The Southern Republican Leadership Conference Straw Poll

This weekend, the Republicans will be having a pretty big 2008 cattle-call down in Memphis, the Southern Republican Leadership Conference. For our purposes, the most important thing about the event will be Saturday's presidential straw poll, which is being sponsored by The Hotine.

Like Chris, I'm a big fan of straw polls to gauge the enthusiasm among a party's activist base for candidates. The attendees at these events really are the opinion makers who will have a lot of influence on primary voters. Even if the primary voters themselves don't yet know who they're going to be voting for, these straw polls can serve as a fairly good indicator.

So how is the track record of the SRLC's straw poll? Well, check out the results of the poll in 1998. It was pretty good when it came to calling the front-runner, even if it relegated John McCain to the same also-ran pool as Christie Whitman, George Pataki, Bill Weld, and Alan Keyes.

GOP Primary Matchups
                                     1st Choice           2nd Choice         1st/2nd Combined
                                     Raw     %age       Raw     %age       %age
 George W. Bush           201     18%         132     13%         31%
 Steve Forbes               161       15           100     10             25
 Dan Quayle                 132       12           124     12             24
 Fred Thompson           107       10             98       9             19
 John Ashcroft               100       9             96         9           18
 Lamar Alexander         88         8               91       9             17
 Newt Gingrich               69         6             56       5             11

Now, one thing that can really muck up a straw poll is a candidate stacking the deck. Let me give you an example. At the Conservative Political Action Committee convention in 1999, Gary Bauer wound up winning the presidential straw poll. If you're scratching your head as to how that's even possible, I don't blame you -- Bauer never had any serious chance of winning. But he did manage to stack the deck at the conference by paying for a number of activists to attend via "scholarships." They came, cheered loudly for Bauer, voted for him in the straw poll, took part in a few specifically anti-choice events, but otherwise, did not get too involved.

Now, something similar could play out here. Home state Senator Bill Frist has apparently been trying to organize groups of local activists from Nashville to make the trip to Memphis for the conference. So if Frist wins big in the straw poll, I'd say it's not really so much indicative of the feelings of conservatives as Frist's local organizational prowess. On the other hand, if Frist performs badly, it's very bad news for him, as it means he couldn't even rally locals to his cause. This is why I don't think it makes sense for candidates to try to game straw polls. They stand to lose credibility for an outcome that's ultimately not all that helpful, especially if the result is less than legitimate.

I have a feeling Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee could surprise people with a solid showing, based on the geography factor -- his constituents live right across the river. If Senator George Allen performs well, it will give him some buzz, coming on top of his first place showing in the CPAC straw poll. These are just two examples of possible outcomes, so we'll have to wait and see how everything plays out. Along with just about everyone else interested in 2008, I'll be very interested to find out the results on Saturday night.



Display:


McCain (none / 0)

McCain didn't perform well in the 2000 CPAC straw poll because he chose not to enter:

Banister said McCain was the only candidate to decline the group's initial invitation on grounds that he does not participate in straw polls. CPAC and McCain are also at odds over the senator's proposal to end certain unlimited campaign spending by political action committees.


ProgressiveHistorians: History For Our Future
by Nonpartisan on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 02:22:11 AM EST

Re: McCain (none / 0)

You are talking about 2000.  The diary referred to a straw poll from 1998.  It looks like McCain did participate in that 1998 poll.  


by Eric11 on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 11:55:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

RE: Polls (none / 0)

What does it mean when our polls are more reliable than our voting machines?


by akhenaten on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 06:41:35 AM EST

Quayle (none / 0)

Interesting to see how well Quayle did.  Goes to show how important name I.D. is.  I've got the feeling his ultimate poor performance come 2000 does not bode well for Kerry (or maybe Edwards for that matter).  


by Eric11 on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 11:58:37 AM EST

Straw Poll (none / 0)

It will be interesting to see how well McCain does, as always.  This is not some libertarian, Cato-institute type event.  This is the SRLC.  If McCain does well in this straw poll, I think it really shows how well he has advanced his position in the South.  These are the people who still need some convincin'.

On another note, does anybody else agree that Guiliani is McCain's worst nightmare come primary season?  Wouldn't he rip away too many independent/moderate votes away from McCain.


by Eric11 on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 12:03:43 PM EST

Re: Straw Poll (none / 0)

I disagree somewhat about Giuliani's strength, because I think the campaign to smear him as a liberal -- both whispered and overt -- should prove pretty effective. But if he's going to hurt anyone, you're right -- it's going to be McCain.


by Scott Shields on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 12:44:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Straw Poll (none / 0)

Oh, I agree.  I don't think Guiliani could win or anything.  Just saying he hurts McCain's chances vis a vis Allen.  


by Eric11 on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 01:27:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McCain is urging his supporters to write in GWB (none / 0)

No, I'm not making this up.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060310/ap_o n_el_pr/republicans;_ylt=An.NZH3X1Uzoen2 UDUqa3.Cs0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlY wM3MDM-


by Geotpf on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 05:54:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

John McCain = epitome of pathetic (none / 0)

what a boot-licking, ass-kissin, sycophant.  How far is he gonna get that tongue up Bush's ass?  Pathetic.  Pathetic.

It's sad because he thinks the Bush people are gonna support him and they are not.  McCain's time has come and gone.  He's never been in good health and he'll be 72 in 2008.  No way he's elected at that age.  I am not even sure I would vote for anyone at that age because of possible senility issues.  Plus, the jury's out on whether the guy is insane after having spent six years in a POW camp, as politically incorrect as that may be.


McCain is defining Obama, and Obama is neither defining himself, nor McCain. This is awful.
by jgarcia on Fri Mar 10, 2006 at 09:21:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.