Fundraising numbers in Q3

by Jerome Armstrong, Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 11:28:52 AM EST

Today we should start to get a solid indicator of how much money was raised in Q3 by the candidates. First out was Bill Richardson:

Bill Richardson raised about $5.2 million for his Democratic presidential bid in the past three months, bringing his total fundraising for the year to more than $18 million, his campaign said Sunday.

The First Read is reporting that:

John Edwards will raise at least $7 million.

As for Clinton and Obama, the WaPost is saying that both camps will raise more than $17 million. NBC News sources indicate both will surpass $20 million (Clinton aides said they expected to bank between $17 million and $19 million).

On the Republican side:

Fred Thompson will raise at least $8 million.

Mitt Romney is expected to raise about $15 million.

Rudy Giuliani's take was expected to run about $10 million.

Anything else?

Update [2007-10-1 13:51:28 by Todd Beeton]: Barack Obama reportedly raised $19 million for the primary in Q3. Total for the year is almost $80 million.




Tags: 2008 (all tags)

Display:
Permalink :: 39 Comments :: Post a Comment


Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

waiting for news from the top two...the silence is deafening.


by aiko on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 11:44:52 AM EST

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

I'll be curious to see how much of Clinton's is for the General in that $20 million total...  


by yitbos96bb on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 11:45:08 AM EST

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

We won't know this for 15 days. I'm sure they will announce a topline figure today and nothing else until they file their report.

IN addition to the breakdown of primary vs general, attention should be paid to spending by the front-runners. They've been spending moderately to heavily and the overall COH figure will be important.


by desmoulins on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:59:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

Wow, isn't it AWESOME our top two have outraised the  GOP in every quarter.  Kick ASS!!!


by yitbos96bb on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 11:45:58 AM EST

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

Hopefully we will have the overwhelming financial advantage for a change.   Lets the Republicans fight it out short of cash like Democrats have had to do so many times.


by dpANDREWS on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:26:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

republicans are sitting on their checkbooks... (none / 0)

waiting for the fields to clear, according to what i've heard.  the staggering figure (to me) was their goal -- $400M for the nominee in primary money (all to be spent before the convention).  i'd be interested to see how they do that, but i'm not prone to underestimate republicans, who have a vastly superior volunteer organizational structure afaict...


"We did not come to fear the future. We came here to shape it." - President Obama, Sept 9, 2009
by bored now on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 03:45:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: republicans are sitting on their checkbooks... (none / 0)

What do you think of the threat to back a third candidate if Guiliani gets the nod?

It makes it seem like their traditional volunteer force organization structure is showing some potential cracks.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Ernst on Tue Oct 02, 2007 at 05:26:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

Edwards has had pretty strong fundraising this year.  Clinton and Obama have just done a better job at it.  The Republicans seem to be in bad shape overall.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 11:49:14 AM EST

No doubt about that. (none / 0)

The republicans suck.


Obama Citizen Ad Videos
by lovingj on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:02:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Whatever Hillary raises, it won't be enough (none / 0)

according to pundits and some people here.  They'll say something sexist like, "she needed a couple million more to make up for that awful cackle."

HRC will be fine.  I'm just shocked that JRE hasn't raised more and he's losing his IA mojo vis-a-vis polls.  Sad.


McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:04:56 PM EST

Re: Whatever Hillary raises, it won't be enough (none / 0)

There hasn't been any poll with a decent likely voter screen coming out of Iowa in ages. The recent newsweek and arg polls aren't worth a warm bucket of spit.


by Quinton on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:24:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

in case you are interested (none / 0)

HRC is competent but she is also calculating.

The cackle was calculated. Her vote to go to war in Iraq was calculated. So much--if not everything-- she does and says is calculated.

Her calculated laugh suggests a lack of spontaneity and is a metaphor for her numerous politically motivated decisions and votes.

Its the calculation that is offensive and non-progressive and unbecoming.  She is competent but her leadership lacks heart and it lacks honesty.


by aiko on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:32:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: in case you are interested (none / 0)

dude, you need to get out more and get more fun out of life.  take off the tinhat.


McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:37:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: in case you are interested (none / 0)

So what would you call it then?  A sudden change in her sense of humor?  Over the last couple weeks she just started doing her laugh a lot more.  What's the reason for it then?  


by JeremiahTheMessiah on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:41:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: in case you are interested (none / 0)

It's the height of naivete to believe that any candidate IS NOT calculating.  Do you think Obama's missed votes on the Senate floor are due to an inability to multitask?


by realistic democrat on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 03:55:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: in case you are interested (none / 0)

your last sentence cracked me up!  haha!


McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 04:08:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Whatever Hillary raises, it won't be enough (2.00 / 1)

..according to pundits and some people here.  They'll say something sexist like, "she needed a couple million more to make up for that awful cackle."

