The Impotent Right-wing

One thing that's striking to me this week is how the right-wing was utterly destroyed this week.  They lost HUGE on Bolton.  They lost badly on Specter's dishonorable FISA bill.  And the kickoff of the war on terror campaign, the ABC movie 'Path to 9/11', has been seriously derailed as a fraudulent piece of propaganda.

The right-wing has thrived on making it painful to oppose them, and profitable to be with them.  Though Disney's executives are probably mostly pro-business Democrats, you can see how the company's tax rate dropped from 2001-2003 every year under Bush.  By 2003 the company was paying no taxes at all - Democratic supporter or not, it's nice to be an executive where your company is paying less and less in taxes.

By contrast, this week, Disney's brand took a massive hit because the company got sloppy and its internal controls were revealed as weak to non-existent.  Not only is the film openly fraudulent, but it's apparently really really bad.  Like, loser, expensive afterschool special schlock bad, the kind of bad that makes me kind of glad I couldn't get an advance copy.  Right-wing death cultists make shitty directors, apparently.  And more significantly, Disney's executives were personally embarrassed, their happy little spa-drenched personas chided by no less than Bill Clinton.

That's new.  What's also new is how Disney got no backup at all from the right-wing.  No Republicans in office came to the company's defense, the RNC offered no online petition, and there was little to no internet organizing on behalf of ABC's film.  Virtually no right-wing pundits defended the network, or the film in any meaningful way.  The open disloyalty to right-wing allies is a really bad decision on the part of the right, since it means that if you back the right-wing, it's not clear that they will back you.  In such a situation, talented people considering a movement career will simply say 'I don't need this shit, I'm going to go make money in the private sector'.  

This kind of incentive system is how movements are destroyed.

So anyway, to recap, the right-wing suffered three big defeats today, on wiretapping, the ABC film, and Bolton.  And their new kickoff advertising campaign from shill group Progress for America doesn't have the regular echo chamber backup.  The networks aren't even cutting away to Bush's stupid speechifying.  

Losers.

Update: This is interesting. The right-wing punditocracy is turning on Disney. That's loyalty.



Display:


Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

Wow, once again, we have to remind ourselves that our opponents are evil, immoral, and want to destroy our way of life.  Which is why we have to defeat them, at the ballot box, on November 7th.

After that, then we can stop the terrorism by focusing on the underlying causes and by destroying the terrorist network, not bystander states.


BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 04:46:42 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

"We were not descended from fearful men."

We sure weren't, but we may have become them anyway.


I'm British, but our politics bores me.
by Illustrious on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:09:48 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

It's interesting the right wingers are talking about not falsifying history, etc.  

We can be sure this is not because they care about lying, or because they want to do the right thing, or any other noble reason.  

No.  This is evidence of the cumulative efficacy of our many attacks on their character and lying natures.  They don't want to take that hit again, not on this movie.

The reason people like Bill Bennet are bashing the movie is because they fear us and understand that we have been able to do real damage to them that is sticking.

Tipping points only look like tipping points because they make apparent in dramatic fashion what has already been ongoing for sometime, below the surface.  The weakness of the right wing is becoming much more apparent this week, not only to us, but to the wider culture.  

If Rick Perlstein or whomever writes the history of the contemporary progressive movement, this week could very well deserve close scrutiny, because this has indeed been a horrific week for the right wing.  But it's been under lots of sustained pressure from us and from the fruits of their own failures for some time.


by Pachacutec on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:22:41 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

Interesting perspective.  I hope you're right.


by mitchipd on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 06:01:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Lack of perspective much? (none / 0)

how the right-wing was utterly destroyed this week.  

Matt has obviously found some dictionary whose definition of destroyed includes has suffered rather a bad week.

If I were seeking to make a wider point, I might suggest that this is typical of the shortsightedness that has bedevilled Dem politics for the last forty or more years; that has, since 1994, had the Dems in Congress more or less vamping till ready until the time when a grateful public filled with buyer's remorse begs them to take up their rightful place as majority again; that has allowed the party's organization at county and precinct level in many places to decay to its current woeful level.

But that seems altogether too grand a point for a little comment like this.

Ever so 'umble...


by skeptic06 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:24:16 PM EST

Re: Lack of perspective much? (3.00 / 2)

Yeah, you're totally right.  The Democrats are just always mounting sustained attacks against major media networks using internet pressure on the topic of 9/11 and national security.  

