An African-American View on the Immigration Debate

Over the next few months we're going to try and bring in guest-bloggers that talk about areas of politics we know little about. Tom will be guest-posting at MyDD for a week or so on African-American politics. Here's his bio: Tom Grayman is a pollster, the publisher of the political website The Intelligence Squad, and is author of the book Ghosts of Florida: Making Elections Fair for Blacks.

So the GOP has decided to drop the felonization of undocumented immigrants from its immigration reform idea stew. I take that as a sign of two things:

1. The GOP is in disarray.
2. Taking to the streets can still make a difference.

If only African-Americans still believed in the power of protest to the same extent (I'll address that matter in another post).

What I'd like to do here and now is not so much discuss the GOP's retreat, as to bring an African-American perspective into the broader immigration debate.

Research has strongly suggested that African-Americans - specifically the too-large class of under-skilled African-Americans - suffer from illegal immigration to a highly disproportionate degree. If one of the biggest problems with illegal immigration is that it lowers wages for unskilled work - and even skilled labor - to a level below what the American standard of living requires, it should be blacks (as well as Puerto Ricans and Latino permanent US residents) who are crying out the loudest against illegal immigrants.

The fact of the matter is that large majorities of African-Americans do want illegal immigration curtailed. They are concerned about their disappearance from the skilled trades - jobs that, contrary to the popular mantra, they do want to do. And yet national leadership in the African-American community - from the congress to the civil rights community - doesn't even come close to reflecting this stance on the issue.

A century ago, such prominent black thinkers as Fredrick Douglas, WEB DuBois, and A. Phillip Randolph were vehemently against mass immigration, for the same above-mentioned reason.

More recently, the NAACP has called for Congress to put "enforcement" on the back burner in favor of family unification, paths to citizenship, and improved workers' rights. The National Urban League, which focuses on economic empowerment for African-Americans, has apparently had nothing to say recently on the issue. The website of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, and umbrella organization of 180 civil rights groups, links only to immigrant-supportive articles and columns on the topic. The Congressional Black Caucus does not appear to have had anything to say on the matter since Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) led a small group of black legislators in proposing a legalization bill a couple of years ago.

Conservatives - particularly white conservatives - often cite the current incongruity between black attitudes and black leadership actions on this issue as a sign that the national African-American leadership is "out of touch" with its own constituency.

They are wrong. Even though blacks -- particularly lower-income blacks -- may not be comfortable with seemingly unchecked immigration, they're even less comfortable with the crew agitating most vocally against it. You will not see blacks kickin' it down on the border with the Minute Men, or in the streets outside Tom Tancredo's office showing their support. There's one simple reason, and it is not that these activists are Republican.

It's that the current anti-immigration movement reeks of racism.

Blacks think back a century, to a time when white Europeans were able to immigrate to the US seemly without restriction to take advatage of the opportunities to make better lives for their families. Then they look at masses of brown and black immigrants being blocked as they try to enter from the south, or villified as they come from the East, and wonder: why now is unbridled immigration so unacceptable to the US government? And: why does the government seem to think that terrorists and drugs can't cross the Canadian border?

What it comes down to is that blacks refuse to be economic gladiators, fighting against brown folks for the financial benefit of an overwhelmingly white business and political class of spectators. Instead, we'd rather see an inclusive policy that focuses more on raising and ENFORCING the minimum wage,and protecting ALL workers' rights, thereby limiting the incentive for employers to undercut American job-seekers.

Our leadership, to the extent is has addressed the issue, reflects that. If only they were more vocal about it...



Display:


Right on (none / 0)

It is not that poor African-Americans are suffering from illegal immigration.  It is that all workers are suffering from the failure to enforce the existing minimum wage and health and safety standards, much less improve and strengthen those laws.

The biggest fallacy among leftist supporters of an immigration crackdown is that a crackdown will somehow be more effective in protecting workers' rights than simply enforcing wage and health and safety laws in the workplace.  Certainly if we could "punish employers who hire undocumented" we could also enforce wage and safety laws.  And I submit that would be a more direct and effective way of addressing the real problem.

Of course there is a great deal of racism in the current immigration debate -- and even today it is much easier to get legal papers to immigrate here from Europe than it is from Mexico, China, India or the Phillippines.  It is very encouraging, though really not surprising, that African-American leaders get it.


by Colorado Luis on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 02:57:39 PM EST

Re: Right on (none / 0)

It is that all workers are suffering from the failure to enforce the existing minimum wage and health and safety standards, much less improve and strengthen those laws.

That is not true. There is a reason why unemployment among young Muslim immigrants to France runs up to 40%. France has a minimum wage of $9.00/hour and lifetime job protection (i.e. tenure). The minimum wage is the simplest way for working class whites to cut off economic competition with immigrants.

