Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion

So much for the President who never met a tax he didn't want to cut. According to David Cay Johnston of The New York Times, tucked into the tax cut legislation recently signed into law by George W. Bush this past week was a major tax increase for American teenagers saving for college.

The $69 billion tax cut bill that President Bush signed this week tripled tax rates for teenagers with college savings funds, despite Mr. Bush's 1999 pledge to veto any tax increase.

Under the new law, teenagers age 14 to 17 with investment income will now be taxed at the same rate as their parents, not at their own rates. Long-term capital gains and dividends that had been taxed at 5 percent will now be taxed at 15 percent. Interest that had been taxed at 10 percent will now be taxed at as much as 35 percent.

The increases, which are retroactive to the first day of the year, are expected to generate nearly $2.2 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, which issues the official estimates.

Usually, it's fairly difficult to talk about the real effects of George W. Bush's tax policy without getting into detail and nuance. Sure, many Americans have seen their tax burden decrease in recent years, but the cuts haven't been doled out equally -- most of them went to the wealthy and the wealthier -- and in the long run, the budget cuts and tax increases that arise in the future as a result of the Republicans' reckless fiscal policy will undoubtedly hit all voters. Certainly people can understand this logic, but it doesn't have the same bang as "I cut your taxes."

But now we're getting into a new realm for President Bush and the Republican Congress. Not only are they imposing the stealth tax hike of massive deficits on the American people, they are actually raising Americans' taxes.

And whose taxes are they raising? Teenagers whose parents and grandparents had the foresight to plan ahead for college. Talk about the wrong sort of disincentives! If anything, Congress and the President should exhort American middle class families to save for their children's education, not tax those savings to pay for a few more billion of dollars in tax cuts for the extremely wealthy.

The Bush administration and the Do Nothing Republican Congress might believe that the American people will put up with their corporatist shenanigans, but they are wrong. The damage of this bill has been done -- Americans will soon see that the Beltway Republicans will do anything to appease their extremely wealthy donors, including trampling on teenagers saving for college (a television ad made for itself, if ever there was one) -- and soon the GOP is going to have to account for its backward policies.



Display:


Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)

He also raised taxes on Overseas Americans. The provisions for exemptions of American citizens living overseas had major changes, housing is no longer an allowed deduction and a bunch of other stuff. We are still trying to get a handle on all that happened.


by HubrisSonic on Sun May 21, 2006 at 07:10:28 AM EST

Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)

that handle looks an awful lot like a presidential monkey spanker knob. methinks the bush republicans have a grip, but its not on their government...


by turnerbroadcasting on Sun May 21, 2006 at 11:41:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)

Republicans are NOT the party of small Government.

Republicans do NOT want to reduce taxes.

What Republicans want to do is to transfer money from the American people to the people who helped them get elected.


by wayward on Sun May 21, 2006 at 07:36:50 AM EST

Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)

Teenagers saving for college? Shouldn't their rich parents just be able to write that check to Harvard?


by zappatero on Sun May 21, 2006 at 09:21:29 AM EST

Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)

well, first they have to get them out of national guard duty border patrol por los zapateros.

then they can grease the skids, and start an oil company for them. pour millions into it, and let osama bin laden's cousin saleem bin laden bail them out of it.

don't forget, amigo - you have to erase a cocaine conviction in texas - why not get a lawyer you can later try to appoint to the supreme court, for the favor?

then and only then, should they write the check. After all, bush republicans are people who are "conservatives"..


by turnerbroadcasting on Sun May 21, 2006 at 11:40:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)


  This isn't an accident.

 A young person who can afford college is a young person who can't be shipped off to Iraq.

  The Republicans have -- stealthily -- made it harder and harder every year for families to be able to afford college. They'd been hoping Americans wouldn't notice -- and by and large, they haven't.

  But this one's too obvious. This one could very well blow up in their faces.

  If we had an opposition party, this would be a BIG issue.


by Master Jack on Sun May 21, 2006 at 11:14:43 AM EST

Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)

If you read up on Straussian philosophy you will see why the neo cons want to higher education out of the reach of the middle class.

''Those who are fit to rule are those who realise there is no morality and that there is only one natural right, the right of the superior to rule over the inferior''.  - Leo Strauss

Education means upward mobility. Upward mobility is a threat to those who have power and want to hold onto it.  

The end of the inheritance tax is one clear indication that they want a permanent ruling class.  The inheritance tax was put in place to prevent the establishment of an all powerful ruling class.

Read this.

http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnew s=18038


by alfredo on Sun May 21, 2006 at 05:55:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Bush Tax (none / 0)

There was a post on the board here once about "the bush tax"

I seem to recall it went something like this.

1. bush proposes unfunded federal mandates like no child left behind and hippa, and as a result, states have to raise property taxes - mine went up 100.00 a month.

2. the bush republicans work as handmaiden to the oil company, cheney writes his energy policy with the energy industry heads behind closed doors. Gas prices skyrocket 270% , we pay an additional 30.00 per week / every week. 120.00 a month. The same oil companies are now trying to run advertisements and marketing - paying billions of dollars - to hide the fact that they're just taking the additional premium on gas, as nothing more than a windfall profit.  (after all, since when does price per barrel of oil have anything to do with how many refineries you can operate to drive the price per +gallon+ of the pumped gas up or down?)

