Feinstein's campaign co-chair endorses Arnold, gets put "on notice!"

I found this tidbit in the comments of our still brand spanking new people powered site GovernorPhil.com. It looks like Dianne Feinstein (who is up for re-election this year, and somehow managed to squeak by without getting Lamont-ed), has a problem. Namely that her campaign co-chair Angela Bradstreet, just
mouthed off to the press about how she is not going to vote for Phil Angelides in the fall... and why? because she's sick of paying taxes! Ohhh... boo hoo...


"Quite frankly, I'm also sick and tired of paying taxes," she said. "And that's Angelides' solution -- raising taxes."

If I may quote the great and wise philosopher Plato: "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!"
Angela Bradstreet, you are officially "on notice".

(quotes and more below the cut)


"A number of my Democratic friends, who have raised lots of money for Democrats, have said they cannot support Phil," said Angela Bradstreet, a well known San Francisco attorney and co-chair of Sen. Dianne Feinstein's re-election campaign. "This is the first time I can remember it being so pronounced."

Bradstreet, a Democrat who said she is voting for Schwarzenegger, argued that the governor has re-established himself as a moderate who has shown strong leadership on economic issues.

Well quite frankly i'm sick and tired of so-called Bloomberg "democrats" constantly wanting to have the world and not pay for it. It's like the guy who always excuses himself to go to the bathroom whenever the bill comes. Pathetic.

Boo fucking hoo!
Taxes are the dues you pay for living in a modern civilized society.
If you don't like the idea of paying taxes, then talk to Enron and the other energy companies that absconded with 9 Billion of the states money in the Rolling Blackmail. In fact talk to Arnold about that, as his buddy the departed Ken Lay was one of the people who benefited from that, which instigated the recall that got him into office.

Phil Angelides is the only candidate to say what needs to be said.
We need to be responsible and pay the debt off, that means tightening the belt a little.

Arnold just plans on borrowing and borrowing and borrowing until the states debt becomes insurmountable, much like Bush's plan for the US.

Also the idea of Arnold as a moderate is simply laughable, and I wouldn't call a policy to borrow, and borrow until the states debt becomes insurmountable, "strong leadership on economic issues."

I can't believe this waste of flesh is on Feinstein's re-election committee.
Hey, she's free to vote however she wants, but if you ask me, she should keep her trap shut, less it affect her candidates election chances.

If this infuriates you as much as it does me, feel free to send DiFi (who's up for re-election this year) an
e-mail

DC office:
                Phone: (202) 224-3841
                Fax: (202) 228-3954
                TTY/TDD: (202) 224-2501

write a local office here

here's the info for the SF office:

SAN FRANCISCO
Jim Molinari, State Director
One Post Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, CA 94104
415/393-0707
TTY/TDD: 415/249-4785

Write a letter
Senator Dianne Feinstein
United States Senate
331 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Campaign office:
Feinstein for Senate
P.O. Box 67457
Los Angeles, CA 90067
(310) 556-VOTE (8683)

Also Angela Bradstreet... You're on NOTICE!

-C.

update:
You can send her a polite email asking her to say she's sorry for distorting Phil's positions.

abradstreet@cbmlaw.com

http://www.cbmlaw.com/bios/abradstreet.asp

"She defends employers in sexual discrimination, harassment, disability, wrongful termination, and racial discrimination claims. She also conducts sensitive investigations...

Representative clients include Citibank; National Surgical Hospitals; Northrop Grumman; Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc.; Pacific Union; Pebble Beach Company; San Francisco 49ers; USI Insurance Services; VeriSign, Inc.; and Wells Fargo Bank."

To be fair, she also does sensitivity workshops, talks about gender and glass ceiling issues, and called on judges to not be members of the boyscouts since they discriminate.

But she obviously has clients who oppose new taxes (not to mention she probably makes a ton of money and would be one of the few people who would pay highter taxes).

thanks Ari!

update: hat tip to MJB

DiFi appointed Angela Bradstreet to the "Northern California Federal Judicial Advisory Committee", which recommends nominees for federal judgeships in northern California to the California senators and the White House.