Europe's meatier progressive laws prove the basic economic point that conservatives have been making for decades: these laws do not protect workers, they protect established (read: white) workers from competition with unestablished (read: immigrants and minorities) workers.

Opportunity trumps progressive economics, folks.


by Jibaholic on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 05:18:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Right on (none / 0)

Go peddle your freeper cryptoracism elsewhere.


by Matt Stoller on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 05:40:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: An African-American View on the Immigration De (none / 0)

You know Harold Ford, Jr. voted in favor of making illegal immigrants "Felons".  

Talk about your fractures in Black Leadership.


by Political Junkie on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 03:35:48 PM EST

Re: An African-American View on the Immigration De (none / 0)

Yes, brother Ford is quite a case study. I'll be addressing him next time.


by Tom Grayman on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 03:59:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: An African-American View on the Immigration De (none / 0)

What is there to study?  There are some young black politicians that have a greater allegiance to the campaign dollar than the civil rights movement and progressive agenda.


by DWCG on Thu Apr 13, 2006 at 01:22:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: An African-American View on the Immigration De (none / 0)

Nathan Newman has more on this theme.


by Matt Stoller on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 03:47:49 PM EST

Re: An African-American View on the Immigration De (none / 0)

When I countered Newman's assertion at TPM Cafe that the NAACP support meant that black people were united with the illegal immigrants by citing this article, he responded:

"[Blacks] -- via the politicians they have elected to Congress and the organizations they support like the NAACP -- have overwhelmingly come out in defense of immigrant rights."

Right, Nathan.  Because politicians speak for the ones who elected them on every issue.  For instance, did you know that I wanted my elected representatives to help Bush to pass a huge, unstainable tax cut, give him king-like war powers, and support the illegal invasion of Iraq?  Neither did I.

This guy must be another bad apple.

"Black America looks to the NAACP for leadership on this issue. Unfortunately, all the organization has to offer is a one-page outline filled with the odd notions that law enforcement officials should not enforce the law, people who break the law should not be detained and people who have disregarded our nations sovereignty should be protected and receive amnesty."
...
"It seems plain that an organization that purports to be for the advancement of "colored people" should be out front in advocating immigration policy that makes sense for a black community that is growing increasingly frustrated at being displaced by workers who are in the country illegally, consuming jobs and services and -- more significantly -- accumulating political clout."


by wilder on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 10:47:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Whoops, I meant un*sustain*able (n/t) (none / 0)


by wilder on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 11:57:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: An African-American View on the Immigration (none / 0)

FYI

I often listen to a call-in talk show with a majority black constituency.  The immigration issue lit up the boards like very, very few issues do.  The audience is "liberal" but the overwhelming majority of callers were anti-immigration, mostly for the resons outlined above.  


by howardpark on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 03:59:12 PM EST

Thesis good (none / 0)

Execution here not so good.

A good idea, that is, to show that bands of society suffer from illegals.

Not so good to say that getting rid of it all, or seeing partisan deadlock on the matter - is some kind of act of racism. The reforms that were up there weren't half bad. Why did they get torpedoed?

Also, its funny to see the post here  when the republican party was founded to end slavery. The whig party which was the precursor to the democratic party couldn't deal with the issue of slavery + it tore them apart.

Sure, there's racism but its directed against a broader mass of people than just the color of their skin. Ask those honkies up in North Carolina shoppin' at a walmart for chinese clothes next to that textile mill they used to work for..

Its institutionalized war corporatism - total 1984 type stuff going on. People being made perpetually afraid with the crawler on the bottom of their screens alerting them to everything + making them feel small and scared all the time.. Corporatism is worse than racism. It kills the earth, not just the citizens, certainly not just one color.


by turnerbroadcasting on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 04:31:06 PM EST

My take on taking to the streets (none / 0)

The immigration protests were effective for a few reasons that seldom occur in unison for protests.

The first is that they were somewhat spontaneous - that is, not planned for months ahead of time. The media was caught a little bit by surprise, and therefore the events were covered, which in turn is why anyone noticed them. Second, they were in many cities nationwide, not just in DC or some other big city. And last, they stayed on the damned message.

Liberals seem to have a chronic inability to stay on message. At the recent anti-Iraq war protests in DC for example, the speakers were talking about Haiti, Sudan, oppression of women in the third world, racism, and a host of other issues - all of which are incredibly important, but let's at least try to have a semblance of focus on actually ending the Iraq War. By the end of the thing, most people suffered from information overload, the media ignored it because they saw it coming for months, and it was in 1 city.

Just any old Protest will not do. Jerome and Markos are right on this matter in CTG.


Melissa Hart is gone - thank you Chris Bowers
by surfbird007 on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 04:48:16 PM EST

Re: My take on taking to the streets (none / 0)

Good points.  Also, the protests ran counter to the conventional wisdom that the people who would be most energized by immigration crackdown proposals would be the Minutemen types.  The protests showed that the mobilization is actually in a completely different direction and therefore were appealing to news media types.


by Colorado Luis on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 05:03:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My take on taking to the streets (none / 0)

Right! Instead of cowering in response to the bullies, the immigrants and their supporters took them on, head-on.

