Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Recruiting Record

This week, Democrats will reach a milestone of real importance: they will break their record for the most House seats challenged since at least 1992. Barry Welsh's Fifty-State strategy page hasn't been updated in a while, but MyDD diarist BENAWU has been picking up the slack (although s/he could stand to drop a few capital letters from his or her titles and tags).

Dating back to 1994, Democrats have lost the last six elections for the House. In each of those six elections, we ran fewer candidates than Republicans. Our best effort was in 2000, when we ran candidates in 403 districts, and Republicans ran candidates in 404 districts. This was both our highest district total, and our smallest deficit to Republicans in the last six elections. Perhaps not surprisingly, we also received our highest share of the national popular vote in 2000, coming in at 47.9%.

Right now, however, we have 402 candidates set, even though just under half of all filing deadlines have passed. Recent deadlines included Missouri, South Carolina, and Arkansas. In all three states, we fielded a full slate of candidates. In fact, to date, there are only five districts where we have failed to field a candidate and the deadline has passed: CA-42, MS-03, PA-09, PA-15, and TX-11 (I'm pretty sure we have a candidate in IA-02). Even then, it appears that we can still field candidates in PA-09 and PA-15, if local candidates and parties can get their acts together.

On Thursday, the filing deadline for Alabama will pass. With five of the remaining thirty-three seats for us to challenge coming in Alabama, Thursday will almost certainly be the day when we break the record. It is just impossible to believe that there will not be at least two or three more Democratic candidates to file in Alabama. While the rest of the nation challenges every Republican, it is hard to imagine that the Alabama Democratic party would let every Republican in their state go unopposed, especially with a potential Gubernatorial pick-p looming in November. We will break the record on Thursday (then again, in an earlier diary, BENAWU argues that we may have already broken the record, and that we now have 406 seats challenged).

Just as importantly, it looks like Republicans will field a surprisingly low number of candidates in 2006. In California alone, Republicans are not challenging seven districts, more than the total number of districts Democrats have so far left unchallenged nationwide. In 2004, Republicans only failed to challenge three seats in California. We are clearly witnessing an upswing in Democratic recruitment, and a downturn in Republican recruitment. Not only will we challenge more seats than we have in any of the six most recent elections, we will almost certainly challenge more seats than Republicans for the first time in at lest seven elections. In fact, with early returns like these, we could challenge far more seats than Republicans.

Not only is this a sign of a Democratic year, this recruiting will become a cause of a democratic year. With fewer Democratic incumbents facing serious challenges, or any challenges at all, they will be able to funnel more money into competitive districts. With more Republicans facing serious challenges, fewer Republican incumbents will be able to funnel money into competitive districts. Research by Project 90 suggests that this could result in a swing of up to $21M in favor of Democrats in swing elections. Our greater number of challenges will stretch Republican defenses to a point they have not been stretched since they took over Congress in 1994.

I do not believe that the netroots did much in the way of actually helping more Democratic candidates run in 2006 than is past years, but I do believe that we at least planted the seeds in the minds of many activists and potential candidates that this was an important step to take in order to regain power. A seed planted by Dr. Dean, and brought into bloom by the netroots and the blogosphere, has resulted in the fifty-state strategy becoming conventional wisdom for Democrats nationwide. In these remarkable, record-breaking recruiting numbers, we can now see the flower of this idea. Come November, it will be time to reap the harvest.



Display:


Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Recruiting Re (3.00 / 1)

This is great news.

I never understood the notion of not fielding a candidate in a given race.

I know it costs money and some races are simply impossible to win.  However, its like a sports team simply not showing up to play a game because their playoff chances are nil or because they are the underdog.

Just ask George Mason University :)


by agpc on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 05:20:54 PM EST

Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Recruiting Re (none / 0)

Well you have to convince people to give up two years of their lives in districts with punishing and hostile demographics. This invovles not having a life for two years, knocking on thousands of dollars, raising money, and exerting a lot of effort. The reason why that you don't find many credible challengers in places like Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Bill Jenkins (R-TN) (where no Democrat has won since in 1860) is because the odds are so insurmountable. It's hard to convince someone to run under such insurmountable odds.


by jiacinto on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 06:35:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Recruiting Re (none / 0)

I disagree, inasmuch as what you're describing refers to CREDIBLE challengers.  If you're the Dem Party chair in a county in Bill Jenkins' district, why not just get your name on the ballot, which isn't too difficult in most places?  

