Fighting The Hostile Takeover

bumped - Matt

There's a lot of inane talk these days about "polarization," "red and blue" America, and increased partisanship. It makes for a good storyline - but it hides a very simple truth: American politics is largely dominated by a very tightly-knit consensus that makes sure every policy debate ends with one or another outcome that benefits the Big Money interests that bankroll political campaigns.

As I argue in Hostile Takeover, my new book being released this week, there is an intricate system of lies, myths and half-truths being rammed down Americans' throats that is designed to make us believe lawmakers are working in our best interests, when in fact they are working against us. These storylines have created the justification for the hostile takeover of our government - and they have marginalized the commonsense policies that most Americans support.

So, for instance, the raging debate over immigration has included almost no discussion of reforming our corporate-written trade policies like NAFTA - a pact that President Clinton joined with Republicans to ram down Americans throat, a pact that we were told would increase American wages and decrease illegal immigration by improving the Mexican economy; yet a pact that has resulted in stagnating wages for Americans, 19 million more Mexicans living in poverty and thus increased illegal immigration. But because this free trade orthodoxy has helped maximize corporate profits, even a discussion of reforming those trade policies is considered off limits by elites in Washington - even in an immigration debate where it is central, even when polls show Americans want our trade policies reformed.

Similarly, the debate over how to solve America's energy problems has largely focused on which kinds of tax breaks to hand over to energy companies - rather than cracking down on energy industry profiteering, as most Americans support. The debate over taxes has largely focused on how much to extend new tax breaks for the super wealthy - rather than on radically reforming our tax system to make it more fair. The debate over globalization has seen Democrats and Republicans join hands to pass corporate-written trade deals that undermine American wages, jobs and environmental standards - despite the fact that polls show Americans want our trade policy to stop selling us out.

As I wrote in today's San Francisco Chronicle, there no longer is a difference between Big Business and government. Worse, the only difference between corporate lobbyists and most politicians today is that the politicians get to call themselves Senator or Congressman. That's the reason why government cannot solve problems anymore - because you can't solve problems if you are unwilling to challenge the Big Money interests that are causing these problems.

The silver lining, of course, is that polls show Americans more than ever understand just how corrupt their government is. That provides us with an opportunity - but only if one of the two parties seizes it.

The GOP, clearly, is uninterested in any kind of reform - they are benefitting from the system of legalized bribery that has now substituted for our democracy. But sadly, Democrats still don't seem ready to make cleaning up our government a real priority. Oh sure, they've pushed modest lobbying reform proposals - but they have refused to champion systemic reforms like public financing of elections. They seem to think they can win the 2006 campaign through a debate over the mundane details of one weak lobbying reform package over another. I hope they are right because I want to see the Democrats take back Congress - but in my heart I fear such shortsightedness and corrupt behavior will only mean another loss on election day.



Display:


Re: Fighting The Hostile Takeover (none / 0)

Man, I knew I was forgetting something from my CDP diary report...  namely, David Sirota signing books!

I've just started reading it, and it's looking like this will be one important book.


by Malacandra on Mon May 01, 2006 at 11:05:59 AM EST

Re: Fighting The Hostile Takeover (none / 0)

Yeah I had the pleasure as well.  Sorry I missed running into you Malacandra.

David, don't forget that you promised to post up your speech from Friday night.


by juls on Mon May 01, 2006 at 03:07:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Good luck with that - Really (3.00 / 1)

As you say in your Chronicle piece,

there no longer is a boundary between Big Business and government

The model is the defense industry. Everything is so much friendlier when the sky's the limit and Uncle Sam is picking up the tab. So many links between industry and government that, as the Animal Farm kicker had it
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

Of course, this corporatism dates from well before megabucks were required for a decent Senate campaign (let alone a presidential one).

But - so far as I can see - the main driver of the generalization of the system has been the extortionate cost of campaigning.

And if you know a practical way to put a stop to that, you're a better man that I am, Gunga Din.


by skeptic06 on Mon May 01, 2006 at 11:37:27 AM EST

Exactly. (none / 0)

The problem is that you are faced with having to ask the corrupt system if it would please please stop being so corrupt. Politicians have no incentive to implement true campaign reforms they are making too much money and having too good of a time screwing us.

