The Dirty Trick Initiative Is Back From The Dead

Remember the initiative a GOP lawyer was trying to get onto California's June 2008 ballot in order to change the way California divies up its electoral votes? The goal of this right-wing power grab was to deliver 20 or so of California's 55 electoral votes to the Republican candidate in the name of electoral college reform and, oh yeah, democracy!

Well, we thought we'd killed it. Looks like we may have spoken too soon.

From The LA Times:

Political strategist David Gilliard said he was taking over the ballot initiative campaign, along with strategist Ed Rollins and fund raiser Anne Dunsmore. Consultant Mike Arno will oversee the signature gathering effort.

"Our budget is going to be whatever it takes to make the June ballot," said Gilliard, who played a key role in placing the 2003 recall of California Gov. Gray Davis onto the ballot.

Word is they began gathering signatures this past weekend on their way to the additional 600,000 they'll need by around November 13 in order to qualify it for the June ballot. The good news is, three weeks is not a lot of time and they're going to need to raise around $2 million to fund this effort to get this on the ballot. The bad news is they may have just the funder: Rep. Darrell Issa, who, surprise! surprise!, bankrolled the recall campaign in 2003.

From The Sacramento Bee:

Neither Gilliard nor fundraiser Anne Dunsmore named their donors, but Gilliard confirmed they hope to get support from Issa. [...]

"He's one of the people being talked to, but I can't confirm that he's involved yet," Gilliard said.

In 2003, Issa spent $1.7 million to finance signature-gathering efforts that qualified the gubernatorial recall for the ballot.

Interestingly, the new dirty trick consultants have indicated that if they don't make the June ballot, they'll try for the November 2008 ballot instead. The turnout in November is going to be huge so the likelihood of its passing then would drop considerably, but this certainly shows us these folks are not going to give up without a fight.

It's a good thing we're organized and ready to take them on. For updates and for what you can do to help fight this dirty trick, go to NoDirtyTricks.com.



Display:


Would it be possible (none / 0)

to put together an opposing ballot initiative that would guarantee all of California's delegates go to the winning candidate?


by Cleveland John on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 08:23:06 AM EST

I doubt it (none / 0)

not at this late date, when so many signatures would be required.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 09:05:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

fortunately for us (none / 0)

it seems that the California electorate is increasingly predisposed to vote against most initiatives unless they see a very compelling reason to vote for one.

I don't think this one would pass, although of course it would be a shame to have to spend money and volunteer resources fighting this instead of doing other things more helpful to Democrats.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 09:06:15 AM EST

Re: The Dirty Trick Initiative Is Back (none / 0)

Perhaps two can play this game.  Why not try to get similar measures on the ballot in Texas, Georgia, Indiana, and other reliably red states.

Better yet, scrap the electoral college.  What's wrong with "one man, one vote" anyway?


by KTinOhio on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 10:36:26 AM EST

Re: The Dirty Trick Initiative Is Back (none / 0)

Most other states don't have the mechanism for ballot initiatives that California has.

Also, this has nothing to do with "one man, one vote". The votes would be distributed by congressional district, so it still wouldn't reflect the popular vote -- just move from focusing on a few swing states to focusing on a few swing districts.


DC Drinking LiberallyDC for Democracy

by KCinDC on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 02:05:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Dirty Trick Initiative Is Back (none / 0)

Sorry, I somehow misread the bit about "one man, one vote" as indicating that the initiative's splitting up the electoral votes was more democratic, since I've seen that argument a few times. I see now that's not what you said.


DC Drinking LiberallyDC for Democracy

by KCinDC on Wed Oct 24, 2007 at 02:08:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.