Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview

Tomorrow is a huge day for primaries, nearly equal to June 6th and August 8th. Also, it basically marks the end of the primary season altogether. The Massachusetts primary, on September 19th, and the Hawaii primary, on September 23rd, both have the strong senses of being general election campaigns. Whoever wins the Democratic primaries for MA-Gov, HI-Sen, and HI-02 will almost certainly take office in early 2007. However, that is not the case in a number of elections that take place tomorrow. Here are the most prominent races to watch:
  • AZ-08. This is an open seat currently held by a Republican. There are primaries on both sides. The Republican front-runner, according to a poll last week, is Randy Graf, a hard-right theocon and militia advocate. The Democratic frontrunner is Gabrielle Giffords. If Graf and Giffords win, this seat will immediately become an almost certain pickup for Dems, since Giffords has four times Graf's money, since Dems already lead in the generic ballot here, and since Graf is such a wingnut. A Graf--Giffords matchup is the outcome I am hoping for. Politics1 has more on the Arizona primaries.

  • MD-Sen: The Democratic primary between Cardin and Mfume is too close to call, as conflicting polls have shown both candidates with pre-election leads. The winner of the primary should get a very nice bump in the polls afterward, and will be favored against Republican Michael Steele in this open seat. Mfume and Cardin both face cash deficits--especially Mfume--so the race will hardly be a slam-dunk even if the post-primary media blitz does result in a double-digit lead for the Democratic nominee. I am neutral in this campaign, as I have my doubts about both Democratic candidates.

  • MD-04: Another intra-party battle in a safe Democratic seat, this time between challenger Donna Edwards. CQ politics says the race should be close, but I have absolutely no idea of knowing one way or the other. Even if Edwards does not win, I hope she is willing to give it another go in 2008. Al Wynn needs to be replaced, and in a different cycle the progressive movement can get behind Edwards much earlier and with far more effectiveness.

  • NY-19: Like WI-08 below, but even more so, the late primary really hurts Democratic chances in this winnable seat. I think we could have even given a netroots endorsement here is the primary had not taken so long. Several Democratic candidates are running, the most prominent of which, at least money-wise, are John Hall and Judy Aydelott. Incumbent Sue Kelly is beatable, but like many New York districts, the races do not seem to be quite coming together this year. Man oh man do we need earlier primaries in several states.

  • NY-Sen: It will be interesting to see if Tasini can put up a respectable number against Clinton, which I would measure at around 25-30%. I don't think it will happen, but it ill be interesting to see.

  • RI-Sen. Again, I'm cheering for the wingnut in a Republican primary. If Steve Laffey wins in Rhode Island tomorrow, Republicans have already declared they will abandon the seat. They would have every cause to do so, as all polls show Whitehouse at least doubling up Chafee Laffey. Being gifted a free pickup would be a huge momentum boost for Democratic chances in the Seante.

  • RI-02: Progressive Jennifer Lawless is challenging incumbent Democrat Jim Langevin in this district. Lawless is a longshot, but if she wins she will become a member of Congress. No matter what happens here, I am encouraged by the larger number of progressives running in primaries this season, as we are finally taking steps to hold our own party accountable other than self-destructive third-party options.

  • WI-08: This is a very winnable open seat currently held by a Republican. The Democratic primary is a tough three-way battle between Jamie Wall, Nancy Nasbaum and Steve Kagen. Combined, as of 8/23, these three candidates have raised an astounding $3.3M. Given this, if you ever needed a reason why we should hold all of our primaries before Labor Day, this is it. While the Democrat leads in the generic ballot 48-44, I worry that our nominee will not have the time to recover following a brutal primary. Then again, our nominee will emerge with a superior infrastructure and name ID to Republican nominee Gard, so maybe it won't be all that bad. Again, I am neutral in this primary.
Check out Politics1 for a run-down of other races. As much as I have enjoyed it, I will be relieved when primary season is over and we can finally focus entirely on defeating Republicans and Lieberman. Tomorrow is going to be a huge day, and I will be around starting at 7pm to bring you live coverage well into the night. If nothing else, trying to cover this many races at once should give me proper training for November 7th. It should be a fun day.



Display:


Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

Great post.  Correction: you mean to say "polls show Whitehouse at least doubling up Laffey", not Chaffee.

