Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsements

Ok, so the last two netroots endorsements were Patrick Murphy and Darcy Burner.  Both were chosen because they have strong netroots support, and because they are in areas that are trending Democratic (the 'Northeastern strategy').

After Yearly Kos, we figured it would be a good time to open up the floor for more nominations.

There's some targeting that goes into these nominations, but the most important qualifying criteria for a netroots endorsement is local blog support.  So if you have a local blog and are following/supporting a candidate, please make your case for the endorsement.

I met these four candidates at Yearly Kos.  There are probably a few more that I met and liked, but the whole experience was a blur.  None of them are netroots-endorsed, and there's no guarantee that any of them will be.  I just figured that you'd want to know that they came to Yearly Kos, since that indicates a certain amount of seriousness when it comes to internet politics.

David Harris (TX-06):  Harris is a young Iraq vet running an extreme longshot race against netroots enemy Joe Barton.  Barton has shades of corruption all around him, taking massive donations from telecom and energy PACs.  He's the prime mover against net neutrality.  The district is extremely red, though Texas is undergoing a progressive takeover of the Democratic Party.  This blog is following the race.  And here's David Harris's MySpace profile.

John Laesch (IL-14) is running against Dennis Hastert.  Laesch is a Navy vet, having served as an intelligence analyst monitoring terrorist activity.  While this is a longshot, Hastert has had ethical problems of late.

Jay Fawcett (CO-05) is running as a longtime Air Force vet in this Republican district, the home of James Dobsen.  He's a presence.

Nancy Skinner (MI-09) is running in the 9th district in Michigan, on a platform of turning the auto industry green.  This district is in play, and she has more institutional support than the other three candidates.  She is a big proponent of media reform, and is a DFA All-Star.

Once again, none of them are netroots-endorsed, and there's no guarantee that any of them will be.  I just figured you should know that they attended Yearly Kos.

The point of the netroots endorsement is to beat Republicans directly, lock down their resources indirectly, and support local infrastructure (including the 50 state strategy).  So please, nominate away.  And include local blog links when you nominate.

Update: I forgot to mention Jack Carter, Senate candidate in Nevada!



Display:


Re: Netroots Candidate Endorsements (3.00 / 6)

I think you guys should support Larry Kissell for the next netroots endorsed candidate, but Kirstin Gillebrand is a good choice, Paul Hodes as well, and any of our three challengers in CT


by Johnny08 on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:17:01 PM EST

Re: Netroots Candidate Endorsements (3.00 / 9)

Matt: Heads up - Hastert's 1st group of ethical problems were investigated on line at DKos. Turns out it's an iceberg. I think you are looking at only the tip.

John Laesch is making terrific headway out in Lee County, Whiteside County (my neck of IL-14)- and in Kendall County, of course [all but a very few Republicans hate him there - and hate is not a word I use loosely].

Laesch is the 1st and only Democratic candidate for Congress to get positive press out of the Sauk Valley Newspaper chain. We now have kids making their own brochures supporting John Laesch.  This campaign has legs - and is people-powered.  John is out there going door to door, appearing at every meeting possible, and is now getting serious press coverage.

This is the impossible campaign that can.  I'm amazed.  Before the primary I worked on behalf of Tammy Duckworth.  Then I met John.  I checked out what he is doing.  And he is doing all the right things.  The Carpenter's union are Republicans - they endorsed him.  The teachers are expected to immediately after labor day. The are Republican.

I have managed a bunch of campaigns before - the last was Illinois manager for Ross Perot (Round 1).  I've been at this for 45 years.  NEVER have a I seen a candidate this good.  He connects with voters the way Sen. Paul Simon did. It's just remarkable.

I strongly urge that you talk with John.  Really explore his campaign strategy.  If you do, you will endorse him. Call it the Miracle Campaign, if you must, but in November everyone will be saying "Jesus, what happended?" And you will have the answer.


by llbear on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 11:22:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This campaign does have legs! (3.00 / 3)

I haven't had the pleasure of meeting John personally like llbear has, but from his diairies and his comments, it's clear that he's as sharp as a tack and really connects with people.  He is humble and not afraid to take criticism.  More importantly, he LISTENS and ponders and doesn't go off half cocked.  Everyone should look at his candidacy and then jump on his band wagon.  If you can't physically help his campaign, then send him money when you can and give him your love.  Get others to send money and get them to get others to send money.  Make it like that old Breck Shampoo ad - tell a friend, who tells  a friend, who tells a friend...that's how netroots campaigns keep growing the legs needed to win.  Besides, we simply have to SHOW HASTERT THE DOOR!  


by sallyinsf on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 12:26:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

A Gut Feeling (3.00 / 4)

It's not just a matter of dumping Denny Hastert.

It's a matter of supporting an everyday guy, who we can claim as one of our own. It's just my gut feeling, but John Laesch's campaign feels like having a neighbor running for office, or the guy who coaches your son's baseball team. Of all the candidates who have come to the Democratic blogs seeking support and counsel, he strikes me as the most sincere, most altruistic, and responsive candidate, deserving of full Netroots support.

And it doesn't hurt that he's all about two-way communication and accountability, which (to me) are cornerstones of the Netroots movement.

Back John Laesch.


by wanderindiana on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 03:34:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

that's the same way... (none / 0)

i feel about david harris.

these fighting dems are awesome, don't you think?


Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 11:03:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Laesch (3.00 / 1)

I got to meet him at YKos and spoke to him for a few minutes.  He is genuine, really connnects with people and his diaries (he has a real good one up now here) seem to show a growing interest for him out in IL.

Plus, the possibility of ousting Denny would be a huge bonus.


by clammyc on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 09:21:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Netroots Candidate Endorsements (3.00 / 1)

John Laesch has worked and earned the fullest endorsements of the grassroots, netroots and committed individuals who are the heart and soul of the 14th District.

John has the background, depths of national and international experiences, integrity we require in a Representative.

The Laesch campaign has proven time an again that it is built on the core principals of Democracy and genuine heartland values.

I encourage everyone working and striving to revive the American Dream for the 21st Century should give serious considerations to John Laesch, along with Netroots backing.

I've been an ardent and full supporter of Laesch since last August.


by SAldrich on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 04:15:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Netroots Candidate Endorsements (none / 0)

i've given to John Laesch and believe he should be netroots endorsed.


by 2liberal on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 02:25:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

All your base are belong to Kissell (3.00 / 5)

It's insane here in NC. Insane. Doesn't matter if you're talking to the good ol' boys at the local bait shack, activists from Asheville to Chapel Hill to Charlotte, the netroots, newspapers, veterans, Hotline (which just debuted Kissell at #47 in the top 50 hot races), or apparently Rahm Emanuel himself, Kissell is the real deal.

