Senate Forecast Update: Border States Will Decide Control

Right now, four Senate races are all looking very good for pickups this year: Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. Below those four races are a tier of three campaigns where the Democratic candidates are slightly behind in polls and also behind on cash: Jim Webb in Virginia, Harold Ford in Tennessee, and Claire McCaskill in Missouri. (Technically, Ford isn't behind on cash according to the latest report, but since his opponent, Corker, can self-finance, he might very well be by now). Looking at polling averages form the last month, it is remarkable how similar these three races have become:

Missouri (Five polls)
Talent: 47.6
McCaskill: 45.4

Tennessee (Four polls)
Corker: 45.6
Ford: 43.5

Virginia (Three polls)
Allen: 47.7
Webb: 45.0

Margins of 2.7, 2.2 and 2.1 across the three races right now. This new tier of races, forming a belt right across the border states, is where control of the Senate will be decided. Democrats have basically no chance of winning the senate unless we win at least two of these three races. Obviously, pulling that off is a very a difficult task, which is why I remain so pessimistic about our chances to take over the Senate. However, as more and more scandals keep cropping up for Republican candidates, and as more and more polls come out such as today's Rasmussen on Tennessee showing races closer after these scandals, today, for the first time, I can write what I have hoped to be able to write since November 3rd, 2004. If the election was held today, there is indeed a real chance that Democrats would take control of the Senate. I am not projecting control yet, but for the first time it is an actual possibility.

All of these campaigns remain uphill battles. On paper, Ford might have the best chance, since he leads in cash and is running for an open seat rather than against an incumbent. However, Tennessee is the most conservative of these three states, and Bob Corker is a rich, rich man. Webb is certainly the most exciting race, as it has the biggest upward trend, was the longest shot to begin with, and is fueled by people-power. However, it is in Virginia that we face the largest cash deficit, even though Webb claims to have raised over $2M since June 30th. In Missouri, we have a race that has been long-established as highly competitive, but lately the very slight leanings one way or the other in this race have shifted against us.

If you had told me eighteen months ago that in early September of 2006 we would be in a realistic position to take the Senate, I probably would have snorted and then shook my head in cynical disagreement. However, miraculously, we have actually achieved that goal. Our odds still are not very good--I'd place them at around 10-20%--but they do exist. If we can come up with just four or five more points in these three states, we could actually pull it off. I have now updated the Senate forecast later today to reflect this.



Display:


Tennessee (3.00 / 1)

We may be the most conservative state on the list, but the average Tennessean would identify with a conservative Democratic platform, rather than a conservative Republican platform, hence our control of both state houses, the governor's mansion, and the majority of Congressional seats.

Harold Ford Jr. is a principled conservative while Bob Corker is an opportunistic conservative. I think right now Ford has a higher chance than McCaskill, if only because his campaign is going so incredibly well.

If we can keep up DSCC negative attacks about Corker's 911 and Wal-Mart problems, and Corker can't shake up his stagnating campaign, Ford is on his way to the other side of Capitol Hill.


Melissa Hart is gone - thank you Chris Bowers
by surfbird007 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:18:28 PM EST

Re: Senate Forecast Update: (3.00 / 2)

Unfortunately, I think we also have to contemplate the possibility that we lose the NJ seat as being as least as likely as taking VA or TN.  It's starting to smell a little, and it's not just Seacaucus.

MO's just going to be a coinflip.  I like our chances in TN more than I used to, because Ford's ads are really effective -- he fights hard.  (Though, really, a Senator who's just two years older than me?)


by Adam B on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:19:58 PM EST

New Jersey (none / 0)

I just don't trust those polls because something smells fishy in their turnout breakdowns.

Once the DSCC or Menedez makes it clear that Kean, Jr. doesn't have the record of his father, Harold Ford will be the only Jr. headed to the Senate for the first time this year.


Melissa Hart is gone - thank you Chris Bowers
by surfbird007 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:22:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Ahem. (none / 0)

Bob Casey, Jr?


by Adam B on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:35:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Oh yeah (none / 0)

My bad - big time.

And I grew up in PA during his dad's administration.

Forget I said anything.


Melissa Hart is gone - thank you Chris Bowers
by surfbird007 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:55:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senate Forecast Update: (3.00 / 1)

I hear you, but give it time for the "hotness" of the story to die down before we freak out too much, and for the remaining debates to happen and TV ads to start. Much as I hate to benefit from it, Menendez is, IMO, Clintonesque in his debating and campaigning ability and I imagine will tell his side quite effectively -- and he's got major piles of money to do it with.

Of course, let's hope that this is as bad as it gets. Believe me, out of the things I feared the Repugs would dig out to stink up Menendez, what they actually dug up seems more "Is this milk off?" stinky than "the septic is backed up" stinky.


by jamfan on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:28:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senate Forecast Update: (3.00 / 1)

Four reasons not to lose too much sleep over the NJ Senate race...

1) A significant amount of people still think Kean is his father. They wont by November.

