Contested primaries work

In OH-06, an open seat to replace Ted Strickland, Charlie Wilson was the favorite candidate of the DCCC and the Democratic Party in OH-06. However, he quickly earned the scorn of many people online when he failed to make the ballot a couple of months ago. This is because he could not even gather the fifty, that's right, fifty signatures necessary to appear on the ballot. Something that pathetic demonstrates just how lacking his campaign was in terms of a field plan and in terms of grassroots support. However, last night he won the Democratic primary through a write in campaign. And here is how he did it:
In OH-06, State Sen. Charlie Wilson's campaign and the DCCC...
  • found more than over 900 volunteers
  • made 281,522 calls
  • knocked on 41,758 doors
  • sent more than 4K personalized letters to absentee ballot requesters
  • sent more than 380K pieces of mail
  • went on TV in all 4 media markets, including being on TV in the largest two markets for over 3 weeks.
The TV might have been a little excessive, but being placed in this position actually forced his campaign to develop an extensive list of volunteers and operate a real ground game. This is going to make him a far, far better candidate this fall. I am sure there are some people in the establishment who would simply look at this and consider it a waste of money, but with an operation like this Wilson has to be considered the favorite to win this open seat now. Now, he has 900 volunteers and an extensive list of voter contacts already completed. Had Wilson found five or six more signatures during the filing period, I have to wonder if he would have even bothered to build an operation like this. Considering the level of incompetence his campaign was demonstrating before his campaign was forced into this desperate situation, I bet he would have gone the way of Joe Sulzer in OH-18 had he not been forced to pursue the write-in route.

By being forced into a contested, competitive primary, Charlie Wilson was forced to significantly upgrade the quality of what to that point had been an extremely lazy campaign. Now, Democratic chances to hold the OH-06 have improved significantly. I hope this is the lesson the DCCC and others take form yesterday, rather than just looking at this election and seeing a big waste of resources.



Display:


Re: Contested primaries work (none / 0)

Ought to make candidates with "only" a write-in opponent work a little harder, also.


by ROGNM on Wed May 03, 2006 at 10:47:58 AM EST

Re: Contested primaries work (none / 0)

Clearly, in his cae, Wislon's primary opponent was weak. Competition allows the best to rise to the top, I guess. I think it is better that Wislon won.
by Chris Bowers on Wed May 03, 2006 at 10:51:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Contested primaries work (none / 0)

posted on KOS for exactly the same reasons , that the write-in F'up was probably a good thing for his campaign and maybe all of Ohio if not as a template for Democrats across the nation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1


by gasperc on Wed May 03, 2006 at 11:59:30 AM EST

Re: Contested primaries work (none / 0)

No doubt that Wilson made lemonade out of lemons but he could have used that $1 million more effectively by building a volunteer base and saving some of the mail and media money for the general election.  Regardless, he seems to have gotten his act together which is encouraging.


by John Mills on Wed May 03, 2006 at 12:21:31 PM EST

Re: Contested primaries work (none / 0)

Just to clarify my point, Wilson did not have to go this expensive route to build that base of volunteers.  Regardless, it is a great outcome of a big mistake.


by John Mills on Wed May 03, 2006 at 12:31:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Contested primaries work (none / 0)

I disagree that the use of TV was excessive. Although it is expensive, I think TV is the quickest method to spread a message about a candidate or issue. Let's face it, most Americans are lazy and watch a LOT of television, and the 15-30 seconds you can use to present your case are often the most voters will learn about your candidate/cause. (Those of you who like to brag "I never watch TV" or "I don't own a TV" should realize that you are a VERY small minority of all Americans.)

The other methods are necessary, too, but TV is very necessary to the campaign process.


by lalawguy on Wed May 03, 2006 at 01:54:14 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.