MyDD Accountability Adwatch: Debbie Stabenow

bumped - Matt

While I still have a few critiques on this ad, it is still a vast improvement over her last ad.

I really like the overall idea of this ad because it tells a story.  Facts are easier for most people to remember if they are given in story form.  In less than thirty seconds the ad established a conflict with both good guys and bad guys and a favorable resolution thanks to the heroine of our story, Debbie Stabenow.

Stabenow's last two ads had her trying to appear strong by having the good Senator say that she was "fighting" for Michigan.  An added benefit of the story format of this Ad has her not saying that she's strong, but showing her fighting for Michigan.  This is much more effective at making her strong rather than saying it.

This ad also states that she "passed a Bill to cut taxes for companies that create jobs in Michigan".  Last ad I berated her for using the Republican frame, "cutting taxes to create jobs".  This time by rephrasing it the way it does she has successfully reframed the issue.  Where as Republicans claim that any tax cuts are good, she claims only cutting taxes for companies who create Michigan jobs are good.  Not only is this good policy, but good politics.

I also like the Bush attack in this Ad.  Not only because it attacks President Bush, but the way it attacks him.  When Peter Perez says, "The Bush administration did nothing to help" it helped to reinforce 1 of 2 narratives on Bush and, by extension, all Republicans.  Bush is either incompetent so therefore is unable to help this American Business, or doesn't care so therefore is unwilling to do anything.

Also, this ad seems to have taken my advice from the last Ad Watch to have someone else sing Stabenow's Praise, instead of her trying to promote herself.

I don't like the way the ad ended with Peter saying that he's neither a Republican or Democrat.  Again, Stabenow is acting like she can trick people into voting for a Democrat by not acknowledging  that she is one.  Instead of Peter saying, "I'm not a Democrat.  I'm not a Republican.  I'm a manufacturer and I support Debbie Stabenow because she supports Michigan manufacturing", he should say something that helps Senator Stabenow and brand `D'.  For instance, I'd have Peter Perez say, "Before, I wasn't a Democrat or Republican, but now, after witnessing Democrats like Stabenow stand up for Michigan businesses, this November, I'll be voting for Senator Debbie Stabenow and Democrats like her."

While I don't know for sure, this ad appears to be made by the same media consultants that made her last 2.  They have the same look and feel.  My last inquiry to Stabenow's campaign went unanswered so I still don't know who's making her ads.



Display:


Re: MyDD Accountability Adwatch: (none / 0)

I've got a problem with this ad -- "fought for the establishment of a trade prosecutor"?  She introduced a bill in July 2005.  It was sent to committee.  No hearings, and nothing else has happened to it.

Some fight.


by Adam B on Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 08:22:19 AM EST

As a Michigander (in NY) (none / 0)

I can say this is ad works.  It may not be the ad we want to see, but it is an effective ad.  I instantly understood the issue.  

In Michigan, whenever big auto is down the fear of competing against nationally supported foreign manufacturing rises.  It's a huge topic of discussion.   It wasn't until I saw this ad that I realized how local that issue must be.  I've never heard it discussed outside of Michigan.  Right now, all the talk in Michigan is how bad things are because the big 3 are bleeding cash.  There is panic in the air about the Michigan manufacturing economy.  

And in that environment, the idea that a Senator would stand up on behalf of a Michigan company the way the Chinese government stands up on behalf of a Chinese company--that will hit the money with voters.

And I bet the problem with Perez is that he will vote for Stabenow, but he still doesn't like Granholm.  I think the "I'm not a Democrat, I'm not a Republican" stuff is about Granholm (my guess).  

Anyway...not a great ad for building the Dem brand, but a very effective ad with Michigan voters.


by Jeffrey Feldman on Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 08:41:02 AM EST

R, D, Independent (none / 0)

I think it is OK for an ad to show an independent praising the candidate. That is not running away from the party. It is demonstrating that independents have just as much of a stake in wresting Congress from the Republicans as the Democrats do.


by Mister Go on Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 10:47:19 AM EST

Re: MyDD Accountability Adwatch: Debbie Stabenow (none / 0)

My only comment is that it is disconcerting to see her lips moving in the pictures and not have the words she is saying match...especially when she is nearly facing the the camera ... if the shots of her showed her listening more or had her in profile clearly talking to someone, it would be better.


by David in Burbank on Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 11:20:14 AM EST

Re: MyDD Accountability Adwatch: Debbie Stabenow (none / 0)

Works for me.


by Bush Bites on Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 01:31:44 PM EST

A Republican ad sample (none / 0)

Off topic a bit, but here's an ad that exemplifies the "high road" we can expect the Republicans to take in the next six weeks:

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/ electioncentral/2006/sep/18/nc_13_gopers tv_ad_shows_illegal_immigrant_grabbing his_crotch_0

Any thoughts???


by mitchipd on Mon Sep 18, 2006 at 06:02:16 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.