GOP = Gay. Out. Proud.

Crossposted from Left Toon Lane, Bilerico Project & My Left Wing


click to enlarge

Exactly one week ago, I ran a strip pondering when the next GOP sex scandal would happen (see Hot Buttery GOP Action). Well, it didn't take long.

From the AP:

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) -- A state lawmaker who has voted against gay rights resigned Wednesday, days after he was quoted in police reports as saying a man he had sex with after they met at an erotic video store was trying to blackmail him.

Rep. Richard Curtis, 48, said he was resigning immediately to spare his wife and children more public embarrassment. In a written statement, Curtis said, "Events that have recently come to light have hurt a lot of people. I sincerely apologize for any pain my actions may have caused."

Curtis, a Republican, told a newspaper in his southwest Washington district on Monday that sex was not involved in what he said was an extortion attempt. He also declared he was not gay.

But in police reports, Curtis said he was being extorted by a man he had sex with at a hotel room in Spokane, where Curtis was attending a GOP retreat. The other man, Cody Castagna, 26, contends Curtis reneged on a promise to pay $1,000 for sex.

CNN is reporting that the police report on this incident is FIFTY PAGES LONG! That I must find. It will make great reading.

So where does that leave us? Well more proof that the GOP has suckered the Religious Right all this time. I wonder when they will wake up? The rest of us have our eyes open.



Display:


Flynt is sitting on something I think (none / 0)

Remember a while back just after Vitter he made it sound as if another shoe was about to drop.   I wonder if maybe he is holding something back for '08.


by dpANDREWS on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 10:28:33 AM EST

Re: GOP = Gay. Out. Proud. (none / 0)

Most cross-dressers supposedly aren't gay- but this one is, obviously.  The media keep dropping hints that Rudy is a cross-dresser- there have been many subtle allusions to it.  I don't know what to make of it but they keep hinting at something- about a "past" New Yorkers know about- about have "peculiar" interests- they are definitely trying to allude to something but I don't know what.  It's all very interesting- people are so diverse- I don't care about people's private lives except in cases like this when the guy is such a hypocrite.


by reasonwarrior on Thu Nov 01, 2007 at 01:19:58 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.