The online activities

I'd like to throw out a couple of open questions regarding politics: What new technologies are you excited about? What emerging technology or web-based practice do you think will have the biggest impact in 2008?

This came from NetPulse in their email newsletter:

2006 will be remembered as the year that social networking or Web 2.0 first had a big impact in American politics.

YouTube, MySpace, Facebook, Wikipedia and other social networking sites played an important and occasionally decisive role in US campaigns. George Allen taught us all the new word `macaca' that will surely take its place in the lexicon on American politics. On YouTube we learned that Sen. Conrad Burns can't stay awake for his day job and Sen. Ted Stevens explained how the Internet `tubes' sometimes get clogged. We also learned from former Congressman Mark Foley that emails never die and they can come back to haunt us at the most inopportune times.

But beyond these high profile moments, countless campaigns used the new 2.0 tools and strategies to organize supporters, recruit volunteers, raise money online and do all the things campaigns need to do to win.

What is most remarkable about 2.0 and politics is the speed from when it was first introduced to when it had a significant impact. In the past we have seen new technologies emerge in one election cycle and then in the next cycle, two years later, it begins to have a real impact. This time the `speed to market' was compressed into one two year election cycle. This trend will only accelerate. We expect 2.0 to play a major role in the '08 elections, especially on the presidential level. Expect to see at least one (and probably several) significant new technologies emerge and have a real impact, all in the next two years.

I've written about a couple of the new technologies quickly adopted by the netroots. OpenID (which is rolling out this month in beta [on netroots.com]) and video blogging (not just reproductions, but actual easily-done before and after commentary edited in, like we do here to text clips).

And this was also in the newsletter, something I had heard a little about, but not read much further:

Globally, we continued to be amazed at the online activities of al-Qaeda and its loose network of supporters and terrorist around the globe. They now have their own daily Internet news program, they have job boards to recruit new terrorists and they have dramatically expanded their propaganda activities thru a vast network of new sites, many operating on the micro or local level.

As we have been saying for some time, we believe that al-Qaeda is probably the most `effective' online organization in the world today. What's even more amazing is the apparent lack of response from the other side.

It shouldn't come as a shock that the web facilitates their activities, and it'd be interesting to learn what has been tried to counter al-Qaeda. My guess would be along the lines of hacking and shutting down ISP's, which is whack-a-mole.



Display:


Re: The online activities (none / 0)

Here's another technology, one I just got an email about: A new concept out there called BlogTalkRadio that lets bloggers have their own radio shows off of their blogs. It's live, then archived; for instance Alan Levy's show, James Boyce and Dave Johnson tonight.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com
by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 11:38:33 AM EST

Re: The online activities (3.00 / 1)

The key development in 2008 will be the continuing rise of local blogs. National blogs have been successful in influecing the national media.  This has been less the case with local blogs.

I think in 2008 local blogs will begin to influence local coverage.  

The challenge will be to integrate the local efforts with the national effort.


by fladem on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 11:41:46 AM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

I think we did that (leveraging local blogs) well with ned this past cycle -- real well.

I can't find the link, but I wrote sometime in the beginning of 2005 that the local blog would be the biggest development of the 2006 cycle -- but focused on field more than comm I believe.  Ultimately, that is what Jerome and I tried to do with Grow Ohio and Senator Sherrod Brown ... but for many reasons, didn't quite work as well as it could have.

Anyway, I am interested in this al-qaeda angle, Jerome.  Please write more as you learn it.

Tim


by Tim Tagaris on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 11:48:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

Tim, research Rita Katz.


by dereau on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 02:13:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

here's the definitive piece on that.


by Adam B on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 02:50:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

I think the local blogs are about where DKos was in 2002.  At that point DKos was mostly a place for discussion - the idea that we were influencing anything would have been absurd.

Right now the local blogs are mostly being used to organize events.    I haven't noticed much influence on local media (certainly in Florida) though you can already see the signs (the Bass race, the allen race) coming.


by fladem on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:12:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

Probably in some states still, but not in Virginia-- they just got done being the main vehicle to launch Webb (whom raised more than half his money online).


by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:21:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

In North Carolina, we have the media commenting on the stories at BlueNC.  They at least know we exist and from what we can tell, they read our stories.