I wish I had any idea how this one was going to end up.  Have there been any polls on the RI Sen primary in September?  I wonder why the heck not?


by schwa on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:08:47 PM EST

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (3.00 / 1)

Tomorrow is the District of Columbia primary, which is basically the main event, since Democrats do not lose in the general election.  Not that we have any, um, Senators or voting House members, but still.  We have races for Shadow Senator and Shadow Representative, not to mention Mayor and various local elections.

The DC Mayor is essentially a governor and Adrian Fenty, the frontrunner, is an ambitious young Democrat with a bright future.

Shadow Senator and Rep are lobbyists for DC voting rights.  We have one candidate for Shadow Senator, Mike Panetta, who has been active on the internets, promoting the DC Olympic team and trying to re-name the grass at RFK field.

If we can get voting rights for DC, then the Dems pick up the bluest of districts in the country.  Not to mention the fact that DC residents would no longer be second class citizens.


by freedc on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:12:56 PM EST

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

MD-Sen: The Democratic primary between Cardin and Mfume is too close to call.... I am neutral in this campaign, as I have my doubts about both Democratic candidates.

I've been neutral, but as what I've heard against Mfume is just smear and innuendo, I lean his way.

....Then again, our nominee will emerge with a superior infrastructure and name ID to Republican nominee Gard, so maybe it won't be all that bad.

I agree with that. Primary campaigns are overall good for candidates and the party. When the candidates have enough bad ammo against each other to mutually destroy themselves, they aren't good enough to win anyway against a Repo would would use that same ammo -- or will beat him anyway if the dirt on him is even worse.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:24:13 PM EST

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

We covered most of the same races, but my 9/12 primary round-up post can be found here: http://www.swingstateproject.com/2006/09 /912_primary_rac.php


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:27:31 PM EST

thanks for the NY-19 mention (none / 0)

I've been volunteering for John Hall here - he has a lot of grassroots support from  activists, based on his long-time commitment to progressive causes. E.g., he helped organize the No Nukes concert in the early 80s. Also he is the only one of the four remaining to actually have held elected office (county legislator and school board).

Hall was also in the seventies band Orleans, who hit the charts with "Still the One" and "Dance with Me." Funny - doing phonebanking, I got to hear these songs (which I actually don't really like) about 100 times.

His main opponent is thought to be Judy Adylott. She was actually registered Republican til December 2004, when she switched.

My hope is that John wins, and finds a way to reach the majority of voters in this plurality-R-but-becoming-less-so district. People are moving north into the 19th since NYC's closer suburbs are too expensive.

If he can make music lots of people buy, he should be able to craft a political message lots of people will buy too, right?


by mightymouse on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:38:55 PM EST

Re: thanks for the NY-19 mention (none / 0)

I thought Ben would be the runner up. Judy seems to have a strong mailing campaign, but a large portion of the support I see is for Ben. Then, that's probablly just my area.


by tigercourse on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:42:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks for the NY-19 mention (none / 0)

who knows how it will end up. The thing with this race is not many people vote, so whoever does the best job motivating their people to vote can win - even if "their people" constitute a minority.


by mightymouse on Tue Sep 12, 2006 at 12:26:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: thanks for the NY-19 mention (none / 0)

Very unfortunate that John decided to go negative on the eve of the primary. If he doesn't win tomorrow and Judy does, expect Sue Kelly to replay this message (originally posted on DKos) over and over again:

http://www.geocities.com/ny19recording/j ohnhall_1.mp3


by Take19 on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 07:44:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

MN-05 (none / 0)

Tomorrow is also the primary for the 5th CD in Minnesota to see who will replace Martin Sabo, who is retiring.

This is Minneapolis' district so whoever wins tomorrow will win in November, but the three leading candidates are not all equal.

We have a true progressive candidate in State Representative Keith Ellison, and it's going to be a close finish tomorrow between him, Mike Erlandson (Sabo's chief of staff and much more of a corporate centrist Dem), and Ember Reichgott Junge (a former state senator and probably the most conservative of the three).

