Kirsten Gillibrand Has More Cash-on-Hand than the NRCC

Earlier this afternoon I noted that the Democratic Congresional Campaign Committee has about 17 times more money in the bank than its GOP counterpart, the National Republcian Congressional Committee. I turns out that that might not be the most embarrassing statistic to come out of the third quarter fundraising reports.

According to its latest filing with the Federal Election Commission, the NRCC had $1,598,505.61 in the bank as of September 30. The committee's debts total $3,850,000, meaning that the NRCC is actually in the red for $2,251,494.39.

For comparison's sake, take a look at the latest campaign filing by Congresswoman Kirsten Gillibrand, who was first elected last fall in the Republican leaning 20th district of New York. As of the end of September, Gillibrand reported having $1,631,852.36 in the bank and owing no debts or obligations. That means that one single freshman Democrat had more money on hand than the entire NRCC -- and significantly more money when debts and obligations are taken into account. I neither have the time nor the resources to look into this, but one would imagine that such a comparison is unprecedented, at least in recent history. So no wonder the Republican leadership in the House has been trying to shake up the leadership of the committee for some time.



Display:


WOW (none / 0)

Jesus she is a fucking prolific fund raiser. Somebody wants to be in the leadership one day.


reality has a well known liberal bias-Stephen Colbert
by pierredude on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 09:13:53 PM EST

Re: Kirsten Gillibrand Has More Cash-on-Hand than (none / 0)

   As much as I hate the current money-soaked campaign system we have right now for Congressional races, I am glad that she and many others of the Democratic freshman House members are working it so that they can get reelected in their swing districts. It also frees me up to use more of my limited resources to support promising challengers. I am also giving to incumbents who are outstanding, and not just run of the mill Dems...


by Zack from the SFV on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 09:36:52 PM EST

Re: Kirsten Gillibrand Has More Cash-on-Hand than (none / 0)

Talk about scaring off the competition.  I wouldn't be surprised if potential Republican candidates look at that number and decide that running against her just isn't worth it.


by Tom on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 08:27:48 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.