Another Factor In Realignment

The open seat situation in the House already noticeably favors Democrats, but over at The Hill Peter Sovodnik writes that it could get even better
House Republicans have limited most of their retirements to conservatives in solidly red districts and a handful of statewide-office seekers, but political analysts say 10 to 15 more Republicans could announce in the coming months that they are stepping down.(...)

For now, there are 25 open seats. Sixteen of those are held by Republicans, eight are held by Democrats and one is vacant and was previously held by a Republican.(...)

Amy Walter, a senior editor at the Cook Political Report, observed that in August 1993 there were three Democratic open seats. By March that had jumped to 22 and by July to 30.

The critical question, Walter said, is whether there will be a similar cascade of Republican retirements in 2006 and, just as important, whether those retirements are in competitive districts.(...)

The Cook Political Report rates three House Democratic open-seat races as competitive and one a tossup, in the district of Ohio Rep. Ted Strickland. The report rates 10 House Republican open-seat races as competitive, with three tossups -- seats now held by Reps. Jim Kolbe of Arizona, Bob Beauprez of Colorado and Jim Nussle of Iowa.

Republicans are favored in the April race to replace Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham (R-Calif.), but only slightly.
Of course, not only would fifteen more Republican retirements be a sign of a coming Democratic wave, but those retirements would actually fuel the wave substantially. Also, this seems to generally be based on speculation, and it is not as though this is somehow a guarantee or even a good bet. It is interesting that we are starting to see more and more of these articles about how 2006 could potentially be a very big year for Democrats. Either political reporters have grown bored after years of writing the "close election" narrative and are now looking for something new, or there is actually a growing consensus that Democrats have a huge opportunity in 2006. I do not know which scenario I more likely, but either way it is good news for us.



Display:


Re: Another Factor In Realignment (none / 0)

where is he getting 15 ? Lets start a list

Duncan Hunter
Sherwood Boehlert

Those are the only two there have been rumors about who have not retired. Hunters seat would be safe for the R's, but i think Acuiri could take Boehlert's seat.


by yomoma2424 on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 02:59:05 PM EST

Re: Another Factor In Realignment (none / 0)

Well, some of the rumors are cancelled.  Jerry Lewis in CA-41 filed.  However, Bill Thomas has not as of the morning of March 1.

Anyway:

Bill Thomas
C.W. Bill Young, FL-10
Don Young, Alaska At Large


by David Kowalski on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 08:25:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not to burst your bubble.... (1.00 / 0)

but this speculation and the previous day's post about governorships up for grabs is simply the result of the existing domination by the Republicans of both federal Congressional seats and governorships.  If there are many more Republicans holding these seats, then statistically, the majority of competitive seats will be those held by Republicans.  In other words, the more you possess, the more you have to lose.


by truthiness on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 03:15:05 PM EST

Re: Not to burst your bubble.... (none / 0)

You are right that the majority may have more retirements than the minority in any given year.  Of course, it's not like the GOP actually out numbers the Dems by 2 or 3 to 1 or something.

Nice spin, though.


by howie14 on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 03:25:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I hear you.... (none / 0)

but many of those Republican seats were historically Democratic seats they recently took, so again, you have to figure they will always be competitive, and make far more Republican seats competitive.


by truthiness on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 03:31:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Not to burst your bubble.... (none / 0)

Ok, so do you have a point? I fail to see how "Well, Republicans are in the majority you know" is insight that this discussion is in particular need of.


by Lucas O'Connor on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 04:31:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes, read my two comments in this thread.... (1.00 / 0)

I think it's cruel and unusual to have Dems getting liberals hopes up every election cycle just to have them dashed the morning after the election - just trying to help you see things rationally, not overexuberently.


by truthiness on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 04:35:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes, read my two comments in this thread.... (none / 0)

trying to avoid cruel and unusual punishment while promoting Repub talking points has been known to cause heads to explode out of overwhelming hypocrisy.


by Lucas O'Connor on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 04:41:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's the only way you learn.... (none / 0)

I tell you about the brick wall, you go ahead and run headlong into it, then I point out "that's the brick wall that I was talking about".  Pavlovian negative reinforcement, works on dogs and Dems.


by truthiness on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 05:30:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's the only way you learn.... (none / 0)

So then, you're posting out of concern for the emotional wellbeing of Democrats, hoping to save all of us from the pain of trying to win elections in November because we'll always just end up disappointed?

