Edwards Evening News: An Election, Not an Auction Edition

This is going to be an election, Tim, it's not going to be an auction.

- John Edwards on Meet the Press today

We start off tonight with a memorable quote from this morning's Meet the Press.  John Edwards doesn't think the election can be bought.  What about you?  Do we still live in the United States of America? We'll have that story and more in tonight's Edwards Evening News. I'm sirius/be inspired, filling in for your regular Sunday night host Tom P.

John Edwards was on Meet the Press this morning, and he did a fantastic job.  I have to tell you something, because I think this is pretty funny. I did not see Meet the Press this morning, and had to wait until the videos were uploaded to the internet. I also didn't know if JRE was on for the whole show, or only part of it. When I finally got the video links from NCDem Amy, I assumed what she had uploaded to YouTube was just the highlights, because it was so good.  It turned out it was the full interview.  I guess it was ALL highlights.

My absolute favorite part of the interview was at the end, when JRE said we're going to have an election not an auction and talked about the importance of breaking through the money influence on politics and fixing our rigged system. Here's the clip:

SEN. EDWARDS: I--this is going to be an election, Tim, it's not going to be an auction. You know, we're not going to determine who can raise the most money and thereby who should be president of the United States. It's an amazing thing to me that when you do something that you believe is right, same thing I did in 2003 and 2004, that this is the response. What I know is true, I know that when we get to after February 5 and it's pretty clear who the Democratic nominee for president's going to be, that there needs to be absolutely clear divisions between me as the Democratic nominee and the Republicans.

And I am completely convinced if I have, and I believe I will, beaten two celebrity candidates who will probably have spent over $200 million during the course of the nomination process, I can certainly beat a Republican who's carrying George Bush's baggage. And the way I will do it is not on the basis of money, but on the basis of what America needs, on the basis of principle stand, on the basis of big and bold ideas. I want people to see clear differences between me and them, them being the Republicans in this case. They will be awash in corporate money. You can take that to the bank. I will not.

You can see the rest of the interview on YouTube here:
Part 1: Iraq
Part 2: Why He's Running
Part 3: Fighting for Those in Poverty

Here's the transcript:

Meet the Press Transcript

John Edwards is still on his tour of Iowa today. Here is the schedule of events for the tour.

During the trip, Edwards will visit 17 counties to talk to caucus goers and answer their questions about his specific plans for change, including his plans to end the war and stop the abuses by security contractors in Iraq. From ending the war in Iraq to guaranteeing universal health care to revitalizing rural America, Edwards has proposed big, bold ideas to change our country and build One America. The four-day trip will also highlight the grassroots strength of Edwards' campaign, with important organizational announcements along the way.

"Our country faces big challenges and we need more than rhetoric and half measures to meet them," said Edwards. "We need big, bold change - and the starting place for change is in Iraq. Last November, the American people voted for real change in Iraq, but instead the president has refused to change course. Congress needs to stand firm against President Bush and not send him any funding bill than does not include a timeline for withdrawal. No timeline, no funding. No excuses."

Here's a video you may enjoy of some of the sights the Edwards team may see along the way.

Tonight's Edwards Diary Roundup

Here are some wonderful Edwards diaries from around the tubes today that you may have missed.

Sacrificing for John Edwards by cjjason (Stop by and welcome this first-time diarist!)
Edwards on MTP: No Combat Troops in Iraq by Tom P.
Changing Minds One Person at a Time -- JRE v. HRC by passionateprogressive
Public Financing and Serving Two Masters by BruceMcF
Free Money... and the American Dream by jamess (Not a JRE diary per se, but worth thinking about)



Display:


I thought my diary (2.00 / 5)

with little content
http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/10/2/1753 33/151

"Let's put the presidency up for sale on EBAY"

was catchy..

let's hope we hear Edwards goof on that


McCain - a serial Opportunist, from marriage to policy positions
by TarHeel on Sun Oct 07, 2007 at 08:30:51 PM EST

Re: I thought my diary (2.00 / 3)

LMAO! Too funny. Thanks for the link!


by sirius on Sun Oct 07, 2007 at 08:41:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Well (2.00 / 4)

I'll take an election NOT and auction.

I have been wondering why so many would opt for a candidate that money is the name of the game.

Thanks for another EENR, it helps having the days recap in one place!

Thanks


Check out the New Progressive Blog EENRBLOG
by dk2 on Sun Oct 07, 2007 at 08:37:42 PM EST

An Election, Not an Auction Edition (2.00 / 6)

Yes, it's NOT an auction.