He's at every festival, every parade, every event, every mill closing, on every blog, in every newspaper, and currently the raison d'etre for the Democratic Party in North Carolina.

Forget the 8th District, Kissell's turning all of NC blue. He's organizing precints 200 miles away via sheer excitement alone. Perhaps telepathy. He's the teflon Andy Griffith, virtual Jesus, the next stage in human evolution and the geographic center of the moderate universe. Kissell has his own gravitational pull. If Kissell were a color, it would be primary. If Kissell were a number, it would be prime. Kissell is the best argument for human cloning we have to date. The Kissell coat-tails won't leave an elected Republican dogcatcher within a 3 state radius of the Uwharrie National forest. I heart Kissell, and apparently coffee. So does this guy. Al Gore stole stole the idea for the Internet from Kissell, but Kissell is just too modest to say anything. In-sane.

Make Kissell the next netroots candidate or I'll set fire to the Internet.


by RANT on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 12:45:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: All your base are belong to Kissell (3.00 / 3)

I'm a teacher, a conservative, sometimes vote Republican, live in GA and I following this campaign closely.  I wish I could vote for Larry Kissell so bad I can't stand it. I will go up there and volunteer this summer. Send a teacher to Congress!!!!


by Kellygirl on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 03:01:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Kissell IS the comeback Kid! (3.00 / 2)

He started out with no chance of winning and has come out of nowhere to now be one of the National Journal's top 50 races.  He has brought on a top notch staff and consultants.  I live in Cabarrus County home of Robin Hayes and I don't have a doubt in my mind that he is going to win. My Dad was here for Father's Day and has been a Hayes supporter over the years...this year he is voting for Kissell as are his other Vietnam Vet friends because the DAV gave Hayes a ZERO rating and he likes that Kissell is a good Baptist.

Kissell is on fire and Hayes is doing a crash and burn.  I'm sure Hayes feels very confident,but he is going to lose when good rednecks like my Daddy are voting against him.  I hope he gets the netroots endorsement--he has really earned it!


by clintonian on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 03:39:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Kissell IS the comeback Kid! (3.00 / 0)

Amen. Support Larry Kissell.  

Kissell can beat Hayes and, as a bonus, the NC Congressional delegation will get a real live grassroots NC citizen. If we put Kissell and Shuler in that NC delegation, WOW! Is this the year we make the NC GOP send all it's money to Hayes and Taylor ... only to lose? Oh, Happy Day!


by Leslie H on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 01:08:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Show some love for Kissell (3.00 / 2)

Hi,

We're bringin out the yellow dogs in NC-8 to put Kissell in Congress and put Robin Hayes back out on the street. Larry Kissell said at our ralley last week "it's not about the money". I hate to disagree with him but it is. Robin Hayes has a huge war chest to use to fearmonger and distort his true position of voting for the rich fat cats. NC-8 is a winnable seat. Hell, Beth Troutman pulled over 35% against Hayes the last election, with little money and having Martin Sheen  and other "Hollywood Liberials" campaign for her.

Show some love netroots and send a real Democrate to the House.


by cutter28001 on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 04:08:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Show some love for Kissell (3.00 / 0)

NC-08 IS a "winnable" seat and with the GOTV effort backed by all "Yellow Dogs" we can put a representative of THE PEOPLE in Congress.  Larry Kissell is the finest candidate the Democrat Party has offered up since the retirement of our beloved Congressman Bill Hefner.
Larry Kissell speaks of the things he believes in and stands for.  He does not make empty promises, will not make decisions based on popularity and truly knows how to relate to all people in the District.  Larry understands WORK and has been working hard to get out his message, whether on internet resource pages (blogs) or walking neighborhood streeets, knocking on doors.  Larry Kissell IS a worthy Netroots candidate and deserves the endorsement. He is the last best hope for the hard-working people of NC-08 and especially all those good folks who lost their jobs to outsourcing.
Please support Larry Kissell and spread the word to everyone you can reach.  DEMOCRATS of the 8th Congressional District:  STOP voting for Hayes the fat-cat Republican.  He's stealing your money.....

by Lady MacDem on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 10:15:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Show some love for Kissell (3.00 / 1)

Actually, didn't Beth Troutman pull 45% against Hayes in a year when she raised $250K and he raised $1.9 million???

She was a 30-something TV aide-de-camp.  Larry is a former textile worker and teacher.  


BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 11:19:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Show some love for Kissell (3.00 / 0)

27 actually. She's 29 now.

I too think if a 27 year old Scientologist from Hollywood can get 45% of the vote against Hayes in this district, an actual grown man should be able to find 6% more.


by RANT on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 11:31:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Show some love for Kissell (none / 0)

Are you B.T.?


BlueNC - Progressive NC Politics
by Robert P on Mon Jul 10, 2006 at 03:35:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Show some love for Kissell (3.00 / 0)

And that was BEFORE Haynes voted for CAFTA!

NC is turing blue right before our eyes.


by NCJim on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 03:12:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: All your base are belong to Kissell (3.00 / 2)

Kissell's message resonates well in his district and throughout North Carolina. People are tired of the same old party politics, and he represents something new and unique.

It would be a missed opportunity not to endorse him as soon as possible!


by jcsemistar on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 05:35:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: All your base are belong to Kissell (3.00 / 2)

I live in Concord NC.
I can't wait to vote for Larry in Nov.
I will be looking to put signs up along the road this week.

Go Larry Go


by eeff on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 06:49:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Kissell Kissell Kissell (3.00 / 1)

I thought it would be worth mentioning that YearlyKos was during the final week of school for Larry and it's next to impossible for teachers to get time off those last couple of weeks.  Larry has been interacting with the online community in North Carolina well before he formally filed.  He has started writing diaries on DKos as well and may be able to write more now that school is out.

When the poll numbers were released Larry gave BlueNC an exclusive for 24 hours.  


Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
by The Southern Dem on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 07:48:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Netroots Candidate Endorsements (3.00 / 2)

The question is, what is the purpose here?  Party building?  Netroots building?  Blog building? Or electing more middle tier candidates to the House?