Beyond that, we regularly have local, state, and federal officials stop by to read or post.  I think you will see much more of this as state-wide blogs begin to take off.

Of course, in our area OrangePolitics.org is the unofficial blog home of nearly every county and town official.  


BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:46:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Cell Phones (none / 0)

I think cell phones have underutilized potential for netroots activists and campaigns alike.  They're a portable way to send and receive information quickly, and now that video is available I expect their use to explode sometime in 2008.

I also agree with Fladem about local blogs.  We've already seen what they can do in places like Connecticut.  I think local sites can have a huge impact on Congressional races next cycle, especially since local media regularly does such a lousy job of covering local politics.


by Melissa Ryan on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 11:47:27 AM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

I continue to maintain my personal theory that all internet technology developments come from the adult entertainment world. Live chats, webcams, secure pay technology, etc. all got their widespread start with porn.

Hell adult film star Jenna Jameson has 1,026,711 friends on MySpace.

Now I don't personally frequent those kind of sites, so you'd have to ask someone else about what the latest developments are on them."

www.adamconner7.com
by Adam Conner on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 11:48:28 AM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

Don't forget search engine optimization.

Tim


by Tim Tagaris on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 11:49:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

I once worked for a client who was very much on the same page as you, Adam.


by lhuynh on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 02:21:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

SKYPE

I installed it last night for my 16 year old daughter...Her friend is off to England and she wants to talk with him..

My daugher has grown  up in the digital world.. Blogs ( her school is teaching Shakespeare using blogs)mps, online courses...

But the chat feature of Skype blew us way


by cybermome1207 on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 11:53:24 AM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

SoapBlox more than MySpace... come on!

I get no love :P.


SquareState.net - Colorado Politics
by pacified on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 12:05:13 PM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

I'll give you your props - SoapBlox was a key element in blowing up the local blog scene. You filled a big need for the progressive blogosphere and the state-level netroots are much better off because you did. I was a big fan of Burnt Orange Report's move to SoapBlox and was one of the small-dollar donors that helped Karl-T pay for it. Of course I was also rewarded with a sweet single digit UID!


by clockwerks on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 04:46:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (3.00 / 1)

In larger cities, here in San Francisco for instance, I predict the rollout of free wifi will have a large effect. This may or may not be in place in time for 2008.

I can see the existence a free city-wide high speed connection as having an effect like youtube on steroids. Coupled with cgg's idea of cell phones, instant access could turn into instant action.


by schlagle on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 12:16:11 PM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

Will TV become participatory?  That's the big nut to crack.


by Matt Stoller on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 12:40:55 PM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

This is why net neutrality matters. If corporate video providers (whether content or cable) can't lock it down, its inevitable that everyone will get some kind of pipe that hooks the free and open internet to a screen they can see from their couch.

It might take a while, but it should be impossible for TimeWarner/Verizon/Comcast to lock you into their browser for content, and that'll mean access to stuff that's not blessed by Viacom/Universal/et al.

Then it's just up to independent content producers and middlemen, and they're actually ahead of the game if anything.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:54:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Online petitions (none / 0)

Consider online petitions -- we used one quite effectively in the fight to retain progressive radio in Madison, gathering 5400 signatures. We used an all-purpose site that just about anyone can figure out, but which does not forward petition-signers eMail addresses to the petition initiators. That's a problem. I see the Columbus and Boston groups fighting for progressive radio have set up their own petitions, good move.


by MikeB on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 12:44:45 PM EST

Re: Online petitions (none / 0)

Locally petitions are great. Nationally they're about listbuilding, which is kind of lame. I look forward to a day when organizations give up the Borg as their model.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:55:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Second on Skype (none / 0)

I agree with respect to skype. They're still innovating, the service still either free or dirt cheap and the feature set keeps growing.

Virtual reality spaces like SecondLife are maturing, and provide opportuities for on-the-fly virtual meetings that are more productive than chat rooms, and much cheaper than video teleconferencing.

