The Californication of the West

Last week I set to the task of debunking the myth that the migration of people from so-called blue states to so-called red states would lead to doom for the Democratic Party, both on the congressional and presidential levels. To refresh your memory, I noted that in a number of areas, particularly in the Mountain West but also parts of the South, the rapid population changes are actually increasing the number of voters open to voting Democratic, making these states less clearly Republican-leaning. As an example, I noted in the growth in the number of Hispanic voters in Texas and how that change has made the Lone Star State more amenable to Democrats.

One point that I failed to explicitly state, however, is that as more reliably Democratic voters leave solidly "blue" regions of the country for "redder" parts they are upending the political realities of their new communities. The influx of New Yorkers into South Florida in decades past is a prime example of this. So too is the "Californication" of the West, as The Economist describes it this week.

To sum up this and other affronts, westerners have used a verb. To "Californicate" a state means to turn it into an image of California, with inflated property prices, traffic jams and rampant crime. Occasionally, as in a recent leader in the Las Vegas Review-Journal, a local political shift (in that case, Nevada's vote to ban smoking in restaurants) is described as Californication. And Californians have indeed spread their politics to other states.

"I wouldn't be mayor without them," says Mr Anderson of Salt Lake City's immigrants. And it is true that a list of the mayor's activities in his office reads like a California Democrat's: setting a greenhouse-gas reduction target for the city, blocking a proposed highway and protesting against a visit by George Bush.

Californian immigrants have changed Colorado's politics not once but twice, according to John Hickenlooper, Denver's mayor. First, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, came conservative, often evangelical exiles from Orange County, south of Los Angeles. They brought a Californian enthusiasm for limited government. Ballot measures imposing term limits and restraining tax increases were soon approved by Colorado's voters, together with a fiercely anti-gay measure.

Then, beginning in the late 1990s, a wave of northern Californians arrived to take up jobs in Colorado's growing high-technology sector. Young, well-educated and liberal, they are a big reason Colorado has moved out of the Republican camp in the past few years, says Floyd Ciruli, a Denver pollster. Four years ago Colorado Republicans had the two US senators, five out of seven congressmen, the governor and control of both houses of the state legislature. They now have just one senator and three congressmen. And this week that senator, Wayne Allard, announced that he will stand down in 2008.

By no means is this population move a new trend. Almost 35 years ago Time magazine carried an article entitled "The Great Wild Californicated West" (though that article focused more closely on efforts of other Western states to avoid turning into endless suburbia, a la Southern California, rather than the migration of Californians to other Western states). Oregon's then-Governor, the liberal Republican Tom McCall, is quoted as telling tourists (notably those from California) to "Come visit us, but for heaven's sake don't come here to live."

But they did move to Oregon to live (much to the consternation of at least some natives of the Beaver State). And not only to Oregon. According to The Economist article, more than 5 million people born in California now live in other states, making it "America's second-biggest domestic diaspora, after New Yorkers, and the most noticeable." Their politics are indeed affecting other parts of the country. To take just one specific example, Pasadena-born Bill Richardson moved to New Mexico in the 1970s and not long after won a seat in Congress. Now he is the state's Governor and a potential candidate for President. On the micro level, too, Californians are having an impact on local races around the country, particularly in the Mountain West, as indicated in the quoted sections of the above article. And as more progressive-leaning Californians move to relatively more affordable regions one, two and three states over, the Democrats are going to have more and more success in elections in places like Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and even Utah. So much for the notion that population shifts to the "red states" spell doom for the Democratic Party!



Display:


So Californication Really Isn't Bad? (none / 0)

Well, so long as the ex-SFers, ex-Angelinos, and other ex-Californians take their politics with their dreams, and continue transforming the political landscape of the Interior West. If it worked for Oregon and Washington, then I guess it can work for Nevada and Arizona, as well!

: )


Want to defend marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how!
by atdleft on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 04:49:19 AM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

Not so fast!