Resources are finite, and cannot always be expended on quixotic long shots.  Two of the three races (Hodes and Gillebrand) mentioned above have far better chances than the ones Matt mentioned, and Kissell probably does too.  What about Mary Jo Kilroy against Deborah Pryce?  Get rid of the #4 House Rep in a race where the two parties are near parity.


by Mimikatz on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 01:26:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Awesome point, and thanks for making it, Mimi... (none / 0)

I'm done backing longshots, merely because it'll tweak the other side's nose.


by Rafe Noboa on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 02:08:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Correctamundo! (3.00 / 3)

The purpose is money. Right? Getting money to winnable elections that need it? Especially for candidates closer to the people than say Lawyer PACS and Fat Cats.

So when respected southern pollster John Anzalone says Kissell with little money is currently trailing Hayes by only 8 points (uninformed vote), and Kissell with money swings 15 points to beat Hayes by 7 points (informed vote), does that not tell the netroots where they can make the most difference?

NC-08 is a value race. Buy low. Win high.


by RANT on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 02:25:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Netroots for Larry Kissell (3.00 / 2)

I would like to vote for Kissell...He has a great chance to win...He just needs the extra push from Netroots.


by philipchang on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 11:18:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Netroots Candidate Endorsements (3.00 / 2)

I lost to Larry Kissell in the NC-8 primary, and I urge you to endorse him.

Mark Ortiz


by markortiz on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 12:31:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Netroots Candidate Endorsements (3.00 / 0)

I too would like to nominate Larry Kissell.  He/we have a good chance of unseating Robin Hayes, and we need to unseat him!


by laadeedaa on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 08:47:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Kissell and local blogs (3.00 / 1)

In my comment below thread I failed to mention the local blogs highlighting Kissell.  I have posted a previous diary including this information and included the link, however this post will make them easier to find.

The Southern Dem

BlueNC

Jim Buie's Blog

EdCone.com

NC Rumors

OrangePolitics.org


Robin Hayes lied. Nobody died, but thousands of folks lost their jobs.
by The Southern Dem on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 01:05:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Senate is ok too right? (3.00 / 3)

Jack Carter for sure.

-C.


by neutron on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:18:09 PM EST

Re: Senate is ok too right? (3.00 / 2)

I am 100% behind Jack Carter as a netroots endorsed candidate.

If Democrats are going to have any kind of shot at retaking the Senate then we need to expand the number of seats in play.  We have seen how the numbers have moved in AZ for the Kyl/Pederson race mainly because Pederson is doing early advertising.  Neveda is a much smaller, less costly, market.

Jack Carter's campaign has been getting attention for his website blog done by Sarah R. Carter and for his efforts to utilize MySpace.  Jack Carter is also working to make inroads in the rural areas of Nevada which could pay large dividends in November. It would be a shame to pass up this opportunity to unseat one of the more useless Senators in the country.


by msstaley on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 02:19:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Senate is ok too right? (none / 0)

I hate to do this but I've said it before and will say it again -- you are sadly mistaken here in supporting Carter as a viable challenge. Carter is "getting attention" where for his blog -- not in NV. The only mention of it online was on www.renodiscontents.com, which is a liberal-leaning blog that made fun of the idea. There is no "netroots support" for him locally, only on blogs based elsewhere. I say this not ot put down Carter; I hope he wins and I've donated to him. But he's not captured much support from local progressive activists.

But to say that I find it really condescending that whomever determines these things refuse to take a look at the candidate hwo does have strong support from actually existing Nevada progressive activists, state SEnator Dina Titus who is running a true insurgent campaign.

She's a state Senator who represents a middle class section of Las Vegas and who has been the Democratic leader for 16 years. She's worked the state relentlessly for years, campaigning for Democrats (she's brought us within one seat of a Democratic majority in teh state Senate which we stand a good chance of picking up this fall). She's known across the state as accessible, intelligent and committed to change.

She more or less introduced the concept of smart growth to southern Nevada (those who were here saw the need for it) and is s running on a platform that includes alternative energy, ethics reform, enhanced funding for education, controlling growth (which will have strong appeal in rural areas whose water is being depleted by Las Vegas), and economic diversification towards high-tech.

She's had strong support from local blogs (check out this one and and this one as well. No, she didn't come to YEarly Kos becaues early voting starts in less than 60 days and she was out meeting with voters.

She's also got a real chance to win, leading in all polls in the primary against a self-described "democrat" who is a corporate lawyer who is both socially and economically conservative and who has taken in massive amounts of bundled contributions from corporations and developers. So he's got enough money to run misleading ads trying to claim the mantle of education and environment and in effect has been openly thumbing his nose at Democratic party activists for years.

Then in the fall, she's got a real chance (latest Rasmussen had her ahead 44-40) against a Delay/Pombo clone/clown.

Given how close this election is going to be and how much it would mean for not only a Democrat but a progressive, western-style Democrat (think Brian Schweitzer) to win here -- and how much she has energized a previously miniscule progressive activist base -- this is really the race in NV that on-line donors should care about.


by desmoulins on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 03:00:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

update (none / 0)

My friends/colleagues Patrick Murphy and Jenni Safford are getting married today.

Don't worry about the wedding registry; we'll take care of that.  But how about showing some love to the campaign today?


by Adam B on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:18:38 PM EST

Re: Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsemen (3.00 / 9)

If you're asking for Senate candidates, too, then I'd like to humbly recommend Jack Carter in Nevada.  I'd like to point out that he was also at Yearly Kos.

Sarah


by Sarah R Carter on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:19:30 PM EST

Re: Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsemen (3.00 / 4)

Sarah - wish I could vote for your dad.  I'm in Illinois and will urge both Barack Obama and Dick Durbin to do fundraising for him.

BTW: Don't be humble about recommending him.  Be proud.  The two men I admire most for their character are Senator Paul Simon of Illinois and Jimmy Carter.  Hope I live long enough to see make your mark on the world.  If I do, this planet will be a better place.  


by llbear on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 11:30:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

absolutely! (3.00 / 1)

The Carter campaign is the little engine that could, and as far as Senate races go, NV is one place where we can most definitely get the most bang for our buck.

I would say, most certainly that Carter and Webb should join Tester in being "netroots endorsed" in the Senate.

But here's the thing, the Democratic establishment has rallied behind Webb, while Carter has been overlooked in favor of other races.

We can make MORE OF A DIFFERENCE in NV.

That's why Jack Carter is my #1 candidate choice for netroots endorsement... followed closely by John Laesch.
-C.


by neutron on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 06:30:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the next Senator from Nevada (3.00 / 1)

with our help!

