Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some Believe

Yesterday Democrat Niki Tsongas won a special congressional election in a Massachusetts district that leans 11 points more Democratic than the nation as a whole in presidential elections, according to the Cook Partisan Voting Index. Her relatively narrow margin of victory -- 51 percent to 45 percent -- has led a number of Republicans to squawk about how this is a bad omen for the Democrats nationally, that it represents a repudiation of the Democratic Party, etc., etc. But does it? Not nearly as much as the Republicans would have you believe, as Marc Ambinder explains.

Well -- this isn't an elite liberal district, as anyone who ever worked for Marty Meehan can tell you. It is insular and provincial and distrusts outsiders; Tsongas lived outside the district before she ran. Though it has stayed in Democratic hands since the 70s, Tsongas still outperformed Gov. Deval Patrick here by two or three points; George H, W. Bush won this congressional district in 1992, as did Mitt Romney in 2002.

So the Republicans lost a district that they won in the 1992 presidential election and the 2002 gubernatorial election, and in which their 2006 gubernatorial nominee ran about a net 18-19 points better than she did statewide and they're calling it a success?

The fact that Patrick, who won statewide 56 percent to 35 percent in 2006, apparently only won the district by 2-3 points whereas Tsongas won the district by 6 points is extremely telling. I'm not shooting for a sense of false triumphalism here. Tsongas had higher name recognition and a lot more money than Jim Ogonowski, the Republican nominee. The American public still generally favors the Democrats to the Republicans. Tsongas simply should have won more handily. At the same time, Tsongas won by a wider margin in the district than Patrick did in his statewide blowout in 2006 -- a fact that seriously undercuts the notion that the Republicans are rebounding or that Ogonowski has figured out the key to success for the Republicans in 2008.



Display:


Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (none / 0)

Glad someone said it.  This is a district that Romney won with 55% in 2002.  For Tsongas to win by 6 points in a special election is what should have been expected.  Republicans just did a good job of downplaying there chances then flipping it into a shockingly close race that could only mean Republican victories in 2008.


by geniousdrew on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 02:59:48 PM EST

The Myth of "Liberal MA" (none / 0)

What a lot of us outside the state do not realize is that Massachusetts, even in Boston, is not as "liberal" as Republicans would have us believe, once you get away from Harvard.


by RandyMI on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 03:00:29 PM EST

Revealing and important analysis (2.00 / 1)

It doesn't parallel what was written at openleft but still tells alot about that particular district.
I think the GOP was doing alot of message testing.  Mainly, we need to finish the job right in Iraq or we'll have to go back in later at a much greater cost.  And I'm sure they tested other themes along the Iraq blurring strategy.  
But, in a year where Democrats are outraising the GOP in spades something I haven't seen since like 1990.  It is telling that we weren't able to turn more of this district more progressive.  Or at least excite the progressive base, while depressing the conservative base.  There still is messaging that appeals to conservatives, there is distrust of the Democrats to do the right thing, or do anything for that matter.  In the end, it may indicate that the GOP may find ways to prevent a progressive realignment which by all accounts is happening organically.  Unfortunately, the democratic leadership is snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.  We'll win maybe 235 or 240 seats but alot of close ones will be left on the table.  The progressive surge will be arrested and a new board will be set in time for the 2010 re-apportionment elections.  Hopefully, the leadership will listen to the advice of the netroots and be much smarter about Iraq withdrawal, FISA and a host of other issues.
One caveot, how will global climate change turn the tables?
by gasperc on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 03:03:06 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (none / 0)

Thanks for the clarification! The MSM has taken this race and think that it provides a blueprint for an outsider candidate like Romney to go against Clinton.


by American1989 on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 03:18:01 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (none / 0)

Well, if that's the case, then... good.  I haven't seen the news today, but if it's pushing Romney out there, then good.  I think most of us would LOVE the GOP nominee to be Mitt Romney, rather than Rudy Giuliani.


by BruinKid on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 05:31:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

MA-5 (none / 0)

has been close for years.  In the late 80's and early 90's Chet Atkins struggled repeatedly to hold it.


by fladem on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 03:49:01 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (2.00 / 1)

As a Democratic resident of Massachusetts' 5th District, I just wanted to clarify some of the things that are being said about this race. Any one of the other Democratic primary candidates probably would have made a better Representative than Niki Tsongas, but the Democratic establishment picked Tsongas from the start, mostly on the basis of name recognition.  In a special election with a short timeframe, the establishment thought that Tsongas wouldn't have to climb the same hill that the other candidates did in making themselves known throughout the district, especially in a race against a candidate like Ogonowski.  And Ogonowski was a really good candidate for the Republicans.  He sold himself as an "independent" Republican and he had a lot of sentimental 9/11 support.  The number of Ogonowski yard signs in the district was pretty amazing for a Republican in a Democratic district.  While I didn't vote for Tsongas in the primary (or do volunteer work for her campaign--something I do for the Democratic candidates in most elections), I did go out and vote for her yesterday.  But I know quite a few progressives (including my husband) who had a hard time voting for her and who had to be dragged to the polls.

In the end, despite voting against Tsongas in the primary, I actually think Ogonowski probably would have beaten any of the other Democratic candidates.  While the 5th is a nominally Democratic district, it includes the part of the Merrimack Valley that consistently votes for Republicans, including some of the few precincts that Kerry Healey won in the last Governor's election.  So like her or not, Tsongas has a name that probably put her over the top.  Whether or not that's her only asset--as many suspect--still remains to be seen.


by jenf on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 03:51:31 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (none / 0)

Massachusetts is just not that liberal.
Highly educated electorate for the most part though so you've gotta have a message other than name recognition to do well.
by joachim on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 04:33:30 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (none / 0)

Nitpicking here:
Deval Patrick did received about 108,594 votes in MA-05 to Kerry Healey's 86,540. Christy Mihos recieved about 14,948 votes; the Green Party guy 4,157.
(I say about because I included the entire town of Wayland, of which only Precincts 1, 3, and 4 are actually in the 5th. The 2nd precinct is in Ed Markey's MA-07.)