From here in the Sonoran Desert, one can take a quick trip on Friday evenings to the airport or the exectutive terminal in Prescott Valley, Arizona, and see all the privately-owned aircraft arriving from California.  And on Sunday evenings, these same aircraft will be seen departing for California.

Far too much is made of Californians migrating to Arizona. If anything, the housing boom of the past few years has seen quite an influx of "migratory" or "speculation" dollars that have been invested in local housing construction.  But now that these speculation dollars have accomplished their purpose and have departed for better climes, the housing boom is now on the skids.

If anything, Arizona now needs more folks from East of the Mississippi River, especially, the folks who still harbor the thought of Clean Elections.  Arizona will soon undergo another battle by the political opposition, the uber-conservatives to demolish our Clean Elections framework.

So, if your from any state where Clean Elections are in fact a "reality", then "come on down!"


by Jaango on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 06:32:37 AM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)


Jaango, I moved to Arizona in 2006 from Pittsburgh (royal blue, but hardly the home of "clean" elections).  When ultra-conservatives unseated moderate Republicans in my local state legislature and senate races, I immediately volunteered to work for the Dems who would be opposing them.  We now have two new Dems in the state legislature, as our candidates proved to please the voters of formerly staunch Republican LD 26 more than the victors of the Repug primary (one of them actually billed himself as a "Culture Warrior" a la O'Reilly!).

A small victory to be sure -- in that the legislature remains in Republican hands -- AND our US Senate candidate lost.  But now having concluded my first-ever "Clean" election, I have one burning question.  "What's so great about the system when not ONE incumbent was unseated in the general election?"  I get the idea of clean elections from an ethical standpoint, but in practice I still ask, "Is it an actual improvement?"


by jukesgrrl on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 11:36:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

Don't expect that trend to be of any help in Florida.

In the past 6 years Republicans have seen a net gain of over 30,000 registered voters state wide since 2000, compared to Democrats.

Any any Democratic gains are concentrated in the urban population areas of the SE, Tampa Bay, Orlando, Jacksonville, which with the Republican domination of the Governor and both state houses they will be able to gerrymander all districts in 2012 even better (and 2002 was a masterful job).

So we'll probably be hard pressed to hold onto 5 of our projected 26 seats (compared to the current 9 out of 25).


by kansasr on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 06:36:54 AM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

ps...note to blue states

Whichever one of you sends us your congressional seat in 2012, make it a RED one, so we don't waste one of our BLUE ones!


by kansasr on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 06:49:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Perhaps (none / 0)

The single most disturbing result in 06 was in Florida.  In 2000 the exit polls showed the dems with a 2 point advantage is party id.  In 2006 that had become a 3 point lead for the GOP.


by fladem on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 09:17:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

It's been going on for a while... (none / 0)

...Florida has been unable to stand up to having a border with Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. Even as the Cubans are decaying as a political block the rest of the "south" has moved in.


by MNPundit on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 10:18:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Florida had 5 uncontested races in 2006 (none / 0)

Which explains why the GOP vote total was 15% higher.


by Cyt on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 03:09:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Southernification of Florida (none / 0)

I'd assume the influx of folks to Florida would come not only from the northeast, but from the rest of the South. Maybe that's why its getting redder?


by emmettoconnell on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 10:18:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

I'll be "Californicating" Austin, TX in the next several months...whatever that means.

The Extremist Rantings Of A Mainstream Progressive


by frizzle on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 06:48:22 AM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

I guess one consequence of Global Climate Change is that the rate of population transfer from blue to red states will slow, along with any associated process of political idiotification.


by Bob H on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 07:07:57 AM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

You can't get a blow job in California these days.

Why's that?

All them cocksuckers are up here!