(and Sarah's of course)

-C.


by neutron on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 06:59:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

NV (none / 0)

Nevada is indeed a place to invest in, but see my post above. I know everyone wants to win back the Senate but if you lived here, you'ld know that the Governors race, and Dina Titus is the progressive, insurgent Brian Schweitzer-style candidate with a real chance to turn NV blue that deserves netroots support.

I think its great what Sara Carter has done to generate interest for her dad, but I'm sorry to say that you can't consider a "local blogger" the way that this one is.

I don't mean to put anyone down but shouldn't those of us who live here and have been trying to turn this state blue for years,  get the support of those who want to support a viable 50-state strategy.


by desmoulins on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 03:07:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Larry Kissell (3.00 / 3)

www.bluenc.com is a local NC blog, I forgot to mention that


by Johnny08 on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:31:36 PM EST

Re: Larry Kissell (3.00 / 3)

Larry Kissell is definitely worthy of endorsement.

He's a teacher and a former textile worker in a majority Dem district.  A distirct where the Rep incumbent promised to vote against CAFTA and then voted for it at the last minute.


by Bear83 on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 11:21:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Larry Kissell (3.00 / 1)

I third Larry Kissell.  I have met him, he is the real deal, and NC-08 is a real pickup opportunity.  Kissell starts with a floor of 45% in this district, he doesn't have far to go to win.


by Leyton on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 02:09:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsemen (none / 0)

Andrew Duck (MD-6) is another Iraq War veteran in a longshot race against a hard right Republican, Roscoe Bartlett; who, if you'll recall, is the guy who gave the Rev. Sun Myung Moon his robes when he, Moon, crowned himself Messiah in a Congressional office building. Bartlett has had yet to face a credible opponent in his 14 years in office; for that reason, despite the conservative nature of the district, I think his seat is less safe than it seems. And if anyone can unseat him, it's Duck.


by Isaac Smith on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:44:46 PM EST

Re: Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsemen (3.00 / 1)

Nancy Boyda in KS-02

She is running against Jim Ryun, incumbent wingnut.

She held him to 56% in 2004, and that was with the GOP pumping in a million dollars in late October and morphing Nancy into Osama in an ad.

This is not a solid R district and Kathleen Sebelius will be at the top of the ticket in a year KS Rs are demoralized.  

http://www.nancyforcongress.com/index.ph p

About Nancy

From 1994 to 2003, Nancy Boyda bicycled across Kansas nine times. With each journey, she saw a new snapshot of a growing Kansas--and with each passing year, she became more passionate about helping her state grow even stronger.

Nancy believed that Kansas is best when its citizens have good jobs, affordable health care, and outstanding public education. So in early 2003, she committed herself to turning these ambitions into reality. She began a full-scale, full-time campaign to return a common-sense voice to Congress. But America wasn't ready in 2004.

Now in 2006, Nancy is running again. This time people all across the Kansas's 2nd District are demanding a change in government. Nancy's bold leadership is uniting this grassroots energy into a campaign that will restore the ideals of democracy.

Nancy's determination is not new. She graduated with honors from William Jewell College in Liberty, MO, where she received dual degrees in chemistry and education. She began her career in 1978 working as an analytical chemist and field inspector for the Environmental Protection Agency. Over the next two decades, she also held management positions in several pharmaceutical companies, including Marion Laboratories.

From these years of hands-on experience, Nancy has developed common-sense ideas about how to boost businesses in Kansas, cut the costs of medical care, and ensure that health insurance is never considered a luxury for any Kansan. She is eager to work with both parties as a moderate, independent voice for the hardworking people of the Second District.

Nancy is married to Steve Boyda, an attorney with a firm in Manhattan. She is the mother of two children and five stepchildren, and a member of Countryside United Methodist Church in Topeka.


Would you hire George W Bush to be YOUR latex salesman?
by jgkojak on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:48:49 PM EST

New Jersey 7th (3.00 / 2)

I support Jack Carter and John Leasch as well.  

But I would like to nominate Linda Stender who has been making her race in NJ-7 more and more competitive.  There is a good blog Dump Mike covering the race and bluejersey covers this race and the entire state.   There is also NOT Ferguson for Congress and blue 7th PAC.


John McCain is a Bush ally on Social Security.
by John DE on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:51:49 PM EST

Re: Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsemen (none / 0)

How is Darcy Burner, in Washington State, part of the Northeast Strategy? I support them both in spirit and in finance, but she isn't Northeast.  Mr. Murphy is only barely Northeast himself.


by Lucas O'Connor on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:56:08 PM EST

Re: Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsemen (none / 0)

Well she's not in the Northeast, but she's part of a solid blue coastal area that is the Democratic analogue to the South.


by Matt Stoller on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 06:48:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another Call for Netroots Candidate Endorsemen (none / 0)

like i said, i'm totally behind both of them, but it's not the northeast strategy.  it is, however, a good strategy.


by Lucas O'Connor on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 02:44:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Patricia Madrid (NM-1) (3.00 / 1)

The case for Madrid:

1) One of the best takeover opportunities in America. A "must win" if the Dems hope to take back the House.

2) Bush just raised $375K for her opponent, Rep. Wilson, yesterday.

3) Minority and female representation. Now that the Busby and Rodriguez specials are finished,  are no longer on the list, you've got a bunch of white men and one white woman. Let's get some diversity going.

4) Strong blog presence in the district. Here are just a few blogs that have been covering the race:

http://www.madridforcongress.com/blog
http://www.democracyfornewmexico.com
http://nmfbihop.blogspot.com/
http://whatdoiknow.typepad.com/
http://maggietoulouse.blogspot.com/


by imaPROgressive on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 05:56:33 PM EST

Re: Patricia Madrid (NM-1) (none / 0)

Madrid is a good choice too.  She has a real chance.  Again, what is the point here?  Elect more Dems or build the blogosphere?  Races that might be won or quixotic races?  

BTW, I would not question the choices of Pat Murphy or Burner.  Nor would I suggest already well-funded folks like Lois Murphy (PA-06) or Diane Farrell (CT-04).  But I think you have to take a good, hard look at the registration in each district and figure out your long-term strategy.  A compelling case could be made for supporting Mary Jo Kilroy, as defeating Deborah Pryce in OH-15 is fairly possible.

I'd wait until the next cycle (what, a couple of weeks?) for Laesch and see how the Hastert scandal pans out. The corruption issue will work, if at all, where the incumbent enriches himself, as seems to be the case here.


by Mimikatz on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 01:35:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jay Fawcett (none / 0)

1) Air Force retired, taught at the Academy, bronze star in Gulf War I. Unimpeachable (well, ahem) military credentials.

2) Willing to go after Dobson. (Click on the "viral ad" on this page.)

