Yet Another Poll Shows Bush Mired in Mid-30s

Yesterday afternoon, the Wall Street Journal published the findings of the latest Harris Poll, the results of which bode poorly for the President and his Republican allies as they go into the last 100 days before election day.

Of 1,002 U.S. adults surveyed in a telephone poll, 34% said Mr. Bush is doing an "excellent or pretty good" job as president, up a tick from 33% in June. By comparison, 65% of Americans said Mr. Bush is doing an "only fair or poor" job, down from 67% last month.

This is the fourth of the last five major national polls to find President Bush's approval rating to be in the 34 percent to 36 percent range, which represents a noticable drop from the than the 41 percent rating President Bush notched in three national surveys from late June.

If President Bush remains below 45 percent -- let alone below 40 percent -- heading into election day, the Republican Party runs the risk of major losses in both the House and the Senate, potentially losing both chambers. However, if the President's approval rating continues this short downward trend, or even remains in the mid-30s come November, it will be extremely difficult for the GOP to maintain control of either House of Congress. Just take a look at the Democrats' double digit generic congressional ballot lead found by Harris Interactive.

With midterm elections less than four months away, the poll also asked respondents whether they would choose a Democratic or Republican candidate "if the election for Congress were held today." Forty-four percent of those surveyed said they would vote for the Democratic candidate, up from 41% in April, while 31% said they would vote for the Republican candidate, down from 37% in April.

Now it is true that these are generic numbers, not actual head-to-head numbers from individual races, and that, what's more, the Democrats are still not close to the 50 percent threshold at which they can begin to feel more optimistic. Nevertheless, the Republicans are at 31 percent in this poll, a truly afwul position to be in this close to the election. And if they are anywhere near this number on generic congressional ballot questions closer to the time at which voters cast their ballots, I am confident that the Democrats will score significant gains in both the Senate and the House.



Display:


Re: Yet Another Poll Shows Bush Mired in Mid-30s (none / 0)

Can we find out who among this astute group said "excellent"?

Jesus Friggin' Christ - our schools aren't really that bad, it's just a fundie talking point.


by zappatero on Sat Jul 22, 2006 at 09:22:40 PM EST

Re: Yet Another Poll Shows Bush Mired in Mid-30s (none / 0)

i think we're starting to learn what percentage of this country is flat crazy


by Lucas O'Connor on Sun Jul 23, 2006 at 12:22:13 AM EST

Re: Yet Another Poll Shows Bush Mired in Mid-30s (none / 0)

Or the percentage that just isn't paying ANY attention.


Enough is enough!
by Bear83 on Sun Jul 23, 2006 at 12:45:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yet Another Poll Shows Bush Mired in Mid-30s (none / 0)

i think a case could be made that paying no attention is a form of insanity.


by Lucas O'Connor on Sun Jul 23, 2006 at 12:52:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Not to pick a nit, but what three June polls? (none / 0)

http://www.pollkatz.homestead.com/files/ graphic-approval_files/pollkatzmainGRAPH ICS_8911_image001.gif

Because in looking at this graph from Prof. Pollkatz I see a Fox Poll at 40, another at 41 and a Gallup at 40. Now Gallup has consistently had Bush above the trend of the other fourteen polls and to that degree should be discounted. But while Fox has tracked the trend pretty well overall, it recently has become detached and reporting Bush numbers significantly above the pack. That their last poll dropped Bush approval right back into the 35% range is great news in that it pretty much confirms those 40 & 41% numbers were outliers. But taking the whole US polling universe (which is why Prof. Pollkatz is a national treasure) it is pretty clear that Bush hit a consensus 33-34% and took the proverbial dead-cat bounce to 35-36%.

If it were really true that Bush had actually shed five points in a month well the drinks would be on me, but in the cruel light of day we have to note that the poll you actually cite has him up from 33% to 34%. A great number in and of itself but by no means evidence that Bush is making a new move to the bottom.

Not to detract from your overall point, and the excellent numbers of the generic R v D polling, but the history of Bush polling before 2005 has pretty much been one of steady deterioration puncutuated by "commander in chief" moments. For whatever reason that trend of deterioration has stopped this year in favor of a sideways trend in 2006. (But at least that Fox 41% turned out to be a fluke).


by Bruce Webb on Sun Jul 23, 2006 at 10:56:38 AM EST

Re: Yet Another Poll Shows Bush Mired in Mid-30s (none / 0)

Nice of the WSJ to help Bush by burying the poll on a Friday afternoon.

Must be a favor in return for the White House directing all their fire at the NY Times during the dustup over "terrorist" banking records.

One hand washes the other, I guess.


by Bush Bites on Sun Jul 23, 2006 at 02:53:08 PM EST

Why Bush Might Throw the Election (none / 0)

Okay, indulge me for a moment.  Faced by one national embarrassment or provocation after another, we often ask ourselves why our president behaves like such an ass.  Even with mid-term Congressional elections fast approaching, he boldly stakes out positions that leave two-thirds of Americans shaking their heads in bewilderment.  Is he deliberately trying to throw the elections.

If a wild theory is correct, yes he is.

For almost 40 years we've seen a cyclical pattern for presidencies.  When one commander-in-chief has had his way for two terms, his successor is out after one.  The American public experiences a backlash after a strong presidency and chops the next incumbent's legs out from under him.  After what was intended to be eight years of Nixon, the GOP knew the Democrats could not nominate anyone in 1976 strong enough to win two terms.  Carter filled the interim admirably, handing 1980 to Reagan on a platter.  And then after eight years of Reagan's slash-and-spend deficits, the GOP expected another Democrat to inherit a mess to clean up for a single term before another two-termer would win in 1992.

But there was a contingency the Republicans didn't expect in 1988.  Dukakis was filmed riding in a tank with a helmet that made him look like a freshman during his first semester away from home.  George H.W. Bush won an election he was supposed to lose, and Clinton swept in four years later to win the next two-term presidency.

The cycle was thrown out of kilter, and W. managed (barely) to eke out a second term for himself.  But even so, the party recognizes that the next president after W might hold office for only a single term, before 2012 will inaugurate another eight years of domination.

If that's the case, the Republicans can't afford to win in 2006, and they will be prepared to cede in 2008.  They would want a Democratic Congress, and later a Democratic president, to inherit the rubber-check national budget that W has crafted.  Yes, the Democrats would be forced to raise taxes to deal with the damage caused by W's profligate ways.  Yes, they would have to soften America's "tough" (i.e., belligerent) image in foreign affairs.  Yes, they would have to reverse the breaks offered by W to the wealthiest.

And the backlash against the Democrats, the Republicans hope in this scenario, would set up a GOP sweep in 2012 and 2016.

As implausible as this theory of the cycle may sound, it's the only explanation I've come across to explain our president's actions.  The GOP desperately wants the Democrats to win.  


P.W. Andersen
by pwandersen on Sun Jul 23, 2006 at 08:11:43 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.