Might America have a different relationship with the Muslim world today if, post 9/11, Muslim-Amercans and South Asian-Americans had actually taken to the streets in a similar manner to demand fair treatment? Perhaps I stretch the analogy too far, but I feel there is a real lesson in here about standing up to the bully even when the odds are, on paper, stacked against you.


by Tom Grayman on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 06:18:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My take on taking to the streets (3.00 / 1)

I agree 100% on all three points. I've always felt uncomfortable, for example, about what I've heard regarding the Mumia Abu Jamal case. I've even participated in a demonstration for a new trial for him. But I swear, if I see one more "Free Mumia" sign at an anti-war rally, or anti-anything Bush is doing rally, I'm going to scream.

Also, the nationwide, multi-city, multi-day nature was crucial. It made the protest seem even bigger than it actually was. It made the nation seem engulfed in protestors.

I feel like what happened this past week could teach the progressive community as a whole a lot about organizing effective demonstrations.


by Tom Grayman on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 06:10:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Great post ! (none / 0)

I'd like to see more minority opinions on this site...


by rajk on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 05:42:37 PM EST

A clearer look at things (none / 0)

I am an African American worker and it is not just in the under educated class.  This is the propogander that the conserv media tells to Americans.  To justify their immigration. There is competition in factory work as well as teaching where they are closing down schools and forming perochial schools where hispanics and latinos can get more jobs over blacks and disassembling the Public schools.  Also, they are competing with us in the construction work environment, the mechanical environment, as well as office type work.  Get real, it isn't just under educated jobs, it is all over.  


by mleflo2 on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 09:12:32 PM EST

Re: A clearer look at things (none / 0)

We do have to be cautious.  A decade ago, we were saying, "Oh, they're just outsourcing manufacturing jobs.  No big deal: The workers will just get more eduation and find better jobs."  Now look what's happened.


by wilder on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 10:33:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Thanks for being open-minded enough (none / 0)

to showcase the views of someone who isn't fully enamored with illegal immigrants.  I do wish he could have clarified what the anti-illegal immigration movement is, though.  I've heard about conservative culture/race baiting in various states in an attempt to bring prejudiced red state voters to the polls, but wasn't sure if this was an actual RNC-coordinated movement, or just separate situations.  The problem is that without clarification, there are many who are all too eager to lump anyone opposed to illegal immigration (including Tom Grayman) in with the racist xenophobes.


by wilder on Wed Apr 12, 2006 at 10:32:02 PM EST

Re: An African-American View on the Immigration De (none / 0)

Want to second this. I had the privilege of working closely with California African American communities and Latino communities in 1994 against Prop. 187 (immigrant bashing much like Tancredo today) and in 1996 against Prop. 209 (outlawing affirmative action, mostly aimed at "unmerited" gains by African Americans.) Not only  did leadership groups understand that it was the same racists who backed these things, but on the ground the communities overcame significant suspicion to ally against both measures.

There are a lot of white obsevers that want to tell you that African Americans supported Prop. 187 (which drew Latinos into the electoral arena as HR 4437 has done today.) Not true. The most  trustworthy exit polls suggest that African Americans narrowly rejected the measure. And on affirmative action the results are unequivocal: even more Latinos voted against killing it than did Blacks.

This unity did not come easily, but in the end it came. That unity is a central building block of a future Democratic majority.


Can It Happen Here?
by janinsanfran on Thu Apr 13, 2006 at 10:53:24 AM EST

African-American View on the Immigration Debate (none / 0)

African Americans stake in the immigration debate has been framed narrowly in terms of job competition. But, as I wrote in an op-ed for New America Media, this debate is also about national values and the kind of country we want to be. Viewed in those terms, African Americans' interests lie with progressive immigration reform. According to recent polls, African Americans are more likely than non-Hispanic whites to say that immigrants hurt the economy by driving down wages, but more likely to say that the United States should make it easier for undocumented immigrants to become citizens. That's not surprising. African Americans know what it means to do low-paying, menial labor under oppressive conditions because there are no other options. We know what it means to be unfairly targeted by law enforcement. And we know what it means to be made a second-class member of society because of what you look like or where you come from. For the same reasons, the marchers in this week's demonstrations called not only for immigration reform, but also for reforms of that are important to black people, like civil rights and fair labor enforcement, a modernized safety net, and a fair criminal justice system. Not all of those reforms are in the interest of immigrant employment. But they embody the values of human rights and opportunity for all that the protests were really about.
Alan Jenkins E.D., The Opportunity Agenda
by ajenkins on Thu Apr 13, 2006 at 05:51:18 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.