3) 6 Republicans are fighting for the seat. They may bloody each other up enough for us to win.

4) 20-year Republican seat. Joel Hefley was on the Armed Services committee - he didn't say squat about body armor, penatagon's lack of plans, PTSD, or WMD. Me must attack on these issues.

5) Club for Growth and Focus on the Family are poised to kick Jay's ass once the [R] fight is over. Let's help him now.

Jay's campaign blog.

PeakDems blog.

He went to YKos and sucked in the info - he sees the strength and benefits netroots can bring - and he needs to use each and every tool to win this race.

Can all of you imagine the kick in the stomach to  Dobson if Jay wins this race? And the next days' headlines? (And oh, by the way, Dobson is 2 to 1 DIS-approval in Jay's internal polling.)


by zappatero on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 06:24:40 PM EST

Linda Stender (NJ-7) (3.00 / 1)

Linda Stender has continued to shock everybody. She did it last quarter by having a killer fundraising drive that left her with $300,000 cash on hand. The race has been upgraded twice recently; Cook moved it from likely Repub to lean Repub, and Chuck Todd (I think) now lists it in the top 50 most competitive.

Linda Stender unapologetic in her stands; she's determined to run that ever-present Bush/Cheney/DeLay rubber-stamp Mike Ferguson out of town. She's got tremendous grassroots support, and if she continues on her current trajectory, she will win this race. Furthermore, in the context of the Northeast strategy, if we can get a two or three term Democratic incumbent in this seat (and Linda Stender would make a phenomenal one), real realignment might take hold in this district/region.

Her local blog support is strong. It includes Dump Mike, Blue 7th PAC, NOT Mike Ferguson for Congress, and the state blog powerhouse Blue Jersey.

Visit Linda's campaign website here.


by SJBrian on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 07:16:51 PM EST

Re: Linda Stender (NJ-7) (3.00 / 0)

whoops, html mess up

www.dumpmike.com
www.blue7th.com
www.fergusonforcongress.net
www.bluejersey.net
www.lindastenderforcongress.com


by SJBrian on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 07:18:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Linda Stender (NJ-7) (3.00 / 0)

Stender is a good choice as well, as Ferguson is getting more unpopular.  Even though the original "fighting Dem" Steve Brozak didn't unseat him in 2004, this may be the year.


by Mimikatz on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 01:36:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 4)

One the netroots should have done some time ago is Jerry McNerney in CA-11 (Northern California's San Joaquin Valley, snaking down east of Oakland). I say should have done because McNerney-- who has a compelling story-- had to use an awful lot of energy and resources to defeat an Inside the Beltway shill that Rahm Emanuel was pushing (despite McNerney's endorsement by the California Democratic Party Convention and most of the district-based Democratic clubs in the area). It was a classic case of a truly progressive, grassroots, independent-minded candidate against a Boss-driven empty suit whose only strong suit would have been, "I'm better than Pombo."

Not that that isn't a strong suit. Pombo is undoubtably one of the very worst of the worst of the Republicrooks infesting Capitol Hill.

There are a wealth of local bloggers all over this race. Start with the comprehensive SAY NO TO POMBO and move out into Pombo Watch, Progressive 11th Blog, CA-11 Blog and half a dozen other California-oriented blogs that cover the race thoroughly.

It's a district that was gerrymandered to protect neighboring (reactionary) Democrats by putting lily-white, upper-income Republican neighborhoods into one odd-shaped central dumping-ground. BUT, Pombo's outrageous, over-the-top behavior is too much even for moderate Republicans, let alone independents. He is very vulnerable because of his public advocacy for selling off the National Parks.

We have a district ripe for change, an egregiously bad and weakened incumbent, and an exceptionally good candidate with a strong local following who has already come closer to beating Pombo than anyone. It's not likely that this will be a DCCC priority because McNerney isn't likely to buy into Emanuel's bullshit consultant-driven advise. This is one the netroots should adopt whole-heartedly. And when he wins, we won't be groaning about him voting with Republicans to screw workers and consumers for the sake of Big Business interests, the way many of us do when we look at some netroots candidates we have helped in the past, like Stephanie Herseth, Melissa Bean and Ben Chandler (all 3 of whom, by the way, were among the 42 Democrats who joined the GOP for the day yesterday to give Bush his moronic Iraq occupation resolution.) After Jerry wins, he'll be there for real Democratic/American/progressive values and principles.


by DownWithTyranny on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 07:48:26 PM EST

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 3)

Jerry McNerney is an excellent choice.

In fact, McNerney just won Russ Feingold's "Progressive Patriot" YearlyKos congressional candidate competition:

Feingold Announces Jerry McNerney as the Choice of the Netroots in "Pick a Progressive Patriot: YearlyKos Event

The Progressive Patriots Fund announced Jerry McNerney as the winner of "Pick a Progressive Patriot: YearlyKos," a special round of its popular online voting event. McNerney is challenging Rep. Richard Pombo in California's 11 District.

"This round of the `Pick a Progressive Patriot' was a huge success," Feingold said. "Over 50 candidates were nominated from 24 states, but in the end McNerney received the most support from a very enthusiastic group of bloggers and online activists. We are happy to send $5000 to the McNerney campaign and we thank everyone who participated in this round of `Pick a Progressive Patriot.'"

Jerry beat out 50 other congressional candidates because the local blogs (especially Say No To Pombo) got out the vote at the Riviera in Vegas.

As the brilliant Kid Oakland said so eloquently many months ago, "We all live in Richard Pombo's district". And now, thousands of Americans are realizing it.


by Fiat Lux on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 08:18:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 1)

Oh, I forgot to mention...

On Monday, click here to see the results from the first round of DFA's Grassroots All-Star online vote:

http://tools.democracyforamerica.com/hou sevote/

DFA is auditing the vote over the weekend. If the preliminary results posted on Friday hold up, Jerry McNerney will finish first (out of 34 candidates) and move on to the second round.

Again, the driving force behind Jerry's netroots success: local blogs like Say No To Pombo, Calitics, Pombo Watch, and Progressive 11th.


by Fiat Lux on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 08:40:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 1)

I'm on board with McNerney.

He's a great candidate, and Pombo is an egregious incumbent... so you got both the carrot and the stick.

