Howard Dean eliminates GLBT post at DNC

This was in my inbox.  I find it awfully disconcerting:

As most of you know, Eric Stern resigned as Director of GLBT Outreach at the DNC back in February 2005, when he became Executive Director of the Stonewall Democrats. Unforunately, his old position has remained vacant.

The Gay and Lesbian Americans Caucus of the Democratic National
Committee made it clear that they would like to see a new GLBT Outreach Director selected. In their statement they asked that the DNC pledge to maintain and fund at least one full-time senior-level position of Director of GLBT Outreach at the DNC, whose primary responsibility will be policy and organizing.

Well today we have our answer.  Having been a strong supporter of Howard Dean, I'm greatly saddened by this decision.  If you are as mad about this as I am, there will be an excellent opportunity to protest this decision next week.  Howard Dean will be appearing in DC at HALO (1435 P Street, NW) from 6:30 to 8:00 PM on Tuesday February 7th .  If your are interested in gathering outside HALO to protest this decision, please let me know.

-----------------

Bringing out the vote
At stake, according to gay Democratic activists, is whether gay voters will turn out in force in the 2006 congressional elections to help Democrats win back control of the House and Senate. Exit poll data has shown that between 75 percent and 80 percent of the gay vote goes to Democratic candidates in presidential and congressional elections, but that the size of the gay vote varies from election to election.

Eric Stern, executive director of the National Stonewall Democrats, would not comment on Deans changes.

"I see it as a restructuring because thats the chairmans prerogative when he or she comes in to take over the DNC," Stern said.

Stern said that while Hitchcock was doing a good job in helping the DNC reach out to gay voters, the NSD believes he needs at least one additional staff assistant to help him.

"Donald needs support in the form of a staff person, and weve certainly voiced that opinion," Stern said.

He said the Stonewall Democrats also have asked the DNC to hire more gay field workers to help with Deans initiative to more aggressively support all 50 state Democratic Party operations during the 2006 election.

Stern held the DNC gay outreach directors position from 2004--during the presidential campaign--until February 2005, when he resigned to take the Stonewall Democrats directors post.

Gay Democratic activists praised Stern for vigorously promoting the partys support for gay rights in appearances throughout the country during the 2004 campaign.

When Dean campaigned for the DNC chair post last February, he stated in a questionnaire prepared by the DNC gay caucus that he favored retaining a full-time gay outreach directors post. He received strong support in his quest to become DNC chair from gay Democrats, many of whom had praised Dean for his support in 2000 for a civil unions law in Vermont during his tenure as Vermont governor.

Dean, who has long supported gay rights, disappointed some gay activists in his unsuccessful campaign for president in the 2004 Democratic primaries when he said he opposed gay marriage because marriage should be remain a union only between a man and a woman. He has rejected criticism on the topic by arguing that civil unions provide gay couples with the same rights as marriage.

Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, who won the Democratic nomination for president in 2004, also expressed opposition to gay marriage and instead said he favored civil unions like Dean.

Dean carried his message of opposition to gay marriage into his role as DNC chair last February, after winning the post at the partys annual winter meeting in Washington, D.C. At the time, Dean told the Associated Press that the Democratic Party is "not for gay marriage," although it has always and continues to believe "in equal rights under the law for all people."

In appearances before meetings of the DNC gay caucus and the NSD that same week, Dean pledged to continue the partys support for gay rights. But he said the party lost the 2004 presidential election to George W. Bush because, in part, it failed to communicate its core principles and allowed the Republicans to falsely define the party as being beholden to a litany of constituent groups.

Integrating minorities
A DNC statement describing Deans reasons for replacing the constituent desks with the new, "integrated" American Majority Partnership program does not specifically mention the gay outreach post but suggests that Dean believes the gay and other constituent "desks" may have hurt the party.

"To ensure all voters are respected, we no longer act as a series of disconnected silos," the statement says. "We will never be greater than the sum of our parts or as effective as we must be to win if we maintain a series of separate operations unable to achieve integration of effort and unity of purpose. Instead, we must have an integrated, elevated and cohesive approach to working with the communities that comprise the
Democratic majority."

