Following the successes of the RNC in the Rhode Island GOP senatorial primary this week and in the special election in California's 50th congressional district back in June, many on this side of the aisle have begun to fret that the superior GOTV apparatus of the Republicans will trump any advantage generally held by Democratic challengers this cycle. But how likely is it that Republicans will be able to replicate what they have achieved in these individual races -- contests in which the electorate was significantly smaller than it is during normal general election campaigns -- on November 7? Jim VandeHei and Chris Cillizza raise an interesting point in their article today in The Washington Post.
Chafee, who often clashes with the White House and congressional leaders over policy and political tactics, said the Rhode Island primary shows that the GOP strategy can work. "The proof is in the pudding," he said. He noted that the state saw a record turnout for a Republican primary and said that the turnout operation "made the difference." The RNC lacks the resources to replicate its efforts in Rhode Island in every competitive congressional race. But GOP officials said that the $30 million they plan to spend on turnout will allow them to run aggressive programs in most of them. Already, for example, they have more than 40 paid field experts in Missouri, Ohio and Tennessee and nine in Connecticut for the three competitive House races, according to a person familiar with RNC operations. [emphasis added]
The article cites as fact a claim by the RNC that it spent $400,000 on turnout efforts in support of Lincoln Chafee, though I would not be surprised if they had invested more than that. The NRSC, to my knowledge, has not publicly discussed its expenses in Rhode Island, but Greg Sargent over at TPM Cafe digs through FEC filings and finds that Liddy Dole dumped at least a half a million dollars in Rhode Island -- and that doesn't even count the tens of thousands of dollars given by GOP leadership PACs directly to Chafee's campaign. In the California-50 special election, the NRCC spent more than $5 million and the RNC's turnout effort included at least 100 congressional staffers flown in from Washington among 160 "deployed volunteers".
Will the RNC and other Republican committees be able to replicate these numbers during the general election, which is made up of not one, but dozens and dozens of competitive contests? On Tuesday, they were able to help Lincoln Chafee win a Republican primary in Rhode Island. Yet at the same time, the NRCC was unable to push favored candidate Steve Huffman over the top in the GOP primary in Arizona's 8th congressional district despite big bucks they spent on his behalf.
With the field of competitive races continuing to expand -- remember, as Charlie Cook notes this week, "14 Republican House members who had double-digit leads on October 1 [1982] ended up losing" -- I am far from convinced that the Republicans will be able to spend as much on GOTV for individual races as they have in in Rhode Island or California's 50th district. They may have sent 40 staffers to oversee turnout in three large states, but that is nothing in comparison to the 160 they sent to a single congressional district in June.
So while the Democratic Party no doubt must devote more resources than ever before to identifying and turning out voters, and the party's three committee chairs must get over their egos and differences and make sure there is enough money to get out the vote, this race is far from over and we can win.
Update (Chris): I have to emhpasize how much Jonathan is right about this one. I'm seeing lots of knock-kneed websites trembling over the supposedly fantastic Republican turnout in Rhode Island. What people forget is that the NRSC sent every single staffer east of the Mississippi to work on this campaign, and yet Chefee still significantly underperformed the final internal NRSC poll on the race. Why the hell are we supposed to be scared of that? Somehow using every staffer they had in one-half of the country to underperform their own poll makes them invincible? What. Ever.|
|
|
Permalink :: 18 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.