The netroots should be slavering love all over McNerney.


by Malacandra on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 09:32:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 1)

I think Jerry McNerney is an excellent choice because he is going up against the baddest of the Bad in the House of Representatives, Richard Pombo. Pombo is hated by people inside and outside of the District. Jerry has a great deal of support from Environmental groups, Bay area DFA and Democratic Clubs, and of course the Blogsphere as already noted. Jerry has lost of Grassroots support but he needs all the cash he can get to go up against Pombo who has over a million dollars already. Helping Jerry will take out an enemy of the Environment, a Tom Delay puppet and take back control of Congress


by jpross on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 11:00:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (none / 0)

I meant to type that Jerry has lots of Grassroots support not lost grassroots supports


by jpross on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 11:04:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 1)

An especially appealing thing about Jerry is his plan to make renewable energy the next dot-com, based in his district but also in benefit to the whole nation, nay, the whole world. This is the antithesis of Pombo, and the best of what being a politician is all about: bringing growth to his district with projects that benefit the country. And he's doing it - so far - with nickels and dimes from within his district. Half of his money is from donations of less than $200. I don't know about you, but I consider this is oppositional to big business buying influence.


POMBO's BEEN PRIVATIZED!
by JohnMac on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 10:56:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 2)

If you like that, John Mac, check out Jerry McNerney's MyDD conversation with Jonathan Singer here.

Choice quote:


Singer: Final question. You talked a little bit about posting on Daily Kos and the netroots. If there's one message you'd like to send out to the readers of the progressive blogosphere, what would that be?

McNerney: I think the important thing in this context really is that the internet, the netroots, the blogging... has opened up democracy in a way that wasn't possible before, and I think it really empowers our democracy. So I really challenge people that would be interested to keep participating and to broaden this sphere of influence, because this is how we take America forward as a country of the people rather than a country of the corporations.

For example, this net neutrality issue. To me, it's absurd that that would even be an issue right now. We need to protect the neutrality of the network and let people get into it as individuals at an equal basis. I can tell you when I get to Congress next year, I'm going to be looking at the blogs, because you get a lot of unfiltered information from the blogs and it's very refreshing.


by Fiat Lux on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 11:06:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (3.00 / 1)

Has anyone read the ROLL CALL story from last week that claims anti-grassroots, pro-war head of the DCCC Rahm Emanuel has announced that, since his hand-picked shill for the CA-11 nomination was soundly defeated in the primary, the DCCC will not be participating in the battle to expel Pombo? All the more reason to support Jerry. And after we defeat Pombo, we should make sure the DCCC has a new chairman, one that fights against Republicans not progressives and grassroots Democrats.


by DownWithTyranny on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 12:42:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I hadn't read that. (3.00 / 2)

But I'm not surprised.

Disappointed, but not surprised. I agree with you... this race can be the trifecta:

1) Get rid of Pombo, one of the worst guys in Congress

2) Get Jerry McNerney into the halls of Chgress: we need folks with his understanding of renewable energy to face the challenges of the "Inconvenient Truth" that we have to address within the next decade.

3) Demonstrate the power of the netroots to the Democratic Party... and show good cause why they need our money, grassroots organizing, and locally-grounded political instincts more than they need the DC stratagems of Rahm Emanuel.

This is the win/win/win race for the netroots.


by Malacandra on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 03:42:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McNerney is Great! (3.00 / 1)

Pombo has to go!


by malik5470 on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 04:27:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Kirsten Gillibrand, NY-20 (none / 0)

Kirsten Gillibrand, Democratic candidate in New York's 20th Congressional District, endorsed as part of the DFA-List, endorsed by 21st Century Democrats, EMILY's List, SEIU 1199 (Kirsten will be speaking at a rally for Columbia Memorial Hospital Workers, June 24 in Hudson, NY after which DFA and SEIU people will be petitioning together for her), and even our dear, dear (Oh Dear!) friends at the DCCC have added her to their Red to Blue list.

Blog support for Kirsten Gillibrand begins with:

20TrueBlue

The 10,000 Things

Troy Polloi

Working Families Party blog (she'll have the WFP ballot line this fall)

NYCowboy

Saratoga Spirit

Adirondack Musing

Democracy in Albany (which seems to be having technical difficulties as I type this).

Sadly, I was going to add dadablog, but he has ceased to be, he is an ex-blog (probably because he's personally too damn busy as one of the 2 primary volunteer coordinators for the campaign.

And of course, Democracy for the Hudson-Mohawk Region's blog (and group) as well as:

Democracy for Otsego and Delaware Counties

Democracy for Saratoga Springs

Democracy for the Greater Glens Falls Area

DFA: Columbia County

DFA: Greene County

the Mid-Hudson Progressive Alliance

and our friends at Democracy for New York City.

Oh... and one of our own home grown favorite Netroots candidates Brian Keeler.

It would be awesomely cool if she was added to the Netroots list as well.


The 10,000 Things
by Andrew C White on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 07:51:58 PM EST

Re: Kirsten Gillibrand, NY-20 (3.00 / 1)

Another good choice.


by Mimikatz on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 01:39:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

slightly off topic question for matt (none / 0)

it's on topic if you factor in dave harris's fight against joe barton, who opposes net neutrality.

matt, how can you and mydd justify running the watertower ad when you are taking the lead in the fight against the telco's who want to end equal access for all?

do you guys need the money bad enough to run ads that are in diametric opposition to your stated values, and the values you want your readers to embrace?

you got me all fired up w/your neutrality panel at ykos, then you take money from the enemy.  what's that about?

before you take the atrios stand, that your readers are smart enough to see thru the bs in the ad, i would ask, what about the casual surfer or first time reader who wanders in?

for the record, skippy refused the same ad.


"blogtopia - yes, i coined that phrase!"
by skippy on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 08:21:20 PM EST

Re: slightly off topic question for matt (none / 0)

Skippy,

Why should the telcos only fund the bad guys?  It's not like it's influencing the blogging.


by Matt Stoller on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 08:30:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: slightly off topic question for matt (none / 0)

yeah, i don't really see that as a justification, more of a rationalization.  also, i think it's a bit flip, and my participation and support of you and your blog, and progressive blogging in general for the past four years, i think, deserves a more thoughtful response than that.

you say it's about money, i want to know how you three guys, after being so adamant about net neutrality, help the other side propagate their false information by having their ad on your site?  especially if it's just about money.

how can you guys expect any legitimacy to be ascribed to you by your readers the next time you take a position that the other side is inconsistent?

if you seriously needed money, i could have given you some.  but i don't think it's about money.

i think you guys didn't really think it through.  you now look like hypocrites, you really do, and it saddens me, because i know you guys are working hard to make things better for this country.  but this looks to me to be a serious mis-step.

at least talkleft and atrios and fdl and other blogs who are carrying the ad posted that they still believe otherwise (i don't think that solves the problem, but at least they are making an effort to deal with the apparent conflict of interest).  and steve gilliard and annatopia have pledged to take the money from that ad and donate it to savetheinternet.com.  and i just refused to carry it.

you say "it's not like it's influenced the blogging."  actually, i believe you.  but there is still the appearance of a conflict of interest.  it seriously undermines your credibility when debating the other side's inconsistencies on any other matter.

and, as i've said elsewhere, of all the issues to run an ad from the opposing side for profit, this is the stupidest move possible, taking money from the very people that want to limit your ability to reach your audience.

again, i challenge you to justify, not to me, but to every reader of mydd, your reasons for taking money from a sponsor with whom you espouse a position that is diametrically opposed to that which the ad dictates.

especially after you spoke so passionately and eloquently against this very position at ykos.  it just really leaves a bad taste in the readers' mouths.