It's the strategy that lost in 2000, 2002, and 2004.  We better find a new strategy, like taking Iraq off the table and focusing on snowmobile legislation, pronto.


by Matt Stoller on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:29:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lack of perspective much? (none / 0)

My comment wasn't directed at all to what Dems were doing against ABC, but merely suggested that the language you were using was a tad on the hyperbolic side.

If, indeed, the right-wing is impotent or destroyed, then clearly one would expect a 1936-sized landslide in November, perhaps even the resignation of Bush and Cheney, to place the Lioness herself in the Oval Office.

But where's your evidence of either impotence or destruction?

As far as right-wing pundits criticizing ABC, perhaps the show is as bad as the notorious Hillary biog by Edward Klein (lesbian, raped by Bill...), so, as with the righties' reactions to the Klein book, the pigs got up and slowly walked away.


by skeptic06 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 06:26:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lack of perspective much? (none / 0)

It's crystal clear that the post is about the 'destruction' of the types of past successes in the specific areas Matt actually discusses--specifically:  PR management of the 'War on Terror,' coordination of RNC message with conservative big media, and forcing well-known sociopaths through the Senate confirmation process.

I don't see anything in this post that attempts to predict election victories.

And the 'evidence' for impotence that you somehow missed are the three examples that are the subject of the post.  One example even has a video in case reading is too rigorous for you on a Friday evening.


by Jeffrey Feldman on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 06:36:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lack of perspective much? (none / 0)

Is this the MyDD equivalent of Spin Alley?

Destroyed surely implies a finality which the events referred to do not import.

In 1936, I think you could rightly call the GOP as having been destroyed - as a party able to control both the White House and Congress for sustained periods.

In 2006, not so much.

Like I said, so far as we know right now, they've had a bad week. It may turn out that this is some sort of turning point, a critical loss of confidence that gradually undermines the whole apparatus built up over the last forty years.

But, as Chou en-Lai said about the French Revolution, It's too early to say.


by skeptic06 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 07:03:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lack of perspective much? (none / 0)

So, you've never heard anyone use "destroy" to mean "defeat" in a limited sense, such as:

Wow...did you see yesterday's game?  This week the Yankeees really got destroyed.

Now, I've heard many people say that before, and not once did I ever hear anyone respond:
The Yankees were destroyed this week?  So tragic...when are the funderals?

Everybody just understands that it means they lost the game.  

But apparently...not everybody.  I guess they must cover this usage in year three of advanced English for foreigners...so hang in there.  You'll get to it eventually.  Meanwhile, maybe we should speak a little LOUDER SO THE NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS CAN UNDERSTAND WHAT WE ARE SAYING.

Or as George Allen would say, "Welcome to America!"


by Jeffrey Feldman on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 07:14:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lack of perspective much? (none / 0)

Well, I'd hope that Stoller would choose his words rather more carefully than one sports fan chatting to another!

And, strangely enough, I'd not thought he'd used impotent and destroyed in a literal sense.

But, even the three things he says are - let's dial it back to -  defeats are, as Brer elemming says just below, not defeats yet - not all of them.

They can bring up the Bolton nom again, have another crack at warrantless wiretaps, and - well, the ABC thing looks doomed.

But - let's say they all fail: whether they have any lasting effect on the machine is still unclear.

We do know it's pretty resilient - what with DeLay and Libby and the disaster in Iraq, and Katrina, etc, etc, there's no sign I've noticed (not saying much!) of imminent implosion.

The danger in words like destroy is that, while they may indeed be used figuratively as practically drained of all of the force in the literal meaning (as in My shoes are killing me), the temptation is to let the literal meaning seep into one's thinking at some emotional level.

It's not as if the blogosphere has never been known to get carried away on the basis of totally inadequate evidence - the Alito confirmation farrago springs to mind.

And - I am indeed a full native speaker. Thank you for asking...


by skeptic06 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 08:08:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Reminds me of the movies (none / 0)

Aside from the question of the specific wording in Matt's post, which maybe is significant (though not so much to me), this exchange somehow makes me think of all those movies where the evil villain is knocked out cold, but the good guy forgets to make sure he can't get up...and then suddenly he comes out of nowhere for one last deadly attack before (at least in Hollywood movies), he's finally dispensed with. I always find myself shouting to the hero, "make sure he's dead or tie him up before you turn your back on him!!!"

We're dealing with Rove and co here, and this ain't no Hollywood movie, where the good guy is pretty much guaranteed to win.  So we should assume this group of bad guys--regardless of how weakened they may seem--are going to come back at us with intent to kill, and not just one more time.

