This cycle, video franchising, or letting telecom companies sell cable, is the big prize, and Verizon and company tacked killing net neutrality onto the package as icing. With the Stevens bill looking like it's going to die and a possible changeover in Congress, the telecom companies are looking for an alternative legislative vehicle so they don't have to have strong net neutrality protections tacked onto the telecom reform bill next cycle. And that means going to the states.
Now, video franchising isn't bad in itself, but this bill is horrible. It allows redlining, which means that no one will invest in building out broadband to rural areas. The only people who will get cable and internet service over fiber are in high income suburbs and dense urban areas. And obviously, there is no net neutrality protections.
There is a broad coalition opposing this bill, from local municipalities to cable interests to progressive organizers. It's beatable, and the hearing is tomorrow. If you care about net neutrality and live in Pennsylvania, please call the following legislators, and use the following script:
Republicans:
Senator Robert Wonderling (chair): (717) 787-3110
Senator John Rafferty: (717) 787-1398
Sen. Gibson Armstrong: (717) 787-6535
Sen. John Pippy: 717-787-5839
Sen Bob Regola: (717) 787-6063
Democrats:
Sen. Connie Williams (minority chair)(717) 787-5544
Sen. Vince Fumo: (717) 787-5662
Sen. Leanna Washington: (717) 787-1427
Sen. John Wozniak: (717) 787-5400
Sen. John Gordner: (717) 787-8928“This bill weakens significant consumer protections with no guarantee of real consumer choice for cable. I urge you to vote no on SB 1247 as written, and work to craft cable competition legislation that protects consumers, not Verizon.”
|
|
|
Permalink :: 13 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.