But all group meeting systems are getting cheaper, which will facilitate progressive team building.


by jayackroyd on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:06:37 PM EST

Re: Second on Skype (none / 0)

I've been doing some real interesting things with skype's free con-calling feature. Through their site you can get 100 people on for free (as opposed to 5 to 10 from the desktop), and it really does work.

Also interesting are developments in the VCN space.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:49:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

These are the Bushies.... (none / 0)

....the only thing they truly understand about the internet is that lefties use it to hurt them. They're an authoritarian government that is arguably within spitting distance of a dictatorship, those never respond well to innovative and evolving threats on things like the internets.


by MNPundit on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:11:21 PM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

Loved reading all the comments, I really don't get why cell phones haven't been used in America as efficiently as in lots of other countries.

A fairly new website -- Stickam -- is quite trendy and sure does offer a lot of potential.

I think the most important change will be one of strategy that Web 2.0 has forced. I think too many of the assumptions that most consultants and politicians use as a starting point have been circumvented by technology. Unfortunately, while I think many of us grasp the potential here, I still think the whole online conventional wisdom gap that Bowers has written about is wide (both a problem and potential, especially in primaries).

Also, while in the last presidential cycle it was the Dean movement that drove innovation, this time around is think innovation will be proven in small races (many of us Californians are going to try it here).

One other interesting dynamic is that a lot of online activists have known a lot of other online activists for a long time. We've fought together (and eachother sometimes) and not only has technology enabled these bonds, but longevity has strengthened them.

And when it comes to the potential for unbelievable disruption, I think 2008 may see the end of balloons at campaign events...


by Bob Brigham on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:12:21 PM EST

Re: The online activities (3.00 / 1)

We've got to be careful with cell phones. Studies have shown that text messages, when used in correctly, just annoy the shit out of people (and I'm in the category).
www.adamconner7.com
by Adam Conner on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 02:35:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

I don't know that we're going to see any fundamental breakthrough online technologies. We're likely to see lots of tactical innovation in the coordinated use of several technologies that have emerged over the last several years.

For instance, too many senior political operatives continue to think of YouTube as a novelty. They don't understand that YouTube and similar services have shaken the TV broadcasters very hard to their core. They are changing their business models because of YouTube. For campaigns in '07 and '08, rather than trying to figure out what the "next YouTube" is, I'd spend my time on figuring out how to actually use YouTube well in a consistent and strategic way.    

Similarly with Myspace. There are hundreds of millions of people with myspace accounts. Niche comedian Dane Cook has over a million friends on myspace. There's no reason a political figure with the broad name recognition of say a "Bill Clinton" or "Al Gore" couldn't have five or ten million friends on myspace. Now imagine if they then took the time to actually use a myspace network to bring attention to important but obscure causes.

In terms of relatively new stuff, I suspect you'll see more innovation with respect to RSS (imagine if each of your campaign workers could publish their own rss feed), interactive content delivery to cell phones, and CRM and work collaboration technologies like SalesForce.com and BaseCamp.


by blueflorida on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:13:32 PM EST

Re: The online activities (none / 0)

OpenID and FOAP (Friend of a Friend, sort of a decentralized profile standard for social networks).  OpenAcademic is working on something that could benefit is us all.  It's looking to integrate drupal (CMS), Elgg (social network), MediaWiki, and Moodle (courseware) via OpenID


by Aurostion on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:17:03 PM EST

OpenID Beta? WTF?!?! (none / 0)

OpenID (which is rolling out this month in beta)

Slow down there, Turbo!

OpenID has been functionally "rolled out" for a couple of years, ever since Brad Fitzpatrick of livejournal showed it can scale in production, and it's been available for decent community-supported open-source projects like  Joomla and Drupal for a while.

I think you mean your project (scoop fork?) is going beta with OpenID support. That's cool, and it's nice that your pushing the protocol, but you really aught not to make it sound like you invented this or are taking credit for it or anything. It's bad for the ol' credibility, not to mention disrespectful to the people who have been working on/with OpenID for years. I'm sure you didn't mean anything like that, but it's just sloppy, you know?

