Write-In Candidacy Could Help Fawcett Take Strong R Seat

Despite the strong efforts of fighting Democrat Jay Fawcett to reach out to the netroots, including a successful trip to Yearly Kos back in June and his addition to the Netroots page on ActBlue, most do not see the race to replace retiring GOP Rep. Joel Hefley in Colorado's fifth congressional district as one that is today competitive -- or one that even has the potential of becoming competitive. But a report today by Ed Sealover of the Colorado Springs Gazette sheds new light on the race and could cause the political handicappers to take a new look at this district.

Rep. Joel Hefley is seriously considering running as a writein candidate to retain his seat rather than risk handing it over to Republican nominee Doug Lamborn.

In meetings with national political consultants, Hefley and his supporters have come up with yard-sign designs and the key messages of a possible campaign, Republican Party activist Peggy Littleton said.

Hefley, who has represented the 5th Congressional District for 20 years, has been the subject of a three-week push by high-level Republicans to take this nearly unheard-of step, Littleton said Monday.

Sealover is skeptical about the possibility that a write-in effort by Hefley would positively impact Fawcett's campaign, writing, "It is unknown if Hefley's write-in campaign would increase Fawcett's chances of becoming the first Democrat elected from the district." True, there are instances where the appearance of two members of the same party does not ensure increased chances for the other party. One need only look to Connecticut, where it is clear that presence of both Joe Lieberman and Ned Lamont on the ballot is clearly not helping Republican nominee Schlesinger. However, given that a) Fawcett is a significantly more credible candidate than someone like Alan Schlesinger, and b) the Democratic Party is not likely to support Hefley as the Republican Party is supporting Lieberman, it seems more likely that having both Hefley and Lamborn in the race will help Fawcett than not.

But helping Fawcett is not the same as assuring his victory, which this move clearly will not do. George W. Bush received two-thirds of the vote in CO-05 in both 2000 and 2004, so Fawcett will have to perform at least marginally better than either Al Gore or John Kerry in order to capitalize on the potentially splitting GOP base. Should Hefley indeed enter the race, Fawcett might only need 37 or 38 percent of the vote to get a ticket to Congress (though that number might be closer to 40 percent).

So at the least, this is a race we should keep an eye on for the next several hours, as the deadline for Hefley to enter the race as a write-in is 5 PM Mountain time tonight. But if Hefley does decide to run, we might want to take a second look at this contest to see if our resources might be able to help Fawcett in an efficient way and steal away this strongly Republican district.

Update [2006-8-29 12:27:46 by Jonathan Singer]: We now have a comment from the DCCC via spokesperson Kate Bedingfield: "Any time you have a candidate as unethical and radical as Doug Lamborn and his own party is coming out against him it certainly isn't good for him."

(The Fawcett campaign does not have a comment on the story, at present.)



Display:


Re: Write-In Candidacy Could Help Fawcett Take Str (none / 0)

Tough to imagine that the write-in campaign would hurt our chances, and Fawcett strikes me as competent enough to figure out the play if it ends up happening.


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 12:53:50 PM EST

How can there be a deadline to run as a write-in? (none / 0)

1) Voters are free to write in the names of persons not named on the ballot.  That's what a write-in vote is.  

2) To run as a write-in candidate means that you're not listed on the ballot, but you actively encourage people to vote for you by writing your name in.

3) Encouraging people to vote for you in any manner is protected by the First Amendment.  So is spending your own money to do so.  I don't see how they could stop you from collecting contributions (up to the legal max), hiring a campaign organization, or any of that.


by RT on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 12:57:40 PM EST

Not now there isn't... (none / 0)

You have to declare your intention to run as a write-in in Colorado.  I'm presuming that's to allow the Clerks to set up the electronic ballot machines, some of which don't offer a write-in spot unless there's a declared write-in candidate.


by Phoenix Rising on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 01:01:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: How can there be a deadline to run as a write- (none / 0)

At least part of the issue, I would assume, is registering the potential misspellings of one's name.  I know that Mark Hull-Richter did that here in California and that Shelly Sekula-Gibbs is up against it in TX-22.  Not sure what all else would be involved.


by Lucas O'Connor on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 01:02:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Write-In Candidacy Could Help Fawcett (none / 0)

I think you mean the Dem Party is not likely to support Hefley like the R's are supporting Lieberman.  The Dem party is supporting Fawcett, as well it should.


by Mimikatz on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 01:00:53 PM EST

Re: Write-In Candidacy Could Help Fawcett (none / 0)

Either I misread or it's been corrected.  Sorry.


by Mimikatz on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 01:01:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Write-In Candidacy Could Help Fawcett (none / 0)

It's been corrected.


