile, George Alexander, mayor of Los Angeles, was locked in a very close re-election battle against Job Harriman, a Socialist Party of America candidate. The bombing, some felt, might simply be a plot to keep Harriman out of City Hall.[3]

Iron Workers president Frank Ryan asked Clarence Darrow to defend the McNamaras. But Darrow was in ill health. Ryan turned to Harriman, who agreed to be the brothers' defense attorney. Gompers, however, visited Darrow in Chicago and convinced him that the case required his expertise. Reluctantly, Darrow consented to be lead defense attorney

too..

I dont like them either.

Its a BIG TENT.

I'm with you on the hedge funds, we are headed into perilous and uncharted waters at cruising speed.

George, plenty of Clinton's supporters on MyDD have made sickening attacks on Edwards, including using Elizabeth's cancer. Tom's not out of line here.

Some Edwards supporters are following him over the cliff.  It is lunacy what they all are trying to do to the party.

Obama even won't / can't go there.

You don't wear suits, do you?  Not these days.

The Edwards supportesr, Tom chief among them are out of control.