There's a time and a place for razzle-dazzle and sales-pitching, and I'm well aware of the coalition effort to raise the profile of OpenID -- which is awesome -- but I'd personally much rather you made MyDD a part of that effort, rather than just another place to spew marketing. Maybe it's just me, but that's part of what this site is all about.

Just so everyone knows, there are pre-built libraries for every major language (even .NET!) that are freely available. Thanks to a lot of hard work by a lot of people over the years, these libraries make  it easy to use OpenID in apache, plone, media wiki and lots lots more!

There is also a pretty decent community of OpenID evangelists who are working on building a Free (as in Speech) identity layer for the internet, which is what this is all about.

This is why it's cool, because just about any community will be able to become an identity provider. There will be zero chance of a monopoly, which is disappointing to a lot of people who thought they'd be able to own a piece of the identity layer and set up a nice little tollbooth. Every platform can (and should) support this and it will enable a functional yet decentralized network for identity, reputation and authority, which is a Good Thing(tm).


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 01:47:40 PM EST

Re: OpenID Beta? WTF?!?! (none / 0)

omg, I offended you with syntax!!  OpenID (which is rolling out this month in beta on netroots.com, which will be one of many and that's a good thing.


by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 02:07:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Busted (3.00 / 1)

omg, I offended you with syntax!!

Actually, you offended me with a lot more. Here's the deal:

Down The Memory Hole
It looks like you deleted and reposted your comment a couple times. I noticed because my reply failed, but I have to say I appreciate the way you dailed back your tone. For anyone who really cares or thinks I'm making things up, here comment v.1 and comment v.2. I appreciate that you didn't want to publicly call me a dick or say you "weren't surprised" I got upset over syntax. Thanks.

It's unfortunate, though, that you updated your front-page post (the original front-page post as I read it is here: it doesn't mention NetRoots) without noting the update.

Not mentioning this change is being a bad actor; you of all people should know this. I know blogger ethics panels are a joke, but come on.

The way it looks to me, you changed the master post, didn't note the change, and then changed your comment to specifically call out the part of the master post that wasn't there when I made my comment. It seems like you did this all to cover your ass (or, you might say, "respond to criticism") and I understand that. I probably would have let it go if you didn't do it by making me look like I'm an asshole who can't read.

I think this shows though that I touched a nerve. Sorry if I stepped on your business model, but this is not how we build trust as a coalition.

Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt
So I'm sorry if this is me being a dick, but back to the lesson at hand it clearly wasn't obvious in your original unedited post that you were talking about NetRoots. I also don't think given the things I hear in the marketplace that it should come as a total surprise that I (and others) might have some concerns that you were positioning yourself as the sole provider or key player in something that's really a mass community effort available from literally 100s of sources.

This is annoying, yes, but more importantly it's ultimately bad for our market and for our clients (e.g. "candidates"). Thanks for clearing this up for posterity though. If you plan on building a business around providing Identity services, the key is trust and accountability.

In that spirit, I don't think you can blame me for pushing back simply by dropping a lot of links for people who might be hungry for context. I also do think giving credit where credit is due is important in principle (which is why I mention Brad by name; he's an unsung hero here).

One Of Many? I Sure Hope So...
Finally, I do find it curious that your initial comment was sort of contentiously about me doing it "instead," which changed to "we'll be one of many." That's a 180-degree turnaround, now isn't it?

It's a good change though, and I hope it's genuine. I'd be glad if you launched something that introduced a lot of people to a technology protocol that I think will be important infrastructure for the next wave of development. But doing it right means having many providers. Functionally I think we can all agree it would be bad design if your or my or any site (or shop) were the one-and-only provider for progressive political OpenID.

It would also be a bad thing if a site provided OpenID but didn't accept it from other reputable providers. But we all know you wouldn't do that, right?