The tide may in fact be turning, but there's still a long way to go in getting this country back on track, and we face an enemy that won't give up without using every trick in their book, just like the good guys in the movie end up having to finally beat the living daylights out of the bad guy before he collapses on the floor and stays there.  

We got some good licks in lately and reality does finally seem to be catching up with hubris- and corruption-infested Bush Admin. That's something to feel good about.  

But the main thing to keep in mind is that we need to keep building strength for a long pitched battle, and to build tools and systems that suit our strengths and that leverage technical and societal changes underway, and to pull out all the stops to win one or both houses of Congress in November. The good news is that this seems to be happening.

I'll be very interested to see how the Disney docudrama thing finally shakes out.  My gut tells me it'll be a win for us, regardless of what Iger & co decide to do.  And, speaking of films, Arianna at HuffPost reminds us that Robert Greenwald's "Iraq for Sale" will be out soon, including some thoughts on its implications, which fit nicely into MyDD's accountability theme.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-hu ffington/iraq-for-sale-_b_28849.html

I wonder what Karl Rove is thinking right now....


by mitchipd on Sat Sep 09, 2006 at 02:46:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

goddam snowmobiles (none / 0)

They take our jobs...our benefits...


by Jeffrey Feldman on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 06:29:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

These are all delays today and not defeats yet. All of these seem more the case of DC Democrats in power finally loudly saying NO and Rove not getting the full support from all the GOP he used to get.


by elemming on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:25:05 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

Question - If this thing airs Sunday and Monday, does the controversy raise interest or decrease interest?  I wasn't going to watch it regardless because I hate all this commercial crap that is coming out about 9/11 but I am curious.

Regardless, I think all the pressure is great and it sends a message to Disney et al to get the facts right and not to pull this crap in the future.  We are showing you can no longer push progressives around.


by John Mills on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:30:47 PM EST

How is this playing in the MSM? (none / 0)

I've only seen ABC news which says "some" are questioning the accuracy, followed by Tom Kean attesting to (or seeming to) the accuracy. i.e."It could have happened like that"  What about NBC and CBS?

Randi Rhodes of course has a blood pressure of about 1000/500, but she is preaching to the choir.

I fear this Swift Boating will succeed with thos who only watch network news (or Faux) and certainly those who only or primarily watch ABC.


by antiHyde on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 06:41:56 PM EST

well said (none / 0)

I've thought for some time, now, that the Republicans had lost control of three key frames that have kept them succeeding on a political level:  security, leadership, and spending.

But this week seems to bring things to a new low for them.  The Disney meltdown suggests that whatever was holding in place the co-ordinated machine of Rove and Big Media is no longer running on all cylinders.  I think this is a hugely important metric for the 2008 election, where we may just see--for the first time--a GOP that can no longer manage its message perfectly in the media.

Meanwhile, the non-partisan media (e.g., MSNBC) looked decidedly partisan this week, which was a very interesting change that could have huge consequences.

So, I would add the phrase 'tipping point in big media' to the discussion.

Very significant week, indeed...


by Jeffrey Feldman on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 06:45:28 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

At this point, I don't think it even matters if they run this piece of crap. First, only the true winger nutjobs will watch and put any faith in it. The program now as zero cred. Second, the political and PR fallout of this is and will continue to be terrible. Third, the producers/directors will never get a real gig again. They'll still make money doing propaganda films for Heir Dobson et al, but they have shot their wad with legit TV/Hollywood outlets.

In the end, and in a very perverse sort of way that only now seems to be possible because the toxic political and cultural environment in which we are all now forced to exist, this debacle may be a good thing for progressives.

On the larger point of the impotent right, that is dead on. Democrats/progressives need to build on this and keep the ball rolling. The cliche is oh so true: the best defense is a good offense. Stay on the offensive through November and great things will happen.


by Whigsboy on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 07:07:25 PM EST

So why no love? (none / 0)

...is the anti-gay bias against Disney that bad?


by MNPundit on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 07:14:47 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

It is important to contrast the response to the Disney movie with the response to the Swift-Boat liars.

Despite the fact that bullshit peddled by the Swifties was every bit as transparent as the Disney movie, the mainstream media basically accepted their crap on "balance" and the Democratic leadership didn't make a sizeable stink.

Here, the blog response was basically echoed by the "Clintonistas" and the mainstream press once they sensed that the CW was not buying the "truthiness" excuses proffered by ABC.

