Rumor in VT: Leahy not thrilled about Sanders candidacy

This is VERY interesting.

According to an entry in today's Vermont Politics Online.

"Some folks assicaited with Vermont Senator Pat Leahy say the Senator is not to thrilled about Bernie Sanders' run for U.S. Senate."

Read on!

Here's what they had to say in the post:

Leahy has come out and thrown his support behind Sanders, who has served as Vermont's lone Representative in the House of Representatives since 1990.

However, this individual (who of course spoke to us on condition of autonomy and who made it clear that she values her job) said that a number of people affiliated with Senator Leahy, including many folks within his 2004 re-election campaign are not thrilled with Sanders joining the most exclusive club in the world.

We're talking about the United States Senate, folks!

Why?

According to this young woman, Leahy's staff does not want to share the lime-light.

"You have to understand the staff and the Senator's position: Since the 1980s, the Senator has had the luxury of being Vermont's Senator. Jim Jeffords was always the quiet follower, much like Winston Prouty was with George Aiken. If Bernie is elected, he will be incredibly aggressive and alienate a whole lot of Senators and their staff's with his mumbo-gumbo. Even more so, Bernie will want to be at the top and I don't think that the Senator and his staff want to share it..."

Interesting.

Again, take it with a grain of salt. However as a Vermonter, I've been wondering why Senator Leahy has been mum ever since Sanders announced his run for Jim Jeffords seat. I can also say there are a few Dems in Vermont and in Washington that are not to thrilled about having a former Socialist in the U.S. Senate. Leahy comes across as one of those people.

The word around Vermont is that the Vermont Republicans are poised to do well this November in state races as well as for U.S. House & Senate races. The state Dems. gas tax proposal (if it succeeds) could hurt their chances to maintain control over the House & Senate, Lt. General Martha Rainville has come across as this "nice lady" moderate Republican, and Bernie's really going to need Leahy's support if he's going to squeak by GOP Senate candidate Rich Tarrant, who seems to be coming across as another nice guy who's socially moderate (and pro-choice)and fiscally conservative. Mark my words it will be close!



Display:


Re: Rumor in VT: Leahy not thrilled about Sanders (none / 0)

Have you been looking at the polls?  I'm not necessarily saying that the numbers will remain that way until November, but this'll be a landslide victory by any reasonable definition.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/Sta te%20Polls/January%202006/Vermont%20Sena te%20January%205.htm

It'll be Bernie who's going to boost VT Democrats (Welch et al.), not the other way around.


by Ramo on Thu Apr 27, 2006 at 11:24:21 PM EST

Re: Rumor in VT: Leahy not thrilled about Sanders (none / 0)

And Bernie still considers himself a socialist (particularly, a European-style Social Democrat)...


by Ramo on Thu Apr 27, 2006 at 11:25:53 PM EST

PoliticsVT is a GOP front group (3.00 / 0)

PoliticsVT is widely considered to be a right-wing disinformation campaign.  Their coverage tilts right to a significant margin, and this is not the first time they have tried such a heavy handed attempt at boosting republicans.  I know for certain that one of the "anonoymous" writers is now working for Rich Tarrant.  And this post helps nobody but him.


Reid DeWolfe Book you should read: "All the Kings Men" by Robert Penn Warren
by Reid on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 07:55:09 AM EST

Re: PoliticsVT is a GOP front group (none / 0)

This is not one of those sites... You're referring to PoliticsXX.com sites that Bowers discussed recently.

This one is a blogspot-hosted blog. And it's "Approved Sites" list includes 3 decidedly not right wing sites and one neutral journalist.

The local CW on this site is that it is written anonymously by political insiders from Montpelier, the state capital.

This is not a GOP front group.


What's the Point?
by Vermonter on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 09:02:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: PoliticsVT is a GOP front group (none / 0)

Seems to me Dem insiders in Montpellier don't exactly have a good relationship w/Bernie's Progressives, do they?

This is not news.


by redstar66 on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 03:41:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Rumor in VT: Leahy not thrilled about Sanders (none / 0)

It is my understanding that Tarrant is decidedly not pro-choice.


WestforderVT "You can have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, or democracy, but you cannot have both." --Louis Brandeis, Supreme Court Justice
by WestforderVT on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 09:13:44 AM EST

Re: Rumor in VT: Leahy not thrilled about Sanders (none / 0)

You really think that Sanders, who is Vermont ONLY Congressman, who therefore has son at the state-level every year since 1990, will have trouble because he's a self-described Socialist? Voters know who he is, and he won his 2004 re-election by 68% to 24%.


by Progressive Moderate on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 09:37:21 AM EST

Re: Rumor in VT (none / 0)

I used to live in VT- VT LOVES BERNIE!


If all politics is local- then it's time to support your local Democratic Town Committee.
by JJonMyDD on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 09:42:16 AM EST

A Totally Bullshit Diary!!! (none / 0)

Progressive Moderate notes that Saunders re-election in 2004 by 68% to 24%.

But that's only the big picture.  There was a discussion in these parts some time ago about how well Bernie did in the red precincts of Vermont.

The discussion was anchored by a May 29, 2005 post at Paperwight's Fair Shot, which said, in part:

   * Bernie Sanders outpolled John Kerry by 8.5 points statewide while splitting the non-Republican vote with a Democratic candidate and a candidate from the truly leftist Vermont Liberty Union party.  Sanders outpolled the Democratic candidate for the House by 60 percentage points statewide.

   * Sanders won every precinct in Vermont but three.  In two of those precincts, both Kerry victories, the Democratic candidate split the non-Republican vote deeply enough for the Republican candidate to win a plurality.  The third was a rural precinct in which George Bush beat John Kerry 86.54% to 13.46% (45 votes to 7 votes).  In that precinct, Sanders lost to the Republican candidate 23 votes to 26 votes, with three votes going to the Democratic candidate.

   * Sanders won in 46 of the 47 Vermont precincts in which George Bush beat John Kerry and in the one precinct where Bush and Kerry tied.  In all but three of those, Sanders beat the Republican candidate (his closest competitor) by double digit margins: he won ten precincts by more than 20%, fourteen precincts by more than 30%, and eleven precincts by more than 40%.  Remember, those are precincts where George Bush won while  Sanders split his vote with two non-Republican candidates, and Sanders didn't just beat his Republican opponent. Sanders destroyed his Republican opponent.

Every candidate should have such problems!


by Paul Rosenberg on Fri Apr 28, 2006 at 09:16:16 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.