We're better than this

Remember Virginia Republican Rep. Virgil Goode, whose reaction to the victory of Democrat Keith Ellison - the first Muslim elected to Congress - can be termed, to say the least, "racist"? In a recent letter to his constituents, Goode wrote, "The Muslim Representative from Minnesota was elected by the voters of that district and if American citizens don't wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran." He later added, "I fear that in the next century we will have many more Muslims in the United States if we do not adopt the strict immigration policies that I believe are necessary to preserve the values and beliefs traditional to the United States of America and to prevent our resources from being swamped."

Unrepentant, Goode is back. In an editorial in Tuesday's USA Today, Goode refused to cede an inch to those criticizing his letter. In fact, he took things a step further. "Let us remember that we were not attacked by a nation on 9/11; we were attacked by extremists who acted in the name of the Islamic religion," Goode wrote. "I believe that if we do not stop illegal immigration totally, reduce legal immigration and end diversity visas, we are leaving ourselves vulnerable to infiltration by those who want to mold the United States into the image of their religion, rather than working within the Judeo-Christian principles that have made us a beacon for freedom-loving persons around the world."

In other words, the democratic election of a Muslim to Congress signals to Goode that, if we don't heed his advice, we're headed toward another September 11. Bad enough, right? You've got another Republican following in the proud footsteps of George Allen, Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Glenn Beck and a host of other prominent Republican politicians and pundits in needlessly resorting to bigoted rhetoric. Well, in citing Goode's latest statements, Daily Kos diarist Kagro X posted a front-page entry originally titled "Virgil Goode: Still Retarded". Damn.

Maybe it's just me, but using such pejorative language to point out the Goode's bigoted comments is rather hypocritical. What Goode said is A. it's prejudiced, B. it's indefensible and C. it's pathetic. And I'm not writing this to point out some sort of equivalency between Goode's shameful words and Kagro X's unfortunate title. My point being: We're better than this. What good is people-powered progressive politics if we allow ourselves to fall into the same traps we so appropriately ridicule the extreme right for failing to avoid? Needless to say, it doesn't look good. What Goode said is bad enough. So blatantly playing to people's prejudices speaks for itself and requires in response stern criticism that avoids making the same mistakes the critiqued has.

By needlessly using "retarded" in an otherwise informative story (the title of which has since changed to "Virgil Goode: Still ..."), we've given the right the smallest foothold from which to mount a counterattack that would only serve to distract people from the true heart of the matter: A sitting Congressman is likening the democratic election of a Muslim colleague to helping enable the next September 11. We've allowed conservative pundits to point to a single unfortunate title as an offense as bad as the entire litany of offensive Republican commentary. We've encouraged the Joseph Ragos of the old media to continue to refer to the blogosphere as "The Blog Mob". In short, and though the much-needed correction has been made, we've unintentionally thrown the right a lifeline. And it didn't have to be that way.

Look, I realize by writing this I'm playing into the stereotype of the progressive circular firing squad. What's more, by writing this I'm helping the very Republicans I hold in disregard by giving them the ammunition they desire. But if we're going to fight for the values I know we stand for, we still have to stand for them, no matter the consequences. Feel free to point out the error of my ways, but I believe - and know - we're better than this.


Display:


Re: We're better than this (3.00 / 1)

It makes me completely ill to think that Goode was a Democratic member of Congress until relatively recently.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Tue Jan 02, 2007 at 06:06:44 PM EST

You might be getting too far down into the weeds.. (3.00 / 1)

1. US elected Ellison, a Muslim, in the midst of a fear campaign directed against Muslims. That says a lot of good about the US.

2. US completely tossed out the Republican Party, specifically the one that Mr. Goode represents in that same election. That says a lot of good about US.

3. Mr. Goode is an racist bigot...and no we are not stooping to his level in calling him a racist bigot.


by BrionLutz on Tue Jan 02, 2007 at 06:33:49 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.