If you're in Minnesota, come volunteer for Keith Ellison!


by the wanderer on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:40:05 PM EST

Another Primary Preview (none / 0)

Political Wire has an excellent primary preview written by Congressional Quarterly's Greg Giroux.


by TDGoddard on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 04:50:52 PM EST

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (3.00 / 1)

I don't see Tasini getting 20% of the vote. That's just a far-left fantasy.


by jiacinto on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 05:03:39 PM EST

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

The only poll of this race I've seen was something like 85-15.  Although 20% wouldn't floor me, it should be obvious that 25-30% is out of the question.

I did see my first Hillary ad of the cycle the other day, though.  I sure hope she has some money left now.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 05:52:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

I agree.  It appears that Dems outside NY are angrier with her than Dems inside NY.  That is bad for her Pres ambitions but not for re-election.


by John Mills on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 06:01:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

Two points.

in MD-04, you rightly point out that, should Edwards lose, the netroots can get behind her early for '08.  I hope by "early" you mean no later than, say, Jan. '07, even if it's only nominally at first.

in WI-08, the brutal primary has already happened at this point.  Whatever damage there is, has been done.  And Dems still lead the generic ballot.  Granted, things can change (which I've watched here in Cali re: Ahnold), but I have a hard time imagining Democrats abandoning Democrats there.


by Lucas O'Connor on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 05:18:34 PM EST

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

I live in WI-08 and you're right, whichever  of the three Democrats who wins the primary will collect all the democratic votes in November.  It may have been a tough primary campaign (although that's not the way I saw it), but none of the candidates seemed to attack each other.  All of them have consistently argued that it's time for a change, and positioned themselves as the better alternative to what's been going on with the current party in power.  I'd gladly vote in November for any one of the three Democrats, and I think I'm no different than any Democrat in this district.

Even Gard has so far been giving us soft soap ads, so no one has yet taken off the gloves.


by grapeshot on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 09:11:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (3.00 / 1)

"Man oh man do we need earlier primaries in several states."

Well said Chris. NY once had a June primary many years ago but it was changed to September which helps incumbents and hurts challengers.  The Dems have been hurt much more in NY by the late primary because we are much more likely in this state to have nomination contests (usually nasty and divisive) than the Repubs who largely choose their nominees behind closed doors.  Al D'Amato won in 1992 largely thanks to the late primary which left him with a tired and broke opponent who made a big slip of the tongue which cost him the election (Bob Abrams called D'Amato a facist).  There are numerous other examples but that one comes to mind.


by John Mills on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 05:24:13 PM EST

Re: Primary Super Tuesday #3 Preview (none / 0)

     The Wisconsin 8 race is mostly going to be an up or down vote on Bush and on Gard, the former Assembly Speaker who was in the middle of the scandals which have resulted in the criminal convictions of former Republican Speaker Scott Jensen, former House Republican Leader Steve Foti, and former Senate Democratic leader Chuck Chvala. It'll help Gard that this is Green's home district, but voters in Northeast Wisconsin are very scandal-averse, and this seat went for a Catholic priest in 1974, who held it for three terms until the Pope told priests to get out of elective politics.


by Ron Thompson on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 05:28:27 PM EST

MA-GOV (3.00 / 3)

Taking back Beacon Hill is not guaranteed; the Dems haven't had that gubernatorial seat since Dukakis left office in early 1991.  The Dem will be favored over Kerry Healey, the current LT-Gov, but nothing is assured.


by Adam B on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 06:02:10 PM EST

Re: MA-GOV (none / 0)

the question is: who will Christy Mihos take more votes from?


by johnny longtorso on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 09:43:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: MA-GOV (none / 0)

It's hard to take any polls for the general seriously until the primary is settled, but the preliminary view is that Mihos is not going to take very many votes from either.

We know Healey's campaign already -- whoever the Democrat is, you can't trust him to stop the legislature from spending too much of your money.  (Of course, Romney has done little in this direction either because his vetoes have all been overridden.)  One argument is that this tack will work better against Patrick because all the liberals are behind Patrick.  Another is that since Patrick is campaigning to a large extent on his personality ("no ordinary leader") he might be more proof against it.

Current gossip is that Reilly screwed the pooch in the debate and is definitely in third place in the primary.  Gabrieli has some hope that Reilly "anti-liberal" voters will go to him because Patrick is more identified with the liberals.  Patrick may have the current lead, is running some very nice TV ads, and has been developing a turnout operation for months if not years.


by DaveMB on Mon Sep 11, 2006 at 10:40:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.