  1. Menendez has a decisive cash advantage and NJ is a very expensive state because it has both the Philly and NYC markets. This is very important. Plus, Menendez has the franking privilege because he's the incumbent.
  2. NJ polls always underestimate the state's democratic strength. Kerry and Corzine had margins of victory at least 3 points higher than the polls indicated.
  3. When it comes to Senate races, states almost always show their true national color. I remember Bowles, Tenenbaum, and Carson all leading their '04 Senate races in deep red states, only to see all three of them lose by signiciant margins. New Jersey is blue, and in a blue year, they will ultimately come back into the fold.


by AC4508 on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:40:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senate Forecast Update: (none / 0)

Franking privilege ends 90 days before the general election.


by Adam B on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:49:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senate Forecast Update: (none / 0)

Also, Justin Rood at TPM Muckraker (I don't know how to post links) did some digging and thinks it's nothing, and points out that the Philly Inquirer was also quite ho-hum, much-ado-about-nothing.


by jamfan on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:50:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re Menendez: Did I read about a subpoena? (none / 0)

Something about a connection with a non-profit to which he channeled money while renting it property on which it paid rent.  Doesn't sound like the worst possible thing, but may make trouble.


by David in NY on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 03:45:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senate Forecast Update: (none / 0)

Agree AdamB.  I think a couple of things are happening - some latent anti-Latino feelings in a largely suburban state that has a relatively small minority population and Menendez's connections to the Hudson County machine even though I don't think Menendez is corrupt.  Having the last name of Kean, even though I am not a fan Daddy Kean, doesn't hurt either.

Is there any word on Corzine's numbers?  Menendez doesn't need anything else to drag him down.

I like Menendez and hope he pulls it out but I am worried.  


by John Mills on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 04:45:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

corzine's numbers (none / 0)

Not great.  


by Adam B on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:16:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: corzine's numbers (none / 0)

Those aren't Florio numbers circa 1990 but it doesn't look like Corzine is going to be able to do much to help Menendez.


by John Mills on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 05:36:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

We need a game-changing event (none / 0)

a major breaking Bush administration scandal, or a breaking scandal effecting the individual republican candidates could be the thing that could shift the game.  


Go back to Hussein Texas
by gobacktotexas on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 02:35:56 PM EST

Missouri (none / 0)

The polls don't take into account the minimum wage and stem cell ballot initiatives in MO, which McCaskill is running on and Talent opposes. Those issues could definitely mobilize non-voters (esp. the minimum wage - the campaign is structured specifically to turn out low-propensity progressives).


by owgriswo on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 03:08:20 PM EST

Re: Missouri (none / 0)

What worries me most about Missouri are the voter supression laws they have put in place. I know some legal challenges have been made, but so far I have heard of no progress on those.

I think we will win five (indluding Tennessee and Virginia) that we will probably lose Missouri and New Jersey, and that Rhode Island will depend on the primary. If Chaffee survives the primary I think the general is too close to call. So I put our net gain at this point at four or five. But six is certainly not out of the question.


by herodotus on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 03:29:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What is going on in Montana? (none / 0)

I see you put Tester in the probable column, and he clearly is a great candidate, but where are the good polls?

The way I see it, he should be way ahead, given what an idiot Burns is.  If Montana is truly so conservative that Tester can't build a bigger lead -- last I saw was maybe 5 points up -- well, that makes me nervous.


by xebecs on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 03:14:48 PM EST

Re: Senate Forecast Update: Border States Will Dec (none / 0)

Chris,

If Webb claims to have raised over two million dollars since June 30, you can sleep peacefully knowing he's got the cash.

Webb's not the normal politician.  This is really a trustworthy guy.


by dpinzow on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 04:12:19 PM EST

Re: Senate Forecast Update: Border States Will Dec (none / 0)

I have a feeling when it's all said and done we'll end up winning by an extremely small margin in Virginia.  Allen's numbers will only go down as everyone realizes his true colors.  The cash difecit is scary but Webb is going to have help from Bill Clinton, increasingly popular Governor Kaine, and unbelievably popular former Governor Warner.  Webb will also receive help from the DSCC.  I think we're going to see a repeat of the 2005 Governor race here and Webb will win.  I have liked our chances here for awhile and was glad to see Charlie Cook finally move this race from Likely Republican to Leans Republican.  Hopefully by early October this will be in the Toss Up category where it belongs.


by blueryan on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 04:35:05 PM EST

polling vs. actuals (none / 0)

I noticed that a poster bove commented correctly that NJ always polls Dems lower than they actually get.  Unfortunately, TN is the opposite, and the Reps tend to do better in the election than they poll.  Ford needs to make sure his GOTV operation in Memphis is top of the line because he will have to win big there to pull out the election.


by alhill on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 04:43:51 PM EST

New Jersey in perspective (none / 0)

Folks, you need to put things in perspective on New Jersey. Not only have the Democrats outdone their polling margin in both 2005 and 2004, but look back to 2002. Remember Bob Torricelli? The scandal-ridden Democratic Senator had to drop out of the race just weeks before the general election. The NJ Democratic Party quickly recruited old standby Frank Lautenberg to run in his stead. In a Bush year, 2002, and with a horrible scandal hanging over the Democrats, Lautenberg still won easily.

The key is getting New Jerseyans to understand that Tom Kean, Jr. is not Tom Kean, Sr. A simple and funny TV ad could drive that point home so nobody forgets it. I'd be surprised if this race is that close in the end.


by elrod on Fri Sep 08, 2006 at 10:27:50 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.