I believe the description of Hillary's fundraising would be:

Cackling all the way to the bank.


by hwc on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 01:30:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

I think it would be important to compare each candidate's total to what they made last quarter.


by jsamuel on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:05:59 PM EST

Edwards small donors (2.00 / 1)

Edwards money looks good. You have to consider the fact that 90% of his donors give $100 or less. The people giving are regular Americans and not lobbyists, corporate executives, billionaires, etc. When I decide who to vote for, I always look at the donors of the candidates. Money talks in this day of age. I believe the donors of a candidates tells me what values the candidate has and where they stand on the issues. As Mike Gravel said in a debate, if you want to know what kind of person they are then follow the money.


by johanna71 on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:49:24 PM EST

Re: Edwards small donors (none / 0)

If 90% of his donors give $100 or less and he raises 42% of his money from maxed out donors then he doesn't have that many donors.  And I would love to know exactly how does the difference between someone giving $20 and someone giving $2300 tell you anything about what values the person has and where they stand on the issue.  This statement is prejudice of the highest order.  


by Piuma on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 02:07:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

yeah - damn that anti-wealthy prejudice! (none / 0)


by DrFrankLives on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 04:02:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: yeah - damn that anti-wealthy prejudice! (none / 0)

If you want to break it down by class, I would say the wealthy have much better values and stand on environmental issues than the poor.  Is that the type of sentiment that gets us anywhere?


by Piuma on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 04:43:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Edwards small donors (none / 0)

I have given the max to at least one candidate in my life.  I am not rich.  What do you have against me?


ABO... Anybody but Obama. I LIKE the democratic party.

by MollieBradford on Tue Oct 02, 2007 at 10:47:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Two Interesting Repulbican Numbers (none / 0)

There are two interesting results for the Rs I am looking forward to seeing.  First, how much of Romney's money is self-financed.  To date, his advantage over Guliani is due to self financing. Second, how much does Huckabee raise.  I think he is perfectly positioned to win the R nomination...close second in Iowa, "better then expected" in NH, win in SC.  

Clearly, the big question mark though is still fund raising.  Because of his results in the Iowas straw poll and the resulting good press, his quarter should show a strong improvement over the first two.  Just how much better, if any, will tell if he has enough to really compete hard in the early states.


Andy Katz
by Andy Katz on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 12:50:20 PM EST

Some Context (none / 0)

http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/money/3r dq03summary.html

Link to 3Q 2003 fundraising -

Richardson raised more this cycle than any Dem in 3Q 2003 with the exception of Dean.


Bill Richardson: "Get out now. Get all our troops out now. It is the only right and responsible choice."
by Stephen Cassidy on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 01:14:49 PM EST

Politico Reporting (2.00 / 1)

Via the AP, $19 million for Barack.
by HatchInBrooklyn on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 01:42:36 PM EST

Plus... (none / 0)

He raised a little money for the general too, bringing the Q3 total to over $20 million.
by HatchInBrooklyn on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 01:45:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Plus... (none / 0)

Could you link that?  I'm not seeing it.  


by JeremiahTheMessiah on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 01:47:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Here you go... (none / 0)

Obama's $19 Million
by HatchInBrooklyn on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 01:49:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Here you go... (none / 0)

Obama should send a thank you note to Oprah .


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 01:59:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Come On (none / 0)

Don't even get me started on who Clinton should thank.
by HatchInBrooklyn on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 02:06:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Come On (none / 0)

Hey don't be so sensitive , I just couldn't resist .

giggle giggle.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 02:11:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Come On (none / 0)

cackle, cackle, okay?

It is true Obama would have collected $16 million to $17 million without Oprah's mega-fundraiser for him this quarter.

The number is still damn impressive, but you have to admit it's a sharp decline from his record $33 million in Q2.


Hillary: We will finally have a president who doesn't mind pulling over and asking for directions. Am I right, ladies?
by areyouready on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 02:18:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Look at History (none / 0)

this is standard in the 3rd quarter.


Bring Back MyDD - Just say No to Rec'ing Candidate Diaries.
by CardBoard on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 02:19:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

cackle cackle (none / 0)


by aiko on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 02:06:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: cackle cackle (none / 0)

Obama raised over 20 million if you include the amount he raised for the general.


by allmiview on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 03:22:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

McCain $5 million.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanma rtin/1007/McCains_money.html


McCain's money

John McCain will raise about $5 million for the quarter but still show well over $2 million in debt, according to two sources familiar with the internal tally.  

Though far below what rivals Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani are expected to report, the $5 million figure is better than what some in the McCain orbit had fretted about a few weeks ago.   The Arizonan enjoyed a mini-surge of contributions following the solid media buzz he earned during his "No Surrender" tour last month.



Hillary: We will finally have a president who doesn't mind pulling over and asking for directions. Am I right, ladies?
by areyouready on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 02:23:27 PM EST

Re: Fundraising numbers in Q3 (none / 0)

He is done.


by iamready on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 04:41:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Edwards (none / 0)

Edwards $7 million. His campaign claims 75,000 new donors this quarter, not far away from Obama's juggernaut.

Those headcounts are getting very silly. Think about one minute, it's pretty much worthless on a grand scale. Clinton had a rally yesterday, sold out 3,000 tickets, so she could claim 3,000 new donors from one event. It has proved nothing when you put this on the scale of the number of voters.


Hillary: We will finally have a president who doesn't mind pulling over and asking for directions. Am I right, ladies?
by areyouready on Mon Oct 01, 2007 at 04:50:26 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.

Login
Username:

Password: