Lieberman's First Finance Chair Endorses Lamont

I didn't blog this yesterday because of the Bill Clinton event, but Carl Feen, Joe Lieberman's first finance chair, endorsed Ned Lamont.  There's a long backstory here involving anti-war Connecticut politics in the 1970s and a group of young reformers all coming into their own at the same time.  Lieberman was a young progressive in those days, having worked in the civil rights movement and challenging a staid status quo.  His gradual turn to the far right is a political tragedy, a textbook example of an institutionalist who gets bought off by the system without even realizing it.

Well his oldest friends realize it.  Here are Feen's remarks.

Joe has lost touch with the people of Connecticut, the Democratic Party in Connecticut and Democrats across the County.  His threats to leave the party and run on his own is an insult to all of us who have worked in the past to get him elected.

His constant cheerleading of the Bush administration and their wrong priorities on the war, on so called "free trade" and on social security is undermining our party and hurting our candidates for Congress & Governor.

Joe also abandoned Bill Clinton when he shamefully sided yet again with the Republicans and condemned our Democratic President from the floor of the Senate.

I stand with Ned because he will not abandon the issues and the people that are about to elect him as the next Senator from the great State of Connecticut.



Display:


Stupid 'too many characters'... (3.00 / 1)

Wow! This is the way to talk about the issues in play here.

I really do believe this can be a turning point. The polls show Ned ahead and I think he'll stay there.

It will be interesting to see what they look like after this week of Boxer/Clinton/VBloggers on the rampage.

No matter what happens Left Blogistan is on the map.

Me?

I'm buyin' a video camera and some editing sofware.

Look out Boxer!

Here I come!


by Pericles on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 08:39:11 PM EST

Re: Stupid 'too many characters'... (3.00 / 1)

Do it. I went guerrilla and it's awesome. YouTube is free.

Go over to the diary linked above if you want a tutorial on how I did it recently. If not then cheers, let us know what you come up with.


by mbair on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 09:15:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Stupid 'too many characters'... (none / 0)

Going to check it out now...and thanks.


by Pericles on Fri Jul 28, 2006 at 09:26:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lieberman's First Finance Chair Endorses Lamon (3.00 / 1)

I know this is supposed to be the "adult" blog, but I just can't wait to open my presents this year. I feel like a kid waiting for the bell to ring me out to Christmas vacation.

Back on point, I don't think that Lamont is a one issue candidate anymore. I'm not sure when he turned that corner, but it's way beyond that now. Lieberman is the rationale for the Lamont candidacy. In a broad sense it's about accountability to the voters, Joe has got to go precisely because he can't get that straight in his head. What a race this is going to be and August 9th is the start, it's not just the day after.


by mbair on Tue Jul 25, 2006 at 09:20:36 PM EST

Lieberman's First Finance Chair (3.00 / 1)

Far right?

Come on!
I'm not a Lieberman fan, but this is a large overexaggeration.

Let's just say that Lieberman isn't exactly the second coming of Sam Brownback


by v2aggie2 on Wed Jul 26, 2006 at 12:32:25 AM EST

Clinton must pay if Lieberman wins narrowly (none / 0)

Clinton could have easily stood by the sidelines. If he was really going to be a good expresident, why not let this be a fair fight? Lieberman already has the massive advantage of being an incumbent. But to prevent his wife from getting caught up in an anti war backlash which would gain more momeentum if Lieberman loses, this man has been willing to support a guy who has shown more love for the Bushies than the Clintons in the past. Clinton should be ashamed of himself for supporting a guy who didn't have his back in the 90s. This is not as low as his Marc Rich pardon, but coming on the heels of his "democrats should be whipped if they make the war issue a litmus test"(paraphrased here), I wish him the worst. Lamont should have bought this guy a a monthly pass to a Nevada brothel and keep him out of CT.  


by Pravin on Wed Jul 26, 2006 at 12:53:47 PM EST

Re: Clinton must pay if Lieberman wins narrowly (none / 0)

I totally agree, any surrogate must wait until after the primary. If he wants to do some fundraising, okay. If he wants to makes statements of support, okay. If he wants to campaign with a primary candidate, NOT okay.

I'm sure there are exceptions, but this isn't one of them.


by mbair on Wed Jul 26, 2006 at 12:58:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Lieberman "far right"? (none / 0)

If Lieberman is "far right" then how do you characterize Senators like Brownback, Thune, the two Senators from Oklahoma, Santorum, and for that matter, DeWine from Ohio. All of them have records that are far more conservative than Lieberman.

I am no Lieberman fan, and also not a resident of CT., but this kind of langauge plays right into the hands of those pundits who are writing/talking about how the blogs are Democratic "crazies" who want to purge the Democratic party of anyone who disagrees with them.


by mrgavel on Wed Jul 26, 2006 at 03:55:04 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.