3. the bush republicans , again in the pocket of the same lobbyists that ran up oil prices - not only got us into a global warming jam but cost us 990 billion dollars and lost lives when they couldnt even respond to a class THREE not FIVE hurricane with their - no other way to describe it - OILY appointments at the head of FEMA

4. These fellows, like Cheney and Bush and Rove, are costing us 120 billion dollars a year in their oil company sponsored / Haliburton Energy contracted war against a country that did not pose any threat at all to ours. None. The same fellows are costing us American lives - and ruining the lives of our soldiers as they are directed to kill innocent civilians. A cost that any christian could not bear.

5. Finally they're costing us heavy at the church - these fellows used evangelicals to get themselves into power, and they're constantly monkeying with a hugely expensive line between church and state. This is a wall that Ben Franklin, George Washington, John Adams and Tom Jefferson built at the cost of hundreds of thousands of American lives and millions of colonial dollars. This wall has protected our churches for years.

Lets talk real cost. Tuition is chicken feed. These guys are a multi trillion dollar drain.


by turnerbroadcasting on Sun May 21, 2006 at 11:37:47 AM EST

Re: The Bush Tax (none / 0)

That was Howard Dean's reasoning back in 2003/4.


by David in Burbank on Sun May 21, 2006 at 12:22:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Republican Tax (none / 0)

It's not just Bush (who can't run again anyway) it's the whole party.

When Republicans take power, things get more expensive. Tax cuts are a distraction.

(By the way, am I the only one who thinks inflation is a lot worse than they the official numbers? Things have gotten expensive fast lately.)


by wayward on Sun May 21, 2006 at 02:48:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Republican Tax (none / 0)

Stirling Newberry at the Blogging of the President (http://www.bopnews.com/) has been writing about inflation, as has Hale Stewart (Bonddad). Something from one of Stirling's recent posts has stuck with me:"if inflation were still calculated the way it was during the Carter administration, Social Security checks would be 70% higher than they are now" a paraphrase, maybe.


by LauraK on Sun May 21, 2006 at 03:08:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Isn't this closing a Tax shelter for the rich? (none / 0)

I mean, I don't know of any teenagers who are independently wealthy enough or savvy enough to be paying taxes on dividends and capital gains from investments.  More likely the transfer of wealth to kids for college was just another way for the wealthy to pay LESS taxes.  So in the end, it is likely Bush's "base" will be more pissed off about this than I will.  

Still, though, Bush has approved a tax increase - so much for "read my lips" -- oh, that was his daddy.


by David in Burbank on Sun May 21, 2006 at 12:21:02 PM EST

two practical observations (none / 0)

A list of who voted for this bill would be helpful. It is quite difficult to ferret out voting records on the .gov sites. I'd love to know if any dems crossed over to support this.

And second, as a father of 15 yr old twins, this tax increase hurts - it hurts directly and doubly. It will cause me to shift more of their college savings into US Treasury I-bonds, which are not taxed until you cash them in (like when the kids are over 17 years old). In this way you can avoid this new tax burden entirely. I don't want to sound too much like a commercial for I-bonds, but they do defer tax obligations and function as a good inflation hedge as well.


by facethemusic on Sun May 21, 2006 at 01:16:45 PM EST

Taxation without representation (none / 0)

I didn't come from a family where there was any thought to paying taxes on investments for a teenager. We didn't have that kind of money to invest.

But I did come from a family where a strong work ethic was important, and when I started working at the usual kinds of jobs for 15-17 year olds (fast food and retail), I remember being angry everytime I looked at a paycheck and saw they were taking out taxes when I couldn't vote for the people who were spending that tax money.

That's why today I support groups likeNYRA, the National Youth Rights Association. It really is sad that the one of the main reasons we fought the revolutionary war is ignored today.


-- The Draft Obama 08 Movement is Starting
Help Us Grow, Sign Up At www.draftobamam.org
by acaben on Sun May 21, 2006 at 01:45:26 PM EST

David Cay Johnston is a Hero (none / 0)

We could use more reporters like him.


by Left in the West on Sun May 21, 2006 at 01:57:44 PM EST

Re: Bush Raised Taxes on Teenagers by $2.2 Billion (none / 0)

Well there is still a way to save for college tax-free: state 529 plans. These accounts allow you to put away money for children and it grows tax free. The other benefit is that these accounts remain in the legal name of the parent or the person making the contributions. That is, if the beneficiary becomes a juvenile deliquent or decides not to go to college for whatever reason, the person making the contributions has control. That means that the kid can't liquidate the account on a car or something stupid.

The downside is that if you need the money for any other reason there is a 10% tax for withdrawls not connected to education. But still it is a tax-free way to put money away for children. In some states, such as Washington, DC, you can even deduct what you put in these accounts off of the state tax return.


by jiacinto on Sun May 21, 2006 at 03:02:54 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.