Anyway, as they say, power corrupts, and admin rights are no different. That's why decentralization matters. Here's hoping you take a second to think about what all this is really about, because we're ultimately on the same side here. This isn't served when you act in bad faith and make claims to inexperienced technology buyers about the state of the marketplace. I hope you can continue to be a positive force, but I have to say this whole experience has raised a lot of questions for me.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:22:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

i hope we're ultimately on the same side here


by dereau on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:25:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

I certainly hope your concerns are addressed by my comment below. We're very much on the same side. Jerome and the rest of us building netroots.com are just trying to move the ball down the political technology field using open standards. We wouldn't be using OpenID if we were trying to be the only progressive identity provider.

I'm not going to defend anybody's comments but my own, but your original comment was a bit unfair - instead of merely pointing out the sloppy wording, you insinuated that he was claiming to invent it or take credit for it. He didn't say "OpenID (a technology we are rolling out in beta this month)". Could've he had said it better originally? Sure. But it didn't sound like "razzle-dazzle" or "sales-pitching" and he certainly wasn't trying to "spew marketing". He mentioned an exciting technology (alongside others) and our project in passing.

I'm curious what you mean when you say "given the things I hear in the marketplace". Which marketplace? What are you hearing?

And what is with your line about us providing OpenID but not accepting it from others? Why even suggest that? It goes against everything OpenID is based upon.

BTW, I appreciate you being honest enough to subtitle part of your own comment FUD. The paragraphs below that were true to it's label.


by clockwerks on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 04:09:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

By the marketplace I mean both the array of clients who might utilize services and the array of providers and technologies. We talk to a lot of the same people about who to do business with. That's what I mean.

I didn't really want to start a flame war, just throw some context around what Jerome has been saying.

Anyway, you seem like a nice guy and a real person -- as opposed to the others who materialized from the ether just to comment on this post -- and I really do wish you well and I really do hope your work is rewarding and successful.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 05:04:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

You know, the original statement made me pause and scratch my head, but I figured it out.

OMG AMBIGUITY IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE HOW SHOCKING.

Stop being so pedantic or go post on slashdot, your one of those zealots that gives open source and open standards a bad name.


by Aurostion on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 04:28:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

it clearly wasn't obvious in your original unedited post that you were talking about NetRoots.

Yes it was.  Even if the syntax was difficult, a little bit of thought would have led you to the right conclusion...

I also don't think given the things I hear in the marketplace that it should come as a total surprise that I (and others) might have some concerns that you were positioning yourself as the sole provider or key player in something that's really a mass community effort available from literally 100s of sources

I think you are reading way too much into Jerome's posts (and reading strangely at that) if you have taken him to mean that he is attempting to set himself up as a sole provider of anything.  You clearly understand how OpenID works, and given that understanding, I think you would agree upon reflection that it is ridiculous to conclude that anyone advocating a distributed, open-source, free identity solution would be hatching a plan to set themselves up as a sole identity provider.

Also, digging up the deleted comments was bad form.  Jerome probably deleted them because upon second-thought he decided that his responses were not civil.  Too bad you did not make the same decision...


by odacrem on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 04:35:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

Welcome to mydd; glad I could draw out your first comment. ;)


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 05:05:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

Actually, he doesn't have SU capability here, so he gets to live with the stupid things he says.


by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 05:21:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

Actually, I don't have any problem living with the stupid things that I say. Not that I think my comment here is stupid, but I stand by my words even when I do step in it because I think that's the kind of thing that, you know, matters.

I've been walking that talk for five years and it's fun. I enjoy transparency and being held accountable. It makes my world a better place.

On the other hand, you clearly do have a problem with shooting off your mouth, and now the stupid things you say are on flickr where you don't have su, or even sudo.

Cheers! I'm off to enjoy a football game.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 06:21:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

cheers (none / 0)

You obviously have the right to infer I'm a snakeoil salesman with inferior motives, but that sort of unbacked claim calls into question both your motives and your credibility.

Who are you working with now Josh?  


by Jerome Armstrong on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 07:19:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Busted (none / 0)

Also, digging up the deleted comments was bad form.

I only know about this because I saw the first version of the first reply (which said, "don't be a dick") and wanted to reply to that, because he did say it to me, but that reply didn't work because Jerome deleted the original.

If he had just deleted it and that's all, I would have almost certainly let it go at that. However, he had to try and "win."