Blogging here @ MyDD.com. Twittering @jonathanhsinger.
by Jonathan Singer on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 01:05:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hefley NOT running, won't endorse Lamborn (none / 0)

There's a new update to the story from the Colorado Springs Gazette, which originally broke the story.

Hefley, who's out-of-state attending a funeral, will not be running as a write-in.  BUT, he's also refused to endorse Lamborn and said "I feel that he ran the most sleazy, dishonest campaign I've seen in a long, long time, and I can not support it[.]"

Also from the article: The effort, [...] involved national political consultants and elected officials; sounds like Dougy stepped on some pretty sensitive toes somewhere up the food chain.

This still may work in Fawcett's favor; Hefley appears to be conflicted between supporting Republican majorities and supporting the opponent of the guy he dislikes so much.


by Phoenix Rising on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 01:05:39 PM EST

This is the best case scenario (none / 0)

Who knows how many R's and independents Hefley might have pulled in as the safe haven for non-Democrats who don't like Lamborn.  The more candidates in the race, the better for Lamborn, who can count on getting out the FOTF fundies.  That's not enough to win a two way race, even in Colorado Springs, but may be enough to win a three way race.  Hefley's criticism without running should help push independents and R's into Fawcett's camp, even if all they think is that they will have to put up with Jay for two years and then have another primary fight down there.


by Colorado Luis on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 02:10:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This is the best case scenario (none / 0)

Have to agree with this analysis.

Hefley's just told all the sane Republicans in the district: "Don't trust Lamborn, don't vote for Lamborn.  Do anything else, just not that..."  I'll take that for a start.  Hefley's endorsement of Jay would be icing on the cake, though.


by Phoenix Rising on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 02:45:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No, more candidates is bad for Lamborn &... (none / 0)

...good for Fawcett.

The math is simple:  most CO-05 voters want to vote for a Republican.  Most of them, almost certainly more than 50%, will suck it up and vote for Lamborn by default unless Hefley had chosen to run as a write-in.  If Hefley runs, he splits the GOP vote and Fawcett has a chance.

It's strange wishful thinking that says Hefley passing on a third-wheel campaign somehow helps Fawcett.  That's just objectively wrong.

Fawcett sounds like a GREAT candidate, and if the Goopers completely implode over the next couple months to give us a 50-odd-seat wave in House races, then he might just be able to pull off the ridiculous upset.  But the way things are right now, it's not such a strong environment to let us take safe Gooper seats like this one.


by DCCyclone on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 03:06:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Objectively wrong? (none / 0)

I think not.  A Hefley write in campaign would take lots of momentum away from the Republicans for Fawcett movement, which is the key to winning this seat right now.  Bringing in the religious wingnut base is how Lamborn won the 6-way primary, and in a 3-way general it would make his job that much easier.

What we really have here is a strong anti-Lamborn movement that would be splintered if Hefley entered the race.  Objectively.


by Colorado Luis on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 05:24:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Something Happening Here (3.00 / 1)

Anytime the opposition is split it helps, a lot!  Fawcett is a steller candidate in a perfect position to pick up the pieces.  Sure, it is a Republican district but something is happening here and it's big trouble for the Republicans, that's clear.


by howardpark on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 01:39:42 PM EST

Re: Write-In Candidacy Could Help Fawcett Take Str (none / 0)

Lamborn may be a Religious Right-Winger; however, the guy that he beat in the Primary, Jeff Crank, is also a Religious Right-Winger.  There are probably enough Religious Right-Wingers in Colorado Springs to beat Fawcett if they all turn out.  Our best hope is that Hefley will say bad things about Lamborn and the lunatics will stay home at election time.


by huskerco on Tue Aug 29, 2006 at 06:04:27 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.