I live in Deschutes County Oregon. The fastest growing county in the state. Bend Oregon, a former mill town used to be Democratic and Union. The growth during the 80's and 90's turned Central Oregon Red as Republican can be. Republicans have a 10 point advantage. Growth in the 00's has given us a feeling of Democratic growth, but voter registration doesn't reflect this.
by phastphil on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 08:29:51 AM EST

The best story on this (none / 0)

Was in the Atlantic several years ago. It breaks down the migration from California to other states very well.

The article is unfortunately available only to subscribers online.


by fladem on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 09:20:33 AM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

Actually, I think a similar effect is why New Hampshire has been changing into the Blue column the past few years.  Home prices have been driving many Bostonians into New Hampshire, where prices are lower, but it is still close enough to commute.


by Professor Foland on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 09:39:25 AM EST

The Californication of California (none / 0)

I live in rural Humboldt County, California, 300 miles north of the Golden Gate.  Historically, the economy was based on resource extraction -- whaling, fishing, timber.  The county was culturally conservative.  Though it often voted Democrat, it was for conservative Democrats a la Scoop Jackson or George Wallace.

Well now, the whales are dead, the fish have (mostly) been caught and the trees have almost all been cut down.  Resource extraction is a rapidly shrinking part of our economy.  What is growing (pun intended) here are jobs based on education and tourism, as well as marijuana cultivation.  People are moving here from the Bay Area because of lower housing prices and for the beauty of the wild (mostly preserved) coast.  They telecommute to their jobs, or they move here and start their own businesses.

This migration means that in the past five years, in election after election, the conservative old guard keeps losing.  This has happened with the elections to the State Senate, Assembly, the county DA election, elections to the Board of Supervisors and to the Eureka City Council.

And you can see this in more than just elections.  It's obvious in the kinds of restaurants that survive, the kind of entertainment available, and even in the kinds of stories the local paper covers.

In my drives across the mountain west, I see the same thing happening -- a shift from resource extraction to an economy that requires more education.  The growing parts of the economy are made up of educated newcomers, not necessarily all from California.  And this shift affects the local culture, as well as its politics.

Here in Humboldt, the local progressive community has been explicitly working this change.  We are doing the polling and canvassing to identify each other.  A colleague of mine is setting up a company to promote Humboldt County to progressive outsiders from the Bay Area and elsewhere, and then to make it easier for them to move here and fit in.  There is an explicit political agenda behind this.  We are also looking to fund a half time staffer to set up an efficient absentee ballot system that identifies our rural supporters, gets them ballots and makes sure the ballots make it to the elections office on time.

We don't win every election, but we feel the wind at our backs.  It must be the same in lots of places throughout the West.


by kaleidescope on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 10:09:14 AM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

The even larger issue than California emigration is just the population turnover in AZ, CO, NV (and to a lesser extent NM and UT) that makes politics much more volatile -- the electorate just isn't the same from election to election as large numbers of people move in and out.  The portion of the populations of UT and NM that don't move make those two states relatively predictable, but so long as the high turnover continues AZ, CO and NV should never be considered reliably Republican or Democratic regardless of how blue Colorado (in particular) starts to look in the next few years.

Also, it's good to see some recognition of the fact that the rightward swing in Colo. in the '90s was just that -- a swing, one caused by the historic migration of religious wingnuts from Orange County to Colorado Springs and not some homegrown movement.  At the time, the passage of the anti-gay amendment was considered a shock and a wake up call about the new power of the religious right in Colorado; we had always been considered a "live and let live" state.


by Colorado Luis on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 11:04:22 AM EST

Migration only partially explains things (none / 0)

Demographics of immigrants is more influential than where they came from, I think.

Colorado has always had Conservative as well as Liberal segments of the population. It has had plenty of in-migration, but just as many newcomers are from Texas as California, not to mention New York, New Jersey and Illinois. You can't really say we're gaining more blue voters from California than red voters from Texas.