The thing is, this whole debacle is precisely an example of the kind of mindset and behavior that are cause for concern for me.


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 06:32:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OpenID Beta? WTF?!?! (none / 0)

This is great.  Next we should work on a system where computers can communicate over the telecommunications backbone in this country by splitting up information into "packets" and then reassembling them.  You could call it TCP/IP or ScoopRoots/Snakeoil or something.  Be sure to build it in perl.

</snark>A shocking number of peope have spend an immeasurable number of hours working on this for years.  This can't be any one person's baby.


by dereau on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 02:10:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OpenID Beta? WTF?!?! (none / 0)

Good points Josh.

This project, building netroots.com as an OpenID provider, is the evolution of the work we were doing for Mark Warner's Forward Together PAC (an OpenID RP). We engaged with the identity community from the beginning: Kaliya (Identity Woman) was at a tech roundtable w/ Gov. Warner and most recently we attended IIW 2006b and hosted a session on how we used OpenID and how a strong open identity layer could benefit the political realm. I was hoping to hook up w/ Zack there since we started a conversation on this at YearlyKos, but we didn't make it happen. And as you suggest, we are trying to OpenID-enable MyDD. I'm aiming to make it usable beyond just this branch of Scoop as well. Wish me luck on my journey through Scoop land.

My point is that we are joining the effort and helping the already amazing identity community by increasing adoption and advocating for user-centric online identity. And we're doing it because it's good for the netroots and the progressive movement to empower internet users with tools to own their digital identity and reputation. You're right on that it's best feature is the actual decentralization. It seems a perfect fit for the spirit of the netroots and MyDD.

The best part of all this is that so many other platforms are becoming OpenID enabled. The WordPress plugin is a snap, your VOX blog is also your OpenID and my favorite: ClaimID. And I even hear that it's being considered for the Drupal core. So I assume we'll see lots of Chapter Three built sites using OpenID right?


by clockwerks on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:26:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OpenID Beta? WTF?!?! (none / 0)

Yep. That's the goodness. As for our shop, who knows if any of our clients will need it, but I've been telling people about it for a while now and I plan on building it into my side projects (e.g. a little friends and family thinger).

Good luck on your journey. It's kind of like pulling the sword from the stone, eh? Tough, but powerful if you can do it!


Me | My Work | Future Majority
by Josh Koenig on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:30:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

we have no idea. (none / 0)

Look -- last year, at this time, YouTube was barely being used.  It'll happen, and then we'll know, but I've been following this stuff for twenty years (since I started using local BBSes), and no one has ever been able to fully fathom or comprehend the next step.  Hell, just work on the idea that users themselves would create most of the content on the web, as opposed to corporations and programmers.  Blogger.com was not inevitable.


by Adam B on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 02:53:40 PM EST

Re: we have no idea. (none / 0)

Blogger also wasn't an accident. They had a vision for what they were making. I remember talking to one of the Blogger folks (Meg Hourihan maybe) at SXSW in 2000. She went on and on about how they were lowering the barrier to web publishing 'so even girl scouts can share their ideas with the world'.


by clockwerks on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:31:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: we have no idea. (none / 0)

When I was in high school in the late 1980s, we were pretty high tech, having landed a Mac lab in 1985 -- like, the second in the country at a high school.  Still, in a school of 3000, I was one of 2-3 students who knew how to run a BBS (using Red Ryder, IIRC), and I didn't even try to learn the new "HyperCard" software that 1-2 others were playing with.

I remember Gopher, which preceded the web.  The idea that it could go graphic, and that data transmission would be so fast . . . it's still stunning.  I remember 300 baud.


by Adam B on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:40:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I want to say one word to you -- just one word. (none / 0)

Widgets!

Little Flash or AJAX widgets that can do and display something dynamically, posted simply by copy and pasting some code into a blog sidebar, a social network profile, or a signature.

Example widgets could be created for fundraising from friends, RSVPing to house parties, signing up to Candidate X's email list, etc. Each widget will have a dynamic counter (I've raised X, or X of my friends are coming to this house party).


Leftmost Bit
by Luigi Montanez on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 08:28:28 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.