When I first learned that the Nassau County Executive Tom Suozzi, a Democrat, was entertaining the idea of challenging Attorney General Eliot Spitzer for the Democratic nomination for Governor of New York, I thought he was probably just trying to make waves to raise his profile. And then I learned that Ken Langone, a billionaire Republican financier with a serious grudge against Spitzer, was one of Suozzi's main cheerleaders. I hoped Suozzi wouldn't take the bait.
Unfortunately, Suozzi did take the bait, officially announcing his candidacy last week. Even more unfortunately, Sen. Chuck Schumer -- another beneficiary of Republican Langone's largesse -- decided to throw his weight behind Suozzi, as well. In researching Langone's financial support of Schumer, it struck me that he'd also supported William Weld, then the Governor of Massachusetts challenging John Kerry for his Senate seat. This is notable as Weld has since moved to New York and is pursuing the Republican nomination for the governorship of that state. It's an eyebrow raiser, to say the least.
But according to the New York Observer's blog, The Politicker, Langone may not be the only enemy of Spitzer's actively backing Suozzi. Nicole Brydson reports that questions are being raised about "campaign donations [Suozzi] received from individuals tied to First American Title Insurance, now under investigation by Eliot Spitzer."
Now, I should make something clear here. I am not opposed to primaries. It makes me a little uncomfortable when people view any debate within the party as a bad thing. However, in this case, I question why Suozzi's in this race. Is it really to help shape the debate? Or is he allowing himself to be used by powerful interests to bloody Spitzer for the general election? Because I think Suozzi's a promising Democrat, I can't stand the fact that I think it's the latter. Based on the evidence however, that's the impression I'm left with.
In his campaign announcement speech, Suozzi said that "New York needs an independent leader who owes nothing to the insiders and the lobbyists and answers only to you." That's great rhetoric. But when he accepts support from a fellow Democrat's most crooked enemies, it certainly doesn't seem to match the reality.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 12 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.