McCain Staffers Just Generally Angry and Petty

I really enjoyed this blog post from Steve Clemons.  It's about McCain's appearance in an excellent documentary called Why We Fight, which I recently saw.  Or rather it's about McCain's dissatisfaction with his appearance in that documentary:

I've seen the film three times now, and Senator McCain comes off as a 21st century Eisenhower in the movie -- the type of potential President who can be a 'big national security president' but not let the military-industrial complex, a term coined first in Dwight Eisenhower's 1961 Farewell Address, run amok.

Salter, who has been a key aide to McCain for many years and has written with McCain Faith of My Fathers and Why Courage Matters, is someone who understands the importance of editing. Not everything makes it into the book, or the film in this case. Salter's demands veer dangerously close to thin-skinned censorship. Not good for any team considering a run at the most admired, feared, pilloried, and lampooned job in the world -- the Presidency of the United States.

TWN has gone to some effort to learn about some of the background on the interview, what was in the larger interview -- tough to get as the director has not wanted to release the material because it would undermine his editorial prerogatives.

TWN has confirmed that the McCain office essentially ignored Jarecki for months, despite calls, a mailed DVD of the film, and various interactions as Jarecki had hoped to involve McCain in the roll-out of the film (figuring that he would like it).

It wasn't until the film became "big" that Salter and the McCain staff paid any attention to the director. They called Charlotte Street Films in a huff, according to one source, demanding a copy of the film. As it turned out, McCain's office had had one already on their shelves, unwatched.

So, while I do not have (yet) the text of the McCain interview, some of the things he said were extremely provocative.

My apologies to both Senator McCain and Eugene Jarecki for sharing some of this, as I admire both, but in my view, Jarecki actually protected McCain's interests in this film -- and Mark Salter is behaving in a surly, oppressive way -- not what Senator McCain deserves.

I'm not one for the 'blame the staffer not the boss', especially since McCain and not just Salter is apparently angry about this.    I guess someone poured petty potion into the McCain office watercooler last week.



Display:


Re: McCain Staffers Just Generally Angry and Petty (none / 0)

Aww!  Poor widdle Johnny!  Why so angry, Johnny?  Why are you such an angry little man, Johnny?

See, we can do this just as easily as the GOP hacks can.  Spread the meme: John McCain is an angry little man, just like Bob Dole was.


by BarmyFotheringayPhipps on Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 06:21:50 PM EST

LOL, Dole not only angry (none / 0)

Dole was also a  small little small who was unstable.

.... Clinton's know how to fight.

Hillary would have had John O'Neill fitted for a body bag.


by dpANDREWS on Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 10:38:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Staffers Just Generally Angry and Petty (none / 0)

First you post how McCain is just off the wall - about how divided he and Obama were, and then, since we don't have any political theatre...

Is this the best you can do, Matt?


by turnerbroadcasting on Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 07:16:15 PM EST

Re: McCain Staffers Just Generally Angry and Petty (none / 0)

People post on the front page and in comments all day about horrible insiders but this story is the ultimate in insider ball.  No one is going to vote for either party based on this spat.  Can we please keep our eye on the ball - electing a Democratic Congress.


by John Mills on Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 08:51:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Oh? (none / 0)

You suggest giving McCain a free ride for his blatantly partisan hackery? Are you one of those "woe is me! we must wring our hands if McCain is their nominee" Democrats? This is another piece to the story of the reactionary politics of McCain - and it doesn't look good, does it?


543,895 votes
by Michael Bersin on Thu Feb 09, 2006 at 12:06:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oh? (none / 0)

No.  I think this is typical "Inside the Beltway" stuff that does not warrant 3 posts (sorry Matt).  We have an election to win this year and this story will have absolutely no impact on it.  We have to take one election cycle at a time.


by John Mills on Thu Feb 09, 2006 at 01:50:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain Staffers Just Generally Angry and Petty (none / 0)

I'm convinced that McCain is an overly sensitive, quick to anger man and that he is tempermentally unfit to be president.

It's not liable if one reports the truth.


by Thaddeus on Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 07:46:03 PM EST

Bush & GOP cut student aid and Medicare (1.00 / 1)

... and we babble on and on about McCain.   No wonder we only have 45 Democratic Senators.   Hey maybe we should pick on Lieberman next!


by dpANDREWS on Wed Feb 08, 2006 at 10:15:27 PM EST

McCain or Lieberman? (none / 0)

Business before pleasure.


543,895 votes
by Michael Bersin on Thu Feb 09, 2006 at 12:08:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.