Historically and of its own accord, Colorado has been fairly Conservative in a Western-Rural sort of way, similar to Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, etc. This kind of conservatism included a strain of rugged individualism, that could be Libertarian at times or pro-gun at other times. Reagan didn't win due to population changes, so much as the national mood and appealling to the already present anti-government populism.

But also, the native Liberal strain in Colorado has also been strong, with environmentalism polling well with hunters as well as granola hippies. Colorado has always been fairly well-educated, which correlates with socially liberal positions.

Even though in-migration has been huge in the last 40, 20 or even 10 years, Colorado's liberal or conservative swings have had less to do with immigration from red or blue areas, and more to do with demographics of the immigrants, who are probably younger, wealthier, whiter, more educated and high-techier when compared to the national average.

Maybe you could say that the Colorado Springs area had a special attraction for conservative Christian immigrants, but you also see mega-churches in Ft Collins and Denver Suburbs.

Specific growth areas of the state

If you look at the big growth areas in Colorado, like South Suburbs of Denver, Colorado Springs (South) and Ft Collins/Greeley (North), you notice that these are all upper-middle class, traditional family and ethnically white. Demographically, these fairly conservative segments.

These are balanced by young professionals and reasonable ethnic diversity in Denver central and near-in suburbs.


There's more of us than there is of them.
by MetaData on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 04:16:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

The Democratic successes in NH are only partially attributable to the influx from MA.  I'm originally from NY, and many of my friends in NH are from NY/NJ/CT.  


by AndyS on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 01:21:52 PM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

Here in Washington State, there are quite a few California transplants. But I think the recent liberalization of politics here was caused more by the influx of East Coasters rather than by Californians.


The truth about McCain
by nstrauss on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 02:19:31 PM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (3.00 / 1)

There's also the Louisianification of Texas.  Human disaster and culpable (if not impeachable) policy failure, but could it end up big enough to be a net gain for Dems?


by historian on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 02:27:16 PM EST

Richardson (none / 0)

It's worth noting that Richardson may have been born in California, but only because his father wanted him to have an unimpeachable claim to citizenship and the benefits thereof; he was raised in Mexico City until he went away to boarding school in massachusetts (were he stayed through college before moving to DC and thence to New Mexico). So he's technically californian, but never actually lived there.


by nhradar on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 02:31:10 PM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

I'd suggest to you that it is not just California, and not just the west. Here in Illinois, at least part of the reason that dems continue to make inroads into the suburbs and exurbs is the movement of Chicagoans to the outlying areas. Even those moving because of racial bias still had a habit of voting dem for other reasons, and many tend to stay with the party. The increasing Hispanic population, the religous wingnuttery of the repugs play important parts in moving folks to the d column, but so, to some extent, does the outward urban migration.


by thelonius on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 03:10:10 PM EST

Most of the comments reject the primary thesis (none / 0)

Looking through the comments, most of them disagree that migration is causing major political shifts, even where there is a lot of migration.

That is also my feeling, but maybe there are specific areas where migration does make a difference:
 - Retirees from Midwest or Northeast moving to Arizona or Florida
 - White flight from cities to the Suburbs
 - Ethnic growth in older, near-in Suburbs

You also have a lot of hispanic immigrants moving to certain states, which increases the population and therefore the electoral influence without adding many actual voters. This would amplify already existing voting tendencies.


There's more of us than there is of them.
by MetaData on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 04:29:14 PM EST

Colorado has more midwest people (none / 0)

then californians... at least in my age range.  I'm 26 by the way.

Most of the people I meet are in Colorado from Ohio, Illinois, Michigan, Iowa, etc.

These people also tend to be at least undergrad educated.


SquareState.net - Colorado Politics
by pacified on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 05:31:09 PM EST

Re: The Californication of the West (none / 0)

I went to a wedding in Coeur D'Aleine, Idaho last year. It was obviously in the grip of a big suburban housing boom, clearly a place being rapidly transformed. Everyone said the new people were those being priced out of California.


by SqueakyRat on Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 09:35:28 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.