You're right, defeatism and apathy are clearly the way to go here. Thank you very much for pointing out our misguided pursuits.

As for the Pavlovian negative reinforcement, how does that compare to the Republican base? They get fewer, lower paying jobs and less access to healthcare and higher education while getting locked into cycles of poverty because their kids have babies at 16 and lack job skills that might be useful in this century.  What would Pavlov say about someone who gets punched in the face and then goes out of their way to ask for another?


by Lucas O'Connor on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 06:53:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's the only way you learn.... (none / 0)

First of all, when either party isn't competitive as a viable alternative to the party in power, we all suffer.

I don't prescribe defeatism and apathy, but I definitely hate the half measures of hype, spin and all the other crap Dems are doing instead of cleaning house, developing values, policies, candidates and campaigns that can win.

Lower paying jobs and less access to healthcare is the result of shifting demographics from 20+ workers per social security / medicare benefits recipiant to fewer than 3 workers per, AND, growing overseas competition, which prevent companies from being able to offer these jobs and health benefits and still make a profit.  This situation would persist and get worse regardless of who was in power, Rep or Dem.  The only answer is, there will be less and less for more and more recipiants.


by truthiness on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 07:26:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You know who sound like? (none / 0)

Democrats circa 1992. Good luck.


"Once in a while you get shown the light In the strangest of places if you look at it right"
by molly bloom on Thu Mar 02, 2006 at 10:11:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another Factor In Realignment (none / 0)

Rumor is Boehlert and Thomas will be retiring. Thomas' seat is unbelievably Republican, so forget that. The only real issue there is in the Republican primary, whether it will be Assembly Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy or State Senator Roy Ashburn (whom I know semi-personally and would really love to see go down in flames). But Boehlert's seat could be winnable. Keep an eye out for what happens in NY-24.

And there are others that could retire. Sensenbrenner, whose Judiciary chairmanship will be over after this Congress. Of course, his seat isn't winnable either, but still, every open seat is more money the Repubs have to spend on defense.


My ActBlue page
by Ament Stone of California on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 03:59:43 PM EST

Re: Another Factor In Realignment (none / 0)

I strongly suspect the media is playing this narrative of more democratic pickups because people do not see government as being competitive anymore, and no one will tune in to watch another round of "Republicans retain control of everything, again".  To counter this the media makes it seem like democrats can get back to being the majority in some places.

This, mind you, is not to say that in this case the narrative isn't actually true.  It may well be that democrats will get a lot of pickups and gain a majority in one of both houses.  I just think that, odd as it sounds, the press has a vested interest in making it seem that way regardless of whther it is true or not.


by tolkien on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 04:10:34 PM EST

Another great insight, please see my other posts.. (none / 0)


by truthiness on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 04:37:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another Factor In Realignment (none / 0)

The "narrative" can easily become a reality just by existing.  The "narrative" is often self-fulfilling, because the "narrative" determines perspective.  And perspective determines electorial realities.

In other words, if people perceive the Democrats as strong and carrying momentum simply due to news coverage, they just might pull it off.


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 05:14:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Dems have depended too long on that sort of.... (1.00 / 0)

artificial pumping of numbers to flail at elections, instead of looking inward, cleaning house, generating winning values, policies, candidates and campaigns.

QUIT PLAYING AT POLITICS AND TRY TO HIT ME DAMN IT!

You bore me....


by truthiness on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 05:27:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another Factor In Realignment (none / 0)

Or to quote Macchiavelli, "Appearance is more important than reality because appearance becomes reality."  Sounds like he was working in this White House, doesn't it?


by David Kowalski on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 07:00:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another Factor In Realignment (none / 0)

That's a wonderful quote, and just one example of why Machiavelli's The Prince was the only book I actually enjoyed reading in my required Political Philosophy class.  Perception is a theme that I love to study in political science--from electoral politics to international relations, perception, often, IS more important than reality.


Swing State Project: Campaign & Election News - Covering Key Races Around the Country
by HellofaSandwich on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 11:12:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What about gerrymandering? (none / 0)

It doesn't matter whether a seat is open or not if the district lines have been redrawn to create a "safe" Rep. (or Dem.) seat.  Now, some of these open seats may indeed be in districts where a top-drawer, well-funded Dem. has a fighting chance, but that factor appears to be missing from your analysis.


by lonemorriscodem on Wed Mar 01, 2006 at 08:43:26 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.