The internet was our last best chance for re-creating the freedom most of us think we already have. I say 'was' because I already notice my ISP (Verizon) blocking and slowing several types of IP traffic from certain IPs. (I am a Software Engineer). This free exchange of information critical of elites is obviously a great threat to the status quo and is already quietly being subverted. Net neutrality to Net neutering in one step!


by TimThe Terrible on Mon May 01, 2006 at 01:01:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Good luck with that - Really (none / 0)

This is where I once again futilely advocate for the abolition of direct election of senators.  The states should appoint them and therefore have more control over them than is now possible.  My own little pipedream, I know.


by Demo Dan in Dayton on Mon May 01, 2006 at 04:15:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fighting The Hostile Takeover (none / 0)

"extortionate"

Had to look that one up to see if it was real!  Great word.


by CarrieCann on Mon May 01, 2006 at 12:05:46 PM EST

Malefactors of Great Wealth (none / 0)

More and more, I'm convinced that we will never solve the problem without a Democrat like FDR -- and I'm not sure who it will be.

The Davos Democrats will spout platitudes about good jobs and working Americans, but at the end of the day, they come down on the side of monied interests.


by ck on Mon May 01, 2006 at 12:53:22 PM EST

Re: Fighting The Hostile Takeover (none / 0)

Sure, laws are written by and for the powerful.  What else is new?  It is periods like FDR's 1930s or LBJ's (for all his manifold flaws) 1960s that are the outliers, not the decades between.  To fight for better government is not to shut your eyes to history.

Moreover, while I'm certain your characterization is a useful rhetorical trope, fuel prices hardly result from "energy industry profiteering," though the industry certainly profits when prices are high.  When crude was at $12, it was not because courageous legislators were holding Exxon, BP, Shell and Total in check.  Sure, HW Bush's Congress abdicated on CAFE, Clinton/Gore failed to enact a BTU tax and W Bush axed Iraqi supply, but to give them primary responsibility is to be as blind on economics as well.

I applaud your efforts to make government better, but I hope your book hews a little closer to inconvenient fact.


by wcw on Mon May 01, 2006 at 01:32:21 PM EST

Amen to the specialness... (none / 0)

...of the New Deal and the Great Society.

It needed the men - and I can't see another FDR or LBJ on the horizon - but also the circumstances (Depression/assassination) and the political balance of forces.

FDR put the fear of ever-loving God up MCs of both parties by his wins in 32, 34 and 36; that's never happened since.

LBJ did something of the sort in 64/65, with a little posthumous assistance from his predecessor (not to mention that civil rights ruckus!) - but the Vietnam worm was already in the bud by then.

Perfect storms, both.

I shudder to think what catastrophe will have to befall the Republic before we get a similarly radical program of laws enacted.


by skeptic06 on Mon May 01, 2006 at 02:09:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is why Howard Dean scared them so much (none / 0)

especially after he told Tweety he would consider breaking up the media monopolies. The Republicans and "Davos Democrats" (great phrase) realized that Dean would be willing to make systematic changes that would end their monopoly on the American Dream.


"We are building a political movement - not one that wields the power of lobbyists and corporate interests, but the power of millions... who seek change." -Dean
by Jim in Chicago on Mon May 01, 2006 at 03:10:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

T-shirt slogan... (none / 0)

How about Davos Democrats phone it in?

Please yourselves...


by skeptic06 on Mon May 01, 2006 at 03:19:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fighting The Hostile Takeover (none / 0)

When I saw "Hostile Takeover", my first thought was of a different kind of hostile takeover. What if the centrists -- what are usually called progressives, but as Sirota and others point out are much closer to the mainstream of popular opinion -- what if the centrists took over the Democratic Party?

Sirota rightly points out the Republican Party is hopeless. The only other possibility seems to be to take over Big Business itself. Traditionally, and usually, it is seldom interested in anything past the next quarter. But we have seen in the last few years quite a few big business interests come out against Bush policy and in favor of reality.

Just a pipe dream, I know. Taking over the Dems is going to be fiendishly hard by itself. However, isn't it in the interests of the Big Guys for humanity to survive the 21st Century, if only to sell us lots of stuff we don't need?


by Hong Kong Chevy on Tue May 02, 2006 at 12:55:01 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.