Unions Backing Off Lieberman?

The  Connecticut Employees Union Independent is backing away from Lieberman.

"I was the first union leader to endorse Joe Lieberman against Lowell Weicker" in 1988, says Steve Perruccio. Eighteen years later, "I'm very disappointed in his years in the Senate." Perruccio's 7,000-member Connecticut Employees Union Independent hasn't gone so far as to endorse Lieberman's Democratic challenger, upstart Ned Lamont. But CEUI president Perruccio says that whatever his union eventually decides, "it won't be endorsing Joe Lieberman."

Perruccio and his union of state and municipal employees have lots of company. As Democratic delegates prepare to endorse a Senate candidate at Friday's party convention in Hartford, organized laborincluding unions that have supported Lieberman beforehas largely decided to sit out the Lieberman-Lamont contest.

Observers predict that the convention will endorse Lieberman while giving Lamont, a Greenwich businessman who's challenging Lieberman from the left, enough votes to force a primary in August. Even after the convention, though, you can expect most unions to stay on the sidelines.

About a dozen unions, mostly smallish locals, have endorsed the the three-term incumbent. But Lieberman's in-your-face support for an unpopular war and an unpopular president has turned many working people against him, especially union activists.

This is surprising.  I was told early on that labor support would be critical for Lieberman, and that his record on labor was very good.  Then again, neither Iraq nor Alito are particularly good for any of us.



Display:


Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

The heroic poetry by James Russell Lowell that is being quoted by bloggers has a passage that the unions might have considered:

"Once to every man and nation comes the moment to decide,
In the strife of Truth with Falsehood, for the good or evil side;
Some great cause, God's new Messiah, offering each the bloom or blight,
Parts the goats upon the left hand, and the sheep upon the right,
And the choice goes by forever 'twixt that darkness and that light."


by terryhallinan on Fri May 19, 2006 at 12:09:54 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

I'm ready to see unions fight for relevance. Getting rid of George's Joe is a major step in standing up for working families.


by Bob Brigham on Fri May 19, 2006 at 01:24:53 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

Great to see a good solid quote. Poetry at that! Past time for unions to get up off the floor and start hammering The Corporate Slave State. Unions changed the face of America before and they can do it again. We can help.


by Pericles on Fri May 19, 2006 at 01:59:31 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

I'm a long-time union member, and my local's rep is based in CT.

I ran into him in March; he had two Lamont stickers on his car.


by BriVT on Fri May 19, 2006 at 02:10:51 AM EST

Matt, Lieberman's record on labor is NOT good (none / 0)

According to progressivepunch.org. He ranks 42nd out of 99, ie essentially close to a Republican. One can click the subcategories to get down to specific votes from that link

His overall progressive ranking is 39th.

He ranks poorly (31st or worse, say), on many categories:

Aid to Less Advantaged People, at Home & Abroad (16 subcategories) 80.28 37/99      

Environment (15 subcategories) 71.67 32/99T

Fair Taxation (6 subcategories) 87.85 33/99

Human Rights & Civil Liberties (9 subcategories) 73.17 35/99

Justice for All: Civil and Criminal (7 subcategories) 69.70 36/99

Labor Rights (8 subcategories) 54.10 42/99     

Making Government Work for Everyone, Not Just the Rich or Powerful (14 subcategories) 78.36 37/99     

War & Peace (17 subcategories) 55.77 41/99

Full details on JL's record.


by NuevoLiberal on Fri May 19, 2006 at 02:34:07 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

I've always disliked Joe. I was real leery of him on the 2000 ticket. lets just say: GO LAMONT


by Kevin Klocke on Fri May 19, 2006 at 07:01:20 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (3.00 / 1)

Matt, I've been telling you, labor support for Joe is an aweful lot like party leadership support for Joe.  National leaders, especially those based in Washington, feel they need to support Joe, but as you get closer to local leaders, union members and regular citizens on the ground in Connecticut, Joe's support just isn't there.

I sure hope to see a lot of brothers and sisters from the labor movement out on the ground where it matters, working for Ned.


by aldon on Fri May 19, 2006 at 08:04:20 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

I read in the story on Lamont's personal wealth that he only raised $60k in April. That's not going to cut it. If he does that every month, he won't have enough to go on TV for more than a couple days.

Anyone have any inside info on whether he's going to kick in big bucks himself (as in the $2-3 million range?)


by ColoDem on Fri May 19, 2006 at 11:20:43 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

Good.  Unions are supposed to exercise the will of their membership, but like a large ship take time to change course.  

This indicates that they are hearing a lot of internal displeasure with lieberman, and can not expect members to be steadfast supporters.

Staying out of the fray may be the wisest move at this point.


by lutton on Fri May 19, 2006 at 11:24:50 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

But Ned's been endorsed by KOS, so he can't win.  

[/freeper]
.


by Grand Moff Texan on Fri May 19, 2006 at 11:44:24 AM EST

Re: Unions Backing Off Lieberman? (none / 0)

I lived in Connecticut during the 2000 election season and I was involved in some union fights in and around New Haven.  From that experience, I can assure you that even then, no one in the labor movement was under the impression that Lieberman was on our side.  They were none too happy that Gore picked him for VP, either.


by RamblinDave on Fri May 19, 2006 at 12:45:35 PM EST

I think Lieberman was a major reason why Gore lost (none / 0)

Lieberman was an awful vp candidate in 2000, methinks.

Any word on whether or not Joe is building up his joementum?


by turnerbroadcasting on Fri May 19, 2006 at 02:45:26 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.