The difference is not in the level of anger found on the blogs. The difference is that people are less afraid to challenge the GOP spin machine.


by space on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 07:22:43 PM EST

Nice ad. (none / 0)

How come only Republican ads say "Death to America" in them?


by Kagro X on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 07:28:41 PM EST

Re: Nice ad. (none / 0)

It's their motto


by antiHyde on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 08:18:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice ad. (none / 0)

It really is, actually.


by blues on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 10:35:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice ad. (none / 0)

I know


by antiHyde on Sat Sep 09, 2006 at 09:22:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

"What's also new is how Disney got no backup at all from the right-wing."

Matt this is a very critical observation. I was expecting the right-wing to ramp up support as soon as the liberal blogs began banging the drums and getting all the airplay in the corporate media. Typcially they have made the Dems look weak and as whiners. What is astounding, and a first in recent memory, is that one, the Dems DC establishment got on the ball right away from Clinton to the Senate leadership, second, they had good reps get on TV to make the case, third, there was immediate organization to get the grassroots provide the numbers. And the tide was so strong that even right-wing hacks like Bennet got on the bash Disney theme.

Disney execs blew this big time! They were left to hang by the right-wing. This will not go un-noticed.


by ab initio on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 07:54:28 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing: Bill Bennett (none / 0)

So true. Bill Bennett for goodness sake! That this consummate partisan would go counter-spin to a right-wing propaganda move here surprises me. The money graf is quoted by Think Progress on CNN American Morning:

Look, "The Path to 9/11″ is strewn with a lot of problems and I think there were problems in the Clinton administration. But that's no reason to falsify the record, falsify conversations by either the president or his leading people and you know it just shouldn't happen. [CNN, 9/8/06]

It's nice to see a disunited Republican bloc for a change.


by Curt Matlock on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 11:49:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

Ok, so I hate to come out of the closet as an occasional viewer of the tv shlock known as "Cheaters", but I just had to point out that that salacious exemplar of non family values viewing shares the same narrator as this PFA ad.

http://www.cheaters.com/


by loolool on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 08:14:09 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

  The Democrats, up to this point, have always seemed to me to be in denial about just how bad our media has become. I think that this denial had something to do with John Kerry's weak response to the Swift Boat slanders -- he probably thought that our "liberal" media would step in and set the record straight. And we know the rest of the story.

 But this Disney hit piece is just SO outrageous, SO blatantly partisan, and SO over-the-top -- in its content, in its marketing, in its pre-screening -- that it seems to have FINALLY blown the blinders off the Democratic leadership. The Dem response has been strong and coordinated, and whether or not this hit piece runs, its credibility has been pretty much destroyed, and its impact will likely be far less than what Disney and the Republicans anticipated.

 The bitterest irony, of course, is that it was Bill Clinton who signed the telecom bill in 1996 that paved the ground for these kinds of abuses by the media. Will the Democrats FINALLY learn that caving to right-wing interests for the appearance of "bipartisanship" does NO favors to either the country or the party?

 I hope that the grim reality has finally penetrated the thick skulls of our leadership -- THE MEDIA IS NOT OUR FRIEND. And the Republicans are SERIOUS about destroying every American institution they can get their hands upon.

 To paraphrase Jack Murtha, the netroots and the grassroots have been way ahead of the Dem establishment when it comes to understanding what's happening to our country. Let's hope that the Disney fiasco finally means our leaders start catching up to us.

And if Dem grassroots and Dem leaders get on the same page and work together, we WILL get our country back.

 


by Master Jack on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 08:14:42 PM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

maybe I'm naive, but i find it comforting that sometimes, just sometimes, the right and left can agree on something.  


by errorcode on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 09:19:43 PM EST

Richard Scaife (3.00 / 0)

So, how many of you think the money behind this is Richard Scaife?? And how does it play when it comes out?


by cmpnwtr on Sat Sep 09, 2006 at 12:30:40 AM EST

ABC just re-opened debate on whose fault 9/11 was (none / 0)

Regardless of how successful we are getting this thing pulled, the next thing to do is start talking about whose fault 9/11 really was.

This was a fight they did not want to pick; let's make them pay.


Progress is Personal | PCCC
by msnook on Sat Sep 09, 2006 at 02:23:04 AM EST

Re: The Impotent Right-wing (none / 0)

"Death cultist"? Clicking the link provided no obvious clarification. Forgive me for being obtuse, but WTF?


by fwoolz on Sat Sep 09, 2006 at 03:17:17 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.