That comes to roughly 50.7% to 40.4% to 7.0% to 1.9%.

So yes, Tsongas did outperform Patrick, but Patrick beat Healey here by a margin of 10%.

Tsongas outran Patrick (margin-wise) in 14 of the 29 towns, including many of the suburban ones such as Acton, Concord and Sudbudy.

Tsongas underperformed Patrick the remaining 15, including the larger jurisdictions, such as Lowell, Lawrence, Haverhill and Methuen. She underperformed Patrick in Dracut by 29%, although that's probably because Ogonowski was from Dracut.

On the other hand, I agree that we shouldn't read too much into this result...the national playing field is unbelievably tilted in our direction (right now), given the cash advantage of the DCCC and the number of takeover opportunities for us.


by jeff06dem on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 04:43:36 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (none / 0)

Margin Wise. Tsongas lost Mihos voters bad, but won damm near every single Patrick voter, except in Dracut.


by Democraticavenger on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 05:01:10 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close as Some (none / 0)

The democrats did not turn out... period...

It's part of this progressive "I'm quitting on the Democrats 'cos I didn't get everything I wanted" temper tantrum BS...  Republicans never do this, and  that is why they win....

It's a shame that so many members of our party are so shamefully weak... Next year is a historic opportunity to massively realign government... and we are pissing it away 'cos some of us fantasize that we have a 2/3 veto-proof majority...

Get in the game, people!  The formula is pretty simple... get more democrats in congress, and you increase the possibility of getting more progressive policies...

Thanks,

Mike


by lordmikethegreat on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 05:10:38 PM EST

compare to OH-2 (none / 0)

Totally agree with your diary.

A lot of Repugs (and even some of us) have tried to compare this to special in OH-2 a while back ...

While Bush carried MA-5 with 41.5%, Ogonowski got 45.1% -- an improvement of only 3.6.

In OH-2, Kerry got 36%, while Paul Hackett received 48.4% -- an improvement of 12.4.

So, there's really no comparison.


by silver spring on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 05:18:49 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly (none / 0)

U.S. House election, 1990: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Chester G. Atkins 110,232 49.85  
 Republican John MacGovern 101,017 45.68  
 Other  9,891 4.47  
Turnout 221,140

U.S. House election, 1992: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 133,844 52.17 +2.32
 Republican Paul W. Cronin 96,206 37.50 -8.18
 Independent Mary Farinelli 19,077 7.44 +7.44
 Independent David E. Coleman 7,214 5.76 +2.81
 Write-in  223 0.09 -4.38

U.S. House election, 1994: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 140,725 69.83 +17.66
 Republican David E. Coleman 60,734 30.14 -7.36
 Write-in  65 0.03 -0.06

U.S. House election, 1996: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 183,429 99.08 +29.25
 Republican Unopposed   -30.14
 Write-in  1,708 0.92 +0.89
Turnout 185,137  
 Democratic hold Swing +29.25  

U.S. House election, 1998: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 127,418 70.70 -28.38
 Republican David E. Coleman 52,725 29.25 +29.25
 Write-in  87 0.05 -0.87
Turnout 180,230  
 Democratic hold Swing -28.38  

U.S. House election, 2000: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 199,601 98.02 +27.32
 Republican Unopposed   -29.25
 Write-in  4,040 1.98 +1.93
Turnout 203,641  
 Democratic hold Swing +27.32  

U.S. House election, 2002: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 122,562 60.15 -37.87
 Republican Charles McCarthy 69,337 34.03 +34.03
 Libertarian Ilana Freedman 11,729 5.76 +5.76
 Write-in  149 0.07 -1.91
Turnout 203,777  
 Democratic hold Swing -37.87  

U.S. House election, 2004: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 179,652 66.99 +6.84
 Republican Thomas Tierney 88,232 32.90 -1.13
 Write-in  305 0.11 +0.04
Turnout 268,189  
 Democratic hold Swing +6.84  

U.S. House election, 2006: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Marty Meehan 159,120 98.98 +31.99
 Republican Unopposed   -32.90
 Write-in  3,152 1.02 +0.91
Turnout 216,832  
 Democratic hold Swing +31.99  

Special election, 2007: Massachusetts District 5
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
 Democratic Niki Tsongas 54,363 51.32%  
 Republican Jim Ogonowski 47,770 45.10%  
 Independent Patrick Murphy 2,170 2.05%  
 Independent Kurt Hayes 1,125 1.06%  
 Constitution Kevin Thompson 494 0.47%  
Turnout 105,922  


by orin76 on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 06:14:39 PM EST

Re: Tsongas' Win Not as Surprisingly Close (none / 0)

the point of this post is not that Ogonowski got more votes it's that the ind candidates got less votes not the democrat. Once your in that district you get high vote totals.  Marty Meehan had a close election the first time then the next time he killed the republican over and over again or wasn't challenged at all. There is a locked in 40% non-dem vote in the district and and a locked in 45 to 48% non-d vote when there isn't an inc


by orin76 on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 06:20:23 PM EST

Re: Why no Bush? (none / 0)

Ogo should have had Bush campaign for him.

That would have gotten Niki's numbers up.


by Bush Bites on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 08:46:18 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.