Senate 2008: Allard Says No to Third Term in Colorado

Second term Colorado Senator Wayne Allard, arguably the most endangered Republican whose seat is up in 2008, has long been rumored to be pondering retirement. According to M.E. Sprengelmeyer of the Rocky Mountain News, these are rumors no longer.

Sen. Wayne Allard said today he will honor his term-limits pledge and leave at the end of 2008, creating a replacement fight that should turn Colorado into one of the country's biggest electoral battlegrounds.

Democratic Rep. Mark Udall, who has all but declared his candidacy for the Senate, will come into this race with significant strengths -- including the fact that, as of the end of November, he had close to $1.3 million in his campaign coffers. Greg Giroux of CQPolitics.com runs down the potential Republican field.

Potential Republican candidates, should Allard decide to retire, include one current and two former House members.

The active incumbent is Tom Tancredo, who was elected to his fifth term last November in the conservative-leaning 6th District outside of Denver. One of the nation's most vocal opponents of illegal immigration, Tancredo is mulling a candidacy for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.

One of the ex-members on the Senate race prospect list is Rep. Scott McInnis, who represented the western 3rd District from 1993 to 2005 and who has $939,000 remaining in a campaign fund that could be transferred to a new Senate campaign account. The other is former Rep. Bob Schaffer, who represented the eastern 4th District from 1997-2003 and who lost the 2004 GOP Senate primary to Coors.

Given that Colorado Democrats, in the past two cycles, have picked up the governorship, both chambers of the state legislature, a Senate seat and two Congressional seats, and that the Democratic Party has selected Denver to house its nominating convention in 2008, there is no doubt that this will be one of the top targets for the strategists and activists trying to extend the Democratic majority in the United States Senate. Chuck Schumer, chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, has said as much recently. While I'm not, at this juncture, ready to call the race for the Democrats, as has Markos, it is clear that this will be an extremely difficult seat for the Republicans to defend next year. At the least, this race is now a toss-up and perhaps even has a slight Democratic lean.

Update [2007-1-15 17:54:16 by Jonathan Singer]: By most measures, Udall is fairly progressive, though various voting scorecards paint at least somewhat different pictures of his position within the Congress. According to CQ, Udall voted with his caucus on party-line votess 92 percent of the time during the second session of the 109th Congress. Looking at his voting pattern during the first session of the Congress, National Journal gave him a liberal ranking of 68.7 (71 on economic issues, 67 on social issues, 67 on foreign policy) while he earned a "B" on the Drum Major Institutes middle class report card, voting in favor of the Republican immigration bill but voting "correctly" on all other measures listed.

Update [2007-1-15 18:15:29 by Jonathan Singer]: According to a subsequent article from the Rocky Mountain News, Tancredo may not, in fact, run next fall.



Display:


Allard Says No (none / 0)

I think 'Senator Udall' has a nice ring to it.


by KevinHayden on Mon Jan 15, 2007 at 04:26:13 PM EST

Not a lock yet. (none / 0)

   But still Udall is a very strong candidate with progressive credentials.  I'm surprised Allard announced his retirement so early; it's a long time until the 2008 election.  I hope that this sets off a rash of retirements.  I'm watching Domenici in particular.


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Mon Jan 15, 2007 at 04:44:30 PM EST

Re: Not a lock yet. (none / 0)

And Warner.  That would be keen.


The sharpest criticism often goes hand in hand with the deepest idealism and love of country. ~RFK
by Vox Populi on Mon Jan 15, 2007 at 05:02:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senate 2008: Allard Says No to Third Term (none / 0)

Don't know anything about Udall, but even from far-away Massachusetts I know Tom Tancredo is a nasty piece of ideological work.


by johnalive on Mon Jan 15, 2007 at 05:04:21 PM EST

Udall "scorecard" (none / 0)

DW Nominate rankings from 108th and 109th sessions.

In the 108th, you see him clustered around Jim Clyburn, Corrine Brown, Chris Van Hollen, Marty Meehan. In the 109th, he seems to have shifted to the right by about 30 congressmen. I don't know how much of that is him moving and how much is him standing still while the rest of the caucus becomes more partisan. But his voting record seems pretty solid for Colorado; somewhere between Ron Wyden and Debbie Stabenow on the political spectrum. Obviously it would be nice if one of the Mountain West Senators would really turn out in the Wellstone/Feingold mold, but those sorts of politicians are very rare.


by niq on Mon Jan 15, 2007 at 07:24:50 PM EST

Re: Senate 2008: Allard Says No (none / 0)

I like Mark Udall (my rep) a lot.  He is rather low key and unlikely to be among the first co-sponsers of a controversial bill or other high-profile activities.  But when I go to check who voted for what on the important stuff, Udall is always on the right side.  Udall is the Boulder rep, which won't help him state wide - Boulder is considered to be far to the left of the state in an out-of-touch, ivory tower kind of way.  But I don't think people will find him to out of touch or ivory tower when they get to know him.  He's kind of a serious, good looking in a craggy way, thoughful guy.

Tom Tancredo today said that he thought Scott McInnis should run for the Senate, so that would tend to indicate TT will not run.  Too bad, in a way, since TT should be easy to beat, but then - what if he won?  Things like that happen.

McInnis is a serious contender, but does have a rep for some dirty laundry of the corruption sort.  I haven't really read up on the details, but if he in fact runs, it will all come out.  He is also considered to be a bit squishy among conservatives.  This might hurt him in the primary, if a true righty runs.  Conservatives want to see Schaffer run.  He was shoved aside in the last race for Pete Coors, who went on to lose, so the righties feel put upon and owed their chance.


by Emma Anne on Mon Jan 15, 2007 at 08:22:40 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.