"blogtopia - yes, i coined that phrase!"
by skippy on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 03:29:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: slightly off topic question for matt (3.00 / 0)

I did post about the Hands Off ads, but I guess I just don't agree with you.  Keeping a separation between advertising and editorial is a well-known and well-respected principle.  

Your choices about what you want to do with your advertising policies are your choices.  I don't agree with them and I'm not sure you have thought through the ethics of what you're advocating particularly well.  For instance, we complain, and rightfully so, that NBC won't accept Moveon ads for political reasons.  How is what you're advocating any different?  And let me point out that if I did reject the ad, Handsoff could have come back at me and used that politically.  I'm not saying your concerns have no merit, but there are two sides to this.  It's not black and white, and our choice is completely valid.

As for the politics, I wasn't being flippant.  How do you think I pay my rent?  My broadband bill?  My travel to Connecticut to check out Ned Lamont's campaign back in FEBRUARY?  Advertising on MyDD.  It's not very much, and it's not sustainable, but that's all there is.

I would also point out, Skippy, that the blogpac fundraising fell $7000 short last week.  This is not to disparage anyone who did give, as many do see the value of what we're trying to do.  But the fact is that you get what you pay for, and until blog readers are willing to pay directly for a different type of politics, we are going to have to rely on the funding sources of those who do pay.  

I have done a lot of work for progressive politics and Blogpac over the past two years.  I wouldn't trade this experience for anything, but the fact is that I did not get paid for most of the effective work.  I have not taken any payment for the net neutrality fight, and that was a choice that I made because I did not fully understand the ethical choices involved.  I helped put together Yearly Kos and paid my own way.  I do a lot of work for free and I am extremely careful about ethics.

Seriously, though, how much is enough, Skippy?  Should I not have furniture?  Do you want me to be homeless?  At what point am I allowed to take money?  

I'm not being flippant, Skippy, but I think that you aren't being helpful here.  The fact is that the blogs need a funding source.  Advertising is the ONLY funding source available.  It is a well-understand funding source that you concede has NO influence over the blogging work.  Politics is about choices, and I'll make that choice.


by Matt Stoller on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 11:18:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: slightly off topic question for matt (3.00 / 0)

ok, matt, i am sorry that i thought you were being flip, and your longer answer certainly makes me feel as if you have thought this thru.

your short answer did not, so that is why i responded as i did.

also, i apologize as i did not see your post about the hands off ad.  my mistake, and i am sorry to have assumed you didn't talk about it with your readers first.  i concede that you did and that helps mitigate your position in my, and other readers', minds.

as to why i am so adamant about this:

again, i go back to the very specific issue of the telco's wanting to limit our access.  i have said that it is one thing to accept ads touting a position complete different than yours...talkleft pointed to a hypothetical case of accepting an nra ad.  

fine, one can make the argument about editorial versus advertising.  (i would assert that since none of us bloggers are huge corporations with million dollar payrolls, the line between editorial and advertising gets pretty fine, and in fact, may be the separation between the right and left hemispheres of our brains... in other words, it's hard to say "it's company policy" when the company is just one or two guys is.)

it seems to me that, especially on an individual level, making the editorial/advertising argument is tantamount to "he said/she said" journalism, only with ad revenue involved.  "hey, you gotta run a godhatsfags.com ad, they've got an opinion, and to be fair everybody's got a right to have their opinion heard!"

however, i could live with any and all of the above rationalizations, and put it off to "well everybody runs their lives differently, and their blogs, too."

but this issue goes to the very heart of our ability to run blogs.  your nbc/moveon analogy doesn't work, because moveon.org is not trying to limit nbc's access to their audience (or make billions of $$ off of them).

you, and other blogs who accept the ads, in my opinion, are shooting yourselves (and the rest of us) in the foot...now, hear me out...because the other side wouldn't run the ads if they didn't work.

especially after all the press that ykos got, there must be thousands of people new to progressive blogging, without the back knowledge of what mydd, talkleft, atrios, or skippy are about on specific issues.

i would bet that there's at least some people reading our blogs for the first time, getting excited about the internet, and then clicking on those ads, and saying "well, hey, i love this blog thing, i don't want the government screwing it up, i'll call my congressman and tell them we don't want a dumb pipe!"

listen, bud, i'm sure not trying to bust your chops here.  i'm not trying to deny you an income.  i'm not saying you aren't working hard enough.  i'm not saying you aren't doing a great job and an important job.

i am saying that, in my opinion, you are making a mistake, a mistake that could have bad ramifications for blogging (and by extension, the country) in the long run, and gosh, i kind of thought that's one of the reasons we're all blogging in the first place, to be able to point out where we think others are making serious mistakes.

and, you have the unfortunate position of being the very guy that got me all excited about this issue in the first place.  it's rather like finding out ghandi like to beat women, or something like that.

you, and the other bloggers who run this ad, disappoint me greatly.  i'm sure you can live with that, and they can, and i will, too.  and i'll still read and participate on mydd, and i would hope you'd do the same with skippy.

but i think you are wrong to the point of danger on this issue.  i can't help it, that's what i think.

thanks for your response and thoughts on the matter.


"blogtopia - yes, i coined that phrase!"
by skippy on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 04:14:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: slightly off topic question for matt (none / 0)

umm, I'm so sorry about this, but gandhi did beat his wife...


by alivingston on Tue Jun 20, 2006 at 04:53:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

that's depressing, but... (none / 0)

not as depressing as the fact that matt didn't bother to continue the convesation and acknowledge my concessions or deal with my position.

it's still pretty crappy, short-sighted, and down-right stupid, imo, for blogs to take money to propagate the position which could severely limit blogs.

i'm just sayin....


