[Apologies for "bending" any rules, but I posted this at Kos, and got 20+ hits in 5 minutes. Then the database went down. When it came back up i was more than 75 stories down the list, and it was dead, so I'm trying it here. I think I make an important point (not that I don't always...). Thanks for understanding.]
---------
In his September 12, 2006 press briefing, Tony Snow, Press Secretary to President George W. Bush explained that while there is not an explicitly direct operational relationship between President Bush and the terrorist organization Al Qaeda, there are "links."
He did not expressly say this was true, but using his inductive logic proves that there is undisputable evidence: Bush is hand-in-hand ("there was a relationship") with the terrorists.
While I have made some [minor edits] to the text for clarity, what Mr. Snow says makes it obvious that this is what he means us to believe.
Q Well, one more, Tony, just one more. Do you believe -- does the President still believe thatSaddam Hussein[this administration] was connected to Zarqawi or al Qaeda before the invasion?MR. SNOW: The President has never said that there was a direct, operational relationship between the two, and this is important.
Zarqawi[Al Qaeda] was inIraq[the United States].Q There was a link --
MR. SNOW: Well, and there was a relationship -- there was a relationship in this sense:
Zarqawi[Mohammed Atta] was inIraq[the United States]; al Qaeda members were inIraq[the United States]; they were operating, and in some cases, operating freely fromIraq[the United States].Zarqawi[Atta], for instance,directed the assassination of an American diplomat in Amman, Jordan[traveled to Afghanistan to meet with Osama bin Laden and train for terrorist attacks]. But did they have a corner office at theMukhabarat[West Wing]? No. Were they getting a line item inSaddam's[the President's] budget? No. There was no direct operational relationship, but there was a relationship. They were in the country, and I think you understand that theIraqis[Bush administration] knew they were there. That's the relationship.Q
Saddam Hussein[George W. Bush] knew they were there; that's it for the relationship?MR. SNOW: That's pretty much it.
Q The
Senate[NSA] report said they didn't turn a blind eye.MR. SNOW: The
Senate[NSA] report -- rather than get -- you know what, I don't want to get into the vagaries of theSenate[NSA] report, but it is pretty clear, among other things, again, that there were al Qaeda operators insideIraq[The US], and they includedZarqawi[the hijackers], they includeda cleric[Atta who]had been described as the best friend of[met with] bin Ladenwho was delivering sermons on TV. But we are simply not going to go to the point that the President is -- the President has never made the statement that there was an operational relationship, and that's the important thing, because I think there's a tendency to say, aha, he said that they were in cahoots and they were planning and doing stuff; there's no evidence of that.
So, there you have it. Tony Snow has shown us the link between George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden. You can see the full text of the entire briefing here. You will see that, except where necessary for clarification, not one bit of Snow's argument or reasoning has been altered. It's time for the appeasers who are supporting this "best friend of the terrorists" to call for George W. Bush's detention as an Enemy Combatant.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 3 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.