Feinstein's appointees on this committee ought to be loyal Democrats.

You know damn well that Bush is only appointing loyal Republicans to judge-picking committees -- he would never give such a plum job to any Republican who endorses Democratic candidates. So why should the Democratic seats on this committee go to fake Democrats like Bradstreet, who work to re-elect Republican governors?

When you call Feinstein's office, ask that she demand that Ms. Bradstreet immediately resign her seat on the Northern California Federal Judicial Advisory Committee.

update: Well I had to call Dianne's campaign again to get an official answer back, (so much for that call back eh?) but this time the guy I talked to was prepared with a statement.

The official word is that Angela Bradstreet speaking in a personal capacity and not for the campaign. That Dianne Feinstein was an early and enthusiastic supporter of Phil Angelides and continues to be so.

No word on if there is going to be a press release, public repudiation or other atonement on the part of DiFi, yet. Or for that matter of Bradstreet will continue to be involved with the campaign.


Poll
Is Bradstreet right?
No
WAAAAAAAH!!!!!

Votes: 27
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Re: Feinstein's campaign co-chair endorses Arnold, (3.00 / 1)

I Called DiFi's campaign office and got a very nervous sounding intern, who took my number and promised somebody would get back with me with a response... we'll see about that. :)

-C.


by neutron on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 02:30:09 PM EST

Re: Feinstein's campaign co-chair (none / 0)

I have to laugh at people telling ME to toe the party line while professionals like Rendell, Bradstreet, Hillary, Obama, Lieberman, Bayh, Reed, From, Kilgore, and Zell Miller badmouth Democrats at every oppotunity that they think helps them.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 02:32:53 PM EST

well to be fair.... (none / 0)

I think there's a time and a place for intraparty criticism but saying out and out that you endorse the Republican for Governor when your candidate is up for re-election is just dumb.

-C.


by neutron on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 03:13:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well to be fair.... (none / 0)

Who defines when it's right? It seems to depend a lot on who's being criticized and who's doing it.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 04:50:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

true, true. (none / 0)

I think we can all agree that Bradstreet is wrong in this case though, right?

-C.


by neutron on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 04:56:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: true, true. (none / 0)

Bradstreet is totally out of line. Active Democrats must respect the nominating process. Support the nominees or step out of the way for those who can.

Feinstein also has email:
 info[@]dianne2006[.]com


by Alice Marshall on Sat Aug 12, 2006 at 01:39:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well to be fair.... (none / 0)

Welcome to life Sitkah. It's messy. I agree with you on the Rendell quote though. He should have had to eat those words praising Santorum. He's done that quite a bit and I don't understand why. Maybe it's just residual hatred of Casey from the primary but who knows.


by adamterando on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 04:56:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well to be fair.... (none / 0)

I've known life for 50 years. And I've learned that hypocrisy has to be called to the carpet.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 05:45:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well to be fair.... (none / 0)

Well it looks like it was

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/ local/states/pennsylvania/counties/montg omery_county/15228978.htm


by adamterando on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 05:56:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well to be fair.... (none / 0)

I couldn't help but notice that Rendell didn't retract his praise of Rick Insantorum in that article.


With Democrats Lieberman goes for the jugular. With Republicans he goes for the lips.
by Sitkah on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 06:21:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well to be fair.... (none / 0)

How about this: There are only so many issues that can be dealt with in a given day.  It sucks, and it doesn't mean that the issues not getting picked up shouldn't, but I, for example, can only read so many diaries, can only contribute so much money, can only get agitated about so many issues each day, week, year, lifetime.

I don't think it's hypocrisy, I think it's just the nature of reality in the current blogosphere that people try to get to all the big issues but might not always be able to.  Strive to fix it? Absolutely.  Weild unrealistic expectations given the current capacity of blogs to handle the nearly infinite list of important issues? Hopefully not as much.


by Lucas O'Connor on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 06:17:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Angelides Quote (3.00 / 3)

"I would ask the wealthiest Californians - those making over $280,000 a year - to pay at least the same taxes they paid under Governor Wilson and Governor Reagan."


by medleysoul on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 03:07:14 PM EST

that is a great quote. (none / 0)

wow... I might have to steal that for Governorphil.com.