"blogtopia - yes, i coined that phrase!"
by skippy on Wed Jun 21, 2006 at 03:10:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: slightly off topic question for matt (none / 0)

Skippy! I thought Barton might cool off with all the hatred and stuff after God gave him a warning. But it's only emboldened him and now it's going to be up to us to drive this freakish monster out of the political arena.


by DownWithTyranny on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 09:06:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the case for dave (3.00 / 0)

hey matt, first it doesn't look like district sixer has been updated in ages.  i'll shoot them an email and see if they'll post an update.  it might be better to refer peeps to the myspace and the texas bloggers, who are all firmly behind david.  in fact, dave's got at least 40 texas-based blog sites backing him in his race against barton.  he certainly has netroots support in our state.

my case for dave has been posted frequently, but it does include democratic gains in the district for each of the past four cycles (even after the delay gerrymandering!).

we also have two HOT texas house races within dave's congressional district.  HD94 (my house district) just kicked out a 14 year GOP incumbent, and the challenger in HD93 (right next door to my district) is poised to steal the seat from another 10+ year GOP incumbent.  in other words, things are trending our way in the most heavily populated part of the district.

i would also point out that dave is a blogger, he's on the right side of our issues, and he takes this movement seriously.

in addition, down in the rural parts of the district we are making massive headway.  i know this is all anecdotal, but every time we go down there we have people coming up to us and saying things like, "you know, i've been voting for barton for x number of years, and i just don't think i can support him any more.  give me some literature/donor cards/website URL..."

also, dave is the first democratic challenger to be featured on the front page of the ellis county press.  the ECP is a conservative newspaper from barton's home county.  they give us great coverage, and they wouldn't even acknowledge barton's previous opponents.  this is helping increase our name ID in the county that's going to swing this race.

dave is endorsed by vetpac and IAVA, and within the next month or two he is going to be featured - along with three other IAVA candidates - in a national magazine that is well respected across the country (i can't let the cat out of the bag here, but you are welcome to email me for details).

sam seder loves him, too, so that's gotta count for something.  LOL

barton is already running scared, too.  he's changed his website in response to some issues we have raised.  for ex, barton didn't used to have a section on vets/veterans issues.  but dave raised a stink and now barton has a section for that on his website.  barton also did a mailbomb across the district three months ago, which included bumper stickers and some GOP propoganda.  

our gravy train protest against barton got some serious press, too.  the traditional media here seems to be on barton's ass as of late, and that's never really happened before.  usually bad barton press has come from the alt-weeklys.
http://www.annatopia.com/archives/001548 .html
http://www.annatopia.com/archives/001550 .html

i could go on and on about dave and michelle.  they are amazing, dedicated people who have a democratic volunteer and voting history in three states.  they are inspiring, honest, and forthright, and they deserve our support.


Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 12:41:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

off topic for anna (none / 0)

congrats on donating your income from the watertower add to savetheinternet.com!

you and steve gilliard are my heros!


"blogtopia - yes, i coined that phrase!"
by skippy on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 04:18:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

it was steve's idea (none / 0)

i just thought that would be a good thing to do with the money.  may as well give it to the guys who are fighting the good fight.


Visit us at TexasKAOS, where we're taking Texas back!
by annatopia on Mon Jun 19, 2006 at 11:10:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: it was steve's idea (none / 0)

but so far only you and steve are donating your ill-gotten gains to savetheinternet.

most other blogs are ignoring the issue (tho not my left wing and the agonist, they at least put up large disclaimers next to the ad).


"blogtopia - yes, i coined that phrase!"
by skippy on Wed Jun 21, 2006 at 03:08:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another Call for Netroots (3.00 / 1)

Phyllis Busansky in an open seat, FL-9, is worthy of consideration.  I'd also second the nomination of Jay Fawcett in CO-5 (open seat) and Bill Winter in CO-4 (running against Rep. Tom Tancredo).


by howardpark on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 08:50:08 PM EST

Here's five (3.00 / 2)

1.  Jerry McNerney.

2.  Linda Stender

3.  Mary Jo Kilroy

4. Tim Walz

5. Nancy Skinner

And keep an eye whoever emerges to oppose Jim Walsh in NY-25 and don't forget to look at Tessa Hafen in NV-03 if she ends up being the one to take on Jon Porter.

{As a side note I think this process should be, could be and would benefit from being much more open and democratic.}


k/o: politics and local blogs
by kid oakland on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 09:13:44 PM EST

Re: Here's five (3.00 / 1)

I totally agree, K/O.

Open source politics should be just that... open.

BTW -- I like the Jerry McNerney pick vs. Richard Pombo.


by Fiat Lux on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 10:52:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I nominate (3.00 / 2)

John Courage in TX-21
www.courageforcongress.org

In the Senate, I would suggest Jack Carter.


by texasdemocrat06 on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 09:55:50 PM EST

Re: I nominate (3.00 / 0)

Well, he's got my vote too (literally, I'm in the district, lol). John's recently brought on board Meghan G., Paul Hackett's fundraiser. Meredith Adams is the new communications guru who is from DFA-Burlington where she was an intern this spring. She also went to college at one point at St. Edwards University, in the 21st. Last month the campaign did it's first lit drop, getting out over 15,000 pieces in both populations anchors in the district, Austin and San Antonio. The campaign has for the second time in as many months, stolen Lamar Smith's media (MyDD Rec diary on that here. There should be a poll out soon done with Lake Research and there is a free training being done my one of the campaigns media/message advisore a week from today for campaign volunteers. Plus the Courage campaign is making a big buy into the Travis County Coordinated campaign which I've recently been hired by to manage their soon to be launched website as well as e-mail campaign and volunteer management online. It's going to be exciting and now that our State Democratic Convention is over (which sucked a lot of Texas people away from YearlyKos, (I was kinda suprise Harris was there instead)) we've got a few stories in waiting on Courage/Smith. And we'll be able to pick up our conference calls again.
Follow Texas Politics at Burnt Orange Report
by KTinTX on Sun Jun 18, 2006 at 12:42:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I support John Laesch (IL-CD14) (3.00 / 7)

I support John Laesch because he has the virtues I want in my Representative. Someone with ties to the land. Someone who has served his country. Someone who has idea's -  a health care policy for the common good. A man who understands fairness and is outraged by the corruption in Washington. He will serve us far better than Mr. Hastert.

John Laesch His website.

Another Conundrum My blog.


by jimijam on Sat Jun 17, 2006 at 09:58:25 PM EST

John Laesch (