Ethics "Truce" Broken: DeLay To File Ethics Complaint Against McKinney

That's right--the first House member to break the ethics "truce" will be Tom DeLay:
Soon-to-retire Rep. Tom DeLay (R.-Tex.) said today he would file an ethics complaint against Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D.-Ga.) for striking a Capitol Police officer should no other House member do so first.

DeLay's comments came during a wide-ranging interview at his Capitol Hill office with reporters, including HUMAN EVENTS Editor Terry Jeffrey.

"If nobody in this House files an ethics charge, I am," DeLay said in response to a question about McKinney. "Her behavior is outrageous. And it's not the only time."
Democrats have really dropped the ball on this one, and not just Democrats in the House leadership. Any House member can file an ethics complaint, but they choose not to. Now, of all people, corrupt and cowardly Tom DeLay is somehow going to seize headlines and file an ethics complaint.

Democrats do not just need to win the House. As my friend BooMan was telling me last night, they need new blood that will challenge ossified interests and power structures that will remake our own party as well. The class of 1974 was like that. As BooMan writes:
The Class of 1974 was unique. It did not change the leadership of Congress, but rather, it increased the Democratic majorities and infused the Democratic Party with liberals with a zeal for reform. They threw out some of their own Committee Chairmen, enacted campaign finance reform, did thorough investigations of our intelligence agencies, reopened the investigation of the JFK assassination (and deemed it a conspiracy), and passed the FISA act (the law being flouted by Bush today).

At times it seems like the Bush/Cheney administration has made it their mission to undo all the reforms of the Class of 1974. But, for all the people that are frustrated with or have given up on the Democrats in Washington, the lesson of 1974 is that big electoral gains in 2006 will bring change. Not just a change in the leadership of the Congress, but change in the very nature and makeup and agenda of the Democreatic Party. And that is what we need.
There are a fairly decent number of Representatives who need ethics complaints filed against them. The vast majority of them are Republicans, but a handful of them are Democrats. We need reformed Democrats who are willing to file ethics challenges against all members who deserve it, regardless of party, regardless of media spin, regardless of retribution that would take place within the caucus. And we are not the only ones who need it--the country needs it too. We need candidates that could make 2006 like 1974.



Display:


D-Man has a sense of humor after all! (3.00 / 1)

Some Grade A chutzpah that I just don't the Congressional Dems have in them.

The response of Pelosi is just awful:

I don't think any of it justifies hitting a police officer. I don't know if that happened, but if it did happen, I don't think it was justified. ... I find it hard to see any set of facts that would justify striking a police officer.

Pick the bones out of that!

While the lefty sphere has been jacking off to the ghetto slut crack and related matters, the wider question identified here becomes ever more pressing: what kind of a leadership will the Dems have if they win the House (just to concentrate on the immediate)?

Will Pelosi be challenged even after pulling off a win? And, if so, will her challenger(s) be any more capable of taking a grip of the House party (in all sorts of ways, but with ethics right up there) if they were to take her place?

And what about the rest of the leadership team? If - to pluck a name at random - Rahmbo dislodges La Pelosi, who gets Majority Leader, Whip, etc?

I don't know the House personnel at all well; but my general sense is that Pelosi hasn't exactly been keeping the lid on a wealth of talent bubbling up from below.

The contrast with the much-mentioned 1994 GOP is striking - and not exactly flattering to the 2006 Dems.

Of course, the middle of a Congressional election is not exactly the best time to addressing these issues. But perhaps panic is the only laxative to shift - well, you catch my drift...


by skeptic06 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 01:41:28 PM EST

Re: D-Man has a sense of humor after all! (3.00 / 1)

Just to finish:

The great twist is

If nobody in this House files an ethics charge, I am.

He's taunting Pelosi with her whiny ass titty baby clutching onto the ethics truce all these years - which (the Chris Bell anomaly aside) let him and his cronies strut their stuff without fear of arraignment before their peers.

If she'll put in the complaint against McKinney, he'll gladly step aside and applaud!

(He knows that, Damascene conversion aside, she won't in a million years.)

I'd almost call that classy...


by skeptic06 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 01:49:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: D-Man has a sense of humor after all! (3.00 / 1)

And the beauty of Delay's move? Yet again the GoOper is able to point out, for all progressives to see, how the Democratic party leadership yet again will hang one of their own out to dry at the drop of a pin.

Pretty damn brilliant if you ask me.


by redstar66 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 02:37:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

BLame people like Pelosi (3.00 / 3)

As I commented before in the other McKinney thread, Nancy Pelosi shows a lot of anger towards McKinney for an incident of misbehaviour in a He Said She Said case(even if may turn out McKinney was probably a little full of herself when asked to produce ID). But where is the same degree of anger when it comes to attacking republicans?

