All In

It is 2:30 am, and I am still blogging live from the New Haven Lamont HQ. It will be time to wake up here at around 5 a.m. People are still in the office working. Maybe I won't get any sleep tonight. It would be a small price to pay.

Before I type anything else, I would first like to say that I was completely wrong in reporting that Steve Rosenthal was up here working for Lieberman. That is just flat out not true, and I apologize to Steve for claiming as much.

More in the extended.


(New Haven office at 1:45 am-my leg is in the foreground)

I spent a long time over at Sullivan's tonight, and yes, there is a blogger conspiracy to defeat Joe Lieberman. It was like Yearly Kos over there--albeit with only 50 people--and I am not exaggerating much. I might as well just say that, because no matter what happens later today, Wednesday will be the worst day of press for the progressive netroots in years. If Lamont loses, we will be branded as ineffectual, irrelevant, extremist, and destructive. If Ned Lamont wins, we will be branded as powerful, relevant, extremist, and destructive. Both descriptions are inaccurate and unfair because this goes so far beyond the blogosphere, but if I have to choose I would much rather have the second one be the story. If we are going to get trashed and be forced to take credit for the fantastic work of others, I would at least like to get trashed as powerful and relevant. I do not know a single netroots leader that is not behind Ned Lamont in this campaign, but at the same time arguing hat we are driving this campaign is preposterous. Still, win or lose, the press will hit us with their hammerstroke, and as idiotic as that will be, that is also fine by me. Maybe we should not have spent so much time at Sullivan's while everyone else was working so hard.

Even apart from the narrative, the enormity of this election is starting to really settle in on me. This is probably the most watched senatorial primary in the history of the United States, and the progressive movement has been the main engine in making it such. If we win, the party and the country are changed, for the better, forever. If we lose, we may suffer irreparable damage to our movement and the right-wing of the party will become emboldened and enshrined for at least two more years. There is no middle ground, there are no moral victories. This is all in. Everything is on the line. We are the Dead Rabbits and the natives are standing on the other side of the square. Use the force--aim for the exhaust port. This is the opportunity of a generation (which, these days, seems to come every two years).

Returning to the media narrative, this campaign could have been a lesson to the establishment media that the progressive netroots are just a subset of the progressive movement, just as the progressive blogosphere is a subset of the progressive netroots. The progressive blogosphere is only about one-third of the progressive netroots, and the progressive netroots are only about on-third of the progressive movement (and the progressive movement has grown to about half the size of the Democratic Party).They could have learned about all of this, and they could have learned that the Internet side of the operation basically just functions as another department in the campaign, just like field, communications and political are departments within campaigns. They could have learned this, and learned how this movement is just itching to become a supplement to the Democratic Party and progressive politics as a whole, rather than against it. They could have learned this, but they would rather blame the downfall of the Democratic Party entirely upon a small handful of national bloggers who gather for drinks at Sullivan's. They could have learned this, but they did not. But you know what? That is fine. If they want to blame what happened here on a small group of people that includes me, that's fine. The blame certainly should not go to the candidate, the staff, or to the volunteers (who are not being paid $150 per day, ala the Lieberyouth). If things go wrong later today, and I seriously doubt that they will, I should be blamed. It probably was my fault in some way, and I should get blamed rather than anyone who actually works on this campaign. I can tell you right now, not a single person who staffs or volunteers here should ever be looked down upon by anyone in political campaigns, ever. This has been a masterpiece of political insurgency. It will be remembered for generations to come as just that.

I think we have a 90% chance of winning today. My personal prediction is Lamont by 4-4.5%. No matter what happens, August 8th, 2006, will be talked about for a long time to come. As long as the GOTV plan goes forward tomorrow without any major hitches, Ned Lamont will win this primary. W can deal with the idiocy of the establishment and the consequences of this victory on Wednesday. Right now, it is all in and we have pocket aces. I like our chances. Today we make history.

Display:


Re: All In (3.00 / 2)

Can we get a new update please?  Its almost 3 am.


John McCain loves war.
by Winston Smith on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 02:51:42 AM EST

Wish I was there... (3.00 / 6)

I just got home from the Norwalk office myself.  I really wish I could have gotten away for the blogger gatherings on Saturday and tonight, but there was just too much work to do.  I get really worried about the premature celebrating.  In fact, my crazy Catholic guilt told me this morning that the Q-poll momentum change was entirely my fault, having single-handedly jinxed Ned Lamont by going to Sullivan's on Sunday night, having two pints, and allowing myself to enjoy the feeling of a potential win for just two hours (rather than working).

We could lose.  We could win.  I don't know, and I've been on the ground for a long time here.  I think it is much closer than the July 20 q-poll and I found all of the out-of-state blogger speculation about a possible landslide to be absolutely torturous.

I do know that if we do lose, it won't be because of bloggers.  It'll be because of the most basic campaign mistake in the world - not ID'ing enough 1's.  Period.