The majority of Iowans are still undecided. Sure, they've seen Hillary's 2 million worth of ads and Obama's four million of ads, and Edwards 23,000 in ads.

But, they haven't garnered all of the info on the candidates yet to make their decisions. Iowans are a very informed electorate. The last 6 out of 7 candidates who won Iowa, won the nomination. They wont be wowed by the big money glitzy campaigns. They'll look beyond that to the actual plans and policies of each candidate.


by NCDemAmy on Sun Oct 07, 2007 at 08:39:59 PM EST

Re: An Election, Not an Auction Edition (2.00 / 2)

Did it seem to anyone else that Russert was tougher on Edwards than Clinton?  Not that it made a difference, as Edwards was terrific.


Take out the trash. Down with Saxby Chambliss!
by CLLGADEM on Mon Oct 08, 2007 at 06:35:37 AM EST

Edwards' Racist, Sexist Comments (none / 0)

On MTP, as he was channeling Mudcat Saunders:

SEN. EDWARDS: Here's what I think. I am the candidate running for president on the Democratic side who's actually won an election in a red state running against the Jessie Helms political machine. I know what you have to do to win in battleground states, and to win in tough, tough congressional districts, and what you have to do to put out your message that works in those kind of places. People--I understand people who vote in those places, and they connect and relate to me. So I do believe when I am the Democratic nominee for president that there is no place in America that I can't go and campaign and help our congressional candidates and help our Senate candidates.

I don't care who you are, or where you live, even in Bubbaland that statement is code for women, African-Americans, or Latinos can't win in the South.  Besides, how would Edwards know how to win?  He has won once, and lost by 10 points in the 2004 presidential race in his home state.  If that weren't bad enough, he lost his home precinct in 2004.  It's bad when your neighbors won't vote for you!  Worst of all, in the current poll of likely Democratic voters in North Carolina, Edwards is only polling 18%.  Maybe they are tired of these types of pandering, racist, sexist statements as well.


by VeniceDave on Mon Oct 08, 2007 at 04:59:30 PM EST

Re: Edwards' Racist, Sexist Comments (none / 0)

how is recognizing the social forces of race and sex racist and sexist? please explain.


zombies are coming
by leewesley on Mon Oct 08, 2007 at 05:31:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Edwards' Racist, Sexist Comments (none / 0)

What Edwards is saying is that he knows how to connect with rural Americans on the issues? It is not a racist or sexist statement. He is talking about what rural American consider when voting. Latley, rural Americans care about fair tax system, creating jobs, and income inequality.

The fact that you feel rural Americans are sexists or racists shows how uneducated you are about rural Americans. I grew up on a farm and we had African-Americans as neighbors. Lately, Latinos have been moving in the area. It is not a sexist thing or racist. The truth is democrats have been ignoring the South and rural Midwest and West for way too long. Look at the 2004 Presidential election. The only Southern State Kerry campaign in was Florida. Kerry made the stupid mistake of campaigning in a handful of states. If you do not campaign in the South then you cannot expect to win. It is not Edwards's fault that Kerry did not win in North Carolina. Kerry did not do one single campaign event in North Carolina and did not show one single ad in North Carolina. You can not win a football game if you do not show up to play. Democrats have been ignoring rural Americans for way too long. Bill Clinton gave us NAFTA, which resulted in a huge job loss in rural areas. Rural Americans have not forgotten about NAFTA. The only democratic candidate that has appealed to rural America is Edwards and maybe Kucinich. Edwards is the only candidate besides Kucinich that wants to fix NAFTA so it will benefit American workers. Edwards and Kucinich are the only ones who care about American workers above corporate profit. Edwards is the only candidate that has stated the tax system needs revision so work is valued more than wealth. Edwards is the only candidate with a rural growth initiative platform. Edwards wants to create green energy jobs in rural America. So far, Clinton and Obama have failed to address rural America needs. Neither Clinton or Obama have talked about fixing NAFTA so it benefit American workers. Neither Obama nor Clinton have a plan to grow the economy in rural America. Neither Clinton nor Obama have stated they will fix the tax system where investment money is taxed more than income money.  It is not a racist or sexist statement. It is all about catering or appealing to their needs. Also, Edwards realize that the majority living in poverty live in rural America. Obama's poverty plan fails to address rural poverty which suprises me because he represents a rural state. Also, rural Americans are concern about income inequality hence Edwards Two Americas theme.


by harmony94 on Mon Oct 08, 2007 at 05:43:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.