Delay has no shame and is not concerned about focus groups. I saw him on that shameless guy Chris Matthews show and the guy's audacity was amazing. When Matthews asked him about the Clinton impeachment versus Bush's , the guy didn't even blink. He said with a straight face - paraphrasing here - "I am proud of our impeachment efforts towards Clinton. He broke the law." "The democrats are full of hate and can't wait to impeach Bush"  

Delay gets away with it for the most part because the democratic leaders are too freaking wimpy.


by Pravin on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 01:43:31 PM EST

Re: Ethics "Truce" Broken (none / 0)

FUCK THE ETHICS TRUCE!!! FUCK IT TODAY!@!!

They should file ethics charges against the entire repukeliscum party.  Set up the charges, and file them en masse.  There is enough on every single member that they could all be filed on.


by dataguy on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 01:57:01 PM EST

Re: Ethics "Truce" Broken (3.00 / 1)

reopened the investigation of the JFK assassination (and deemed it a conspiracy)

From Wikipedia:

The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations was established in 1976 to investigate the John F. Kennedy assassination and the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination. The Committee investigated until 1978, and in 1979 issued its final report, concluding that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald, probably as a result of a conspiracy. The members of this probable conspiracy were not identified. However, the committee noted that it believed that the conspiracy did not include the governments of the Soviet Union or Cuba, nor the FBI, the CIA, or the Secret Service. It also stated it did not believe the conspiracy was organized by any organized crime group, nor any anti-Castro group, but that it could not rule out individual members of either of those groups acting together.

So it was a conspiracy, but no conspirators were identified.

Yeah, they really pinned that one down, didn't they?


by Screamin Demon on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 02:36:37 PM EST

Re: Ethics "Truce" Broken: DeLay To File (none / 0)

Well, the truce is broken.  Maybe the Dems will finally find the stones to levy a whole load of ethics complaints against the Republicans in retaliation.

But I'm not counting on it.


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 02:40:23 PM EST

New blood (none / 0)

New blood is exactly what our party needs; indeed it's the only thing that can save us.  That's why I'm backing Allan Lichtman in Maryland's Democratic Senate primary.  With Paul Sarbanes retiring we have an open seat and it's anybody's race.  Allan's taking on a 10 term congressman who has spent 20 years in the capital cultivating a reputation for "compromise" and "bi-partisanship."  I truly believe that if progressives want to advance our agenda then our first step has to be taking over the Democratic Party and backing progressive candidates.  If you agree then please  throw some love Allan's way.

Allan Lichtman

Allan Lichtman for US Senate.


Support Allan Lichtman for U.S. Senate!
by Theo929 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 03:37:02 PM EST

Re: Ethics "Truce" Broken (none / 0)

"Her behavior is outrageous. And it's not the only time."

great moments in projection.
psych 101 classes the world over should take note


by big in japan on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 04:14:19 PM EST

What happens if.... (3.00 / 1)

some Dem filed an ethics charge against Delay?  Would charges force hom to remain in Congress longer so he could twist in the wind more?  (and screw up the very well planned exit from Texas).

Anyone know?


by NvDem on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 12:27:26 AM EST

Re: What happens if.... (none / 0)

Once someone leaves Congress, the Congressional ethics process ends because they no longer have jurisdiction.  You can't punish someone who is no longer a member of your body.


by John Mills on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 09:44:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Ethics "Truce" Broken (none / 0)

Remember, our candidate for Governor in Texas, Chris Bell broke the truce when he was in the House, and Delay was reprimanded, believe it or not.

Support Chris Bell for Texas Governor!

www.chrisbell.com


by v2aggie2 on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 01:56:24 AM EST

Ethics Process Needs to be Non-Partisan (none / 0)

"There are a fairly decent number of Representatives who need ethics complaints filed against them. The vast majority of them are Republicans, but a handful of them are Democrats."

Previous posts on Ethics filings have suggested using it for partisan advantage which is wrong.  The Ethics process needs to be like criminal court proceedings and beyond partisanship.  That was the mistake of the late 80s to mid 90s when the ethics process became tit for tat and was used to try to gain political advantage.  It got so bad a complaint was filed on a mortgage on Dick Gephardt's house.  It was spurious and dismissed but was good for a couple days headlines.  That led to the "truce" which has also been a mistake because those who have broken the rules have gone unpunished.

The solution is take the ethics process away from the House and Senate and give it to an independent, non-partisan or bi-partisan entity to review complaints of wrong doing.


by John Mills on Thu Apr 06, 2006 at 09:53:54 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.