"To that end," the statement says, "Governor Dean has insisted that every staff member at every level must be aware of the needs and priorities of all the communities the party represents, must reach out respectfully to those communities, and must build bridges between and among communities based on our shared values and priorities."



Display:


Re: Howard Dean eliminates GLBT post at DNC (none / 0)

very disappointing, but it's been a very very disappointing year for my party--trying to speak in code about civil rights is a very weaselly thing to do, and with the recent attacks in MA, strong, direct support is needed more than ever, or some of us will just sit home in Nov.


by amberglow on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 01:35:36 AM EST

Re: Howard Dean eliminates GLBT post at DNC (none / 0)

As my sister would say, this is totally whack.

The more we water down our positions, the further the country moves to the (radical)right. We need to lead and bring the citizens with us, especially on equal-rights issues.

Plus, if we're shooting for majority status in the mid-terms, we can't afford to take any votes for granted.

Any ideas on the point person to send an angry letter to?

        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

And on a slightly related topic, did everybody see the story about this Massachusetts high school kid? He walks into a gay bar, orders a drink, and then starts attacking people with a hatchet and a gun.
<Sigh> It's a sad world we're living in...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060203/us_n m/crime_massachusetts_gay_dc_2;_ylt=AuhB ULsAjfxGmx7yEl_6RohH2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA2ZG Zwam4yBHNlYwNmYw--


by paulrobeson on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 02:26:16 AM EST

Re: Howard Dean eliminates GLBT post at DNC (none / 0)

All the minority outreach positions were eliminated, so why the specific outcry?

I'm an Indian-American, and would have no issue with this.

If anything, a lot of these "outreach" positions encourage segregation of different groups to a certain extent.  And many groups are sidelined as a result.  We become, in my case, "Indian-American" Democrats.  But like other communities, we're not a homogenous community, so why are we treated that way.

I'm a Democrat for many reasons besides my race.
And that's how I want to be treated.

Also see the diary/comments at:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/3/1 94140/2006


by v2aggie2 on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 03:10:50 AM EST

Consolidation sounds good, but (none / 0)

my biggest fear is losing focus on a number of topics. The fact is that different communities are facing different challenges, or have different concerns. Hispanics may be more concerned with immigration and ESL training, african-americans with community violence, and so on.

Another fact is that homosexuals are seriously under attack right now, more than any other single group that I can think of. It seems as though each week brings another state or national bill outlawing gay rights of some sort. And they pop up even more frequently during election season.

It's not that GLBTs want to be specially treated, it's just that without a STRONG public commitment to their efforts, politicians seem to find it quite easy to distance themselves from the cause. (this has also been happening with the pro-choice movement lately)

Hopefully, Dean and the DNC are correct, and this will better unify the party. I'm willing to give the Guv the benefit of the doubt, since I support so much of what he's doing. But I'm watching!


by paulrobeson on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 04:22:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Consolidation sounds good, but (none / 0)

"Focus" is the key word here, IMHO.  You cannot focus on everything under the sun (pun intended!)... the 2006 election won't be about ESL or community violence or even civil rights for gays (including marriage benefits)...

In 2006 we need to get out the vote, including the various factions that vote D in large swaths.  But should each group get teo or three staffers dedicated to that segment?  I don't know... that's a lot of staffers!  Can you imagine if the GOP had a pair of staffers for each flavor of radical Christianity that swings their way?  Not sure if the DNC would be getting bang for the buck.

So far I'm inclined to throw this in the 'tactical decions' bucket, and in that area Dean has been a very strong performer so far.  Now, if I get the sense the the DNC is abandoning gay civil rights, that's another thing. but i do't think that's what this is.


McCain sucks!
by teknofyl on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 10:25:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Consolidation sounds good, but (none / 0)

I see where you're coming from.

But I wouldn't worry about it.
I think it is an improvement, for all groups.
It makes everyone an equal partner in the ultimate goal and brings everybody together, as opposed to someone on the fringes with an outreach director.


by v2aggie2 on Sat Feb 04, 2006 at 09:00:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.