If we win, it will be a triumph of HOPE more than anything else -- an amazing group of individuals who had the audacity to HOPE against all odds, predictions, and warnings, and a candidate, campaign team, grassroots volunteer crew, 15,000+ grassroots donors, and, yes, a ragtag group of bloggers here in Connecticut and around the country who channeled that audacious hope into tangible and courageous action.

I'm in awe of all of us.  :-)

Still, I really want to fucking win.  In three hours I'll be standing outside my polling place ready to be the first voter to cast a vote for Ned Lamont, and then I'll be spending every minute until the polls close doing what I can do bring in votes for Ned.

Hope over fear.  Hope into action.  Action into victory.


(The artist formerly known as "Maura in VA"!)
by Maura in CT on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 02:57:08 AM EST

Maura, You Kick Ass (none / 0)

Keep on Rockin in the free world girl.  I can say that I saw with my own eyes how huge of an assett you were to the campaign.

Maura is how bloggers helped, not necesarillay by writting about the race, but by ponying up and heading to CT.

Have a pint for me on Tuesday night.

If you live far away from CT and want to help out, you can always Virtual Phone Bank with MoveOn.org
They give you the list, and the script, it's great, I'll be calling for a few hours later today, and I hope everyone else will take a shot at it too.


Next Generation Democrats
by Pitin on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 03:59:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: All In (none / 0)

If possible, can people in other states take a gander at your GOTV plan if you win.

I know I'd like to see it.

phat


by phatass on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 03:05:38 AM EST

Re: Phat, agreed. (none / 0)

I can only reiterate Phatass's point, that this knowledge, in the right hands, could be a major boon later on, in November.


by justathought on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 03:44:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: All In (3.00 / 1)

You did a great job here Maura.  Your simple question to Lieberman about loyalty was covered nicely in local news, and did a lot to draw attention to Lieberman's opportunism.  I dont think Lieberman's support would have fallen so much if he was in this as a committed Democrat.  

Whatever the outcome.. all your hard work, along with everyone else's, has made the world a better place.  You deserve a nice long rest after this one.  

I really want to fucking win.

You are speaking for us all here.


John McCain loves war.
by Winston Smith on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 03:10:32 AM EST

Re: All In (none / 0)

I'm not sure if it will help much, but I just donated $50 to Lamont.  I've been reading for the past week about what you guys are doing there, and it's amazing.  I wish more then anything I could be there helping.  But I live in Nevada, so that didn't happen this time around.  Go Ned Go!

PS. don't forget about Jack Carter!


by jmeugniot on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 03:24:55 AM EST

Re: All In (none / 0)

That's my prediction also, Lamont by 4.

Actually, if Lamont wins the blogosphere will have to share the focus with Lieberman. He will be the highest profile losing primary candidate in history. The headlines nationwide will be Lieberman loses, not Lamont wins.

I'm looking forward to every second of his squirming and excuses, and the condemnation of his campaign. After his desperate and disgraceful comment today that a Lamont win indicates the Democratic party has no place for someone who is strong on security, my rooting interest in Lamont increased tenfold.


by jagakid on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 04:14:02 AM EST

My prediction... (none / 0)

Lamont by 7.  But that's just me, we'll see what happens.


Next Generation Democrats
by Pitin on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 04:24:55 AM EST

Re: All In (none / 0)

About three minutes until the voting begins.


by Natyjalm on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 05:57:09 AM EST

Re: All In (none / 0)

I love the Gangs of New York reference.


by Matt Ortega on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 06:10:47 AM EST

Re: All In (none / 0)

Win or lose, looking forward to reading about the work you guys and gals do. We're counting on you to make a strong showing.


by johnalive on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 06:20:29 AM EST

Eye on the Prize (3.00 / 0)

I hear your exhaustion and your second guessing and see you looking at the small picture. I'm glad you are, because your intelligence shines through in your dissection of the fine points.

But as somebody who proudly calls himself a liberal, and has lately voted for Democratic candidates who border on Republican by hugging the center, who has joined Bill Maher and Michael Moore in spirit begging Ralph Nader on bended knee not to run in the singleminded purpose of getting rid of Bush43, Lamont is a line in the sand.

That's why this Floridian sent him money, talks him up to anyone who will listen, and watches closely for what I hope is victory. But even in defeat, you will have resurrected something tremendously important and long lost (at least to me): the principled stand.


by PBCliberal on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:15:44 AM EST

I think you guys must be working too hard (none / 0)

You all look awfully skinny in that picture. Get some big sandwiches or something.

But seriously - thanks for the work and the updates. The nation is watching...


by odum on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 10:24:31 AM EST

Re: All In (none / 0)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_Rabbit s explains the reference.  best of luck. win lose or draw, politics is going to change because of what you have done here.  


by msobel on Tue Aug 08, 2006 at 11:05:18 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.