True, it's not going to win you the seat, but if you talk reasonably at debates and do a little door-knocking and such, you are going to pick up a few new Dem voters.  Granted, it's not exactly going to turn the district blue overnight, but that can add up long term.

Moreover, if someone reasonable is on the ballot, it's likely that at least their friends, neighbors and co. will go to the polls to vote for them and, while they're there, punch down the Dem line.  Maybe we pick up a school board seat somewhere or a county council seat somewhere, but if we get even one extra seat because of those coattails, even if it's not the congressional seat, that's still better than nothing.

Long story short, if you don't have someone running, why not just get on the ballot and tell your friends and neighbors to vote for you?  It's real easy to make a simple website and e-mail list, which is enough to get a little respect.  Even a 90-10 loss is going to be a lot better than 100-0 and that's not too hard to make happen.  

Finding credible challengers, it's true, is much more difficult.  But we should at least be able to get someone on the ballot, which is a net positive, as long as they're not batshit crazy.


John McCain
by DanM on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 11:58:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Recruiting Re (none / 0)

搬家 搬家公司 打折机票 特价机票 飞机票 机票 机票 成都机票 成都机票 成都飞机票 成都打折机 票 北京机票 北京机票 北京飞机票 北京特价机 票 北京打折机 票 上海机票 上海机票 上海机票 上海飞机票 上海打折机 票 广州机票 广州特价机 票 广州机票 广州飞机票 深圳机票 深圳特价机 票 深圳机票 深圳飞机票 深圳打折机 票 重庆机票 重庆特价机 票 重庆机票 重庆飞机票 重庆打折机 票 西安机票 西安特价机 票 西安机票 西安打折机 票 快递 北京快递 北京快递公 司 上海快递 上海快递公 司 成都快递 成都快递公 司 广州快递 广州快递公 司 深圳快递 深圳快递公 司 重庆快递 重庆快递公 司 工程设计 中国語 网络电话 身份证阅读 器 澳洲房地产 澳大利亚房 地产 上海翻译公 司 录音电话 电话录音 电话录音卡 录音系统 电话录音系 统 语音卡 电话语音卡 呼叫中心 一卡通 一卡通企业 一卡通方案 收费机 售饭机 门禁机 考勤机 餐桌 重庆人才网 重庆招聘网 重庆火锅 重庆餐饮 餐饮加盟 北京到上海 机票 北京到深圳 机票 北京到成都 机票 北京到重庆 机票 北京到海口 机票 北京到三亚 机票 北京到福州 机票 北京到厦门 机票 北京到南宁 机票 北京到珠海 机票 北京到西宁 机票 北京到银川 机票 北京到郑州 机票 北京到兰州 机票 北京到悉尼 机票 北京到大阪 机票 北京到曼谷 机票 北京到旧金 山机票 北京到纽约 机票 北京到汉城 机票
by liaozhi123 on Wed Apr 26, 2006 at 03:30:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Recruiting... (3.00 / 1)

This is a nice balance to the idea that certain democratic activists don't have the stomach to win.

Everyone who is implementing the 50-state strategy increases our chances in the house immeasurably, and (partially) negates the effect of any activist who is afraid to do what it takes to win.


This administration sucks.
by thief on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 05:38:36 PM EST

But.. (3.00 / 1)

Dean's crazy! Crazy I tell you!

50 state strategy is a good one. Glad to see. Around here, we're hoping the money they throw at IL-06 will take some away from helping down ticket races as well.


Witty comment goes here...
by michael in chicago on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 06:19:41 PM EST

South Dakota (3.00 / 1)

South Dakota allows candidates to file by post-marking mailed petitions by 5 PM today, CDT.  However, as of closing time today nobody has filed to run against Stephanie Herseth.  And the state GOP site lists no opponent.  We will either get a pass or a weak candidate for this race.  Amazing. This was a marquee match-up in 2004.

I'm also hoping that another GOP seat or two will become an open seat in Florida.  Bill Young, a 75-year old who has been in the House for 36 years has yet to file paperwork.  Yes, the deadline is a month away but he has been rumored as a retiree.  Similarly, if Katharine Harris is shoved out, GOP House members like Mark Foley are likely to run for the Senate nomination.


by David Kowalski on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 06:20:15 PM EST

Foley (3.00 / 1)

He won't run for statewide office. For one thing, his rumored orientation doesn't go over well with Republican voters in Florida.


by RBH on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 06:56:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: South Dakota (none / 0)

Holy Crap. "However, as of closing time today nobody has filed to run against Stephanie Herseth.  And the state GOP site lists no opponent."