-C.


by neutron on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 03:14:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

i know....and check this out (none / 0)

Look at the post i just put up about Arnold it shows that he was lobbied to end the investigation into enron AND that he agreed with Ken Lay's solution


by medleysoul on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 03:20:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Here's another one (none / 0)

"... hey, if you've noticed, your tuition and fees are up, which is the worst kind of tax on hard-working families and on young people,"

http://www.vote-smart.org/speech_detail. php?speech_id=187900&keyword=&ph rase=&contain=
Angelides Quote:


by medleysoul on Sat Aug 12, 2006 at 03:52:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feinstein's campaign co-chair endorses Arnold, (none / 0)

Thanks for calling attention to this.

Somebody else recommend this please! We need to put DiFi's feet to the fire. We saw what Arnold tried to do when he thought he had a mandate. What do people think he will do if he wins reelection? Somehow I doubt he will see the need to be more like a Democrat. Especially on issues that matter to most non-Bloomberg Democrats (i.e. taxes, unions, health care, and jobs).

It will make me sick to my stomach if the wealthiest Democrats in the state throw the election to Ahnold.


by adamterando on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 03:42:11 PM EST

Re: Feinstein's campaign co-chair endorses Arnold, (none / 0)

Thats the nice thing about the top 10%: they are only 10% of the population. And that's assuming that all those in the top 10% of earners who aren't already republicans would support the governator.


by TimThe Terrible on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 03:59:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Feinstein's campaign co-chair endorses Arnold, (none / 0)

I meant more in influencing the money chase and the meta-narrative of the race, i.e. Phil is to far to the left, Ahnold is the sensible alternative.

Although the top 10%/1% are only a small part of the population, they have an inordinate amount of influence in the electoral process and on who is determined to be "acceptable".


by adamterando on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 04:09:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Stragegy (none / 0)

I say whenever a piece like this comes out we e-mail
the press with a counter-argument and a link to governorphil.com
by medleysoul on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 03:57:30 PM EST

Re: Feinstein's campaign co-chair endorses Arnold, (none / 0)

I'd love to threaten to withhold my vote from her over this, but she's already lost it and I've already told her as much.  I think if I keep saying "because of this, I won't vote for you" it might start losing its resonance.  But here's a great reason for me to never ever EVER vote for Feinstein.  Though I don't think that was likely to happen anyhow.


by Lucas O'Connor on Fri Aug 11, 2006 at 04:01:14 PM EST

Re: Feinstein's campaign (none / 0)

Phil is still going to win despite Feinstein. When the ads go on the air in the fall, Angelidas will catch up and win. You can never count out a Dem for governor in this predominently liberal state. Angelidas has the money to win.


by olawakandi on Sat Aug 12, 2006 at 03:13:04 AM EST

Feinstein's campaign co-chair (none / 0)

"Taxes are the dues you pay for living in a modern civilized society."

____

True, but having lived in California (the rest of my family still lives there), there is an expectation of performance.  If this performance is not being met, then there should be a reluctance for paying more in taxes, whatever the income level.  And California doesn't always deliver in this regard.

My brother commented to me that this year, he ended up paying more in California state income taxes than federal income taxes.  Isn't there something wrong with that picture?

Also, California has a very high cost of living, so tax increases will be met with greater resistance than otherwise


by v2aggie2 on Sat Aug 12, 2006 at 05:02:13 PM EST

Re: Feinstein's campaign co-chair endorses Arnold, (none / 0)

California seems to be in a huge mess. Must have been that little Reagan experience. Now they are having a Schwarzenegger experience. He has public works workers create potholes so he, "Arnie the Big Man," can be photoöpped filling them in with a shovel! He is much worse than Reagan. (They were big- time, embubbled actors, for cryin' out loud!)

SCHWARZENEGGER IS A GOD DAMNED NAZI! HE COMES FROM A GOD DAMNED LINE OF NAZIS!


by blues on Sun Aug 13, 2006 at 06:50:41 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.