I sent $100 bucks Stephanie's way during the Special Election. Man I was just hoping she put up a good show. That she won in June 1994 then won again in the Regular in November and now has sidelined the Republican Party in the High Plains (i.e. historically prime Republican territory) makes that the best $100 I ever spent.

And that was all Netroots baby.


PollKatz: Bush Approval in 15 polls
by Bruce Webb on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 09:19:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Won in June 1994, eh? (none / 0)

What kind of crazy time machine do you have!? :P


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 12:16:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Beer and Rum fueled (none / 0)

Hey my chronology is right twice a day and once a millenium.


PollKatz: Bush Approval in 15 polls
by Bruce Webb on Fri Apr 14, 2006 at 10:07:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is good news, but... (3.00 / 1)

...even better than simply recruiting more Democrats to run is recruiting more viable Democrats to run.  I won't disagree with you that this is a good sign--I think we're looking at the same tea leaves--but putting more names on the ballot won't be enough, these people have to campaign.

But the fact that fewer Republicans are filing and more Democrats are jumping into races is indicative of the political climate.  I'm optimistic.


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 09:08:22 PM EST

Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Record (none / 0)

Has there been any info on the effect of the 50 state strategy on the various state lege races?  It would be nice (though difficult I'm sure) to see where we stand on these various down ticket races.


by Demo Dan in Dayton on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 11:04:18 PM EST

Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Record (none / 0)

No kidding.  That's where it all begins.  We need some serious help in our state legislatures, especially in the upper Midwest.  


by Eric11 on Tue Apr 04, 2006 at 11:24:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not sure, but... (none / 0)

Since the 2004 elections, the Democrats have been on an upswing--winning more and more seats all over the country, including many of the special elections.  The DLCC (Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee) works on this thing, and Democrats overall hold more state legislative seats in the country than the Republicans by a 30 or 40 seat margin, I think. (Which is a fraction of a percent, but still a majority!)


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 12:15:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

my thoughts (3.00 / 2)

OK Chris I will settle down on the capitals - sheesh.

Great diary agree with your thoughts.

Just a few points.

You are right about IA 2. They will hold a nominating convention and Dave Loebsack will be the candidate. - http://www.loebsackforcongress.org/

His campaign confirmed that to me by email.

You are also right about PA 9 and PA 15. 1000 write in votes is all you need. I post at the wrong time of the day to get much attention you might consider doing a write up on this. Please.

Another suggestion for a longer story. We have 16 races to fill in jsut 4 southern states.
Alabama - 4, Louisiana - 4, Florida - 5, Georgia - 3.

I have found a confirmed? candidate for TN 2.

By my count I have us up at 408 races filled. Stunning effort.

I will diary this later.


by BENAWU on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 04:35:25 AM EST

DIARY (none / 0)

Here it is:
http://mydd.com/story/2006/4/5/101733/22 27#1

And I am a he!


by BENAWU on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 10:21:54 AM EST

netroots is a cog in the democratic community (none / 0)

a very important cog.  Just as millions were searching the web for others to communicate with after the 2000 selection, and again after 9/11, and through 2002 and 2004.  We all searched for each other to remind us we weren't crazy or wrong or stupid for holding an opinion different than the Bush administration.  Not only that, but that the Bush administration's policies were flat out wrong, dangerous and will make conditions in the world far worse not better.
I was, am and still remain one of the few, the proud, the 10% THAT NEVER APPROVED OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION.
by gasperc on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:13 AM EST

Re: Democrats Set To Break Post-1994 Recruiting Re (none / 0)

Good post; gave you props at VichyDems. God, I love Dean. God, I hate Emanuel.


by Thersites2 on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 12:10:16 PM EST

IA-02 has a candidate: David Loebsack (none / 0)

In Iowa's Second District, David Loebsack, will definitely be nominated at the 2nd District Convention on April 29th.  He is running an active campaign, and just had a big fundraiser last week.  Yesterday he proposed four improvements for Medicare Part D - there are more details at his website.  


by corncam on Wed Apr 05, 2006 at 03:40:54 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.